On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 17/12/2021 00:38, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 17/12/2021 00:10, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> [....]
>>>> Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe
>>>> what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
>>>> write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
>>>> you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
>>>> written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
>>>> the title accordingly.
>>>
>>> Shadow is a *LIAR*.
>>
>> According to whom?
>
> *IT IS A FACT*

So you're not only an empath you're also the director of the "Ministry
of Truth"? Glasser likes to be the sole arbiter of every 'discussion' he
enters, too. Like minds...

(I fixed your title again)

On 17/12/2021 14:40, LegionX wrote:
> David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> Wrote in message:
>>> I suggest you concentrate only on posts which Snit has made here in ACW
>> An acceptable suggestion.
>
>> Good! :-D
>
> David,
>
> Why did you snip and run? Here's what you snipped:
>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>

I'm not interested in reviewing the feud you lost.

> Those took place in ACW. They are the lies he wrote that you
> aren't even disputing. The same lies you quoted back to us as you
> made your suggestion. They took place in ACW - this very
> newsgroup.
>
> So what do you have to say for the lies snit wrote here?

Nothing. Not my fight.

On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:27:10 +0000, David Brooks
<DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
>
>I'm not interested in reviewing the feud you lost.

LOST?
Seems you "caught" snit's comprehension disability.
snit *LIED* through his teeth, and was caught "in flagrante
delicto".
LOL.

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Stalker".
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

On 16/12/2021 13:41, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
[....]
>> Let's have Skype of FaceTime chat about this and sort things out
>> properly. What do you say?
>
> There's nothing to sort, you just used the old 'Evidence for me but not
> for thee' routine and anyone bothering to read can see it. Readers have
> a good indication why Glasser believes everyone is as stupid as he needs
> them to be.

So, you're a chicken-shit. I guessed as much. Sad. :-(

What drives you in that foolish belief?

I seek the truth. I TELL the truth too.

I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018. *ANY* reference to me being 'drunk'
or a drunkard are *OBVIOUSLY* lies.

HTH

On 16/12/2021 13:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 15/12/2021 23:01, LegionX please note
>>
>> David Brooks stopped drinking alcohol on 21 March 2018
>
> And Shadow says otherwise

Shadow is a *LIAR*

On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 16/12/2021 13:41, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> [....]
>>> Let's have Skype of FaceTime chat about this and sort things out
>>> properly. What do you say?
>>
>> There's nothing to sort, you just used the old 'Evidence for me but not
>> for thee' routine and anyone bothering to read can see it. Readers have
>> a good indication why Glasser believes everyone is as stupid as he needs
>> them to be.
>
> So, you're a chicken-shit.

So, you're a dumb-sh*t (who, like Glasser, believes people are as stupid
as he needs them to be, especially when pushing blatant hypocrisy).

On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 16/12/2021 13:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 15/12/2021 23:01, LegionX please note
>>>
>>> David Brooks stopped drinking alcohol on 21 March 2018
>>
>> And Shadow says otherwise
>
> Shadow is a *LIAR*

Snit is a *LIAR*. What's your point?

On 17/12/2021 21:42, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 16/12/2021 13:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 15/12/2021 23:01, LegionX please note
>>>>
>>>> David Brooks stopped drinking alcohol on 21 March 2018
>>>
>>> And Shadow says otherwise
>>
>> Shadow is a *LIAR*
>
> Snit is a *LIAR*. What's your point?

The point is that *I* am *NOT* a liar.

David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote in news:spj476$jur$2
@hunterbd.eternal-september.org:

> On 17/12/2021 21:42, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 16/12/2021 13:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 15/12/2021 23:01, LegionX please note
>>>>>
>>>>> David Brooks stopped drinking alcohol on 21 March 2018
>>>>
>>>> And Shadow says otherwise
>>>
>>> Shadow is a *LIAR*
>>
>> Snit is a *LIAR*. What's your point?
>
> The point is that *I* am *NOT* a liar.
>

Of course you are a liar Boater Dave.
Snit lies more than you do though. If you practice you may be able to
surpass snit as usenet's most dishonest poster.

FACTS:-

David Brooks stopped drinking alcohol on 21 March 2018

Shadow is a *LIAR*

David Brooks is *NOT* a liar.

David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> Wrote in message:r
> On 17/12/2021 14:40, LegionX wrote:> David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> Wrote in message:>>> I suggest you concentrate only on posts which Snit has made here in ACW>> An acceptable suggestion.> >> Good! :-D> > David,> > Why did you snip and run? Here's what you snipped:> >

<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>

>I'm not interested in reviewing the feud you lost

We didn't provide a link to a feud. You suggested that we stick to
lies snit has written since he's been here - you weren't
interested in his lies written elsewhere. We did as you
requested. The url we shared:

<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>

Is proof of two separate lies snit has written about Gremlin since
snit has been posting here.

We didn't participate in their discussion and it's quite clear
that Gremlin proved beyond any doubt that snit was lying about
him. As he wrote.

>>So what do you have to say for the lies snit wrote here?

>Nothing. Not my fight.

We didn't know how much of a weasel you are until now. You asked
for proof of snit writing lies in this newsgroup specifically -
and we provided it. Atleast you can no longer deny that snit is
every bit the liar many have stated he is.

--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitlies>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Snit is one f*cked up puppy - who steals our hard earned tax
paying dollars from the government by running a long con for
welfare - who can be reached via telephone - text message - or in
person - by using the publically available contact information
below:

Michael (snit) and Anne Glasser (life-like troll lady)
3181 Willow Dr, Prescott, AZ
86301-4855 
1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425
1.928.776.9519 or 1-(928)-776-9519
They are professional Grifters who live on the benefits your hard
earned tax paying dollars provide. Animal abuser = snit pissed on
his own cat!

On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 17/12/2021 21:42, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 16/12/2021 13:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 15/12/2021 23:01, LegionX please note
>>>>>
>>>>> David Brooks stopped drinking alcohol on 21 March 2018
>>>>
>>>> And Shadow says otherwise
>>>
>>> Shadow is a *LIAR*
>>
>> Snit is a *LIAR*. What's your point?
>
> The point is that *I* am *NOT* a liar.

No, the point is Snit *is* a liar and you just attempted to use some of
his BS as "EVIDENCE" for something it can't possibly be evidence for.

On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:28:43 +0000, David Brooks
<DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>I seek the truth. I TELL the truth too.

Yes, of course you do, which is why you said this:

Message-ID: <spivec$o5q$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>
> So what do you have to say for the lies snit wrote here?

Nothing. Not my fight.

That's you seeking the truth? NOT
You neither seek the truth, nor do you speak the truth.

>I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018. *ANY* reference to me being 'drunk'
>or a drunkard are *OBVIOUSLY* lies.

Your claim is noted and disregarded. It's not supported by the available
evidence.

On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:50:14 +0000, David Brooks
<DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>On 17/12/2021 21:42, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 16/12/2021 13:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 15/12/2021 23:01, LegionX please note
>>>>>
>>>>> David Brooks stopped drinking alcohol on 21 March 2018
>>>>
>>>> And Shadow says otherwise
>>>
>>> Shadow is a *LIAR*
>>
>> Snit is a *LIAR*. What's your point?
>
>The point is that *I* am *NOT* a liar.

Everyone will react to your claim as they see fit, but for me I think I
need to see at least 24 hours of honesty before I give serious
consideration. Yes, I know that 24 hours isn't much at all, but it's
still far more than I think you can manage.

On 18/12/2021 00:28, LegionX wrote:
> David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> Wrote in message:r
>> On 17/12/2021 14:40, LegionX wrote:> David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> Wrote in message:>>> I suggest you concentrate only on posts which Snit has made here in ACW>> An acceptable suggestion.> >> Good! :-D> > David,> > Why did you snip and run? Here's what you snipped:> >
>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
>
>> I'm not interested in reviewing the feud you lost
>
> We didn't provide a link to a feud. You suggested that we stick to
> lies snit has written since he's been here - you weren't
> interested in his lies written elsewhere. We did as you
> requested. The url we shared:
>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
>
> Is proof of two separate lies snit has written about Gremlin since
> snit has been posting here.
>
> We didn't participate in their discussion and it's quite clear
> that Gremlin proved beyond any doubt that snit was lying about
> him. As he wrote.

One can see how Snit easily got the better of Gremlin, sure!

>>> So what do you have to say for the lies snit wrote here?
>
>> Nothing. Not my fight.
>
> We didn't know how much of a weasel you are until now. You asked
> for proof of snit writing lies in this newsgroup specifically -
> and we provided it. Atleast you can no longer deny that snit is
> every bit the liar many have stated he is.

Can you make better videos than these?

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCW-Nh7GJhJUpmAp5ZJLxSgQ/videos

They might help you pin down who is responsible for the flooder posts.

HTH

On 18/12/2021 05:28, Kelly Phillips wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:50:14 +0000, David Brooks
> <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 17/12/2021 21:42, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 16/12/2021 13:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 15/12/2021 23:01, LegionX please note
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David Brooks stopped drinking alcohol on 21 March 2018
>>>>>
>>>>> And Shadow says otherwise
>>>>
>>>> Shadow is a *LIAR*
>>>
>>> Snit is a *LIAR*. What's your point?
>>
>> The point is that *I* am *NOT* a liar.
>
> Everyone will react to your claim as they see fit, but for me I think I
> need to see at least 24 hours of honesty before I give serious
> consideration. Yes, I know that 24 hours isn't much at all, but it's
> still far more than I think you can manage.

There is no claim.

Shadow *IS* a liar.

On 18/12/2021 05:24, Kelly Phillips wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:28:43 +0000, David Brooks
> <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> I seek the truth. I TELL the truth too.
>
> Yes, of course you do.

That is correct.

>> I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018. *ANY* reference to me being 'drunk'
>> or a drunkard are *OBVIOUSLY* lies.
>
> It's not supported by the available evidence.

Maybe not, but it *IS* the truth! 🙏

David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> Wrote in message:r
> On 18/12/2021 00:28, LegionX wrote:> David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> Wrote in message:r>> On 17/12/2021 14:40, LegionX wrote:> David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> Wrote in message:>>> I suggest you concentrate only on posts which Snit has made here in ACW>> An acceptable suggestion.> >> Good! :-D> > David,> > Why did you snip and run? Here's what you snipped:> >> > <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>> >> I'm not interested in reviewing the feud you lost> > We didn't provide a link to a feud. You suggested that we stick to> lies snit has written since he's been here - you weren't> interested in his lies written elsewhere. We did as you> requested. The url we shared:> > <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>> > Is proof of two separate lies snit has written about Gremlin since> snit has been posting here.> > We didn't participate in their discussion and it's quite clear> that Gremlin proved beyond any doubt that snit was lying about> him. As he wrote.

>One can see how Snit easily got the better of Gremlin, sure!

So much for your claims of seeking the truth as well as being
truthful. At no point concerning snit have you been truthful.
This is another example of that, David. Snit didn't get the
better of Gremlin or anyone else. Instead snit claimed that
Gremlin had a copy of the bot itself. He also claimed that
Gremlin had been called out and clarified that he did have a copy
of the bot because someone called him out on it.

David - the events snit claimed never happened. Your dishonest
friend snit made everything up. As the contents of the
url

<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>

All clearly show - snit wrote multiple lies about Gremlin and dug
himself quite the hole in the process.

And you're going out of your way to lie about Gremlin in order to
support your friend. You can't even dispute the facts here. And
those are repeated again - snit wrote from his arsehole when he
made the accusation.

The next lie where he claimed that Gremlin directly lied on you
when he wrote that you had asked snit for help. You did ask for
his help with the phone number he doxd Gremlin with. You were
trying to locate his Business information. And it's obvious to
almost all? What you would have done with it had you found
it.

Your xian attitude towards Gremlin is laughable on a good day.
More importantly though - your replies to us on this subject are
letting others see your true colors. They're seeing for
themselves what a dishonest bad guy you are. There's absolutely
no reason for any of us to think you've reduced your alcohol
consumption - certainly nothing about your posts gives any of us
the impression that you even know what the word truth means.

>>> So what do you have to say for the lies snit wrote here?> >> Nothing. Not my fight.> > We didn't know how much of a weasel you are until now. You asked> for proof of snit writing lies in this newsgroup specifically -> and we provided it. Atleast you can no longer deny that snit is> every bit the liar many have stated he is.

>Can you make better videos than these?

We aren't interested in a topic change just yet. We are enjoying
seeing snit make a complete fool of you though. As a result we've
got you directly supporting a poster who is very dishonest
knowingly lie about one of your adversaries - with your
blessing.

And this is after you recommended that we only focus on the lies
he has written here. You can't claim he's an honest person
without lying your ass off for sure now David. Luckily for you
though your reputation is already in ruins so you won't lose any
credibility publically supporting someone who's a liar like
snit.

You came to pcbutts defense when he was lying and taking credit
for the work of others. You have a history of supporting trolls
and liars. Going so far as to lie for them when you
can.

snit is making a total fool out of you. He isn't your friend -
because a real friend wouldn't lie as he does and expect you to
help him try to sell it. And you have done exactly that too,
David. Multiple times now.

>They might help you pin down who is responsible for the flooder posts.

Thanks for showing Steve Carroll your true colors. It took you
long enough. He's partially to blame for it. He continued to
ignore what you were as he attempted to talk tech with you about
website design. He incorrectly assumed that by treating you as a
normal poster instead of the pile of shit you are that you'd be
reasonable and could be taught things. We hope he sees for
himself now and stops trying to educate you. That'll leave Mike
Easter as the only poster here who plays devils advocate on your
behalf. His reputation took a nosedive awhile ago because he
tried to rewrite the definition of cyber stalking to make it
appear as if you weren't doing that to others online. You still
try doing so.

>HTH

Are you sure about that? Not only have you confirmed that you know
snit is a liar - you support it.

--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitlies>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Snit is one f*cked up puppy - who steals our hard earned tax
paying dollars from the government by running a long con for
welfare - who can be reached via telephone - text message - or in
person - by using the publically available contact information
below:

Michael (snit) and Anne Glasser (life-like troll lady)
3181 Willow Dr, Prescott, AZ
86301-4855 
1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425
1.928.776.9519 or 1-(928)-776-9519
They are professional Grifters who live on the benefits your hard
earned tax paying dollars provide. Animal abuser = snit pissed on
his own cat!

On 16/12/2021 13:37, Steve Carroll wrote:
[....]
>
> Stop blowing smoke, fool, it's not working.

You are not being honest.

Will your children be spending Christmas with you .... or with their mother?

On 18/12/2021 07:51, LegionX wrote:
> David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> Wrote in message:r
>> On 18/12/2021 00:28, LegionX wrote:> David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> Wrote in message:r>> On 17/12/2021 14:40, LegionX wrote:> David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> Wrote in message:>>> I suggest you concentrate only on posts which Snit has made here in ACW>> An acceptable suggestion.> >> Good! :-D> > David,> > Why did you snip and run? Here's what you snipped:> >> > <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>> >> I'm not interested in reviewing the feud you lost> > We didn't provide a link to a feud. You suggested that we stick to> lies snit has written since he's been here - you weren't> interested in his lies written elsewhere. We did as you> requested. The url we shared:> > <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>> > Is proof of two separate lies snit has written about Gremlin since> snit has been posting here.> > We didn't participate in their discussion and it's quite clear> that Gremlin proved beyond any doubt that snit was lying about> him. As he wrote.
>
>> One can see how Snit easily got the better of Gremlin, sure!
>
> So much for your claims of seeking the truth as well as being
> truthful. At no point concerning snit have you been truthful.
> This is another example of that, David. Snit didn't get the
> better of Gremlin or anyone else. Instead snit claimed that
> Gremlin had a copy of the bot itself. He also claimed that
> Gremlin had been called out and clarified that he did have a copy
> of the bot because someone called him out on it.
>
> David - the events snit claimed never happened. Your dishonest
> friend snit made everything up. As the contents of the
> url
>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
>
> All clearly show - snit wrote multiple lies about Gremlin and dug
> himself quite the hole in the process.
>
> And you're going out of your way to lie about Gremlin in order to
> support your friend. You can't even dispute the facts here. And
> those are repeated again - snit wrote from his arsehole when he
> made the accusation.
>
> The next lie where he claimed that Gremlin directly lied on you
> when he wrote that you had asked snit for help. You did ask for
> his help with the phone number he doxd Gremlin with. You were
> trying to locate his Business information. And it's obvious to
> almost all? What you would have done with it had you found
> it.
I DID NOT ASK SNIT FOR HIS HELP! *I was trying to help Snit*!
If Dustin Cook provided his business information it would show that he
really had 'turned a corner' and was now being open and honest.
He could then, at long last, put his evil past behind him.
> Your xian attitude towards Gremlin is laughable on a good day.
> More importantly though - your replies to us on this subject are
> letting others see your true colors. They're seeing for
> themselves what a dishonest bad guy you are. There's absolutely
> no reason for any of us to think you've reduced your alcohol
> consumption - certainly nothing about your posts gives any of us
> the impression that you even know what the word truth means.
What you and/or others THINK is irrelevant.
The *FACT* is that I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018

>>>> So what do you have to say for the lies snit wrote here?> >> Nothing. Not my fight.> > We didn't know how much of a weasel you are until now. You asked> for proof of snit writing lies in this newsgroup specifically -> and we provided it. Atleast you can no longer deny that snit is> every bit the liar many have stated he is.
>
>> Can you make better videos than these?
>
> We aren't interested in a topic change just yet. We are enjoying
> seeing snit make a complete fool of you though. As a result we've
> got you directly supporting a poster who is very dishonest
> knowingly lie about one of your adversaries - with your
> blessing.
>
> And this is after you recommended that we only focus on the lies
> he has written here. You can't claim he's an honest person
> without lying your ass off for sure now David. Luckily for you
> though your reputation is already in ruins so you won't lose any
> credibility publically supporting someone who's a liar like
> snit.
>
> You came to pcbutts defense when he was lying and taking credit
> for the work of others. You have a history of supporting trolls
> and liars. Going so far as to lie for them when you
> can.
>
> snit is making a total fool out of you. He isn't your friend -
> because a real friend wouldn't lie as he does and expect you to
> help him try to sell it. And you have done exactly that too,
> David. Multiple times now.
You sound just a sick as Dustin Cook!
>> They might help you pin down who is responsible for the flooder posts.
>
> Thanks for showing Steve Carroll your true colors. It took you
> long enough. He's partially to blame for it. He continued to
> ignore what you were as he attempted to talk tech with you about
> website design. He incorrectly assumed that by treating you as a
> normal poster instead of the pile of shit you are that you'd be
> reasonable and could be taught things. We hope he sees for
> himself now and stops trying to educate you. That'll leave Mike
> Easter as the only poster here who plays devils advocate on your
> behalf. His reputation took a nosedive awhile ago because he
> tried to rewrite the definition of cyber stalking to make it
> appear as if you weren't doing that to others online. You still
> try doing so.
>
>> HTH
>
> Are you sure about that? Not only have you confirmed that you know
> snit is a liar - you support it.
WRONG
I don't support ANYONE who lies.
Dustin Cook lies. He claims that he LIKES to hurt people.
That, Shirley, *IS* a lie ...... isn't it?

On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 05:28:24 +0000, David Brooks
<DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>One can see how Snit easily got the better of Gremlin, sure!

How much do you have to drink before you start "seeing" things
like that?
TIA

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Stalker".
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 08:01:59 +0000, David Brooks
<DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>
>You are not being honest.

Posting to yourself *AGAIN*?
>
>Will your children be spending Christmas with

He's dead, BD. DEAD!!!. Filicide.
He won't be spending Xmas with you. You can always try
confabulating though.
HTH

PS Why are you crossposting to a Mac group without an [OT]. Is
wrecking that group on your agenda too?

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Stalker".
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 08:55:46 +0000, David Brooks
<DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>*I was trying to help Snit*

He's a "bad guy". A *LIAR*, a felon and a troll.
Why help him and refuse to "help" the "good guys" here?
Not posting OT trash to a Mac group would be a good start.
HTH

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Stalker".
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

*SHADOW LIES*!

> On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 08:55:46 +0000, David Brooks
> <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> *I was trying to HELP Snit*

.......to determine whether or not Dustin Cook REALLY has a business as
Cook claims.

I don't support ANYONE who lies.

Dustin Cook lies. He /claims/ that he LIKES to hurt people.

That, surely, *IS* a lie ...... isn't it?

If Dustin Cook provided his business information it would show that he
really had 'turned a corner' and was now being open and honest.

He could then, at long last, put his evil past behind him. A true gift
for Christmas! :-D

=

For anyone who is unaware, Mr Cook wrote the IROK virus, published under
his RAID/SLAM pseudonymn, details of which may be found here:-
https://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/irok.shtml

=

Irok is a virus-worm created by RaiD/SLAM which spreads via IRC and
Microsoft Outlook. The worm is 10001 bytes long DOS-based program that
is heavily packed and encrypted with a protective envelope that uses
anti-debugging tricks.

When run, the worm copies itself to C:\Windows\System\ and C:\Mirc\
folders as IROK.EXE and drops WINRDE.DLL to the \Windows\System\ folder.
This file is not a Windows DLL, it is a data file. The worm also
replaces SCRIPT.INI file in the C:\Mirc\ folder with its own script that
sends the IROK.EXE file to everyone on the IRC channel to which the
infected user joins. The worm finally drops a Visual Basic script file
IROKRUN.VBS to the Windows Startup directory. This script will be
executed next time the system is restarted.

During the next Windows startup, the IROKRUN.VBS script will be
executed. It uses Microsoft Outlook to send the worm executable as
IROK.EXE to 60 recipients whose addresses are taken from each of
Outlook's address books.

The message in which the worm spreads itself looks like this:

Subject: I thought you might like to see this.
Body:

I thought you might like this. I got it from paramount pictures
website. It's a startrek screen saver.

=

After every message is sent they are removed from the 'Sent Items'
folder. Finally the script file is removed from the Windows Startup
directory.

At the same time Irok is a non-resident virus, which scans directories
listed in PATH= variable for COM and EXE files and then infects them.
The virus is a very fast infector. It can infect up to 80 files at a
time. The virus is relocating type - it writes itself to the start of
the file and relocates the original 10kb of the file to the end. The
relocated part is encrypted. Infected files grow 10kb in size.

In some cases the virus can corrupt host programs. The virus has a bug
and it does not supply command line options to the host program
correctly, so every program that operates with command line parameters
will work incorrectly after infection.

The virus avoids infecting files that have extensions and/or their names
start with one of the following:

dll spa man drv scr krnl 386 msc com exp mou gw go sta use gdi con
The virus also deletes the following files:

anti-vir.dat
chklist.ms
chklist.cps
vs.vsn
ivb.ntz
When internal counters of the virus reach certain values, the virus
displays a message on the screen. Most of this message is taken from
lyrics of the song 'Aenema' by the band called 'Tool'. We will not
reproduce the message here as the song seriously needs the Parental
Advisory sticker for explicit lyrics.

The message ends with this text:

People cry and people moan. look for a dry place to call their
own, look for a dry place to rest there bones.
Thanks for reading the text above, I've had enough time to
remove the contents of your hard disk for you. :-)

IRoK v1.1 - RaiD/SLAM[2000]

And indeed, the virus has corrupted files on the hard drive during this
event.

The virus also has several internal text strings:

IRoK v1.1 is initializing... Ok!

Hey You!
<----------- >>> Push enter stupid!

RaiD/SLAM[2000]

The Irok virus-worm will not spread itself via Outlook if Windows
Scripting Host is not installed on the infected system. The worm will
not work if Windows is installed in some other directory than
C:\Windows\ and it will not spread itself via IRC if mIRC is installed
in a directory other than C:\Mirc\. Regardless of software installed,
the worm will infect COM and EXE files on the system it infects.

On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 11:04:57 +0000, David Brooks
<BDB@nomailatall.invalid> wrote:

It's a Linux/Mac/Windows command.

Try "man ping"

Or in your case:

"gay ping"

It might bring more colorful information.
HTH, as always.

PS OT up. Why are you attempting to wreck the Mac groups? Did
they *BAN* (killfile) you *AGAIN*?

><slight snip of inappropriate text>

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

103 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Stalker".
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021