On Mon, 06 Dec 2021 01:28:50 -0800, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:

>On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 21:38:39 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>>>>>>Still waiting for you to answer my question,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I JUST GAVE IT TO YOU
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you blind as well as stupid and fat?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That wasn't the question.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was my question. Well? Are you?
>>>>
>>>>We will move on to your question AFTER you have answered MY question.
>>>>
>>> I already have.
>>
>>I obvoiusly meant type it out and post it to the newsgroup, klous.
>>
>>ANSWER THE QUESTION.
>
> Asked and answered. Your LYING about it will not diminish the
>TRUTH of this.
> Please be honest and admit that which everyone reading knows. hat
>Klaus answered in Message-ID:
><opmshgpiuvaqobrkpj1k2epah4rn3s04on@4ax.com>. In fact, Klaus answered
>BEFORE that post. He simply answered again.
> Now LIE about this, Gasbag. You will because, unless you make a
>mistake, you are psychologically UNABLE to be honest.

If this group *was* moderated, Jenny would be banned for wasting
everyone's time by asking the same question over and over again while
ignoring the answer.

On Mon, 06 Dec 2021 04:30:58 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

>>>>>> Are you now claiming that because they are a different continent, Peru
>>>>>> and Chile are somehow NOT south of the border?
>>>>>
>>>>>Peru and chile are SOUTH OF THE COUNTRY. MEXICO is the country that is
>>>>>south of the border.
>>>>
>>>> They are ALL south of our border.
>>>
>>>THEY ARE ALL SOUTH OF THE COUNTRY. ONLY MEXICO IS SOUTH OF THE BORDER.
>>
>> Do stop lying. If they are south of the country, they MUST be
>>south of the border. And they are.
>
>
>He's just too stupid to deal with this early in the morning sometimes.
>LOL

He's flat out lying. Nothing more.

--
I suffer from chronic apathy.
I was going to go see a doctor about it, but I didn't really care.

On Mon, 06 Dec 2021 05:24:19 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

>>>I obvoiusly meant type it out and post it to the newsgroup, klous.
>>>
>>>ANSWER THE QUESTION.
>>
>> Asked and answered. Your LYING about it will not diminish the
>>TRUTH of this.
>> Please be honest and admit that which everyone reading knows. hat
>>Klaus answered in Message-ID:
>><opmshgpiuvaqobrkpj1k2epah4rn3s04on@4ax.com>. In fact, Klaus answered
>>BEFORE that post. He simply answered again.
>> Now LIE about this, Gasbag. You will because, unless you make a
>>mistake, you are psychologically UNABLE to be honest.
>
>If this group *was* moderated, Jenny would be banned for wasting
>everyone's time by asking the same question over and over again while
>ignoring the answer.

Very true.
I do hope the Gasbag will actually address the TRUTH that you did
answer. And that you answered twice.

--
Aspire to inspire before you expire.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:mgndpgtu945j9r4ock0sog301mmqscijnr@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:23:22 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:ct6dng9u8q2otl9ohu4esfvu54l3c1dpmm@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:55:08 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:u5rokg99nuup45cb7hofarhbd1tv1bmtqg@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:11:30 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> They don't fold their tostada.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>BUT THE DO FOLD THIER TACO'S, SO A FOLDED TOSTADA TRANSLATES INTO A
>>>>>>TACO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Wrong. Pay attention.
>>>>
>>>>Once again, you just blather out "wrong" without sayting WHY I'm
>>>>"wrong".
>>>
>>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>>
>>> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
>>> [ x ] You are lying, as usual
>>> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
>>> [ x ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
>>> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
>>> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
>>> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
>>> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
>>> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>>>
>>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>>
>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>klous.............................
>>
>
> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>
> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
> [ ] You are lying, as usual
> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
> [ x ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>
> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========

Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
klous.............................

On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 20:14:08 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:mgndpgtu945j9r4ock0sog301mmqscijnr@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:23:22 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:ct6dng9u8q2otl9ohu4esfvu54l3c1dpmm@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:55:08 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message
>>>>>news:u5rokg99nuup45cb7hofarhbd1tv1bmtqg@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:11:30 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They don't fold their tostada.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>BUT THE DO FOLD THIER TACO'S, SO A FOLDED TOSTADA TRANSLATES INTO A
>>>>>>>TACO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wrong. Pay attention.
>>>>>
>>>>>Once again, you just blather out "wrong" without sayting WHY I'm
>>>>>"wrong".
>>>>
>>>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>>>
>>>> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
>>>> [ x ] You are lying, as usual
>>>> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
>>>> [ x ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
>>>> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
>>>> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
>>>> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
>>>> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
>>>> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>>>>
>>>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>>>
>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>klous.............................
>>>
>>
>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>
>> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
>> [ ] You are lying, as usual
>> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
>> [ x ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
>> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
>> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
>> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
>> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
>> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>>
>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>
>
>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>klous.............................

====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========

[ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
[ ] You are lying, as usual
[ ] Typical racist Jenny response
[ x] This has already been explained to you
[ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
[ ] Yes, it *is* private property
[ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
[ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
[ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet

======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========

On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 20:14:08 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:mgndpgtu945j9r4ock0sog301mmqscijnr@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:23:22 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:ct6dng9u8q2otl9ohu4esfvu54l3c1dpmm@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:55:08 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message news:u5rokg99nuup45cb7hofarhbd1tv1bmtqg@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:11:30 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They don't fold their tostada.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>BUT THE DO FOLD THIER TACO'S, SO A FOLDED TOSTADA TRANSLATES INTO A
>>>>>>>TACO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wrong. Pay attention.
>>>>>
>>>>>Once again, you just blather out "wrong" without sayting WHY I'm
>>>>>"wrong".
>>>>
>>>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>>>
>>>> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
>>>> [ x ] You are lying, as usual
>>>> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
>>>> [ x ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
>>>> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
>>>> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
>>>> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
>>>> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
>>>> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>>>>
>>>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>>>
>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>klous.............................
>>>
>>
>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>
>> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
>> [ ] You are lying, as usual
>> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
>> [ x ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
>> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
>> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
>> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
>> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
>> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>>
>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>
>
>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>klous.............................

He already explained it. And offered actual evidence for his
claim. What do you think you gain by flat out LYING about this? I
really do want to know. But I also KNOW you're too scare of truth and
honesty to answer. You will run away, as you ALWAYS do, from my
request.
FYI: Leaders do not run away from requests. This is more PROOF,
if any where needed, that you have NO authority here, or anywhere
else.

--
Be really good to your family and friends. You never know
when you are going to need them to empty your bedpan.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:238npgpr8q9b9jv3ursd0g2gdmjstnh2h0@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 23:49:27 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:9t8dng5i1ptn3kdr8k2ti6ruf643acsioa@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 01:08:17 -0700, KWills <A@B.C> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:55:08 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message
>>>>>news:u5rokg99nuup45cb7hofarhbd1tv1bmtqg@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:11:30 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They don't fold their tostada.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>BUT THE DO FOLD THIER TACO'S, SO A FOLDED TOSTADA TRANSLATES INTO A
>>>>>>>TACO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wrong. Pay attention.
>>>>>
>>>>>Once again, you just blather out "wrong" without sayting WHY I'm
>>>>>"wrong".
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's been explained to you MANY times.
>>>>
>>>>>This is why my debating skill's are FAR superior to yours, becouse
>>>>>EVERY
>>>>>SINGLE FUCKING TIME I CALL YOU WRONG, I back it up with a reason and
>>>>>usually
>>>>>RELEVANT fact's.
>>>>
>>>> You suck at debate. When you're PROVED wrong, which is, as far as
>>>>I can tell every time you post, you ignore the facts and continue with
>>>>your lying.
>>
>>
>>Example? Becouse the way I remember it, every time you think you proved
>>me
>>wrong, I responded with a counter-argumnet, based on FACT, that proves
>>your
>>argument WRONG.
>>
>
> Then not only are you a liar, but you must have early onset
> Alzheimer's, because you've never proven me wrong.

Sounds to me like YOUR teh one with Alzeimer's, Klous, I proven you wrong
MANY time's.

The fact that you IGNORED me, doesn't mean I didn't do it.

On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 19:28:26 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>>> You suck at debate. When you're PROVED wrong, which is, as far as
>>>>>I can tell every time you post, you ignore the facts and continue with
>>>>>your lying.
>>>
>>>
>>>Example? Becouse the way I remember it, every time you think you proved
>>>me
>>>wrong, I responded with a counter-argumnet, based on FACT, that proves
>>>your argument WRONG.
>>
>> Then not only are you a liar, but you must have early onset
>> Alzheimer's, because you've never proven me wrong.
>
>Sounds to me like YOUR teh one with Alzeimer's, Klous, I proven you wrong
>MANY time's.
>
>The fact that you IGNORED me, doesn't mean I didn't do it.

You've NEVER proved anyone wrong since I joined the group. But
post the MID(s) and/or archive link(s) that prove your claim. If
you're feeding your NEED to lie, and you are, you will not offer the
requested cites.
I'm waiting...

--
There's no place like 127.0.0.1

On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 19:28:26 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> Then not only are you a liar, but you must have early onset
>> Alzheimer's, because you've never proven me wrong.
>
>Sounds to me like YOUR teh one with Alzeimer's, Klous, I proven you wrong
>MANY time's.
>
>The fact that you IGNORED me, doesn't mean I didn't do it.
>

You have NEVER proven me wrong.

The fact that you failed to provide a MID proves that.

On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 02:20:35 -0800, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 19:28:26 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>> You suck at debate. When you're PROVED wrong, which is, as far as
>>>>>>I can tell every time you post, you ignore the facts and continue with
>>>>>>your lying.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Example? Becouse the way I remember it, every time you think you proved
>>>>me
>>>>wrong, I responded with a counter-argumnet, based on FACT, that proves
>>>>your argument WRONG.
>>>
>>> Then not only are you a liar, but you must have early onset
>>> Alzheimer's, because you've never proven me wrong.
>>
>>Sounds to me like YOUR teh one with Alzeimer's, Klous, I proven you wrong
>>MANY time's.
>>
>>The fact that you IGNORED me, doesn't mean I didn't do it.
>
> You've NEVER proved anyone wrong since I joined the group. But
>post the MID(s) and/or archive link(s) that prove your claim. If
>you're feeding your NEED to lie, and you are, you will not offer the
>requested cites.
> I'm waiting...

Do you suppose there is a special dialect up there in Green Bay that
we're not familiar with?

Where "proved you wrong" means "run away?"

On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 03:07:11 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 02:20:35 -0800, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 19:28:26 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> You suck at debate. When you're PROVED wrong, which is, as far as
>>>>>>>I can tell every time you post, you ignore the facts and continue with
>>>>>>>your lying.
>>>>>
>>>>>Example? Becouse the way I remember it, every time you think you proved
>>>>>me
>>>>>wrong, I responded with a counter-argumnet, based on FACT, that proves
>>>>>your argument WRONG.
>>>>
>>>> Then not only are you a liar, but you must have early onset
>>>> Alzheimer's, because you've never proven me wrong.
>>>
>>>Sounds to me like YOUR teh one with Alzeimer's, Klous, I proven you wrong
>>>MANY time's.
>>>
>>>The fact that you IGNORED me, doesn't mean I didn't do it.
>>
>> You've NEVER proved anyone wrong since I joined the group. But
>>post the MID(s) and/or archive link(s) that prove your claim. If
>>you're feeding your NEED to lie, and you are, you will not offer the
>>requested cites.
>> I'm waiting...
>
>Do you suppose there is a special dialect up there in Green Bay that
>we're not familiar with?
>
>Where "proved you wrong" means "run away?"

It would explain some things.

--
I suffer from chronic apathy.
I was going to go see a doctor about it, but I didn't really care.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hk0sqg5chc46n8vb9j2nt7km9ta54eeljn@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 21:38:39 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>ANSWER THE QUESTION.
>
> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>
> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
> [ ] You are lying, as usual
> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
> [ x ] This has already been explained to you
> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>
> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========

====== BEGIN STANDARD KLOUS RESPONSE =========

[ ] The public enteres teh Property.
[ ] You are lying, as usual
[ ] Have you 9 y/o nieghbor show you how to do that.
[ ] Just upgrade your damn computer.
[ ] That wasn't a lie, you just don't understand
[ ] Yes, it *is* public property
[ ] That discussion has already been closed.
[ ] What are you blathering on about now.
[ ] My name is Jerry, not Jenny
[ X ] Stop avoiding teh issue and answer the question.
[ ] STFU and give other people a chance to talk.

======= END STANDARD KLOUS RESPONSE ==========

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 13:13:14 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:hk0sqg5chc46n8vb9j2nt7km9ta54eeljn@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 21:38:39 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>ANSWER THE QUESTION.
>>
>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>
>> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
>> [ ] You are lying, as usual
>> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
>> [ x ] This has already been explained to you
>> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
>> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
>> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
>> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
>> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>>
>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>
>====== BEGIN STANDARD KLOUS RESPONSE =========
>
>[ ] The public enteres teh Property.
>[ ] You are lying, as usual
>[ ] Have you 9 y/o nieghbor show you how to do that.
>[ ] Just upgrade your damn computer.
>[ ] That wasn't a lie, you just don't understand
>[ ] Yes, it *is* public property
>[ ] That discussion has already been closed.
>[ ] What are you blathering on about now.
>[ ] My name is Jerry, not Jenny
>[ X ] Stop avoiding teh issue and answer the question.
>[ ] STFU and give other people a chance to talk.
>
>======= END STANDARD KLOUS RESPONSE ==========
>
====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========

[ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
[ ] You are lying, as usual
[ ] Typical racist Jenny response
[ X ] This has already been explained to you
[ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
[ ] Yes, it *is* private property
[ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
[ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
[ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet

======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 13:13:14 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:hk0sqg5chc46n8vb9j2nt7km9ta54eeljn@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 21:38:39 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>ANSWER THE QUESTION.
>>
>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>
>> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
>> [ ] You are lying, as usual
>> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
>> [ x ] This has already been explained to you
>> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
>> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
>> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
>> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
>> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>>
>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>
>====== BEGIN STANDARD KLOUS RESPONSE =========
>
>[ ] The public enteres teh Property.
>[ ] You are lying, as usual
>[ ] Have you 9 y/o nieghbor show you how to do that.
>[ ] Just upgrade your damn computer.
>[ ] That wasn't a lie, you just don't understand
>[ ] Yes, it *is* public property
>[ ] That discussion has already been closed.
>[ ] What are you blathering on about now.
>[ ] My name is Jerry, not Jenny
>[ X ] Stop avoiding teh issue and answer the question.
>[ ] STFU and give other people a chance to talk.
>
>======= END STANDARD KLOUS RESPONSE ==========

As you KNOW, Klaus has answered. More than once.
What do you hope to gain by LYING about this?

[Cue crickets]

--
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons...
for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gqmargh0ffeah1km75c8kqsjqkc9nv07o6@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 20:14:08 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:mgndpgtu945j9r4ock0sog301mmqscijnr@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:23:22 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:ct6dng9u8q2otl9ohu4esfvu54l3c1dpmm@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:55:08 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message
>>>>>>news:u5rokg99nuup45cb7hofarhbd1tv1bmtqg@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:11:30 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They don't fold their tostada.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>BUT THE DO FOLD THIER TACO'S, SO A FOLDED TOSTADA TRANSLATES INTO A
>>>>>>>>TACO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wrong. Pay attention.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Once again, you just blather out "wrong" without sayting WHY I'm
>>>>>>"wrong".
>>>>>
>>>>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
>>>>> [ x ] You are lying, as usual
>>>>> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
>>>>> [ x ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
>>>>> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
>>>>> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
>>>>> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
>>>>> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
>>>>> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>>>>>
>>>>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>>>>
>>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>>klous.............................
>>>>
>>>
>>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>>
>>> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
>>> [ ] You are lying, as usual
>>> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
>>> [ x ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
>>> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
>>> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
>>> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
>>> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
>>> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>>>
>>> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>>
>>
>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>klous.............................
>
> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>
> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
> [ ] You are lying, as usual
> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
> [ x] This has already been explained to you
> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>
> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========

Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
klous.............................

On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:21:53 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>klous.............................

Still wondering why you're ignoring the other times I've answered,
Jenny.

On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:21:53 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>klous.............................
>

He's already explained it. Why LIE and present that he has not?

[Cue crickets]

--
Bless me, Father, for I have committed an original sin.
I poked a badger with a spoon.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2djp1hha3fght0sg7e5hfgggohbuspa335@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 21:32:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:njqgugt0fr1kkhh3efnkeaedgdl3t5s9ld@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:21:53 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>>klous.............................
>>>
>>> Still wondering why you're ignoring the other times I've answered,
>>> Jenny.
>>
>>
>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>klous.............................
>>
>
> No, you're not.

Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
klous.............................

On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 01:06:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:2djp1hha3fght0sg7e5hfgggohbuspa335@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 21:32:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:njqgugt0fr1kkhh3efnkeaedgdl3t5s9ld@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:21:53 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>>>klous.............................
>>>>
>>>> Still wondering why you're ignoring the other times I've answered,
>>>> Jenny.
>>>
>>>
>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>klous.............................
>>>
>>
>> No, you're not.
>
>
>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>klous.............................
>
Still wondering why you're ignoring the other times I've answered,
Jenny.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g1cu4h99hsf98kn1m20hjplv4eftk7c56l@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 01:06:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:2djp1hha3fght0sg7e5hfgggohbuspa335@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 21:32:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:njqgugt0fr1kkhh3efnkeaedgdl3t5s9ld@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:21:53 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>>>>klous.............................
>>>>>
>>>>> Still wondering why you're ignoring the other times I've answered,
>>>>> Jenny.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>>klous.............................
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, you're not.
>>
>>
>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>klous.............................
>>
> Still wondering why you're ignoring the other times I've answered,
> Jenny.

Yes you answer, but no explanation.

Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
klous.............................

On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 13:38:49 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:g1cu4h99hsf98kn1m20hjplv4eftk7c56l@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 01:06:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:2djp1hha3fght0sg7e5hfgggohbuspa335@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 21:32:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message
>>>>>news:njqgugt0fr1kkhh3efnkeaedgdl3t5s9ld@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:21:53 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>>>>>klous.............................
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still wondering why you're ignoring the other times I've answered,
>>>>>> Jenny.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>>>klous.............................
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, you're not.
>>>
>>>
>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>klous.............................
>>>
>> Still wondering why you're ignoring the other times I've answered,
>> Jenny.
>
>Yes you answer, but no explanation.

I answered and explained.

You ignored.

Then you demand that I answer again.

I find that.... strange.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:thke5h9cdc6qvu18a1gb8592gnufnit6dm@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 13:38:49 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:g1cu4h99hsf98kn1m20hjplv4eftk7c56l@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 01:06:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:2djp1hha3fght0sg7e5hfgggohbuspa335@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 21:32:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message
>>>>>>news:njqgugt0fr1kkhh3efnkeaedgdl3t5s9ld@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:21:53 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>>>>>>klous.............................
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still wondering why you're ignoring the other times I've answered,
>>>>>>> Jenny.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>>>>klous.............................
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No, you're not.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>>klous.............................
>>>>
>>> Still wondering why you're ignoring the other times I've answered,
>>> Jenny.
>>
>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>klous.............................
>
>BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
>BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH LIAR!!!!!

Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
klous.............................

On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 20:15:43 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>klous.............................
>

Why do you lie about this?

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:nkoq5hpf95im0puqpt50atlqigtnb11aop@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 20:15:43 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>klous.............................
>>
>
> Why do you lie about this?

Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
klous.............................

On Sat, 14 May 2022 14:45:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:nkoq5hpf95im0puqpt50atlqigtnb11aop@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 20:15:43 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>>>klous.............................
>>>
>>
>> Why do you lie about this?
>
>
>Still waiting for that explanation of yours,
>klous.............................
>
Why do you lie about this?