On 2022-05-07 2:58 p.m., Lefty Lundquist wrote:
> On 5/7/2022 5:55 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On May 7, 2022 at 2:45:28 PM MST, "%" wrote
>> <1pCdndOz3Mfrdev_nZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
>>
>>> On 2022-05-07 1:29 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>> On May 7, 2022 at 1:27:31 PM MST, "%" wrote
>>>> <VO2dnWYjZc-vS-v_nZ2dnUU7-emdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2022-05-07 12:34 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On May 7, 2022 at 11:52:59 AM MST, "%" wrote
>>>>>> <DpidnUxaUOCUXev_nZ2dnUU7-WWdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2022-05-06 10:06 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>> On May 6, 2022 at 8:42:27 PM MST, "%" wrote
>>>>>>>> <1-WdnS4rMsI-d-j_nZ2dnUU7-IGdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-06 8:35 p.m., Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On May 6, 2022 at 6:42:09 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <XnsAE8FDCC54EB8CHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       The regulars here don't have short term or long
>>>>>>>>>>> term memory issues, with the exception of David.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You often forget topics have been covered repeatedly. Or you
>>>>>>>>>> do not care. Or
>>>>>>>>>> maybe you just love repetition.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Or, are you forgetting that fromtherafters and apd both asked
>>>>>>>>>>> you to explain
>>>>>>>>>>> your reasoning for describing me as such but you couldn't do so?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have noted specific examples. Hell, I have challenged you to
>>>>>>>>>> note any time I
>>>>>>>>>> have done so not in response to a specific example. There are
>>>>>>>>>> a few such times
>>>>>>>>>> but they are rare.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you were to stop giving such clear examples I would stop
>>>>>>>>>> noting it. Heck,
>>>>>>>>>> there are examples I do not note.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       That's the results of your description that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> created for me and had
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the help of the floodbot to seed search engines with.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I love how you STILL think I somehow manipulated Carroll's
>>>>>>>>>>>> bot. Are you
>>>>>>>>>>>> actively trying to present yourself as a functionally
>>>>>>>>>>>> illiterate fraud?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Snit, it's not a secret that any of us could get the bot to
>>>>>>>>>>> seed material
>>>>>>>>>>> that we wanted it to seed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Interesting you have insider information to know how it grabs
>>>>>>>>>> data. How did
>>>>>>>>>> you come to get this knowledge?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You didn't manipulate a bot and I didn't claim
>>>>>>>>>>> you did.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Remember above where you denied memory issues? LOL! You just
>>>>>>>>>> got done telling
>>>>>>>>>> me I got it to help me (a form of manipulation of it).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       I also didn't accuse anyone of being behind it as you
>>>>>>>>>>> have.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have noted the evidence.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>>>>>> simply took advantage of its tendency to quote conversations
>>>>>>>>>>> and pieces out
>>>>>>>>>>> of context and you rolled with it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> See above on your knowledge of how it grabs data. Curious.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's a little taste of real expertise, asshat:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/gremlinslab
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.tiktok.com/@gremlinhhi
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Without even clicking I bet those are tied to electronics. :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. Just clicked. You have almost 200 hits on some of those
>>>>>>>>>>>> TikTok
>>>>>>>>>>>> videos. So amazing. LOL!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's not the amounts of hits they have, that wasn't the
>>>>>>>>>>> point. It's the
>>>>>>>>>>> content in the video that is. The content in the video
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't support the
>>>>>>>>>>> description you wrote up for me. How do you explain that snit?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I did not watch all, but sees it fits perfectly: You focus on
>>>>>>>>>> your circuitry.
>>>>>>>>>> I have noted that repeatedly. You are merely backing what I
>>>>>>>>>> have said of you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The site actually has video of my cat,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I saw those. Cute cat. And good to see you seem to be able to
>>>>>>>>>> show positive
>>>>>>>>>> feelings.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       some goats (natures lawnmower), some
>>>>>>>>>>> electrical repair teaching videos, a few videos on
>>>>>>>>>>> electronics specifically.
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and for you desperate sad stalking fucks, one video has
>>>>>>>>>>> me! in it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I saw you. I have no issue with that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> When Carroll shows code he IS showing more knowledge that
>>>>>>>>>>>> you do.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh yea? :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Hell, when have you ever posted code in response to a
>>>>>>>>>> tech issue or
>>>>>>>>>> relevant to a discussion on hand? You posted code here... but
>>>>>>>>>> you failed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> your not noting has been noted
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Noted.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but did you record it it's no good if its not noted and recorded
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I corded it. Will record it later.
>>>>>>
>>>>> steve carroll doesn't like you
>>>>
>>>> Or he loves me.
>>>>
>>> its a fine line
>>
>> People have suggested in the past he might have a crush on me. He acts
>> like an
>> unhealthy person getting rejected.
>>
> You said the same thing about Elizabot.
> So how did that one work out for you snit?
>
>
its possible to be loved by more than one person