Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

6 May, 2024: The networking issue during the past two days has been identified and fixed.


interests / rec.games.backgammon / Rollout: Worst possible roll

SubjectAuthor
* Worst possible rollTimothy Chow
+- Re: Worst possible rollpeps...@gmail.com
+* Re: Worst possible rollStick Rice
|`* Re: Worst possible rollpeps...@gmail.com
| `- Re: Worst possible rollStick Rice
+- Re: Worst possible rollah...Clem
`- Rollout: Worst possible rollTimothy Chow

1
Worst possible roll

<tiblj2$23sm7$2@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=10161&group=rec.games.backgammon#10161

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tchow12...@yahoo.com (Timothy Chow)
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Subject: Worst possible roll
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 08:44:16 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <tiblj2$23sm7$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 12:44:18 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0f05dafe297909818602d1f893d28ad6";
logging-data="2224839"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18uQR28sUO4ZzUMOgr0vgX6t6YKy2AVzZw="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.3.3
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ePpqGZMAfvQkMCIirvVTBQL8Cow=
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Timothy Chow - Fri, 14 Oct 2022 12:44 UTC

Here's another unwelcome 55 in an otherwise excellent position.
XG says it's my worst roll here. Some years ago, Othello made up
a quiz consisting entirely of checker plays where the roll was the
unluckiest possible roll. Like all his quizzes, it was fascinating.

XGID=aBaBBCBAAA--b----Aacbcb---:1:-1:1:55:0:0:0:0:10

Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X O | | O O O O | +---+
| | | O O O O | | 2 |
| | | O O | +---+
| | | |
| | | |
| |BAR| |
| | O | |
| | | |
| | | X |
| O | | X X X X X |
| O X X X | | X X X X O X |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 84 O: 127 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 2, O own cube
X to play 55

---
Tim Chow

Re: Worst possible roll

<8cb59d3e-06e6-4a20-b1f8-54ca3c9f9aacn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=10162&group=rec.games.backgammon#10162

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:614:b0:39c:cd36:ff9a with SMTP id z20-20020a05622a061400b0039ccd36ff9amr4380396qta.432.1665758834018;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 07:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:20d1:b0:661:8f90:4e31 with SMTP id
z17-20020a05683020d100b006618f904e31mr2588227otq.59.1665758833725; Fri, 14
Oct 2022 07:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 07:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <tiblj2$23sm7$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=217.155.59.144; posting-account=X1j9wgoAAADLt4UnZrIneT3jwl9HvLMd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.155.59.144
References: <tiblj2$23sm7$2@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8cb59d3e-06e6-4a20-b1f8-54ca3c9f9aacn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Worst possible roll
From: pepste...@gmail.com (peps...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 14:47:14 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 3272
 by: peps...@gmail.com - Fri, 14 Oct 2022 14:47 UTC

On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 1:44:20 PM UTC+1, Tim Chow wrote:
> Here's another unwelcome 55 in an otherwise excellent position.
> XG says it's my worst roll here. Some years ago, Othello made up
> a quiz consisting entirely of checker plays where the roll was the
> unluckiest possible roll. Like all his quizzes, it was fascinating.
>
> XGID=aBaBBCBAAA--b----Aacbcb---:1:-1:1:55:0:0:0:0:10
>
> Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
> +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
> | X O | | O O O O | +---+
> | | | O O O O | | 2 |
> | | | O O | +---+
> | | | |
> | | | |
> | |BAR| |
> | | O | |
> | | | |
> | | | X |
> | O | | X X X X X |
> | O X X X | | X X X X O X |
> +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
> Pip count X: 84 O: 127 X-O: 0-0
> Cube: 2, O own cube
> X to play 55

Unlucky rolls need not be difficult to play. Don't let the bad emotion cloud your judgment.
To me, it seems natural to play 7/2*, but we should look at the safest option too, which
leaves the opponent with no direct shots.
So let's see what happens with the only play that does _not_ include 7/2*.
Let's count the shots here. If the number of shots in this safe play is close to 11, then
the timidity is not warranted.
I see hits with 52/65/61. But it won't be easy to bring the blots home even after being missed.
I think we need 7/2*. 6/1(2) also seems mandatory -- otherwise we leave too many shots.
So, to me, the key choice is here. Do we play 8/3 or 9/4? Keeping the 8 point blot gives more
covers for the 2, but it also gives the opponent a more dangerous attack if they hit back on the 2.
I judge that this latter factor is more important because I can get enough cover numbers anyway.
7/2* 6/1(2) 8/3 is my play.
I feel a certain degree of psychological confidence in this play. It's not the case that any other play
seems worth considering, and I can't make up my mind.
However, there are plenty of times I've been confident and wrong.
If I was a non-captain in a chouette team, and the captain didn't play this, I would be quite disappointed
and frustrated (unless they could convince me).
7/2* 6/1(2) 8/3.

Paul

Re: Worst possible roll

<67aaf7b4-af2f-4d59-9703-d509159e66dan@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=10164&group=rec.games.backgammon#10164

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:178b:b0:39c:c9db:2c5e with SMTP id s11-20020a05622a178b00b0039cc9db2c5emr5535223qtk.111.1665776404712;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 12:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2805:b0:659:aab:f8e4 with SMTP id
w5-20020a056830280500b006590aabf8e4mr3310590otu.84.1665776404473; Fri, 14 Oct
2022 12:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 12:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <tiblj2$23sm7$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.222.45.238; posting-account=yTK5ugoAAACRs3TgAz02kMublhPpKQBJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.222.45.238
References: <tiblj2$23sm7$2@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <67aaf7b4-af2f-4d59-9703-d509159e66dan@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Worst possible roll
From: bananabo...@gmail.com (Stick Rice)
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 19:40:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2183
 by: Stick Rice - Fri, 14 Oct 2022 19:40 UTC

On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 8:44:20 AM UTC-4, Tim Chow wrote:
> Here's another unwelcome 55 in an otherwise excellent position.
> XG says it's my worst roll here. Some years ago, Othello made up
> a quiz consisting entirely of checker plays where the roll was the
> unluckiest possible roll. Like all his quizzes, it was fascinating.
>
> XGID=aBaBBCBAAA--b----Aacbcb---:1:-1:1:55:0:0:0:0:10
>
> Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
> +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
> | X O | | O O O O | +---+
> | | | O O O O | | 2 |
> | | | O O | +---+
> | | | |
> | | | |
> | |BAR| |
> | | O | |
> | | | |
> | | | X |
> | O | | X X X X X |
> | O X X X | | X X X X O X |
> +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
> Pip count X: 84 O: 127 X-O: 0-0
> Cube: 2, O own cube
> X to play 55
>
> ---
> Tim Chow

Isn't this all 'forced'? You're obviously going to hit a second checker so 7/2*. You're obviously not going to leave two inner board blots so 6/1(2). With the remaining five it's obviously better to bring in another direct cover 9/4....?

Stick

Re: Worst possible roll

<94f53fc4-888d-448e-8c8d-dd5b04aec268n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=10165&group=rec.games.backgammon#10165

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
X-Received: by 2002:a37:bd84:0:b0:6cf:6049:f12a with SMTP id n126-20020a37bd84000000b006cf6049f12amr5040252qkf.697.1665777734109;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:f629:b0:136:b5dd:8717 with SMTP id
ek41-20020a056870f62900b00136b5dd8717mr3645579oab.33.1665777733735; Fri, 14
Oct 2022 13:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <67aaf7b4-af2f-4d59-9703-d509159e66dan@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=217.155.59.144; posting-account=X1j9wgoAAADLt4UnZrIneT3jwl9HvLMd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.155.59.144
References: <tiblj2$23sm7$2@dont-email.me> <67aaf7b4-af2f-4d59-9703-d509159e66dan@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <94f53fc4-888d-448e-8c8d-dd5b04aec268n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Worst possible roll
From: pepste...@gmail.com (peps...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:02:14 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2525
 by: peps...@gmail.com - Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:02 UTC

On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 8:40:05 PM UTC+1, Stick Rice wrote:
> On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 8:44:20 AM UTC-4, Tim Chow wrote:
> > Here's another unwelcome 55 in an otherwise excellent position.
> > XG says it's my worst roll here. Some years ago, Othello made up
> > a quiz consisting entirely of checker plays where the roll was the
> > unluckiest possible roll. Like all his quizzes, it was fascinating.
> >
> > XGID=aBaBBCBAAA--b----Aacbcb---:1:-1:1:55:0:0:0:0:10
> >
> > Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
> > +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
> > | X O | | O O O O | +---+
> > | | | O O O O | | 2 |
> > | | | O O | +---+
> > | | | |
> > | | | |
> > | |BAR| |
> > | | O | |
> > | | | |
> > | | | X |
> > | O | | X X X X X |
> > | O X X X | | X X X X O X |
> > +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
> > Pip count X: 84 O: 127 X-O: 0-0
> > Cube: 2, O own cube
> > X to play 55
> >
> > ---
> > Tim Chow
> Isn't this all 'forced'? You're obviously going to hit a second checker so 7/2*. You're obviously not going to leave two inner board blots so 6/1(2). With the remaining five it's obviously better to bring in another direct cover 9/4....?

Not to me it wasn't. I played 8/3 instead of 9/4 because I didn't want to be too vulnerable if my opponent rehit me on the 2.

Paul

Re: Worst possible roll

<2a522d40-0bfe-4738-a02a-4bb3742c3b91n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=10166&group=rec.games.backgammon#10166

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5de8:0:b0:4b1:85db:3509 with SMTP id jn8-20020ad45de8000000b004b185db3509mr5806205qvb.121.1665780702076;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2a8f:b0:661:b9c8:9a63 with SMTP id
s15-20020a0568302a8f00b00661b9c89a63mr3351286otu.210.1665780701796; Fri, 14
Oct 2022 13:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <94f53fc4-888d-448e-8c8d-dd5b04aec268n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.222.45.238; posting-account=yTK5ugoAAACRs3TgAz02kMublhPpKQBJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.222.45.238
References: <tiblj2$23sm7$2@dont-email.me> <67aaf7b4-af2f-4d59-9703-d509159e66dan@googlegroups.com>
<94f53fc4-888d-448e-8c8d-dd5b04aec268n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2a522d40-0bfe-4738-a02a-4bb3742c3b91n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Worst possible roll
From: bananabo...@gmail.com (Stick Rice)
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:51:42 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2828
 by: Stick Rice - Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:51 UTC

On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 4:02:14 PM UTC-4, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 8:40:05 PM UTC+1, Stick Rice wrote:
> > On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 8:44:20 AM UTC-4, Tim Chow wrote:
> > > Here's another unwelcome 55 in an otherwise excellent position.
> > > XG says it's my worst roll here. Some years ago, Othello made up
> > > a quiz consisting entirely of checker plays where the roll was the
> > > unluckiest possible roll. Like all his quizzes, it was fascinating.
> > >
> > > XGID=aBaBBCBAAA--b----Aacbcb---:1:-1:1:55:0:0:0:0:10
> > >
> > > Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
> > > +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
> > > | X O | | O O O O | +---+
> > > | | | O O O O | | 2 |
> > > | | | O O | +---+
> > > | | | |
> > > | | | |
> > > | |BAR| |
> > > | | O | |
> > > | | | |
> > > | | | X |
> > > | O | | X X X X X |
> > > | O X X X | | X X X X O X |
> > > +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
> > > Pip count X: 84 O: 127 X-O: 0-0
> > > Cube: 2, O own cube
> > > X to play 55
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Tim Chow
> > Isn't this all 'forced'? You're obviously going to hit a second checker so 7/2*. You're obviously not going to leave two inner board blots so 6/1(2). With the remaining five it's obviously better to bring in another direct cover 9/4....?
> Not to me it wasn't. I played 8/3 instead of 9/4 because I didn't want to be too vulnerable if my opponent rehit me on the 2.
>
> Paul

So you're preparing for 11/36 instead of 25/36? Generally doesn't sound like a winning game plan.

Stick

Re: Worst possible roll

<tieea4$2ott5$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=10168&group=rec.games.backgammon#10168

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ah_c...@ymail.com (ah...Clem)
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Subject: Re: Worst possible roll
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 09:57:38 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <tieea4$2ott5$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tiblj2$23sm7$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 13:58:28 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6f4fb0745645a2f2b59e1505277cb795";
logging-data="2914213"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18M3sK5XYmNrdSJYcuPd8UT"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.3.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oPIyFHDAj6skoC8ihs6JR2B94jE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <tiblj2$23sm7$2@dont-email.me>
 by: ah...Clem - Sat, 15 Oct 2022 13:57 UTC

On 10/14/2022 8:44 AM, Timothy Chow wrote:
> Here's another unwelcome 55 in an otherwise excellent position.
> XG says it's my worst roll here.  Some years ago, Othello made up
> a quiz consisting entirely of checker plays where the roll was the
> unluckiest possible roll.  Like all his quizzes, it was fascinating.
>
> XGID=aBaBBCBAAA--b----Aacbcb---:1:-1:1:55:0:0:0:0:10
>
> Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
>  +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
>  |             X  O |   | O  O  O  O       | +---+
>  |                  |   | O  O  O  O       | | 2 |
>  |                  |   | O     O          | +---+
>  |                  |   |                  |
>  |                  |   |                  |
>  |                  |BAR|                  |
>  |                  | O |                  |
>  |                  |   |                  |
>  |                  |   |    X             |
>  | O                |   | X  X  X  X     X |
>  | O        X  X  X |   | X  X  X  X  O  X |
>  +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
> Pip count  X: 84  O: 127 X-O: 0-0
> Cube: 2, O own cube
> X to play 55

X will still be ahead in the race by a lot with O on the bar after this
play, so seems to me that minimizing shots would be the right approach.
So, I'll play 9/4 8/3 6/1(2).

The other option would be to hit loose, clear the six point, and then
either 9/4 or 8/3 for the fourth five. I don't think exposing two blots
in the homeboard is correct.

I'll minimize shots.

(PS - been traveling for the last two weeks without usenet access hence
the radio silence)

Rollout: Worst possible roll

<tigujv$353vk$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=10174&group=rec.games.backgammon#10174

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tchow12...@yahoo.com (Timothy Chow)
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Subject: Rollout: Worst possible roll
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 08:49:02 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <tigujv$353vk$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tiblj2$23sm7$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 12:49:04 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2d006b3dca8e887c11e2cb144f58d6ef";
logging-data="3313652"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19PTNbekDTbjZez56XKZkxy9HjIgDXgZnc="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.3.3
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lap15735os7LjKq5Yz/fZ8rZvc0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <tiblj2$23sm7$2@dont-email.me>
 by: Timothy Chow - Sun, 16 Oct 2022 12:49 UTC

XGID=aBaBBCBAAA--b----Aacbcb---:1:-1:1:55:0:0:0:0:10

Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X O | | O O O O | +---+
| | | O O O O | | 2 |
| | | O O | +---+
| | | |
| | | |
| |BAR| |
| | O | |
| | | |
| | | X |
| O | | X X X X X |
| O X X X | | X X X X O X |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 84 O: 127 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 2, O own cube
X to play 55

The "safe" play still leaves some shots from the bar, and we still have
work to do even if missed. After putting the second checker up with
7/2* 6/1(2), do we play 9/4 or 8/3? Like Paul, I focused only on O's
good rolls from the bar. But in highly volatile positions, there's a
basic principle one should follow: consider both the opponent's good
rolls and the opponent's bad rolls, and weigh them against each other.
If we're not hit (and the opponent doesn't roll 66), then we definitely
gain a lot by having three builders for the 2pt. If we are hit, then
it doesn't make all that much difference whether our remaining blot is
on the 9pt or the 8pt. Furthermore, there are fewer hitting rolls than
non-hitting rolls. So 9/4 is the play.

1. Rollout¹ 9/4 7/2* 6/1(2) eq:+0.640
Player: 71.52% (G:40.26% B:0.26%)
Opponent: 28.48% (G:9.21% B:0.60%)
Confidence: ±0.006 (+0.634..+0.646) - [100.0%]

2. Rollout¹ 8/3 7/2* 6/1(2) eq:+0.527 (-0.112)
Player: 68.47% (G:37.38% B:0.26%)
Opponent: 31.53% (G:10.24% B:0.67%)
Confidence: ±0.005 (+0.522..+0.533) - [0.0%]

¹ 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Dice Seed: 271828
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller

eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.211.pre-release

---
Tim Chow

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor