On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:51:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
<pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:

>On 3/31/2024 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>> Sherman) wrote:
>>
>>> |
>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>> | Hamas."
>>> | ...
>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>
>>> --bks
>>
>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons.
>
>He said "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick." That
>means he's advocating the use of nuclear weapons by unavoidable implication.
>That's what it means.

Damn liberals are dumb. He said not one word about nuclear weapons.
It's your inability to think that caused your logic leap.

>
>He also said "We shouldn’t be spending a dime on humanitarian aid" for Gaza.
>He's advocating genocide, as you neo-Nazis always do.

Tell us how much of the aid we send there gets to the people. What we
send goes to support the terrorists.

On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 07:00:46 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>Sherman) wrote:
>
>> |
>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>> | Hamas."
>> | ...
>><https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>
>> --bks
>
>NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons. He
>says that the war should end quickly like Nagasaki but he does not say
>to use nuclear weapons.
>
>This is why YOU have no credibility and neither does the media.

And Bradley the coward runs away again.

On 4/1/2024 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:51:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/31/2024 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>
>>>> |
>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>> | Hamas."
>>>> | ...
>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>
>>>> --bks
>>>
>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons.
>>
>> He said "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick." That
>> means he's advocating the use of nuclear weapons by unavoidable implication.
>> That's what it means.
>
> He said not one word about nuclear weapons.

He said to do it "quick" like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Those were done "quick"
because of nuclear weapons.

He said to use nuclear weapons in Gaza. That's what he said.

On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 05:46:03 -0700, pyotr filipivich
<pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:

>On 4/1/2024 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:51:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/31/2024 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> |
>>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>>> | Hamas."
>>>>> | ...
>>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>>
>>>>> --bks
>>>>
>>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons.
>>>
>>> He said "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick." That
>>> means he's advocating the use of nuclear weapons by unavoidable implication.
>>> That's what it means.
>>
>> He said not one word about nuclear weapons.
>
>He said to do it "quick" like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Those were done "quick"
>because of nuclear weapons.
>
>He said to use nuclear weapons in Gaza. That's what he said.

Then you can quote where the word "nuclear" was used.
We'll wait.

On 4/2/2024 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 05:46:03 -0700, pyotr filipivich
> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/1/2024 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:51:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/31/2024 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>>>> | Hamas."
>>>>>> | ...
>>>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>
>>>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons.
>>>>
>>>> He said "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick." That
>>>> means he's advocating the use of nuclear weapons by unavoidable implication.
>>>> That's what it means.
>>>
>>> He said not one word about nuclear weapons.
>>
>> He said to do it "quick" like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Those were done "quick"
>> because of nuclear weapons.
>>
>> He said to use nuclear weapons in Gaza. That's what he said.
>
> Then you can quote where the word "nuclear" was used.

No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
use of nuclear weapons. They have been for more than 70 years.

On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 09:38:47 -0700, pyotr filipivich
<pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:

>On 4/2/2024 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 05:46:03 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/1/2024 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:51:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/31/2024 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>>>>> | Hamas."
>>>>>>> | ...
>>>>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons.
>>>>>
>>>>> He said "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick." That
>>>>> means he's advocating the use of nuclear weapons by unavoidable implication.
>>>>> That's what it means.
>>>>
>>>> He said not one word about nuclear weapons.
>>>
>>> He said to do it "quick" like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Those were done "quick"
>>> because of nuclear weapons.
>>>
>>> He said to use nuclear weapons in Gaza. That's what he said.
>>
>> Then you can quote where the word "nuclear" was used.
>
>No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
>quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
>use of nuclear weapons. They have been for more than 70 years.

Just quote for us where the word "nuclear" was used.

On 4/3/2024 3:54 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 09:38:47 -0700, pyotr filipivich
> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/2/2024 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 05:46:03 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/1/2024 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:51:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/31/2024 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>>>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>>>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>>>>>> | Hamas."
>>>>>>>> | ...
>>>>>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He said "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick." That
>>>>>> means he's advocating the use of nuclear weapons by unavoidable implication.
>>>>>> That's what it means.
>>>>>
>>>>> He said not one word about nuclear weapons.
>>>>
>>>> He said to do it "quick" like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Those were done "quick"
>>>> because of nuclear weapons.
>>>>
>>>> He said to use nuclear weapons in Gaza. That's what he said.
>>>
>>> Then you can quote where the word "nuclear" was used.
>>
>> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
>> quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
>> use of nuclear weapons. They have been for more than 70 years.
>
> Just quote for us where the word "nuclear" was used.

No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
use of nuclear weapons, especially when both Nagasaki and Hiroshima are
mentioned in the same context. They have been for more than 70 years. Walberg
advocated dropping nuclear weapons on Gaza.

pyotr filipivich wrote:
> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of
> stopping a war quickly are understood — at least by thinking
> persons — to be references to the use of nuclear weapons,
> especially when both Nagasaki and Hiroshima are mentioned in the
> same context. They have been for more than 70 years. Walberg
> advocated dropping nuclear weapons on Gaza.

Why do you need to be so stupid? Does it give you a secret thrill
like sixty year fatty streaking AYSO?

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

NoBody wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 07:00:46 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>> Sherman) wrote:
>>
>>> |
>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>> | Hamas."
>>> | ...
>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>
>>> --bks
>>
>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons. He
>> says that the war should end quickly like Nagasaki but he does not say
>> to use nuclear weapons.
>>
>> This is why YOU have no credibility and neither does the media.
>
> And Bradley the coward runs away again.
>

Why do you need to be so stupid? Does it give you a secret thrill
like sixty year fatty streaking AYSO?

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 06:55:46 -0700, pyotr filipivich
<pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:

>On 4/3/2024 3:54 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 09:38:47 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/2/2024 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 05:46:03 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/1/2024 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:51:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/31/2024 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>>>>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>>>>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>>>>>>> | Hamas."
>>>>>>>>> | ...
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He said "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick." That
>>>>>>> means he's advocating the use of nuclear weapons by unavoidable implication.
>>>>>>> That's what it means.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He said not one word about nuclear weapons.
>>>>>
>>>>> He said to do it "quick" like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Those were done "quick"
>>>>> because of nuclear weapons.
>>>>>
>>>>> He said to use nuclear weapons in Gaza. That's what he said.
>>>>
>>>> Then you can quote where the word "nuclear" was used.
>>>
>>> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
>>> quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
>>> use of nuclear weapons. They have been for more than 70 years.
>>
>> Just quote for us where the word "nuclear" was used.
>
>No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
>quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
>use of nuclear weapons, especially when both Nagasaki and Hiroshima are
>mentioned in the same context. They have been for more than 70 years. Walberg
>advocated dropping nuclear weapons on Gaza.

Thank you for your admission that the words "nuclear weapons" were
not used.

On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 18:22:25 -0700, Siri Cruise
<chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:

>NoBody wrote:
>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 07:00:46 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>
>>>> |
>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>> | Hamas."
>>>> | ...
>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>
>>>> --bks
>>>
>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons. He
>>> says that the war should end quickly like Nagasaki but he does not say
>>> to use nuclear weapons.
>>>
>>> This is why YOU have no credibility and neither does the media.
>>
>> And Bradley the coward runs away again.
>>
>
>Why do you need to be so stupid? Does it give you a secret thrill
>like sixty year fatty streaking AYSO?

Ah so you're a nasty drunk. Got it.

NoBody wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 18:22:25 -0700, Siri Cruise
> <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> NoBody wrote:
>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 07:00:46 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> |
>>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>>> | Hamas."
>>>>> | ...
>>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>>
>>>>> --bks
>>>>
>>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons. He
>>>> says that the war should end quickly like Nagasaki but he does not say
>>>> to use nuclear weapons.
>>>>
>>>> This is why YOU have no credibility and neither does the media.
>>>
>>> And Bradley the coward runs away again.
>>>
>>
>> Why do you need to be so stupid? Does it give you a secret thrill
>> like sixty year fatty streaking AYSO?
>
> Ah so you're a nasty drunk. Got it.
>

So the answer is yes.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

On 4/4/2024 3:53 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 06:55:46 -0700, pyotr filipivich
> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/3/2024 3:54 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 09:38:47 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/2/2024 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 05:46:03 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/1/2024 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:51:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/31/2024 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>>>>>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>>>>>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>>>>>>>> | Hamas."
>>>>>>>>>> | ...
>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He said "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick." That
>>>>>>>> means he's advocating the use of nuclear weapons by unavoidable implication.
>>>>>>>> That's what it means.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He said not one word about nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He said to do it "quick" like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Those were done "quick"
>>>>>> because of nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He said to use nuclear weapons in Gaza. That's what he said.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then you can quote where the word "nuclear" was used.
>>>>
>>>> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
>>>> quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
>>>> use of nuclear weapons. They have been for more than 70 years.
>>>
>>> Just quote for us where the word "nuclear" was used.
>>
>> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
>> quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
>> use of nuclear weapons, especially when both Nagasaki and Hiroshima are
>> mentioned in the same context. They have been for more than 70 years. Walberg
>> advocated dropping nuclear weapons on Gaza.
>
> Thank you for your admission that the words "nuclear weapons" were
> not used.

They didn't need to be expressly used. Everyone knows that's what the
knuckle-dragging Republiscum/QAnon whackjob meant.

On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 18:20:15 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:

>pyotr filipivich wrote:
>> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of
>> stopping a war quickly are understood — at least by thinking
>> persons — to be references to the use of nuclear weapons,
>> especially when both Nagasaki and Hiroshima are mentioned in the
>> same context. They have been for more than 70 years. Walberg
>> advocated dropping nuclear weapons on Gaza.
>
>Why do you need to be so stupid? Does it give you a secret thrill
>like sixty year fatty streaking AYSO?

It makes sense to me. Wahlberg is backpedaling which also make sense. If I'd said
something that stupid, I'd run away from it too.

Swill
--
"Eventually he turns on everyone, and soon it will be you and then the entire country."
- Anthony Scaramucci

https://www.gocomics.com/robrogers/2024/03/28

https://www.forwardparty.com/ . .

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 05:27:30 -0700, Siri Cruise
<chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:

>NoBody wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 18:22:25 -0700, Siri Cruise
>> <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 07:00:46 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>>>> | Hamas."
>>>>>> | ...
>>>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>
>>>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons. He
>>>>> says that the war should end quickly like Nagasaki but he does not say
>>>>> to use nuclear weapons.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is why YOU have no credibility and neither does the media.
>>>>
>>>> And Bradley the coward runs away again.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why do you need to be so stupid? Does it give you a secret thrill
>>> like sixty year fatty streaking AYSO?
>>
>> Ah so you're a nasty drunk. Got it.
>>
>
>So the answer is yes.

To that you're drunk? Absolutely.
As to whatever you were rambling about, ask something that makes sense
first.

On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:33:09 -0700, pyotr filipivich
<pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:

>On 4/4/2024 3:53 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 06:55:46 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/3/2024 3:54 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 09:38:47 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/2/2024 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 05:46:03 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/1/2024 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:51:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 3/31/2024 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>>>>>>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>>>>>>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>>>>>>>>> | Hamas."
>>>>>>>>>>> | ...
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He said "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick." That
>>>>>>>>> means he's advocating the use of nuclear weapons by unavoidable implication.
>>>>>>>>> That's what it means.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He said not one word about nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He said to do it "quick" like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Those were done "quick"
>>>>>>> because of nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He said to use nuclear weapons in Gaza. That's what he said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you can quote where the word "nuclear" was used.
>>>>>
>>>>> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
>>>>> quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
>>>>> use of nuclear weapons. They have been for more than 70 years.
>>>>
>>>> Just quote for us where the word "nuclear" was used.
>>>
>>> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
>>> quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
>>> use of nuclear weapons, especially when both Nagasaki and Hiroshima are
>>> mentioned in the same context. They have been for more than 70 years. Walberg
>>> advocated dropping nuclear weapons on Gaza.
>>
>> Thank you for your admission that the words "nuclear weapons" were
>> not used.
>
>They didn't need to be expressly used. Everyone knows that's what the
>knuckle-dragging Republiscum/QAnon whackjob meant.

Never let the fact that the words did not appear to claim that they
did.

Damn libs are stupid.

On 4/5/2024 3:52 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:33:09 -0700, pyotr filipivich
> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/4/2024 3:53 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 06:55:46 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/3/2024 3:54 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 09:38:47 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/2/2024 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 05:46:03 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/1/2024 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:51:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/31/2024 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>>>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>>>>>>>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>>>>>>>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>>>>>>>>>> | Hamas."
>>>>>>>>>>>> | ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He said "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick." That
>>>>>>>>>> means he's advocating the use of nuclear weapons by unavoidable implication.
>>>>>>>>>> That's what it means.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He said not one word about nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He said to do it "quick" like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Those were done "quick"
>>>>>>>> because of nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He said to use nuclear weapons in Gaza. That's what he said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then you can quote where the word "nuclear" was used.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
>>>>>> quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
>>>>>> use of nuclear weapons. They have been for more than 70 years.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just quote for us where the word "nuclear" was used.
>>>>
>>>> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
>>>> quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
>>>> use of nuclear weapons, especially when both Nagasaki and Hiroshima are
>>>> mentioned in the same context. They have been for more than 70 years. Walberg
>>>> advocated dropping nuclear weapons on Gaza.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your admission that the words "nuclear weapons" were
>>> not used.
>>
>> They didn't need to be expressly used. Everyone knows that's what the
>> knuckle-dragging Republiscum/QAnon whackjob meant.
>
> Never let the fact that the words did not appear to claim that they
> did.

The word "nuclear" didn't need to appear. It was necessarily implied by the
context. The neo-Nazi was advocating the use of nuclear weapons. That's what "It
should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick." necessarily means.
Everyone knows it.

On 4/5/24 10:50 AM, pyotr filipivich wrote:
> On 4/5/2024 3:52 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:33:09 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/4/2024 3:53 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 06:55:46 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/3/2024 3:54 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 09:38:47 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/2/2024 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 05:46:03 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/1/2024 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:51:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>>>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/31/2024 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> (Bradley K.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Hamas."
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>          --bks
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He said "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it
>>>>>>>>>>> over quick." That
>>>>>>>>>>> means he's advocating the use of nuclear weapons by
>>>>>>>>>>> unavoidable implication.
>>>>>>>>>>> That's what it means.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He said not one word about nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He said to do it "quick" like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Those
>>>>>>>>> were done "quick"
>>>>>>>>> because of nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He said to use nuclear weapons in Gaza. That's what he said.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then you can quote where the word "nuclear" was used.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of
>>>>>>> stopping a war
>>>>>>> quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be
>>>>>>> references to the
>>>>>>> use of nuclear weapons. They have been for more than 70 years.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just quote for us where the word "nuclear" was used.
>>>>>
>>>>> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of
>>>>> stopping a war
>>>>> quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be
>>>>> references to the
>>>>> use of nuclear weapons, especially when both Nagasaki and Hiroshima
>>>>> are
>>>>> mentioned in the same context. They have been for more than 70
>>>>> years. Walberg
>>>>> advocated dropping nuclear weapons on Gaza.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your admission that  the words "nuclear weapons" were
>>>> not used.
>>>
>>> They didn't need to be expressly used. Everyone knows that's what the
>>> knuckle-dragging Republiscum/QAnon whackjob meant.
>>
>> Never let the fact that the words did not appear to claim that they
>> did.
>
> The word "nuclear" didn't need to appear. It was necessarily implied by
> the context. The neo-Nazi was advocating the use of nuclear weapons.
> That's what "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over
> quick." necessarily means. Everyone knows it.

Really ?

"Knuckle-dragging Republicans" have been In-Charge a number of
times since the (continuing) Cold War started. The NEAREST to
destruction was because of JFK, who was not a Republican.

68hx.1805 wrote:
> On 4/5/24 10:50 AM, pyotr filipivich wrote:
>> On 4/5/2024 3:52 AM, NoBody wrote:

>>
>> The word "nuclear" didn't need to appear. It was necessarily implied
>> by the context. The neo-Nazi was advocating the use of nuclear
>> weapons. That's what "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it
>> over quick." necessarily means. Everyone knows it.
>
>
>   Really ?

Yes. What, YOU didn't know that?

>   "Knuckle-dragging Republicans" have been In-Charge a number of
>   times since the (continuing) Cold War started. The NEAREST to
>   destruction was because of JFK, who was not a Republican.

JFK stopped your rooskie friends from putting nuke
missiles in Cuba.

NoBody wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
> Sherman) wrote:
>
>> |
>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>> | Hamas."
>> | ...
>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>
>> --bks
>
> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons. He
> says that the war should end quickly like Nagasaki but he does not say
> to use nuclear weapons.
>
> This is why YOU have no credibility and neither does the media.

And WHAT about Hiroshima and Nagasaki that made the
war end quickly?

On 4/6/24 12:24 AM, Gronk wrote:
> 68hx.1805 wrote:
>> On 4/5/24 10:50 AM, pyotr filipivich wrote:
>>> On 4/5/2024 3:52 AM, NoBody wrote:
>
>>>
>>> The word "nuclear" didn't need to appear. It was necessarily implied
>>> by the context. The neo-Nazi was advocating the use of nuclear
>>> weapons. That's what "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get
>>> it over quick." necessarily means. Everyone knows it.
>>
>>
>>    Really ?
>
> Yes. What, YOU didn't know that?
>
>>    "Knuckle-dragging Republicans" have been In-Charge a number of
>>    times since the (continuing) Cold War started. The NEAREST to
>>    destruction was because of JFK, who was not a Republican.
>
> JFK stopped your rooskie friends from putting nuke
> missiles in Cuba.

Sort of ... but the RISK FACTOR was EXTREME, way
more than anything seen before or since (so far).

Actually JFK didn't even solve it - it was the
"back-channel" boyz. THEY prevented The War,
came up with the needed compromises.

STILL wonder if JFK wasn't shot over THAT debacle.

JFK was a Rich Boy who got off on "brinksmanship".
This was NOT an especially great thing in the 60s
once Russia also had thermo-nukes.

DO note that even a dozen good thermo-nuke hits on
the USA at the time would have TRASHED most of our
socio-economic infrastructure. Those good ole'
nasty fission/fusion/fission megaton+ devices made
HUGE fallout plumes. A hit in Dallas, maybe in
Colorado Springs too, would have POISONED the
bulk of our corn/wheat crops for YEARS. Add one
other hit near the TVA nuke facilities and most
of the southeastern/central crops would wilt
as well. No food = No Country.

Everybody thinks cities/mil-bases ... but anything
that compromises FOOD is MUCH worse ...........

As for Russkies ... hope they all catch Super-Herpes.
Medieval mindsets carried into a much more dangerous
modern reality ....

Tell yer patron Xi that you haven't fooled anybody.
There's a place for you, on one of the collective
farms out west .......

On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 07:50:23 -0700, pyotr filipivich
<pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:

>On 4/5/2024 3:52 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:33:09 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/4/2024 3:53 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 06:55:46 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/3/2024 3:54 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 09:38:47 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/2/2024 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 05:46:03 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/1/2024 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:51:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>>>>>>>> <pyotrpeckerhead@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/31/2024 4:00 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:23:37 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Michigan U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg [R] suggested that nuclear
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | weapons should be dropped on Gaza, which his office said
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | was a metaphor to "support Israel's swift elimination of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Hamas."
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/03/30/michigan-congressman-tim-walberg-suggests-nuking-gaza-ending-humanitarian-aid-nagasaki-hiroshima/73156051007/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> NOWHERE in the video tweet does he say to use nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He said "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick." That
>>>>>>>>>>> means he's advocating the use of nuclear weapons by unavoidable implication.
>>>>>>>>>>> That's what it means.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He said not one word about nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He said to do it "quick" like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Those were done "quick"
>>>>>>>>> because of nuclear weapons.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He said to use nuclear weapons in Gaza. That's what he said.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then you can quote where the word "nuclear" was used.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
>>>>>>> quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
>>>>>>> use of nuclear weapons. They have been for more than 70 years.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just quote for us where the word "nuclear" was used.
>>>>>
>>>>> No need — references to Nagasaki and Hiroshima in the context of stopping a war
>>>>> quickly are understood — at least by thinking persons — to be references to the
>>>>> use of nuclear weapons, especially when both Nagasaki and Hiroshima are
>>>>> mentioned in the same context. They have been for more than 70 years. Walberg
>>>>> advocated dropping nuclear weapons on Gaza.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your admission that the words "nuclear weapons" were
>>>> not used.
>>>
>>> They didn't need to be expressly used. Everyone knows that's what the
>>> knuckle-dragging Republiscum/QAnon whackjob meant.
>>
>> Never let the fact that the words did not appear to claim that they
>> did.
>
>The word "nuclear" didn't need to appear

And it didn't. You lied.
Moving on....

On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 23:10:08 -0400, "68hx.1805" <68hx.1804@g5t7x.net> wrote:

>On 4/5/24 10:50 AM, pyotr filipivich wrote:

>> The word "nuclear" didn't need to appear. It was necessarily implied by
>> the context. The neo-Nazi was advocating the use of nuclear weapons.
>> That's what "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over
>> quick." necessarily means. Everyone knows it.
>
>
> Really ?

Yeah, really.

He could've referenced any number of historic military events. Pearl Harbor, the fall of
Berlin, the sack of Carthage, Agincourt, Midway, Little Bighorn, Napoleon at Waterloo,
even Desert Storm! But no. He references the two cities that are world famous for just
*one* thing; they were the only targets in all of history to get nuked in combat.

> "Knuckle-dragging Republicans" have been In-Charge a number of
> times since the (continuing) Cold War started. The NEAREST to
> destruction was because of JFK, who was not a Republican.

But this isn't the Cold War is it?

The US wasn't under threat was it?

The Congressman isn't President, is he?

No, he's just another knuckle dragging Republican, pretending to be a tough guy, flashing
his ignoramus Trumpling creds for all to see by raising the specter of using nukes to
against a tiny country that's doing us no harm.

Why, exactly?

Because he let his alligator mouth overload his jaybird ass just to prove how like Trump
he is. He didn't even stand by his words! (again, like Trump) The coward couldn't back
pedal fast enough!

Swill
--
Conservative thinking only predicts the past. - R Kym Horsell

https://www.gocomics.com/mattdavies/2024/04/01

https://www.forwardparty.com/ . .

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 22:24:10 -0600, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>68hx.1805 wrote:
>> On 4/5/24 10:50 AM, pyotr filipivich wrote:
>>> On 4/5/2024 3:52 AM, NoBody wrote:
>
>>>
>>> The word "nuclear" didn't need to appear. It was necessarily implied
>>> by the context. The neo-Nazi was advocating the use of nuclear
>>> weapons. That's what "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it
>>> over quick." necessarily means. Everyone knows it.
>>
>>
>>   Really ?
>
>Yes. What, YOU didn't know that?
>
>>   "Knuckle-dragging Republicans" have been In-Charge a number of
>>   times since the (continuing) Cold War started. The NEAREST to
>>   destruction was because of JFK, who was not a Republican.
>
>JFK stopped your rooskie friends from putting nuke
>missiles in Cuba.

Whatever Putin is paying him to troll Usenet is too much.

Swill
--
Conservative thinking only predicts the past. - R Kym Horsell

https://www.gocomics.com/mattdavies/2024/04/01

https://www.forwardparty.com/ . .

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 02:34:52 -0400, "68hx.1805" <68hx.1804@g5t7x.net> wrote:

>On 4/6/24 12:24 AM, Gronk wrote:
>> 68hx.1805 wrote:
>>> On 4/5/24 10:50 AM, pyotr filipivich wrote:
>>>> On 4/5/2024 3:52 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> The word "nuclear" didn't need to appear. It was necessarily implied
>>>> by the context. The neo-Nazi was advocating the use of nuclear
>>>> weapons. That's what "It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get
>>>> it over quick." necessarily means. Everyone knows it.
>>>
>>>
>>>    Really ?
>>
>> Yes. What, YOU didn't know that?
>>
>>>    "Knuckle-dragging Republicans" have been In-Charge a number of
>>>    times since the (continuing) Cold War started. The NEAREST to
>>>    destruction was because of JFK, who was not a Republican.
>>
>> JFK stopped your rooskie friends from putting nuke
>> missiles in Cuba.
>
> Sort of ... but the RISK FACTOR was EXTREME, way
> more than anything seen before or since (so far).

How about the risk factor of letting Kruschev install ballistic nukes in Cuba?

> Actually JFK didn't even solve it - it was the
> "back-channel" boyz. THEY prevented The War,
> came up with the needed compromises.

I thought "compromise" was a dirty word to you guys?

The US had installed nukes in Turkey, the only NATO country (at that time) to share a
border directly with the Soviet Union. The US agreed to remove them if Russia pulled back
from Cuba.

> STILL wonder if JFK wasn't shot over THAT debacle.
>
> JFK was a Rich Boy who got off on "brinksmanship".
> This was NOT an especially great thing in the 60s
> once Russia also had thermo-nukes.

It worked though. The Russians *did* blink first but the Turkish affair was a necessary
part of the settlement.

> DO note that even a dozen good thermo-nuke hits on
> the USA at the time would have TRASHED most of our
> socio-economic infrastructure. Those good ole'
> nasty fission/fusion/fission megaton+ devices made
> HUGE fallout plumes. A hit in Dallas, maybe in
> Colorado Springs too, would have POISONED the
> bulk of our corn/wheat crops for YEARS. Add one
> other hit near the TVA nuke facilities and most
> of the southeastern/central crops would wilt
> as well. No food = No Country.

But you don't seem to have trouble with Israel kicking off WW III by nuking Gaza.

> Everybody thinks cities/mil-bases ... but anything
> that compromises FOOD is MUCH worse ...........
>
> As for Russkies ... hope they all catch Super-Herpes.
> Medieval mindsets carried into a much more dangerous
> modern reality ....
>
> Tell yer patron Xi that you haven't fooled anybody.
> There's a place for you, on one of the collective
> farms out west .......

Tell your patron Putin that he's paying you too much.

Swill
--
Conservative thinking only predicts the past. - R Kym Horsell

https://www.gocomics.com/mattdavies/2024/04/01

https://www.forwardparty.com/ . .

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>