On 2/17/22 23:02, KlausSchadenfreude wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 20:11:00 +0000, Scientific (she/her) ?
> <science@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>
>> On 2/15/22 05:59, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>> "Scientific (she/her) ?" <science@danwin1210.de> wrote in message
>>> news:sr7jcc$6kd$2@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 1/2/22 4:08 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <almarsoft.3199036217974838348@news.easynews.com>,
>>>>> tedsmasher@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 21:02:00 +0000, Scientific (she/her)
>>>>>> ?<science@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no reason to read his transphobic
>>>>>>> bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't, I ignore it.
>>>>>>
>>>>> LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>> You be the Judge:
>>>>>
>>>>> Glenn Shadix or KWills?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://youtu.be/r4urInnAz3I
>>>>>
>>>>> Kwills photo - from his Twitter page before he
>>>>> yanked it down and replaced it with a phony
>>>>>
>>>>> https://postimg.cc/dhN2kzSG
>>>>>
>>>>> https://casetext.com/case/state-v-wills-26 tsk tsk
>>>>
>>>> A burglar who whines about the right of us, trans people to exist. Nobody
>>>> should see people by their gender. It literally doesn't matter who you
>>>> are. Hopefully, when have job in IT, especially on extremely-high-skill
>>>> positions like mine, nobody is whining about your gender identity.
>>>
>>> That's becouse people with obvious mental issue's don't get high-skilled
>>> job's.
>>>
>>>
>> And that's because being trans is not a mental illness. Any state worth
>> it's salt have gender identity anti-discrimination laws.
>
> No true American wants to deny mentally ill people the right to jobs,
> food, clothing, or shelter.
>
> That doesn't give them any other special rights, like "accepting"
> their delusions.
Well, and trans rights are human rights.

On 2/18/22 10:49, KWills wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 20:11:00 +0000, Scientific (she/her) ?
> <science@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>
>> On 2/15/22 05:59, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>> "Scientific (she/her) ?" <science@danwin1210.de> wrote in message
>>> news:sr7jcc$6kd$2@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 1/2/22 4:08 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <almarsoft.3199036217974838348@news.easynews.com>,
>>>>> tedsmasher@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 21:02:00 +0000, Scientific (she/her)
>>>>>> ?<science@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no reason to read his transphobic
>>>>>>> bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't, I ignore it.
>>>>>>
>>>>> LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>> You be the Judge:
>>>>>
>>>>> Glenn Shadix or KWills?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://youtu.be/r4urInnAz3I
>>>>>
>>>>> Kwills photo - from his Twitter page before he
>>>>> yanked it down and replaced it with a phony
>>>>>
>>>>> https://postimg.cc/dhN2kzSG
>>>>>
>>>>> https://casetext.com/case/state-v-wills-26 tsk tsk
>>>>
>>>> A burglar who whines about the right of us, trans people to exist. Nobody
>>>> should see people by their gender. It literally doesn't matter who you
>>>> are. Hopefully, when have job in IT, especially on extremely-high-skill
>>>> positions like mine, nobody is whining about your gender identity.
>>>
>>> That's becouse people with obvious mental issue's don't get high-skilled
>>> job's.
>>>
>> And that's because being trans is not a mental illness. Any state worth
>> it's salt have gender identity anti-discrimination laws.
>>
>
> Try asking Jenny to cite where in the DSM V Transgender is listed
> as a mental illness. Then cue the crickets since you'll never get an
> answer.

And it isn't... you're lucky.

>> Naturally, the transgender population in America is still low - around
>> 1% or so. It might be higher, though.
>
> Openly Transgender. How many decades did Caitlyn Jenner live as
> Bruce?
>
Well, there are at least 1 million openly transgender individuals in
America. There might be many more that keep it to themselves.

On 3/14/22 03:41, Jerry Sauk wrote:
> "Scientific (she/her) ?" <science@danwin1210.de> wrote in message
> news:suma62$57h$2@science.eternal-september.org...
>> On 2/15/22 05:59, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>> "Scientific (she/her) ?" <science@danwin1210.de> wrote in message
>>> news:sr7jcc$6kd$2@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 1/2/22 4:08 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <almarsoft.3199036217974838348@news.easynews.com>,
>>>>> tedsmasher@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 21:02:00 +0000, Scientific (she/her)
>>>>>> ?<science@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no reason to read his transphobic
>>>>>>> bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't, I ignore it.
>>>>>>
>>>>> LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>> You be the Judge:
>>>>>
>>>>> Glenn Shadix or KWills?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://youtu.be/r4urInnAz3I
>>>>>
>>>>> Kwills photo - from his Twitter page before he
>>>>> yanked it down and replaced it with a phony
>>>>>
>>>>> https://postimg.cc/dhN2kzSG
>>>>>
>>>>> https://casetext.com/case/state-v-wills-26 tsk tsk
>>>>
>>>> A burglar who whines about the right of us, trans people to exist.
>>>> Nobody
>>>> should see people by their gender. It literally doesn't matter who you
>>>> are. Hopefully, when have job in IT, especially on extremely-high-skill
>>>> positions like mine, nobody is whining about your gender identity.
>>>
>>> That's becouse people with obvious mental issue's don't get high-skilled
>>> job's.
>>>
>>>
>> And that's because being trans is not a mental illness. Any state worth
>> it's salt have gender identity anti-discrimination laws.
>>
>> Naturally, the transgender population in America is still low - around 1%
>> or so. It might be higher, though.
>
> it'ss lower MUCH LOWER. And most people that do it, only do it for a short
> time becouse for most it's just a phase.
>
>
Do you believe in rapid-onset gender dysphoria bullshittery?

After serious thinking Scientific (she/her) ? wrote :
> On 3/17/22 08:44, KWills wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 07:26:48 +1100, ]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> Chad is so extremely obese, it can't get out of bed. It ends up
>>>>> sitting and sleeping in its own waste until a home health aide comes
>>>>> by to clean him up.
>>>>
>>>> He certainly seems inordinately interested in you. I'd keep my doors
>>>> locked.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> With Chad's extreme obesity, it's unlikely it will ever be able
>> to come and visit. Plus it would cost money to do so. Chadlee's
>> government stipend probably won't allow it the finical means to
>> travel.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Truth is I am a convicted child molester and registered sex
>> offender."
>> -- Chadlee Bryant in Message-ID: <VZFnG.10427$th5.3183@fx14.iad>
>>
>> An old picture of Chad showing off his triple chin:
>> https://ibb.co/k0F0mcn
>>
>> Chad's Grinder profile picture:
>> (Word is he's removed it out of embarrassment.)
>> https://ibb.co/jyC1ys9
>>
>> Check out Triple Chin Chad's shoplifting record (what is known of it)
>> https://utah.arrests.org/Arrests/Chadlee_Bryant_18232615/
>
> He is 45.

Stone...

--
"I already served during an armed campaign"
- self-described decorated veteran, Chadlee Bryant on Apr 11, 2017

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.flame.rspw/c/nYtUHLNwtGA
http://www.stolenvalor.com/

On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 23:47:00 +0000, Scientific (she/her) ?
<science@danwin1210.de> wrote:

[...]

>> Try asking Jenny to cite where in the DSM V Transgender is listed
>> as a mental illness. Then cue the crickets since you'll never get an
>> answer.
>
>And it isn't... you're lucky.
>

How am I lucky?

>>> Naturally, the transgender population in America is still low - around
>>> 1% or so. It might be higher, though.
>>
>> Openly Transgender. How many decades did Caitlyn Jenner live as
>> Bruce?
>>
>Well, there are at least 1 million openly transgender individuals in
>America. There might be many more that keep it to themselves.

If they're keeping it to themselves, they aren't openly
transgender.

--
There's no place like 127.0.0.1

On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 23:43:00 +0000, Scientific (she/her) ?
<science@danwin1210.de> wrote:

>On 3/14/22 12:43, KlausSchadenfreude wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 12:28:00 +0000, Scientific (she/her) ?
>> <science@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/17/22 23:00, KlausSchadenfreude wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 20:09:00 +0000, Scientific (she/her) ?
>>>> <science@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/15/22 06:00, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>>>> "Scientific (she/her) ?" <science@danwin1210.de> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:sr90n4$d0a$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>> On 1/6/22 10:54 PM, KlausSchadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 20:27:00 +0000, Scientific (she/her) ?
>>>>>>>> <science@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A burglar who whines about the right of us, trans people to exist.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course trans people have a right to exist.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We should not discriminate against the mentally ill.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Being transgender is not a mental illness.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Correct. It is actually a mental disorder, since it is something the
>>>>>> patienent chooses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Being transgender is not a mental disorder
>>>>
>>>> Um, well, yeah, it is.
>>>>
>>>> It is a defect in the brain.
>>>>
>>>> When your "transgendered" corpse is dug up by archeologists a thousand
>>>> years from now, if you were born male they will note that you are a
>>>> male. They may notice that you are a male with silicone breast
>>>> implants and wearing a dress, but you'll still be a male.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well I have no breast implants, but I have been taking estrogen and they
>>> made me grow me breasts.
>>
>> That doesn't make you a woman.
>
>You're right, it's only being a woman that makes you a woman.
>
>>> Also, they have found an MtF skeleton from 5000
>>> years ago.
>>
>> LOL
>>
>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2013/4/8/1200096/-Archaeologists-announce-discovery-of-5000-year-old-transgender-skeleton
>>
>> They found a skeleton of a man dressed as a woman. This proves what,
>> exactly? That there was mental illness 5000 years ago?
>>
>>
>> We already knew that.
>
>5000 years ago it wasn't.

Well, yeah, it was.

On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 23:46:00 +0000, Scientific (she/her) ?
<science@danwin1210.de> wrote:

>On 2/17/22 23:02, KlausSchadenfreude wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 20:11:00 +0000, Scientific (she/her) ?
>> <science@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/15/22 05:59, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>> "Scientific (she/her) ?" <science@danwin1210.de> wrote in message
>>>> news:sr7jcc$6kd$2@dont-email.me...
>>>>> On 1/2/22 4:08 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <almarsoft.3199036217974838348@news.easynews.com>,
>>>>>> tedsmasher@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 21:02:00 +0000, Scientific (she/her)
>>>>>>> ?<science@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no reason to read his transphobic
>>>>>>>> bullshit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't, I ignore it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You be the Judge:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Glenn Shadix or KWills?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://youtu.be/r4urInnAz3I
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kwills photo - from his Twitter page before he
>>>>>> yanked it down and replaced it with a phony
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://postimg.cc/dhN2kzSG
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://casetext.com/case/state-v-wills-26 tsk tsk
>>>>>
>>>>> A burglar who whines about the right of us, trans people to exist. Nobody
>>>>> should see people by their gender. It literally doesn't matter who you
>>>>> are. Hopefully, when have job in IT, especially on extremely-high-skill
>>>>> positions like mine, nobody is whining about your gender identity.
>>>>
>>>> That's becouse people with obvious mental issue's don't get high-skilled
>>>> job's.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> And that's because being trans is not a mental illness. Any state worth
>>> it's salt have gender identity anti-discrimination laws.
>>
>> No true American wants to deny mentally ill people the right to jobs,
>> food, clothing, or shelter.
>>
>> That doesn't give them any other special rights, like "accepting"
>> their delusions.
>Well, and trans rights are human rights.

Nobody is saying that mentally ill people don't have rights.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 02:59:01 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

>>>> And that's because being trans is not a mental illness. Any state worth
>>>> it's salt have gender identity anti-discrimination laws.
>>>
>>> No true American wants to deny mentally ill people the right to jobs,
>>> food, clothing, or shelter.
>>>
>>> That doesn't give them any other special rights, like "accepting"
>>> their delusions.
>>Well, and trans rights are human rights.
>
>Nobody is saying that mentally ill people don't have rights.

Transgender does not appear in the DSM V. It's not seen as a
mental illness.

--
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons...
for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 06:46:04 -0700, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 02:59:01 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>>> And that's because being trans is not a mental illness. Any state worth
>>>>> it's salt have gender identity anti-discrimination laws.
>>>>
>>>> No true American wants to deny mentally ill people the right to jobs,
>>>> food, clothing, or shelter.
>>>>
>>>> That doesn't give them any other special rights, like "accepting"
>>>> their delusions.
>>>Well, and trans rights are human rights.
>>
>>Nobody is saying that mentally ill people don't have rights.
>
> Transgender does not appear in the DSM V. It's not seen as a
>mental illness.

Not surprising, since political correctness tends to try to change
even the definitions of common words.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 12:39:10 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 06:46:04 -0700, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 02:59:01 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>>>> And that's because being trans is not a mental illness. Any state worth
>>>>>> it's salt have gender identity anti-discrimination laws.
>>>>>
>>>>> No true American wants to deny mentally ill people the right to jobs,
>>>>> food, clothing, or shelter.
>>>>>
>>>>> That doesn't give them any other special rights, like "accepting"
>>>>> their delusions.
>>>>Well, and trans rights are human rights.
>>>
>>>Nobody is saying that mentally ill people don't have rights.
>>
>> Transgender does not appear in the DSM V. It's not seen as a
>>mental illness.
>
>Not surprising, since political correctness tends to try to change
>even the definitions of common words.

I don't care too much about someone being transgender. The degree
to which I do care is as follows.

Is the person able to consent to being transgendered? If yes,
then

Does the person consent to being transgendered? If yes, then

Are the rights of others being infringed by being transgendered?
If no, then

I don't care.

--
Dadass
Tuesdays 8PM
Network TV Channel

On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 01:21:08 -0700, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:

>On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 12:39:10 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 06:46:04 -0700, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 02:59:01 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>>>>> And that's because being trans is not a mental illness. Any state worth
>>>>>>> it's salt have gender identity anti-discrimination laws.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No true American wants to deny mentally ill people the right to jobs,
>>>>>> food, clothing, or shelter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That doesn't give them any other special rights, like "accepting"
>>>>>> their delusions.
>>>>>Well, and trans rights are human rights.
>>>>
>>>>Nobody is saying that mentally ill people don't have rights.
>>>
>>> Transgender does not appear in the DSM V. It's not seen as a
>>>mental illness.
>>
>>Not surprising, since political correctness tends to try to change
>>even the definitions of common words.
>
> I don't care too much about someone being transgender. The degree
>to which I do care is as follows.
>
> Is the person able to consent to being transgendered? If yes,
>then

A person cannot be 'transgender': a change of sex without a full DNA
transplant is simply impossible. These people are delusional.

> Does the person consent to being transgendered? If yes, then
>
> Are the rights of others being infringed by being transgendered?
>If no, then
>
> I don't care.

The rights of others (e.g. female athletes) ARE being infringed by
'transgenders' i.e. female impersonators.
--

"SHPAMMERSH ARE CROOKSH
DON'T DO BUSINESSH VITH CROOKSH!"
- jew paedophile shpammer Barry Z. Shein (world.std.com home page)

On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:54:23 +0000, HQ <hq-observer@xxx.yyy> wrote:

>On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 01:21:08 -0700, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 12:39:10 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 06:46:04 -0700, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 02:59:01 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>[...]
>>>>
>>>>>>>> And that's because being trans is not a mental illness. Any state worth
>>>>>>>> it's salt have gender identity anti-discrimination laws.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No true American wants to deny mentally ill people the right to jobs,
>>>>>>> food, clothing, or shelter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That doesn't give them any other special rights, like "accepting"
>>>>>>> their delusions.
>>>>>>Well, and trans rights are human rights.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nobody is saying that mentally ill people don't have rights.
>>>>
>>>> Transgender does not appear in the DSM V. It's not seen as a
>>>>mental illness.
>>>
>>>Not surprising, since political correctness tends to try to change
>>>even the definitions of common words.
>>
>> I don't care too much about someone being transgender. The degree
>>to which I do care is as follows.
>>
>> Is the person able to consent to being transgendered? If yes,
>>then
>
>A person cannot be 'transgender': a change of sex without a full DNA
>transplant is simply impossible. These people are delusional.

Your right. Cutting someone's dick off doesn't change their gender.

>> Does the person consent to being transgendered? If yes, then
>>
>> Are the rights of others being infringed by being transgendered?
>>If no, then
>>
>> I don't care.
>
>The rights of others (e.g. female athletes) ARE being infringed by
>'transgenders' i.e. female impersonators.

Right!
--
KWills
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

On 2022-03-24 2:14 p.m., KWills wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:54:23 +0000, HQ <hq-observer@xxx.yyy> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 01:21:08 -0700, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 12:39:10 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 06:46:04 -0700, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 02:59:01 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And that's because being trans is not a mental illness. Any state worth
>>>>>>>>> it's salt have gender identity anti-discrimination laws.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No true American wants to deny mentally ill people the right to jobs,
>>>>>>>> food, clothing, or shelter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That doesn't give them any other special rights, like "accepting"
>>>>>>>> their delusions.
>>>>>>> Well, and trans rights are human rights.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nobody is saying that mentally ill people don't have rights.
>>>>>
>>>>> Transgender does not appear in the DSM V. It's not seen as a
>>>>> mental illness.
>>>>
>>>> Not surprising, since political correctness tends to try to change
>>>> even the definitions of common words.
>>>
>>> I don't care too much about someone being transgender. The degree
>>> to which I do care is as follows.
>>>
>>> Is the person able to consent to being transgendered? If yes,
>>> then
>>
>> A person cannot be 'transgender': a change of sex without a full DNA
>> transplant is simply impossible. These people are delusional.
>
> Your right. Cutting someone's dick off doesn't change their gender.
>
>>> Does the person consent to being transgendered? If yes, then
>>>
>>> Are the rights of others being infringed by being transgendered?
>>> If no, then
>>>
>>> I don't care.
>>
>> The rights of others (e.g. female athletes) ARE being infringed by
>> 'transgenders' i.e. female impersonators.
>
> Right!
> --
> KWills
> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
>
you got beat by a woman

On 4/22/2022 1:30 AM, Jerry Sauk wrote:
> Do you know ANY Man that wore Women's clothing for an actual entire
> lifetime? All the way from teenage year's to beyond middle age? Pretty
> much all teenagers grow out of it, any anybody old today doing it didn't do
> it as a young man.
>
>
Tell that to Ted&Alice -

http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=160968069700 <--- Ted comes out as Alice

--
KWills was busted for breaking into his neighbors garages:

https://casetext.com/case/state-v-wills-26

https://www.google.com/search?q=KWills,+fat+fuck+felon&filter=0&biw=1360&bih=657&dpr=1

You be the Judge:

Glenn Shadix or KWills?

https://youtu.be/r4urInnAz3I <--- Glenn Shadix from Bettlejuice

Kwills photo - from his Twitter page before he
yanked it down and replaced it with a phony

https://postimg.cc/dhN2kzSG <--- KWills

On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 04:56:27 -0700, KWills wrote:

> He did post as Jenny for a while.

One post.

-sw

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:oe8u2h9n72hhn26lj6136g438a6n3kv0pu@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 22:41:31 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Naturally, the transgender population in America is still low - around
>>> 1%
>>> or so. It might be higher, though.
>>
>>it'ss lower MUCH LOWER. And most people that do it, only do it for a
>>short
>>time becouse for most it's just a phase.
>
> I thought I taught you to provide a citation when you make a claim
> like this.

Do you know ANY Man that wore Women's clothing for an actual entire
lifetime? All the way from teenage year's to beyond middle age? Pretty
much all teenagers grow out of it, any anybody old today doing it didn't do
it as a young man.

On 4/22/22 05:30, Jerry Sauk wrote:
> "KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:oe8u2h9n72hhn26lj6136g438a6n3kv0pu@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 22:41:31 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Naturally, the transgender population in America is still low - around
>>>> 1%
>>>> or so. It might be higher, though.
>>>
>>> it'ss lower MUCH LOWER. And most people that do it, only do it for a
>>> short
>>> time becouse for most it's just a phase.
>>
>> I thought I taught you to provide a citation when you make a claim
>> like this.
>
> Do you know ANY Man that wore Women's clothing for an actual entire
> lifetime? All the way from teenage year's to beyond middle age? Pretty
> much all teenagers grow out of it, any anybody old today doing it didn't do
> it as a young man.
>
>
Well, those people are typically aren't men because they are mostly
trans women.

On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:30:59 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:oe8u2h9n72hhn26lj6136g438a6n3kv0pu@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 22:41:31 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Naturally, the transgender population in America is still low - around
>>>> 1%
>>>> or so. It might be higher, though.
>>>
>>>it'ss lower MUCH LOWER. And most people that do it, only do it for a
>>>short
>>>time becouse for most it's just a phase.
>>
>> I thought I taught you to provide a citation when you make a claim
>> like this.

==================================================
==================================================
================= WARNING! ========================
**** GOAL POST MOVES AHEAD! ****
================= WARNING! ========================
==================================================
==================================================

>Do you know ANY Man that wore Women's clothing for an actual entire
>lifetime?

Note how Jenny goes from "only a short time" to "not a life time."

On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 01:16:55 -0700, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:

>On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:30:59 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:oe8u2h9n72hhn26lj6136g438a6n3kv0pu@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 22:41:31 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Naturally, the transgender population in America is still low - around
>>>>> 1% or so. It might be higher, though.
>>>>
>>>>it'ss lower MUCH LOWER. And most people that do it, only do it for a
>>>>short time becouse for most it's just a phase.
>>>
>>> I thought I taught you to provide a citation when you make a claim
>>> like this.
>>
>>Do you know ANY Man that wore Women's clothing for an actual entire
>>lifetime? All the way from teenage year's to beyond middle age? Pretty
>>much all teenagers grow out of it, any anybody old today doing it didn't do
>>it as a young man.
>>
>
> Where is your citation for this claim?
>
>[Crickets]

Do you suppose... personal experience?

"Scientific (she/they) ?" <science@danwin1210.de> wrote in message
news:t3v74n$rbt$3@science.eternal-september.org...
> On 4/22/22 05:30, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> "KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>> message
>> news:oe8u2h9n72hhn26lj6136g438a6n3kv0pu@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 22:41:31 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Naturally, the transgender population in America is still low - around
>>>>> 1%
>>>>> or so. It might be higher, though.
>>>>
>>>> it'ss lower MUCH LOWER. And most people that do it, only do it for a
>>>> short
>>>> time becouse for most it's just a phase.
>>>
>>> I thought I taught you to provide a citation when you make a claim
>>> like this.
>>
>> Do you know ANY Man that wore Women's clothing for an actual entire
>> lifetime? All the way from teenage year's to beyond middle age? Pretty
>> much all teenagers grow out of it, any anybody old today doing it didn't
>> do
>> it as a young man.
>>
>>
> Well, those people are typically aren't men because they are mostly trans
> women.

So in other word's, your answer would be "no".