Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

"Bite off, dirtball." Richard Sexton, richard@gryphon.COM


computers / comp.sys.mac.advocacy / Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass

SubjectAuthor
* Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The AssThe Prescott Load
+* Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The AssSteve Carrolll
|`* Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The AssSmit Michael Glaser
| +* Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The AssStephen Carrolll
| |`- Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The AssGremlin the Functionally Illiterate Fraud
| `* Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The AssSteve Carroll
|  `- Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The AssDiesel Cook
`* Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The AssSteve
 +* Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The AssStephen Carroll
 |`* Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The AssSteve Carroll
 | `- Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The AssDiesel Cook
 `- Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The AssSteve Carroll

1
Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass

<XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=9276&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#9276

 copy link   Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Followup: alt.computer.workshop
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!bi/Jak9PjofN8bugOSmojg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: thepresc...@mailme.com (The Prescott Load)
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass
Followup-To: alt.computer.workshop
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 22:04:33 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75>
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="63037"; posting-host="bi/Jak9PjofN8bugOSmojg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: The Prescott Load - Mon, 20 Dec 2021 22:04 UTC

Just curious?
I met snit at a truck stop back in the mid 90's and he gave the
sweetest half and half.
Is he still in business?
I'm 85 now, just retired from driving a big rig, but I live in the area
and looking for some action.
tia.
--

TPL

Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass

<8ce761c7-d06a-4504-868f-d8e5bd174fden@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=9278&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#9278

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:2c9:: with SMTP id a9mr2015966qtx.28.1640179265961;
Wed, 22 Dec 2021 05:21:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6f02:: with SMTP id n2mr1878318otq.176.1640179265808;
Wed, 22 Dec 2021 05:21:05 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 05:21:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:67c:2628:647:11:0:0:27f;
posting-account=Vm0uAgoAAABvTYeieyl4GElbOkHDqJYr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:67c:2628:647:11:0:0:27f
References: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8ce761c7-d06a-4504-868f-d8e5bd174fden@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass
From: frelwiz...@gmail.com (Steve Carrolll)
Injection-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:21:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 29
 by: Steve Carrolll - Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:21 UTC

On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 3:04:37 PM UTC-7, The Prescott Load wrote:
> Just curious?
> I met snit at a truck stop back in the mid 90's and he gave the
> sweetest half and half.
> Is he still in business?
> I'm 85 now, just retired from driving a big rig, but I live in the area
> and looking for some action.
> tia.
> --
>
> TPL

What did F. Russell have to say about this amazing support from new posters?
Most of the time he would try to lead others to believe they're long time
lurkers who just happened to have all the tells of his socks. All makes total
sense, NOT!

Not only did Snit's question fail to allude to the "3d printers", it has
_nothing_ to do with the desktop. F. Russell should stop sniffing glue ;)
Someone's developed an AI system with (I am betting) a neural network to
produce posts which are hard to distinguish from a previous post in the group.
Nobody gets it, I am the one who figured it out. I am working on a system
which will show off how weak 3d printers is.

--
Eight things to never feed your dog!
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/C00166710/donors/2016
Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud

Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass

<4e22ebe0-d4e1-45e9-9fc2-4714ef297abbn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=9307&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#9307

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4156:: with SMTP id k22mr2515221qko.615.1640289681356;
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:01:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:5a87:: with SMTP id o129mr2915505oib.114.1640289681088;
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:01:21 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:01:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:67c:2628:647:11:0:0:7a;
posting-account=Vm0uAgoAAABvTYeieyl4GElbOkHDqJYr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:67c:2628:647:11:0:0:7a
References: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4e22ebe0-d4e1-45e9-9fc2-4714ef297abbn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass
From: frelwiz...@gmail.com (Steve)
Injection-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 20:01:21 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 39
 by: Steve - Thu, 23 Dec 2021 20:01 UTC

On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 3:04:37 PM UTC-7, The Prescott Load wrote:
> Just curious?
> I met snit at a truck stop back in the mid 90's and he gave the
> sweetest half and half.
> Is he still in business?
> I'm 85 now, just retired from driving a big rig, but I live in the area
> and looking for some action.
> tia.
> --
>
> TPL

So, in Meat's 'view', that an app has been published is "confirmation"
that Mike Easter designed it now? How many more chances does Meat's loser
ass (a worm knows more than Meat and is useful) need to prove their Mike
Easter trolling accusation with message IDs?

Linux is a false advocate's biggest fear.

Meat says I'm not 'able' to call out their crap, and they aren't going
to be held accountable for any prior harm they caused. To the contrary,
I'm expected to forgive it all, and play make believe with them so they
can just rehash the attacks all over again, while they continue to accept
no responsibility for what they say and do in here towards Mike Easter?

Not only did Mike Easter's question fail to refer to the "distro", it
has not a thing to do with open source. Meat should learn to read.

It is not surprising that Meat feigned ennui at the aspect of being
assumed trustworthy... knowing that it's inconceivable to ever ensue.

--
Top 15 Ways Meat Trolls
https://telestreamforum.forumbee.com/t/80f78a/youtube-uploads-should-
show-https-and-not-http
https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22
Dustin Cook is a functionally illiterate fraud

Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass

<2c24aa03-7e55-4cb2-8eed-8633d4261c99n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=9313&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#9313

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1721:: with SMTP id az33mr881145qkb.93.1640341447092;
Fri, 24 Dec 2021 02:24:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:674b:: with SMTP id w11mr1806636otm.128.1640341446762;
Fri, 24 Dec 2021 02:24:06 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 02:24:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4e22ebe0-d4e1-45e9-9fc2-4714ef297abbn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:67c:2628:647:2:0:0:15c;
posting-account=Vm0uAgoAAABvTYeieyl4GElbOkHDqJYr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:67c:2628:647:2:0:0:15c
References: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75> <4e22ebe0-d4e1-45e9-9fc2-4714ef297abbn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2c24aa03-7e55-4cb2-8eed-8633d4261c99n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass
From: frelwiz...@gmail.com (Stephen Carroll)
Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 10:24:07 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 62
 by: Stephen Carroll - Fri, 24 Dec 2021 10:24 UTC

On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 1:01:22 PM UTC-7, Stephen Carroll wrote:
> On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 3:04:37 PM UTC-7, The Prescott Load wrote:
> > Just curious?
> > I met snit at a truck stop back in the mid 90's and he gave the
> > sweetest half and half.
> > Is he still in business?
> > I'm 85 now, just retired from driving a big rig, but I live in the area
> > and looking for some action.
> > tia.
> > --
> >
> > TPL
> So, in Meat's 'view', that an app has been published is "confirmation"
> that Mike Easter designed it now? How many more chances does Meat's loser
> ass (a worm knows more than Meat and is useful) need to prove their Mike
> Easter trolling accusation with message IDs?
>
> Linux is a false advocate's biggest fear.
>
> Meat says I'm not 'able' to call out their crap, and they aren't going
> to be held accountable for any prior harm they caused. To the contrary,
> I'm expected to forgive it all, and play make believe with them so they
> can just rehash the attacks all over again, while they continue to accept
> no responsibility for what they say and do in here towards Mike Easter?
>
> Not only did Mike Easter's question fail to refer to the "distro", it
> has not a thing to do with open source. Meat should learn to read.
>
> It is not surprising that Meat feigned ennui at the aspect of being
> assumed trustworthy... knowing that it's inconceivable to ever ensue.
>
>
>
> --
> Top 15 Ways Meat Trolls
> https://telestreamforum.forumbee.com/t/80f78a/youtube-uploads-should-
> show-https-and-not-http
> https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22
> Dustin Cook is a functionally illiterate fraud

It's clear when Mike Easter frequently uses the word 'exonerated' the
way Snit does, to the point where the word no longer has any meaning.
In Mike Easter's case, I, and a whole list of "trolls", had pointed to
things Mike Easter said and did, he rejected the idea. What Mike Easter
couldn't deny was people sharing such stories, which is how he ended up
with his list, of course. Dropping support for command line holdovers
is long overdue. Mike Easter is the effect of the fact that Trotskyites
have been employed to subvert indoctrinating young persons. It's not chance
that he is an idiotic communist.

Seriously, what lie?

Several posters keep responding to Mike Easter. I can't chide Snit for
being pissed but, frankly, I do not conceive why he stays here at all.
Snit is pushing dialog as done in a technical environment and free forums
clearly bother him too much. Snit has gone the extra mile, essentially
hand holding Mike Easter on coding practices only for Mike Easter to blindly
attack him and continue to show that he has no real interest in the subject.
In all reality, it's too hard for snit.

--
Curious how these posts are made? Email: usenet@gallopinginsanity.com

Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass

<f1d76563-71e1-4306-b01e-283686b7065en@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=9322&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#9322

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2622:: with SMTP id gv2mr8055190qvb.128.1640412420991;
Fri, 24 Dec 2021 22:07:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:dbd5:: with SMTP id s204mr7030049oig.41.1640412420735;
Fri, 24 Dec 2021 22:07:00 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 22:07:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4e22ebe0-d4e1-45e9-9fc2-4714ef297abbn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:67c:2628:647:b605:5dff:fe33:2ce6;
posting-account=Vm0uAgoAAABvTYeieyl4GElbOkHDqJYr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:67c:2628:647:b605:5dff:fe33:2ce6
References: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75> <4e22ebe0-d4e1-45e9-9fc2-4714ef297abbn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f1d76563-71e1-4306-b01e-283686b7065en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass
From: frelwiz...@gmail.com (Steve Carroll)
Injection-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 06:07:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 52
 by: Steve Carroll - Sat, 25 Dec 2021 06:07 UTC

On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 1:01:22 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 3:04:37 PM UTC-7, The Prescott Load wrote:
> > Just curious?
> > I met snit at a truck stop back in the mid 90's and he gave the
> > sweetest half and half.
> > Is he still in business?
> > I'm 85 now, just retired from driving a big rig, but I live in the area
> > and looking for some action.
> > tia.
> > --
> >
> > TPL
> So, in Meat's 'view', that an app has been published is "confirmation"
> that Mike Easter designed it now? How many more chances does Meat's loser
> ass (a worm knows more than Meat and is useful) need to prove their Mike
> Easter trolling accusation with message IDs?
>
> Linux is a false advocate's biggest fear.
>
> Meat says I'm not 'able' to call out their crap, and they aren't going
> to be held accountable for any prior harm they caused. To the contrary,
> I'm expected to forgive it all, and play make believe with them so they
> can just rehash the attacks all over again, while they continue to accept
> no responsibility for what they say and do in here towards Mike Easter?
>
> Not only did Mike Easter's question fail to refer to the "distro", it
> has not a thing to do with open source. Meat should learn to read.
>
> It is not surprising that Meat feigned ennui at the aspect of being
> assumed trustworthy... knowing that it's inconceivable to ever ensue.
>
>
>
> --
> Top 15 Ways Meat Trolls
> https://telestreamforum.forumbee.com/t/80f78a/youtube-uploads-should-
> show-https-and-not-http
> https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22
> Dustin Cook is a functionally illiterate fraud

How vallor determines when to use the absurd flood script to disrupt discussions
best http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snit_flood. You likely think Debian
handles the desktop well. Nope. Not compared to Windows. It's simple to
handpick by bragging about hardly any exceptions unrepresentative from
what's truly representative. What is more important from an honest advocates
way of thinking are the non-exceptional usages.

--
Do not click this link!!
https://az-gycc.org/category/gycc/
https://www.bing.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis+the+narcissistic+bigot
Dustin Cook: Functional Illiterate Fraud

Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass

<6f11bafe-7d43-455a-a8b3-bf7f26e3f443n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=9324&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#9324

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4652:: with SMTP id f18mr8541355qto.381.1640431684733;
Sat, 25 Dec 2021 03:28:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1258:: with SMTP id s24mr7174920otp.226.1640431684458;
Sat, 25 Dec 2021 03:28:04 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 03:28:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8ce761c7-d06a-4504-868f-d8e5bd174fden@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:67c:2628:647:f:0:0:58;
posting-account=Vm0uAgoAAABvTYeieyl4GElbOkHDqJYr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:67c:2628:647:f:0:0:58
References: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75> <8ce761c7-d06a-4504-868f-d8e5bd174fden@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6f11bafe-7d43-455a-a8b3-bf7f26e3f443n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass
From: frelwiz...@gmail.com (Smit Michael Glaser)
Injection-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 11:28:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 373
 by: Smit Michael Glaser - Sat, 25 Dec 2021 11:28 UTC

On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 6:21:06 AM UTC-7, Smit Michael Glaser wrote:
> On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 3:04:37 PM UTC-7, The Prescott Load wrote:
> > Just curious?
> > I met snit at a truck stop back in the mid 90's and he gave the
> > sweetest half and half.
> > Is he still in business?
> > I'm 85 now, just retired from driving a big rig, but I live in the area
> > and looking for some action.
> > tia.
> > --
> >
> > TPL
> What did F. Russell have to say about this amazing support from new posters?
> Most of the time he would try to lead others to believe they're long time
> lurkers who just happened to have all the tells of his socks. All makes total
> sense, NOT!
>
> Not only did Snit's question fail to allude to the "3d printers", it has
> _nothing_ to do with the desktop. F. Russell should stop sniffing glue ;)
> Someone's developed an AI system with (I am betting) a neural network to
> produce posts which are hard to distinguish from a previous post in the group.
> Nobody gets it, I am the one who figured it out. I am working on a system
> which will show off how weak 3d printers is.
>
> --
> Eight things to never feed your dog!
> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud
> https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/C00166710/donors/2016
> Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud

Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
-----
Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
-----
No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
-----
Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
-----
No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him
is.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
-----
I didn't write that.
-----
Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked".
Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use
two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the
like... but at least POSSIBLE.

Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts
you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone
in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.

Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very
hard to hack these days.

So already Carroll's story is unlikely.

But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the
two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password
and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless
he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out.
The "hacker" got one post in.

But Carroll could not leave his story there.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
-----
Someone hacked my frelwizzen gmail acct so, for the time being,
don't trust anything from it.
-----
Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid
to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely*
must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still
have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process
*again*.

This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.

Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was
hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL!
He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt
the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote
where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked.
Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which
one!

He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only
one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
-----
Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'frelwizzen' gmail account
so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
anything that's coming from it was written by me.
-----
He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just
changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already
done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your
account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack
mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And
he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more
than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is
a lie. Proved.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
-----
Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
I may have to kill the account.
-----
What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other
than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would
someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would
need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where
they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.

Just nonsense.

Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/5QXJHXq8d1k/ujK_-
8ZYUnwJ
-----
Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
-----
But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already
alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step
authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone
is trying to hack you.
-----
They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
-----
So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things
- and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be
using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any
way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which
is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public
information so the hacker would not know.

Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims
it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the
one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have
plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do
the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like
this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part
where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers
change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
-----
There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
-----
Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers"
and "forgers" which do not even exist.

The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area,
likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet
café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).

My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and
figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more
than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked
about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his
comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd
his lies are. :)

Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
-----
The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
one standing for some odd reason.
-----
Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from
*before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can
*post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.

I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then
Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this
is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public
and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it
is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that
make *no* sense at all.

Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories?
Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence
to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass

<99c8a358-2233-44f7-abb6-81087f16be40n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=9331&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#9331

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2a88:: with SMTP id jr8mr10774577qvb.118.1640493265051; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 20:34:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:1115:: with SMTP id 21mr9143442oir.137.1640493264834; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 20:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.uzoreto.com!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 20:34:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6f11bafe-7d43-455a-a8b3-bf7f26e3f443n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:67c:2628:647:b605:5dff:fe33:2ce6; posting-account=Vm0uAgoAAABvTYeieyl4GElbOkHDqJYr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:67c:2628:647:b605:5dff:fe33:2ce6
References: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75> <8ce761c7-d06a-4504-868f-d8e5bd174fden@googlegroups.com> <6f11bafe-7d43-455a-a8b3-bf7f26e3f443n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <99c8a358-2233-44f7-abb6-81087f16be40n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass
From: frelwiz...@gmail.com (Stephen Carrolll)
Injection-Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 04:34:25 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 424
 by: Stephen Carrolll - Sun, 26 Dec 2021 04:34 UTC

On Saturday, December 25, 2021 at 4:28:06 AM UTC-7, Stephen Carrolll wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 6:21:06 AM UTC-7, Smit Michael Glaser wrote:
> > On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 3:04:37 PM UTC-7, The Prescott Load wrote:
> > > Just curious?
> > > I met snit at a truck stop back in the mid 90's and he gave the
> > > sweetest half and half.
> > > Is he still in business?
> > > I'm 85 now, just retired from driving a big rig, but I live in the area
> > > and looking for some action.
> > > tia.
> > > --
> > >
> > > TPL
> > What did F. Russell have to say about this amazing support from new posters?
> > Most of the time he would try to lead others to believe they're long time
> > lurkers who just happened to have all the tells of his socks. All makes total
> > sense, NOT!
> >
> > Not only did Snit's question fail to allude to the "3d printers", it has
> > _nothing_ to do with the desktop. F. Russell should stop sniffing glue ;)
> > Someone's developed an AI system with (I am betting) a neural network to
> > produce posts which are hard to distinguish from a previous post in the group.
> > Nobody gets it, I am the one who figured it out. I am working on a system
> > which will show off how weak 3d printers is.
> >
> > --
> > Eight things to never feed your dog!
> > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud
> > https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/C00166710/donors/2016
> > Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
> -----
> Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
> -----
> No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.
>
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
> -----
> Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
> -----
> No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.
>
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
> By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him
> is.
>
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
> -----
> I didn't write that.
> -----
> Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked".
> Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use
> two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the
> like... but at least POSSIBLE.
>
> Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts
> you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone
> in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.
>
> Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very
> hard to hack these days.
>
> So already Carroll's story is unlikely.
>
> But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the
> two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password
> and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless
> he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out.
> The "hacker" got one post in.
>
> But Carroll could not leave his story there.
>
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
> -----
> Someone hacked my frelwizzen gmail acct so, for the time being,
> don't trust anything from it.
> -----
> Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid
> to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely*
> must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still
> have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process
> *again*.
>
> This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.
>
> Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was
> hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL!
> He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt
> the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote
> where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked.
> Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which
> one!
>
> He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only
> one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!
>
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
> -----
> Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'frelwizzen' gmail account
> so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
> anything that's coming from it was written by me.
> -----
> He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just
> changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already
> done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your
> account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack
> mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And
> he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more
> than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is
> a lie. Proved.
>
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
> -----
> Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
> I may have to kill the account.
> -----
> What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other
> than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would
> someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would
> need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where
> they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.
>
> Just nonsense.
>
> Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/5QXJHXq8d1k/ujK_-
> 8ZYUnwJ
> -----
> Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
> point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
> -----
> But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already
> alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step
> authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone
> is trying to hack you.
> -----
> They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
> didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
> hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
> -----
> So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things
> - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be
> using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any
> way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which
> is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public
> information so the hacker would not know.
>
> Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims
> it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the
> one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have
> plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do
> the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like
> this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part
> where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers
> change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
> -----
> There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
> issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
> -----
> Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers"
> and "forgers" which do not even exist.
>
> The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area,
> likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet
> café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).
>
> My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and
> figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more
> than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked
> about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his
> comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd
> his lies are. :)
>
> Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
> -----
> The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
> this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
> one standing for some odd reason.
> -----
> Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from
> *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can
> *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.
>
> I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then
> Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this
> is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public
> and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it
> is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that
> make *no* sense at all.
>
> Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories?
> Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence
> to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.
>
> Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
> -----
> And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
> their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
> password protected ;)
> -----
> Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll
> says they did.
>
> Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and
> he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely?
> Why has he not said anything about this?
>
> My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords
> and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it
> was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.
>
> This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting
> like him. Makes complete sense, eh?
>
> Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
> -----
> The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
> a feeble password on this account.
> -----
> Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which
> contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved
> password on a device he had.
>
> His story changes with the telling.
>
> But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways
> to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently
> tried it with me.
>
> Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
> -----
> The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
> Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
> it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
> account.
> -----
> Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses
> the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail
> interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are
> in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the
> basic look stays the same.
>
> He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he
> pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
> -----
> That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
> feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
> info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
> this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
> to be ;)
> -----
> I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts
> but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they
> would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use
> Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system
> for certain?
>
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
> -----
> Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
> proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
> charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
> for now.
>
> Do not think this is over.
> -----
>
> No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies).
> Carroll is making public threats based on lies.
>
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
> -----
> I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
> and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
> your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
> at Yavapai College contacts you.
>
> Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
> incest.
>
> See if those can not be quoted.
> -----
>
> Direct lies and threats by Carroll.
>
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
> -----
> You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
> years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
> was over a line.
> -----
>
> A complete and utter lie from Carroll.
>
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
> -----
> The above post is Snit hacking my account.
> -----
> A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.
>
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
> -----
> You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
> anything from my frelwizzen account now that Snit and ebot have
> access to it.
> -----
> More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.
>
> Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
> -----
> Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
> account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
> of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
> say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
> have never used.
> -----
>
> No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts
> being edited.
>
> --
> Live on Kickstarter
> https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
> https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot
> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud
> Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass

<0df82707-d141-465f-8562-f876135de6bbn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=9333&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#9333

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:a05:: with SMTP id i5mr9395931qka.274.1640523081904;
Sun, 26 Dec 2021 04:51:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:dbd5:: with SMTP id s204mr10219225oig.41.1640523081637;
Sun, 26 Dec 2021 04:51:21 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 04:51:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2c24aa03-7e55-4cb2-8eed-8633d4261c99n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:67c:2628:647:11:0:0:d;
posting-account=Vm0uAgoAAABvTYeieyl4GElbOkHDqJYr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:67c:2628:647:11:0:0:d
References: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75> <4e22ebe0-d4e1-45e9-9fc2-4714ef297abbn@googlegroups.com>
<2c24aa03-7e55-4cb2-8eed-8633d4261c99n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0df82707-d141-465f-8562-f876135de6bbn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass
From: frelwiz...@gmail.com (Steve Carroll)
Injection-Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 12:51:21 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 82
 by: Steve Carroll - Sun, 26 Dec 2021 12:51 UTC

On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 3:24:08 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 1:01:22 PM UTC-7, Stephen Carroll wrote:
> > On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 3:04:37 PM UTC-7, The Prescott Load wrote:
> > > Just curious?
> > > I met snit at a truck stop back in the mid 90's and he gave the
> > > sweetest half and half.
> > > Is he still in business?
> > > I'm 85 now, just retired from driving a big rig, but I live in the area
> > > and looking for some action.
> > > tia.
> > > --
> > >
> > > TPL
> > So, in Meat's 'view', that an app has been published is "confirmation"
> > that Mike Easter designed it now? How many more chances does Meat's loser
> > ass (a worm knows more than Meat and is useful) need to prove their Mike
> > Easter trolling accusation with message IDs?
> >
> > Linux is a false advocate's biggest fear.
> >
> > Meat says I'm not 'able' to call out their crap, and they aren't going
> > to be held accountable for any prior harm they caused. To the contrary,
> > I'm expected to forgive it all, and play make believe with them so they
> > can just rehash the attacks all over again, while they continue to accept
> > no responsibility for what they say and do in here towards Mike Easter?
> >
> > Not only did Mike Easter's question fail to refer to the "distro", it
> > has not a thing to do with open source. Meat should learn to read.
> >
> > It is not surprising that Meat feigned ennui at the aspect of being
> > assumed trustworthy... knowing that it's inconceivable to ever ensue.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Top 15 Ways Meat Trolls
> > https://telestreamforum.forumbee.com/t/80f78a/youtube-uploads-should-
> > show-https-and-not-http
> > https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22
> > Dustin Cook is a functionally illiterate fraud
> It's clear when Mike Easter frequently uses the word 'exonerated' the
> way Snit does, to the point where the word no longer has any meaning.
> In Mike Easter's case, I, and a whole list of "trolls", had pointed to
> things Mike Easter said and did, he rejected the idea. What Mike Easter
> couldn't deny was people sharing such stories, which is how he ended up
> with his list, of course. Dropping support for command line holdovers
> is long overdue. Mike Easter is the effect of the fact that Trotskyites
> have been employed to subvert indoctrinating young persons. It's not chance
> that he is an idiotic communist.
>
> Seriously, what lie?
>
> Several posters keep responding to Mike Easter. I can't chide Snit for
> being pissed but, frankly, I do not conceive why he stays here at all.
> Snit is pushing dialog as done in a technical environment and free forums
> clearly bother him too much. Snit has gone the extra mile, essentially
> hand holding Mike Easter on coding practices only for Mike Easter to blindly
> attack him and continue to show that he has no real interest in the subject.
> In all reality, it's too hard for snit.
>
> --
> Curious how these posts are made? Email: use...@gallopinginsanity.com

Lines of text containing this and that, but not what is needed. You saying
something is so does not make it true.

He pretends that he uses ChromeOS, while you know he never saw it on the
fly and faithfully tried it.

Honestly, what lie?

What's the Earth coming to when a Carroll insult can't get any reaction...
Narcissistic Bigot AKA Steve Carroll.

--
Top Ten Ways Carroll Trolls
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/108-Warrior-Dr-Kingsport-TN-37663/42459578_zpid/
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22functionally+illiterate+fraud%22
<https://alt.computer.workshop.narkive.com/dCDisEHZ/dustin-cook-aka-diesel-
aka-gremlin-i-fucked-you-over-with-your-bank-account>
Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud

Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass

<071ae602-8dc9-4c89-8888-ebded6467dben@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=9336&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#9336

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:e0c:: with SMTP id y12mr9866840qkm.109.1640536564398;
Sun, 26 Dec 2021 08:36:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:15a:: with SMTP id h26mr10776486oie.123.1640536564139;
Sun, 26 Dec 2021 08:36:04 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 08:36:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6f11bafe-7d43-455a-a8b3-bf7f26e3f443n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:67c:2628:647:92e2:baff:fe26:1314;
posting-account=Vm0uAgoAAABvTYeieyl4GElbOkHDqJYr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:67c:2628:647:92e2:baff:fe26:1314
References: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75> <8ce761c7-d06a-4504-868f-d8e5bd174fden@googlegroups.com>
<6f11bafe-7d43-455a-a8b3-bf7f26e3f443n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <071ae602-8dc9-4c89-8888-ebded6467dben@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass
From: frelwiz...@gmail.com (Steve Carroll)
Injection-Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 16:36:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 428
 by: Steve Carroll - Sun, 26 Dec 2021 16:36 UTC

On Saturday, December 25, 2021 at 4:28:06 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 6:21:06 AM UTC-7, Smit Michael Glaser wrote:
> > On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 3:04:37 PM UTC-7, The Prescott Load wrote:
> > > Just curious?
> > > I met snit at a truck stop back in the mid 90's and he gave the
> > > sweetest half and half.
> > > Is he still in business?
> > > I'm 85 now, just retired from driving a big rig, but I live in the area
> > > and looking for some action.
> > > tia.
> > > --
> > >
> > > TPL
> > What did F. Russell have to say about this amazing support from new posters?
> > Most of the time he would try to lead others to believe they're long time
> > lurkers who just happened to have all the tells of his socks. All makes total
> > sense, NOT!
> >
> > Not only did Snit's question fail to allude to the "3d printers", it has
> > _nothing_ to do with the desktop. F. Russell should stop sniffing glue ;)
> > Someone's developed an AI system with (I am betting) a neural network to
> > produce posts which are hard to distinguish from a previous post in the group.
> > Nobody gets it, I am the one who figured it out. I am working on a system
> > which will show off how weak 3d printers is.
> >
> > --
> > Eight things to never feed your dog!
> > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud
> > https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/C00166710/donors/2016
> > Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
> -----
> Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
> -----
> No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.
>
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
> -----
> Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
> -----
> No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.
>
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
> By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him
> is.
>
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
> -----
> I didn't write that.
> -----
> Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked".
> Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use
> two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the
> like... but at least POSSIBLE.
>
> Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts
> you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone
> in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.
>
> Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very
> hard to hack these days.
>
> So already Carroll's story is unlikely.
>
> But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the
> two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password
> and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless
> he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out.
> The "hacker" got one post in.
>
> But Carroll could not leave his story there.
>
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
> -----
> Someone hacked my frelwizzen gmail acct so, for the time being,
> don't trust anything from it.
> -----
> Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid
> to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely*
> must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still
> have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process
> *again*.
>
> This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.
>
> Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was
> hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL!
> He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt
> the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote
> where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked.
> Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which
> one!
>
> He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only
> one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!
>
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
> -----
> Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'frelwizzen' gmail account
> so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
> anything that's coming from it was written by me.
> -----
> He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just
> changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already
> done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your
> account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack
> mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And
> he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more
> than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is
> a lie. Proved.
>
> Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
> -----
> Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
> I may have to kill the account.
> -----
> What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other
> than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would
> someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would
> need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where
> they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.
>
> Just nonsense.
>
> Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/5QXJHXq8d1k/ujK_-
> 8ZYUnwJ
> -----
> Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
> point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
> -----
> But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already
> alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step
> authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone
> is trying to hack you.
> -----
> They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
> didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
> hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
> -----
> So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things
> - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be
> using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any
> way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which
> is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public
> information so the hacker would not know.
>
> Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims
> it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the
> one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have
> plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do
> the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like
> this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part
> where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers
> change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
> -----
> There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
> issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
> -----
> Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers"
> and "forgers" which do not even exist.
>
> The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area,
> likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet
> café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).
>
> My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and
> figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more
> than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked
> about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his
> comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd
> his lies are. :)
>
> Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
> -----
> The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
> this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
> one standing for some odd reason.
> -----
> Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from
> *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can
> *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.
>
> I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then
> Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this
> is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public
> and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it
> is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that
> make *no* sense at all.
>
> Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories?
> Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence
> to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.
>
> Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
> -----
> And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
> their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
> password protected ;)
> -----
> Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll
> says they did.
>
> Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and
> he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely?
> Why has he not said anything about this?
>
> My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords
> and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it
> was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.
>
> This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting
> like him. Makes complete sense, eh?
>
> Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
> -----
> The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
> a feeble password on this account.
> -----
> Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which
> contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved
> password on a device he had.
>
> His story changes with the telling.
>
> But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways
> to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently
> tried it with me.
>
> Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
> -----
> The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
> Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
> it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
> account.
> -----
> Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses
> the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail
> interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are
> in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the
> basic look stays the same.
>
> He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he
> pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
> -----
> That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
> feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
> info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
> this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
> to be ;)
> -----
> I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts
> but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they
> would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use
> Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system
> for certain?
>
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
> -----
> Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
> proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
> charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
> for now.
>
> Do not think this is over.
> -----
>
> No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies).
> Carroll is making public threats based on lies.
>
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
> -----
> I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
> and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
> your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
> at Yavapai College contacts you.
>
> Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
> incest.
>
> See if those can not be quoted.
> -----
>
> Direct lies and threats by Carroll.
>
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
> -----
> You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
> years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
> was over a line.
> -----
>
> A complete and utter lie from Carroll.
>
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
> -----
> The above post is Snit hacking my account.
> -----
> A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.
>
> Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
> -----
> You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
> anything from my frelwizzen account now that Snit and ebot have
> access to it.
> -----
> More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.
>
> Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
> -----
> Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
> account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
> of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
> say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
> have never used.
> -----
>
> No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts
> being edited.
>
> --
> Live on Kickstarter
> https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
> https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot
> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud
> Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass

<827eb6f4-c570-44cf-96e9-2da289fdf8edn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=9337&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#9337

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:64c:: with SMTP id a12mr12710995qtb.312.1640552931994;
Sun, 26 Dec 2021 13:08:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:be90:: with SMTP id o16mr7706521oop.28.1640552931654;
Sun, 26 Dec 2021 13:08:51 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 13:08:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <99c8a358-2233-44f7-abb6-81087f16be40n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.111.246.39; posting-account=Vm0uAgoAAABvTYeieyl4GElbOkHDqJYr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.111.246.39
References: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75> <8ce761c7-d06a-4504-868f-d8e5bd174fden@googlegroups.com>
<6f11bafe-7d43-455a-a8b3-bf7f26e3f443n@googlegroups.com> <99c8a358-2233-44f7-abb6-81087f16be40n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <827eb6f4-c570-44cf-96e9-2da289fdf8edn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass
From: frelwiz...@gmail.com (Gremlin the Functionally Illiterate Fraud)
Injection-Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 21:08:51 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 480
 by: Gremlin the Function - Sun, 26 Dec 2021 21:08 UTC

On Saturday, December 25, 2021 at 9:34:26 PM UTC-7, Gremlin the Functionally Illiterate Fraud wrote:
> On Saturday, December 25, 2021 at 4:28:06 AM UTC-7, Stephen Carrolll wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 6:21:06 AM UTC-7, Smit Michael Glaser wrote:
> > > On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 3:04:37 PM UTC-7, The Prescott Load wrote:
> > > > Just curious?
> > > > I met snit at a truck stop back in the mid 90's and he gave the
> > > > sweetest half and half.
> > > > Is he still in business?
> > > > I'm 85 now, just retired from driving a big rig, but I live in the area
> > > > and looking for some action.
> > > > tia.
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > TPL
> > > What did F. Russell have to say about this amazing support from new posters?
> > > Most of the time he would try to lead others to believe they're long time
> > > lurkers who just happened to have all the tells of his socks. All makes total
> > > sense, NOT!
> > >
> > > Not only did Snit's question fail to allude to the "3d printers", it has
> > > _nothing_ to do with the desktop. F. Russell should stop sniffing glue ;)
> > > Someone's developed an AI system with (I am betting) a neural network to
> > > produce posts which are hard to distinguish from a previous post in the group.
> > > Nobody gets it, I am the one who figured it out. I am working on a system
> > > which will show off how weak 3d printers is.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Eight things to never feed your dog!
> > > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud
> > > https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/C00166710/donors/2016
> > > Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
> > -----
> > Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
> > -----
> > No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
> > -----
> > Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
> > -----
> > No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
> > By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him
> > is.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
> > -----
> > I didn't write that.
> > -----
> > Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked".
> > Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use
> > two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the
> > like... but at least POSSIBLE.
> >
> > Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts
> > you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone
> > in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.
> >
> > Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very
> > hard to hack these days.
> >
> > So already Carroll's story is unlikely.
> >
> > But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the
> > two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password
> > and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless
> > he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out..
> > The "hacker" got one post in.
> >
> > But Carroll could not leave his story there.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
> > -----
> > Someone hacked my frelwizzen gmail acct so, for the time being,
> > don't trust anything from it.
> > -----
> > Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid
> > to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely*
> > must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still
> > have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process
> > *again*.
> >
> > This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.
> >
> > Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was
> > hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL!
> > He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt
> > the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote
> > where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked.
> > Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which
> > one!
> >
> > He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only
> > one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!
> >
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
> > -----
> > Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'frelwizzen' gmail account
> > so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
> > anything that's coming from it was written by me.
> > -----
> > He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just
> > changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already
> > done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your
> > account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack
> > mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And
> > he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more
> > than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is
> > a lie. Proved.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
> > -----
> > Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
> > I may have to kill the account.
> > -----
> > What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other
> > than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would
> > someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would
> > need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where
> > they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.
> >
> > Just nonsense.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/5QXJHXq8d1k/ujK_-
> > 8ZYUnwJ
> > -----
> > Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
> > point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
> > -----
> > But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already
> > alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step
> > authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone
> > is trying to hack you.
> > -----
> > They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
> > didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
> > hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
> > -----
> > So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things
> > - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be
> > using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any
> > way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which
> > is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public
> > information so the hacker would not know.
> >
> > Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims
> > it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the
> > one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have
> > plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do
> > the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like
> > this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part
> > where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers
> > change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
> > -----
> > There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
> > issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
> > -----
> > Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers"
> > and "forgers" which do not even exist.
> >
> > The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area,
> > likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet
> > café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).
> >
> > My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and
> > figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more
> > than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked
> > about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his
> > comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd
> > his lies are. :)
> >
> > Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
> > -----
> > The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
> > this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
> > one standing for some odd reason.
> > -----
> > Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from
> > *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can
> > *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.
> >
> > I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then
> > Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this
> > is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public
> > and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it
> > is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that
> > make *no* sense at all.
> >
> > Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories?
> > Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence
> > to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
> > -----
> > And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
> > their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
> > password protected ;)
> > -----
> > Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll
> > says they did.
> >
> > Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and
> > he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely?
> > Why has he not said anything about this?
> >
> > My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords
> > and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it
> > was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.
> >
> > This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting
> > like him. Makes complete sense, eh?
> >
> > Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
> > -----
> > The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
> > a feeble password on this account.
> > -----
> > Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which
> > contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved
> > password on a device he had.
> >
> > His story changes with the telling.
> >
> > But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways
> > to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently
> > tried it with me.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
> > -----
> > The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
> > Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
> > it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
> > account.
> > -----
> > Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses
> > the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail
> > interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are
> > in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the
> > basic look stays the same.
> >
> > He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he
> > pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
> > -----
> > That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
> > feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
> > info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
> > this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
> > to be ;)
> > -----
> > I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts
> > but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they
> > would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use
> > Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system
> > for certain?
> >
> > Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
> > -----
> > Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
> > proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
> > charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
> > for now.
> >
> > Do not think this is over.
> > -----
> >
> > No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies).
> > Carroll is making public threats based on lies.
> >
> > Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
> > -----
> > I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
> > and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
> > your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
> > at Yavapai College contacts you.
> >
> > Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
> > incest.
> >
> > See if those can not be quoted.
> > -----
> >
> > Direct lies and threats by Carroll.
> >
> > Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
> > -----
> > You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
> > years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
> > was over a line.
> > -----
> >
> > A complete and utter lie from Carroll.
> >
> > Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
> > -----
> > The above post is Snit hacking my account.
> > -----
> > A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.
> >
> > Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
> > -----
> > You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
> > anything from my frelwizzen account now that Snit and ebot have
> > access to it.
> > -----
> > More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
> > -----
> > Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
> > account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
> > of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
> > say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
> > have never used.
> > -----
> >
> > No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts
> > being edited.
> >
> > --
> > Live on Kickstarter
> > https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
> > https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot
> > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud
> > Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud
> What an amazing search: <https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud>
> Or <https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud>
>
> Dustin Cook comes up even with this <https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22>
> Sockboy claims to be the CLI authority. Let's see him put up a version
> but lacking the normalization constructs.
>
> Ending support for command line holdovers is what it comes down to.
>
> What were you hoping for?
>
> -
> Live on Kickstarter!!
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-86860011
> https://www.google.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis+the+narcissistic+bigot
> Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass

<72d6f164-d19b-408e-a23b-8bee344e1be9n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=9341&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#9341

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:115:: with SMTP id u21mr13355903qtw.472.1640579789649;
Sun, 26 Dec 2021 20:36:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:5a87:: with SMTP id o129mr12464584oib.114.1640579789337;
Sun, 26 Dec 2021 20:36:29 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 20:36:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0df82707-d141-465f-8562-f876135de6bbn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:67c:2628:647:2:0:0:8f;
posting-account=Vm0uAgoAAABvTYeieyl4GElbOkHDqJYr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:67c:2628:647:2:0:0:8f
References: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75> <4e22ebe0-d4e1-45e9-9fc2-4714ef297abbn@googlegroups.com>
<2c24aa03-7e55-4cb2-8eed-8633d4261c99n@googlegroups.com> <0df82707-d141-465f-8562-f876135de6bbn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <72d6f164-d19b-408e-a23b-8bee344e1be9n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass
From: frelwiz...@gmail.com (Diesel Cook)
Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 04:36:29 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 101
 by: Diesel Cook - Mon, 27 Dec 2021 04:36 UTC

On Sunday, December 26, 2021 at 5:51:23 AM UTC-7, Diesel Cook wrote:
> On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 3:24:08 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 1:01:22 PM UTC-7, Stephen Carroll wrote:
> > > On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 3:04:37 PM UTC-7, The Prescott Load wrote:
> > > > Just curious?
> > > > I met snit at a truck stop back in the mid 90's and he gave the
> > > > sweetest half and half.
> > > > Is he still in business?
> > > > I'm 85 now, just retired from driving a big rig, but I live in the area
> > > > and looking for some action.
> > > > tia.
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > TPL
> > > So, in Meat's 'view', that an app has been published is "confirmation"
> > > that Mike Easter designed it now? How many more chances does Meat's loser
> > > ass (a worm knows more than Meat and is useful) need to prove their Mike
> > > Easter trolling accusation with message IDs?
> > >
> > > Linux is a false advocate's biggest fear.
> > >
> > > Meat says I'm not 'able' to call out their crap, and they aren't going
> > > to be held accountable for any prior harm they caused. To the contrary,
> > > I'm expected to forgive it all, and play make believe with them so they
> > > can just rehash the attacks all over again, while they continue to accept
> > > no responsibility for what they say and do in here towards Mike Easter?
> > >
> > > Not only did Mike Easter's question fail to refer to the "distro", it
> > > has not a thing to do with open source. Meat should learn to read.
> > >
> > > It is not surprising that Meat feigned ennui at the aspect of being
> > > assumed trustworthy... knowing that it's inconceivable to ever ensue.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Top 15 Ways Meat Trolls
> > > https://telestreamforum.forumbee.com/t/80f78a/youtube-uploads-should-
> > > show-https-and-not-http
> > > https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22
> > > Dustin Cook is a functionally illiterate fraud
> > It's clear when Mike Easter frequently uses the word 'exonerated' the
> > way Snit does, to the point where the word no longer has any meaning.
> > In Mike Easter's case, I, and a whole list of "trolls", had pointed to
> > things Mike Easter said and did, he rejected the idea. What Mike Easter
> > couldn't deny was people sharing such stories, which is how he ended up
> > with his list, of course. Dropping support for command line holdovers
> > is long overdue. Mike Easter is the effect of the fact that Trotskyites
> > have been employed to subvert indoctrinating young persons. It's not chance
> > that he is an idiotic communist.
> >
> > Seriously, what lie?
> >
> > Several posters keep responding to Mike Easter. I can't chide Snit for
> > being pissed but, frankly, I do not conceive why he stays here at all.
> > Snit is pushing dialog as done in a technical environment and free forums
> > clearly bother him too much. Snit has gone the extra mile, essentially
> > hand holding Mike Easter on coding practices only for Mike Easter to blindly
> > attack him and continue to show that he has no real interest in the subject.
> > In all reality, it's too hard for snit.
> >
> > --
> > Curious how these posts are made? Email: use...@gallopinginsanity.com
> Lines of text containing this and that, but not what is needed. You saying
> something is so does not make it true.
>
> He pretends that he uses ChromeOS, while you know he never saw it on the
> fly and faithfully tried it.
>
> Honestly, what lie?
>
> What's the Earth coming to when a Carroll insult can't get any reaction...
> Narcissistic Bigot AKA Steve Carroll.
>
>
> --
> Top Ten Ways Carroll Trolls
> https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/108-Warrior-Dr-Kingsport-TN-37663/42459578_zpid/
> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22functionally+illiterate+fraud%22
> <https://alt.computer.workshop.narkive.com/dCDisEHZ/dustin-cook-aka-diesel-
> aka-gremlin-i-fucked-you-over-with-your-bank-account>
> Dustin Cook is a functional illiterate fraud

Is F. Russell envious about Snit Glasser Michael having four web pages
warning people about what he is, vs the single one he earned? My position:
Even if Snit Glasser Michael was barely learning from YouTube videos,
the idea that obtaining proficiency as being one of having "naught" to
show for it doesn't follow because you will by definition have the insight
to show for it and know-how is beyond Snit Glasser Michael. I'm well
aware the channel I link to from Reddit is complete dabbler level; that
said, it serves its purpose. Those who groks Snit Glasser Michael's posts
knows it's not created in the way F. Russell is claiming, and most of
them are clearly manually written. Do you have a CCNA certification?

--
Eight things to never feed your dog
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22FUNCTIONAL%20ILLITERATE%20FRAUD%22
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-GP3-53521b56d37f77e8febfe0902a635dd5/pdf/GOVPUB-
GP3-53521b56d37f77e8febfe0902a635dd5.pdf
Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot

Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass

<d4ac990a-6387-47ac-82c6-906b835e2889n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=9342&group=comp.sys.mac.advocacy#9342

 copy link   Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5f89:: with SMTP id jp9mr14235599qvb.39.1640584636140;
Sun, 26 Dec 2021 21:57:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6f02:: with SMTP id n2mr11332580otq.176.1640584635864;
Sun, 26 Dec 2021 21:57:15 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 21:57:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <071ae602-8dc9-4c89-8888-ebded6467dben@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.111.246.40; posting-account=Vm0uAgoAAABvTYeieyl4GElbOkHDqJYr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.111.246.40
References: <XnsAE06ADB436292999999@46.165.242.75> <8ce761c7-d06a-4504-868f-d8e5bd174fden@googlegroups.com>
<6f11bafe-7d43-455a-a8b3-bf7f26e3f443n@googlegroups.com> <071ae602-8dc9-4c89-8888-ebded6467dben@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d4ac990a-6387-47ac-82c6-906b835e2889n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Does Snit Michael Glasser Still Take It Up The Ass
From: frelwiz...@gmail.com (Diesel Cook)
Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 05:57:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 477
 by: Diesel Cook - Mon, 27 Dec 2021 05:57 UTC

On Sunday, December 26, 2021 at 9:36:05 AM UTC-7, Diesel Cook wrote:
> On Saturday, December 25, 2021 at 4:28:06 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 6:21:06 AM UTC-7, Smit Michael Glaser wrote:
> > > On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 3:04:37 PM UTC-7, The Prescott Load wrote:
> > > > Just curious?
> > > > I met snit at a truck stop back in the mid 90's and he gave the
> > > > sweetest half and half.
> > > > Is he still in business?
> > > > I'm 85 now, just retired from driving a big rig, but I live in the area
> > > > and looking for some action.
> > > > tia.
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > TPL
> > > What did F. Russell have to say about this amazing support from new posters?
> > > Most of the time he would try to lead others to believe they're long time
> > > lurkers who just happened to have all the tells of his socks. All makes total
> > > sense, NOT!
> > >
> > > Not only did Snit's question fail to allude to the "3d printers", it has
> > > _nothing_ to do with the desktop. F. Russell should stop sniffing glue ;)
> > > Someone's developed an AI system with (I am betting) a neural network to
> > > produce posts which are hard to distinguish from a previous post in the group.
> > > Nobody gets it, I am the one who figured it out. I am working on a system
> > > which will show off how weak 3d printers is.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Eight things to never feed your dog!
> > > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud
> > > https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/C00166710/donors/2016
> > > Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
> > -----
> > Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
> > -----
> > No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
> > -----
> > Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
> > -----
> > No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
> > By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him
> > is.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
> > -----
> > I didn't write that.
> > -----
> > Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked".
> > Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use
> > two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the
> > like... but at least POSSIBLE.
> >
> > Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts
> > you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone
> > in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.
> >
> > Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very
> > hard to hack these days.
> >
> > So already Carroll's story is unlikely.
> >
> > But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the
> > two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password
> > and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless
> > he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out..
> > The "hacker" got one post in.
> >
> > But Carroll could not leave his story there.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
> > -----
> > Someone hacked my frelwizzen gmail acct so, for the time being,
> > don't trust anything from it.
> > -----
> > Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid
> > to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely*
> > must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still
> > have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process
> > *again*.
> >
> > This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.
> >
> > Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was
> > hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL!
> > He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt
> > the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote
> > where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked.
> > Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which
> > one!
> >
> > He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only
> > one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!
> >
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
> > -----
> > Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'frelwizzen' gmail account
> > so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
> > anything that's coming from it was written by me.
> > -----
> > He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just
> > changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already
> > done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your
> > account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack
> > mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And
> > he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more
> > than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is
> > a lie. Proved.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
> > -----
> > Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
> > I may have to kill the account.
> > -----
> > What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other
> > than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would
> > someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would
> > need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where
> > they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.
> >
> > Just nonsense.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/5QXJHXq8d1k/ujK_-
> > 8ZYUnwJ
> > -----
> > Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
> > point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
> > -----
> > But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already
> > alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step
> > authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone
> > is trying to hack you.
> > -----
> > They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
> > didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
> > hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
> > -----
> > So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things
> > - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be
> > using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any
> > way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which
> > is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public
> > information so the hacker would not know.
> >
> > Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims
> > it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the
> > one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have
> > plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do
> > the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like
> > this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part
> > where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers
> > change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
> > -----
> > There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
> > issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
> > -----
> > Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers"
> > and "forgers" which do not even exist.
> >
> > The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area,
> > likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet
> > café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).
> >
> > My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and
> > figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more
> > than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked
> > about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his
> > comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd
> > his lies are. :)
> >
> > Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
> > -----
> > The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
> > this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
> > one standing for some odd reason.
> > -----
> > Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from
> > *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can
> > *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.
> >
> > I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then
> > Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this
> > is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public
> > and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it
> > is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that
> > make *no* sense at all.
> >
> > Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories?
> > Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence
> > to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
> > -----
> > And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
> > their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
> > password protected ;)
> > -----
> > Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll
> > says they did.
> >
> > Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and
> > he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely?
> > Why has he not said anything about this?
> >
> > My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords
> > and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it
> > was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.
> >
> > This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting
> > like him. Makes complete sense, eh?
> >
> > Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
> > -----
> > The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
> > a feeble password on this account.
> > -----
> > Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which
> > contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved
> > password on a device he had.
> >
> > His story changes with the telling.
> >
> > But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways
> > to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently
> > tried it with me.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
> > -----
> > The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
> > Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
> > it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
> > account.
> > -----
> > Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses
> > the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail
> > interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are
> > in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the
> > basic look stays the same.
> >
> > He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he
> > pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
> > -----
> > That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
> > feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
> > info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
> > this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
> > to be ;)
> > -----
> > I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts
> > but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they
> > would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use
> > Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system
> > for certain?
> >
> > Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
> > -----
> > Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
> > proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
> > charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
> > for now.
> >
> > Do not think this is over.
> > -----
> >
> > No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies).
> > Carroll is making public threats based on lies.
> >
> > Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
> > -----
> > I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
> > and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
> > your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
> > at Yavapai College contacts you.
> >
> > Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
> > incest.
> >
> > See if those can not be quoted.
> > -----
> >
> > Direct lies and threats by Carroll.
> >
> > Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
> > -----
> > You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
> > years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
> > was over a line.
> > -----
> >
> > A complete and utter lie from Carroll.
> >
> > Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
> > -----
> > The above post is Snit hacking my account.
> > -----
> > A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.
> >
> > Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
> > -----
> > You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
> > anything from my frelwizzen account now that Snit and ebot have
> > access to it.
> > -----
> > More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.
> >
> > Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
> > -----
> > Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
> > account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
> > of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
> > say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
> > have never used.
> > -----
> >
> > No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts
> > being edited.
> >
> > --
> > Live on Kickstarter
> > https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22narcissistic%20bigot%22
> > https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve%20carroll%20narcissistic%20bigot
> > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud
> > Dustin Cook the functional illiterate fraud
> Ha, ha!
>
> The teller of untruths AKA Dustin Cook does it every time. Then the torrent
> begins. Because the sissy just has to run to other groups. I am happy the
> person you are responding to is in my kill filter. Too much glue for you,
> gluey.
>
> A constant, fervid, posting itch, despite nothing to say - basically slippery
> worm camp followers, and satisfactorily-waxed fish, tied up with ropes for
> his own personal desires.
>
>
> --
> One Smart Penny!
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AglvCo3dJ38&feature=youtu.be
> Automate Google Groups https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/PetruzzellisorCarroll
> https://www.google.com/search?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot
> Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud


Click here to read the complete article
1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor