Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

The world is coming to an end. Please log off.


computers / comp.theory / Re: Proving that P(P) != the correct x86 emulation of the input to H(P,P)

Re: Proving that P(P) != the correct x86 emulation of the input to H(P,P)

<20220610174104.00005991@reddwarf.jmc>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=34147&group=comp.theory#34147

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.theory comp.ai.philosophy sci.logic sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.neodome.net!news.uzoreto.com!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx14.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: flib...@reddwarf.jmc (Mr Flibble)
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy,sci.logic,sci.math
Subject: Re: Proving that P(P) != the correct x86 emulation of the input to
H(P,P)
Message-ID: <20220610174104.00005991@reddwarf.jmc>
References: <N8GdnUDJ0IRRxjz_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<20220610145124.00006b36@reddwarf.jmc>
<oIKdneD0eqar0z7_nZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<20220610150318.0000143d@reddwarf.jmc>
<FIudncIf4s6fzz7_nZ2dnUU7_8xh4p2d@giganews.com>
<20220610152154.000014c7@reddwarf.jmc>
<EOydndJCqYmMyz7_nZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<20220610153727.000015ca@reddwarf.jmc>
<uN2dnUK2NLQ5xT7_nZ2dnUU7_8xh4p2d@giganews.com>
<20220610154757.00001577@reddwarf.jmc>
<BsydnUepqLWJxj7_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<20220610160615.00007726@reddwarf.jmc>
<zp6dneOPmo60_T7_nZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<20220610161958.00006f0a@reddwarf.jmc>
<8ZudnX-C1a3u_j7_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<20220610163735.000057bc@reddwarf.jmc>
<5YSdncjj4qcd-z7_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<20220610164734.00001fca@reddwarf.jmc>
<3-6dndSSYsy29D7_nZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<20220610165719.00000b46@reddwarf.jmc>
<BZqdnSVZ79vg7j7_nZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Organization: Jupiter Mining Corp
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 1008
X-Complaints-To: abuse@eweka.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:41:04 UTC
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 17:41:04 +0100
X-Received-Bytes: 60426
 by: Mr Flibble - Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:41 UTC

On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 11:38:19 -0500
olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:

> On 6/10/2022 10:57 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:54:18 -0500
> > olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/10/2022 10:47 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:42:55 -0500
> >>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 6/10/2022 10:37 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:29:54 -0500
> >>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 6/10/2022 10:19 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:15:52 -0500
> >>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 6/10/2022 10:06 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:54:10 -0500
> >>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2022 9:47 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:43:47 -0500
> >>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2022 9:37 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:32:47 -0500
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2022 9:21 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:15:29 -0500
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2022 9:03 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:59:17 -0500
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2022 8:51 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:43:48 -0500
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2022 8:35 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:33:27 -0500
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2022 8:29 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:27:28 -0500
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2022 8:23 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:05:57 -0500
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2022 6:11 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 17:35:05 -0500
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2022 5:27 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 17:18:38 -0500
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2022 5:15 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 17:09:08 -0500
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2022 4:54 PM, Richard Damon
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/22 5:29 PM, olcott wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2022 4:13 PM, Richard Damon
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/22 5:00 PM, olcott wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2022 3:25 PM, Richard
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Damon wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/22 4:13 PM, olcott
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2022 2:57 PM, Richard
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Damon wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/22 3:52 PM, olcott
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2022 2:38 PM, Richard
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Damon wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/22 3:26 PM, olcott
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2022 1:12 PM,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Damon wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/22 1:55 PM, olcott
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2022 12:46 PM, Mr
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12:39:32 -0500 olcott
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <NoOne@NoWhere.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2022 12:28 PM,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mr Flibble wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12:15:24 -0500 olcott
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <NoOne@NoWhere.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2022 12:06 PM,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Damon wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/22 12:54 PM,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2022 11:34
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AM, Richard Damon
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/22 11:47
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AM, olcott wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> void P(u32 x)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      if
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (H(x, x)) HERE:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goto HERE;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return; }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> int main()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      P(P);
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _P()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012e7](01)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 55 push ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012e8](02)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8bec mov ebp,esp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012ea](03)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8b4508 mov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eax,[ebp+08]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012ed](01)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50 push eax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012ee](03)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8b4d08 mov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecx,[ebp+08]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012f1](01) 51
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push ecx
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012f2](05)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e880feffff call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00001177 // call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H [000012f7](03)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 83c408 add
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> esp,+08
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012fa](02)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 85c0 test
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eax,eax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012fc](02)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7402 jz 00001300
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012fe](02)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ebfe jmp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 000012fe
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001300](01)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5d pop ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001301](01)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c3 ret Size in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bytes:(0027)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001301]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _main()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001307](01)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 55 push ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001308](02)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8bec mov ebp,esp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000130a](05)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 68e7120000 push
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 000012e7 // push
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P [0000130f](05)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e8d3ffffff call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 000012e7 // call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P [00001314](03)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 83c404 add
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> esp,+04
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001317](02)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 33c0 xor eax,eax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001319](01)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5d pop ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000131a](01)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c3 ret Size in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bytes:(0020)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000131a]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     machine
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack stack
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine assembly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> address address
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data code
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =======> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =======> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =======> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ========> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ============> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001307][00102190][00000000]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 55 push ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001308][00102190][00000000]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8bec mov ebp,esp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000130a][0010218c][000012e7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 68e7120000 push
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 000012e7 // push
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000130f][00102188][00001314]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e8d3ffffff call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 000012e7 // call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012e7][00102184][00102190]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 55 push ebp //
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enter executed P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012e8][00102184][00102190]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8bec mov ebp,esp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012ea][00102184][00102190]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8b4508 mov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eax,[ebp+08]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012ed][00102180][000012e7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50 push eax //
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012ee][00102180][000012e7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8b4d08 mov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecx,[ebp+08]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012f1][0010217c][000012e7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 51 push ecx //
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012f2][00102178][000012f7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e880feffff call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00001177 // call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Begin Local Halt
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Decider
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Simulation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Execution Trace
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stored at:212244
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012e7][00212230][00212234]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 55 push ebp //
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enter emulated P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012e8][00212230][00212234]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8bec mov ebp,esp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012ea][00212230][00212234]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8b4508 mov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eax,[ebp+08]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012ed][0021222c][000012e7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50 push eax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> // push P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012ee][0021222c][000012e7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8b4d08 mov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecx,[ebp+08]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012f1][00212228][000012e7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 51 push ecx //
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012f2][00212224][000012f7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e880feffff call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00001177 // call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, by what
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference manual
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a call 00001177
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> followedby the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 000012e7.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your "CPU" is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> broken, or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorrect.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FAIL.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012e7][0025cc58][0025cc5c]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 55 push ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> // enter
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulated P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012e8][0025cc58][0025cc5c]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8bec mov ebp,esp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012ea][0025cc58][0025cc5c]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8b4508 mov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eax,[ebp+08]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012ed][0025cc54][000012e7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50 push eax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> // push P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012ee][0025cc54][000012e7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8b4d08 mov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecx,[ebp+08]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012f1][0025cc50][000012e7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 51 push ecx //
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012f2][0025cc4c][000012f7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e880feffff call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00001177 // call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H Local Halt
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Decider:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Infinite
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recursion
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Detected
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Simulation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stopped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is completely
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obvious that when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H(P,P) correctly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulates its
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> input that it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must emulate the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first seven
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instructions of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P. Because the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seventh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction of P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeats this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process we know
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with complete
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certainty that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the correct and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complete
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulation of P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by H would never
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reach its final
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “ret”
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thus never
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> halts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Problem, the 7th
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intruction DOESN't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Just repeat the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> procedure",
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because that H
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always has the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> option to abort
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its simulation,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just like this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> onne did, and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return to its P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and see it halt.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THAT YOU ARE SIMPLY
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TOO STUPID TO
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNDERSTAND THIS IS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NO ACTUAL REBUTTAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AT ALL:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The partial correct
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> x86 emulation of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the input to H(P,P)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusively proves
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the complete
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and correct x86
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulation would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never stop
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You SAY that, but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you don't answer the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actual questions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about HOW.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THAT YOU ARE SIMPLY
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TOO STUPID TO
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNDERSTAND THIS IS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NO EVIDENCE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WHAT-SO-EVER THAT I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DID NOT COMPLETELY
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PROVE THAT THE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CORRECT PARTIAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EMULATION OF THE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INPUT TO H(P,P)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CONCLUSIVELY PROVES
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THAT THE CORRECT AND
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> COMPLETE X86
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EMULATION OF THE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INPUT TO H(P,P)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WOULD NEVER STOP
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RUNNING.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is completely
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obvious that when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H(P,P) correctly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulates its input
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it must emulate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first seven
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instructions of P.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because the seventh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction of P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeats this process
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we know with complete
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certainty that the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct and complete
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulation of P by H
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would never reach its
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> final “ret”
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction, thus
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never halts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If P should have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> halted (i.e. no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite loop) then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your simulation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detector, S (not H),
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gets the answer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong. You S is NOT a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> halting decider.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Flibble
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THAT YOU ARE SIMPLY TOO
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> STUPID TO UNDERSTAND
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THIS IS NO ACTUAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> REBUTTAL AT ALL.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _P()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001352](01)  55
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push ebp [00001353](02)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8bec mov ebp,esp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001355](03) 8b4508
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mov eax,[ebp+08]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001358](01)  50 push
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eax // push P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001359](03) 8b4d08
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mov ecx,[ebp+08]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000135c](01) 51 push
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecx // push P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000135d](05)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e840feffff call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 000011a2 // call H
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001362](03) 83c408
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add esp,+08
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001365](02) 85c0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test eax,eax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001367](02) 7402 jz
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0000136b
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001369](02) ebfe
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jmp 00001369
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000136b](01) 5d pop
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ebp [0000136c](01) c3
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ret Size in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bytes:(0027) [0000136c]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is completely
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obvious that when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H(P,P) correctly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulates its input
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it must emulate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first seven
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instructions of P.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because the seventh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction of P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeats this process
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we know with complete
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certainty that the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct and complete
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulation of P by H
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would never reach its
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> final “ret”
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction, thus
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never halts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are going around and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around and around in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> circles. I will try
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you replace the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opcodes "EB FE" at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00001369 with the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opcodes "90 90" then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your H gets the answer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong: P should have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> halted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Flibble
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I already said before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is merely your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluelessness that when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H(P,P) is invoked the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct x86 emulation of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the input to H(P,P) makes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and code after [0000135d]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unreachable.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong, because when that H
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return the value 0, it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will get there.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like I said people that are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dumber than a box of rocks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be able to correctly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand this.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When H(P,P) is invoked the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correctly emulated input to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H(P,P) cannot possibly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reach any instruction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beyond [0000135d].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, you are defining that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you H(P,P) never returns
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because it is caught in the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite rcursion.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thats fine, just says it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't be the correctly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answering decider you claim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to be.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have corrected you on this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too many times.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How. You need to define what
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H(P,P) actually does.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have explained that too many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> times.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To understand that H(P,P)==0 is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct we only need to know
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that H performs a correct x86
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulation of its input and then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examine the execution trace.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And a CORRECT emulation of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code will Halt if H(P,P) returns
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0, which it can only do if it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not actually do a correct
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The correctly emulated input to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H(P,P) never gets past its
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine address [0000135d].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if H actually doesn't return
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0. Yes, H can't correctly return
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0 if it correctly emulates its
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> input, but you can't drop that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requirement.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> void P(u32 x)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    if (H(x, x))
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      HERE: goto
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HERE; return;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> int main()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    Output("Input_Halts
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = ", H((u32)P, (u32)P)); }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When H returns 0 it does not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> returns 0 to P it returns 0 to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> main().
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it also return 0 to the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> computation P(P), maybe not the copy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it is simulating, since it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aborts that before it get to it,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Finally you are not stupid or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deceptive.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If H never returns a value to P then H
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a halting decider; if H
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> returns a value of 0 to main() when P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> halts then H is not a halting decider.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H is not a halting decider; H is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulation detector, S.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Flibble
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other words you are saying the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infintely nested emulation only excutes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a few steps and then it stops on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its own.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am saying that your H is not a halting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decider; I am saying that your H is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a simulation detector, S.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Flibble
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are saying that you simply "don't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe in" simulating halt deciders.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You haven't got a simulating halt decider,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what you have got is a simulation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detector.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Flibble
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is an easily verified fact that H does
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correctly decide the halt status of its
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> input.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> void Infinite_Loop()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HERE: goto HERE;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> int main()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Output("Input_Halts = ",
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H0(Infinite_Loop)); }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _Infinite_Loop()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001342](01) 55 push ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001343](02) 8bec mov ebp,esp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001345](02) ebfe jmp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00001345 [00001347](01) 5d
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pop ebp [00001348](01) c3 ret
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0007) [00001348]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _main()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001372](01) 55 push ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001373](02) 8bec mov ebp,esp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001375](05) 6842130000 push
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00001342 [0000137a](05) e833fdffff
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> call 000010b2 [0000137f](03) 83c404
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add esp,+04 [00001382](01) 50
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push eax [00001383](05) 6823040000
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push 00000423 [00001388](05) e8e5f0ffff
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> call 00000472 [0000138d](03) 83c408
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add esp,+08 [00001390](02) 33c0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xor eax,eax [00001392](01) 5d
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pop ebp [00001393](01) c3
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ret Size in bytes:(0034) [00001393]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine stack stack
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine assembly address address data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code language ======== ======== =======> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ========= ============> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001372][0010228f][00000000] 55 push ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001373][0010228f][00000000] 8bec mov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ebp,esp [00001375][0010228b][00001342]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6842130000 push 00001342 // push
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _Infinite_Loop
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000137a][00102287][0000137f] e833fdffff
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> call 000010b2 // call H0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Execution Trace Stored at:212343
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001342][00212333][00212337] 55 push ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001343][00212333][00212337] 8bec mov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ebp,esp [00001345][00212333][00212337] ebfe
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jmp 00001345 [00001345][00212333][00212337]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ebfe jmp 00001345 Local Halt Decider:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Infinite Loop Detected Simulation Stopped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000137f][0010228f][00000000] 83c404
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add esp,+04 [00001382][0010228b][00000000]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50 push eax [00001383][00102287][00000423]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6823040000 push 00000423
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001388][00102287][00000423] e8e5f0ffff
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> call 00000472 Input_Halts = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000138d][0010228f][00000000] 83c408
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add esp,+08 [00001390][0010228f][00000000]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 33c0 xor eax,eax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001392][00102293][00100000] 5d pop ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001393][00102297][00000004] c3 ret
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Number of Instructions Executed(680)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> int Sum(int X, int Y)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return X + Y;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> int main()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Output("Input_Halts = ",
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H2(Sum, 3, 4)); }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _Sum()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012b6](01) 55 push ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012b7](02) 8bec mov ebp,esp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [000012b9](03) 8b4508 mov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eax,[ebp+08] [000012bc](03) 03450c
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add eax,[ebp+0c] [000012bf](01) 5d
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pop ebp [000012c0](01) c3
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ret Size in bytes:(0011) [000012c0]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _main()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001316](01) 55 push ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001317](02) 8bec mov ebp,esp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [00001319](02) 6a04 push +04
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000131b](02) 6a03 push +03
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0000131d](05) 68b6120000 push
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 000012b6 [00001322](05) e85ffaffff
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> call 00000d86 [00001327](03) 83c40c
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add esp,+0c [0000132a](01) 50
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push eax [0000132b](05) 6807040000
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push 00000407 [00001330](05) e821f1ffff
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> call 00000456 [00001335](03) 83c408
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add esp,+08 [00001338](02) 33c0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xor eax,eax [0000133a](01) 5d
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pop ebp [0000133b](01) c3
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ret Size in bytes:(0038) [0000133b]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine stack stack
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine assembly address address data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code language ======== ======== =======> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ========= ============> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...[00001316][001021d7][00000000] 55 push
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ebp ...[00001317][001021d7][00000000] 8bec
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mov ebp,esp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...[00001319][001021d3][00000004] 6a04
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push +04 ...[0000131b][001021cf][00000003]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a03 push +03
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...[0000131d][001021cb][000012b6]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 68b6120000 push 000012b6
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...[00001322][001021c7][00001327]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e85ffaffff call 00000d86
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Execution Trace Stored at:21228b
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...[000012b6][00212273][00212277] 55 push
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ebp ...[000012b7][00212273][00212277] 8bec
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mov ebp,esp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...[000012b9][00212273][00212277] 8b4508
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mov eax,[ebp+08]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...[000012bc][00212273][00212277] 03450c
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add eax,[ebp+0c]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...[000012bf][00212277][00000e54] 5d pop
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ebp ...[000012c0][0021227b][00000003] c3
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ret ...[00001327][001021d7][00000000]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 83c40c add esp,+0c
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...[0000132a][001021d3][00000001] 50 push
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eax ...[0000132b][001021cf][00000407]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6807040000 push 00000407
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---[00001330][001021cf][00000407]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e821f1ffff call 00000456 Input_Halts = 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...[00001335][001021d7][00000000] 83c408
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add esp,+08
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...[00001338][001021d7][00000000] 33c0 xor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eax,eax ...[0000133a][001021db][00100000]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5d pop ebp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...[0000133b][001021df][00000004] c3 ret
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Number of Instructions Executed(660)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All you are showing here is that your H can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide the halt status of two trivial cases
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> however you have not shown that H can decide
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the halt status of non-trivial cases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "You haven't got a simulating halt decider"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apologize and we can move on.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I posted four paragraphs but you ignored three
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of them. Lets try again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IF YOU DON'T APOLOGIZE THEN WE CANNOT MOVE ON
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> !!!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I need to try again. Perhaps it will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help if I combine the four paragraphs into a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> single paragraph:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All you are showing here is that your H can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide the halt status of two trivial cases
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> however you have not shown that H can decide
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the halt status of non-trivial cases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H is a halt decider for a subset of its inputs.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H is a halt decider for P.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When H is a halt decider for P all of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conventional halting problem proofs have been
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refuted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For H to be a halt decider it needs to be a halt
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decider for all inputs not a subset.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Publish the source code of your halt
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decider so we can see what classes of programs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your H can decide. I am interested in deciding
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the halt status of programs containing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-trivial branching logic predicated on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arbitrary program input.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> These are out-of-scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You may assert this but that doesn't make your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assertion true. If they are out-of-scope then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your H is out of scope of the Halting Problem.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Crucially if your H cannot return an answer for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an arbitrary non-halting program in finite time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then it isn't a halt decider.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One can either say that H is a halt decider for a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subset of its inputs or that H is a halt
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> determiner. As long as H(P,P) correctly decides
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its input all of the conventional HP proofs have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been refuted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we are to make progress you need to publish the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code of your infinite loop detector.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you can't understand 14 lines of code then this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusively proves that you won't understand
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of pages of code.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because people here are only interested in rebuttal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and don't give a rat's ass about an honest dialogue
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I make the price of a continued dialogue key points
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of mutual agreement.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't understand that H(P,P)==0 is correct
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then providing the source code will only provide
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the means for denigration based on lack of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comprehension. I absolutely will not tolerate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we are to make progress you need to publish the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source code of how your infinite loop detector works
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as your disassembly traces DO NOT provide that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Flibble
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will not do that until many many points of mutual
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreement have occurred. Until many many points of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mutual agreement have occurred my assessment that my
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewers are lying cheating bastards remains
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affirmed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At this point, as you refuse to provide evidence to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the contrary, I conclude that the only case of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-halting behavior you can detect are the execution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the Intel x86 opcodes "EB FE". Being only able to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detect a single case of non-halting behavior out of a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> total 2^n cases obviously does not qualify as a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> halting decider.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know what you must do to refute this conclusion:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide evidence in the form of source code.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Flibble
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That I prove that H(P,P)==0 by itself refutes the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> halting problem proofs that claim that neither 0 nor 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is correct.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Your H gets the answer wrong if P would have halted as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> only your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> That people with shit for brains think that is gets the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrong answer is no rebuttal at all.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Shit for brains? Your insults are definitely increasing in
> >>>>>>>>>>> intensity, have you checked your blood pressure recently?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> /Flibble
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> My proof has gotten down to the point that it is proven
> >>>>>>>>>> correct on the basis of easily verified facts. Lying
> >>>>>>>>>> cheating bastards disagree with these easily verified
> >>>>>>>>>> facts.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Why don't you just take a step back for a minute and
> >>>>>>>>> consider what if you are wrong and there isn't actually a
> >>>>>>>>> grand conspiracy of liars acting against you?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> When I say that H(P,P)==0 on the basis of the actual behavior
> >>>>>>>> of the actual input all of the rebuttals are of the form that
> >>>>>>>> H is wrong on the basis of the behavior of a non-input.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A halting P isn't non-input though; your H gets the answer
> >>>>>>> wrong if P would have halted after calling H and H isn't a
> >>>>>>> recursive call into a simulator.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> /Flibble
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You don't even understand the simple concept of unreachable
> >>>>>> code.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I do though.
> >>>>
> >>>> You have proven that you do not even understand the simple
> >>>> concept of unreachable code.
> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unreachable_code
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It is an easily verified fact that the actual behavior of the
> >>>>>> actual input to H(P,P) conclusively proves that it never
> >>>>>> reaches its "ret" instruction thus never halts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Unless P is a program which halts after calling H.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The complete and correct x86 emulation of the input to H(P,P)
> >>>>>> by H would never stop running.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Not if P halts, i.e. invokes the decider but doesn't then
> >>>>> pathologically flip the result.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /Flibble
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Because you can't even understand the concept of unreachable code
> >>>> you are totally unqualified to review my work.
> >>>
> >>> I do though ergo I am totally qualified to review your work.
> >>>
> >>> The parts of P that are unreachable when P is invoked by your
> >>> simulation bollocks are not unreachable when considered by a sane
> >>> halt decider (which is what the halting problem proofs you are
> >>> attempting to refute consider).
> >>>
> >>> /Flibble
> >>>
> >>
> >> _P()
> >> [000012e7](01) 55 push ebp
> >> [000012e8](02) 8bec mov ebp,esp
> >> [000012ea](03) 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08]
> >> [000012ed](01) 50 push eax
> >> [000012ee](03) 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08]
> >> [000012f1](01) 51 push ecx
> >> [000012f2](05) e880feffff call 00001177 // call H
> >> [000012f7](03) 83c408 add esp,+08
> >> [000012fa](02) 85c0 test eax,eax
> >> [000012fc](02) 7402 jz 00001300
> >> [000012fe](02) ebfe jmp 000012fe
> >> [00001300](01) 5d pop ebp
> >> [00001301](01) c3 ret
> >> Size in bytes:(0027) [00001301]
> >>
> >> That you believe that the correctly emulated input to H(P,P) can
> >> ever get past the machine address of [000012f2] conclusively
> >> proves that you are totally incompetent to review my work.
> >>
> >> Some of your replies refer to changing the opcodes in the
> >> unreachable part of the code.
> >
> > I suggest you review [Strachey 1965] again: the program is an
> > impossible program because the infinite loop *is* reachable.
> >
> > /Flibble
> >
>
> Changing the subject is one of the most common means of fake rebuttal.
I am not changing the subject you fucking idiot.

/Flibble

SubjectRepliesAuthor
o No one has sufficiently addressed this H(P,P)==0

By: olcott on Thu, 9 Jun 2022

121olcott
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor