Got the large size (8). Every one of then was little more than a hollow
shell with a tiny bit of the original cheese and jalapeno filling left.
It had been microwaved or fried out. I can only assume the mozzarella
sticks are the same deal.

I'll never make that mistake again.

The double cheeseburger was adequate.

I went there for a milk shake and the machine was broken. I settled for
an iced mocha coffee. Another average rating.

I'll give it three Saukweasels out of 10. Disappointing overall. I did
notice signs saying it was private property, so Jenny is still lying.

On Sun, 22 May 2022 15:06:49 -0000 (UTC), "Scott Oaf - (I'm really
Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote:

>Got the large size (8). Every one of then was little more than a hollow
>shell with a tiny bit of the original cheese and jalapeno filling left.
>It had been microwaved or fried out. I can only assume the mozzarella
>sticks are the same deal.
>
>I'll never make that mistake again.

That sure doesn't sound like the picture
https://fastfoodnutrition.org/item-photos/full/8894_s.jpg
No wonder they're getting sued.

>The double cheeseburger was adequate.
>
>I went there for a milk shake and the machine was broken. I settled for
>an iced mocha coffee. Another average rating.
>
>I'll give it three Saukweasels out of 10. Disappointing overall. I did
>notice signs saying it was private property, so Jenny is still lying.

Three Saukweasels out of 10 is just a couple of steps above "Condemned
by the Health Department! But I hate expecting a shake from a
$Billion+ burger company that can't make a milkshake.

KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
news:8rmk8h5fgq4ud1rvngo80rjuitd9aljjco@4ax.com:

> On Sun, 22 May 2022 15:06:49 -0000 (UTC), "Scott Oaf - (I'm really
> Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote:
>
>>Got the large size (8). Every one of then was little more than a
>>hollow shell with a tiny bit of the original cheese and jalapeno
>>filling left. It had been microwaved or fried out. I can only assume
>>the mozzarella sticks are the same deal.
>>
>>I'll never make that mistake again.
>
> That sure doesn't sound like the picture
> https://fastfoodnutrition.org/item-photos/full/8894_s.jpg
> No wonder they're getting sued.

Believe me, they looked absolutely delicious. The reality is that 85% of
the bite is air, at least from my experience. Next time I order
something with those ingredients somewhere else, I'll order a larger
size than "bites".

>>The double cheeseburger was adequate.
>>
>>I went there for a milk shake and the machine was broken. I settled
>>for an iced mocha coffee. Another average rating.
>>
>>I'll give it three Saukweasels out of 10. Disappointing overall. I did
>>notice signs saying it was private property, so Jenny is still lying.
>
> Three Saukweasels out of 10 is just a couple of steps above "Condemned
> by the Health Department! But I hate expecting a shake from a
> $Billion+ burger company that can't make a milkshake.

The worst part of this is that there are two different places near me
that make absolutely exquisite (and real) milk shakes. I had coupons for
a burger, and one for a milk shake on my app. So I walked in for a
burger and recalled the milk shakes were decent. I haven't ever had a
reason to order the chicken fries, I suspect it's all reconstituted
chicken sludge/slurry.

There's a McDrecks literally across the street that's legendary for
health code violation, so no thanks. I've long since given up on Taco
Hell and the Subway down the street is owned or managed by a bunch of
assholes that treated their workers like shit on my solitary visit.

Today is a Costco rotisserrie chicken (or the meat) or their mesquite
ribs.

"Scott Oaf - (I'm really Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote in message
news:XnsAE9F8590E48F5CowardlyChadRunsAway@144.76.35.252...
> KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:8rmk8h5fgq4ud1rvngo80rjuitd9aljjco@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sun, 22 May 2022 15:06:49 -0000 (UTC), "Scott Oaf - (I'm really
>> Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Got the large size (8). Every one of then was little more than a
>>>hollow shell with a tiny bit of the original cheese and jalapeno
>>>filling left. It had been microwaved or fried out. I can only assume
>>>the mozzarella sticks are the same deal.
>>>
>>>I'll never make that mistake again.
>>
>> That sure doesn't sound like the picture
>> https://fastfoodnutrition.org/item-photos/full/8894_s.jpg
>> No wonder they're getting sued.
>
> Believe me, they looked absolutely delicious. The reality is that 85% of
> the bite is air, at least from my experience. Next time I order
> something with those ingredients somewhere else, I'll order a larger
> size than "bites".

well instead of complaing, why don't you just go "somewhere else" and
review the food thier?

On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:29:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Scott Oaf - (I'm really Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote in message
>news:XnsAE9F8590E48F5CowardlyChadRunsAway@144.76.35.252...
>> KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:8rmk8h5fgq4ud1rvngo80rjuitd9aljjco@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sun, 22 May 2022 15:06:49 -0000 (UTC), "Scott Oaf - (I'm really
>>> Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Got the large size (8). Every one of then was little more than a
>>>>hollow shell with a tiny bit of the original cheese and jalapeno
>>>>filling left. It had been microwaved or fried out. I can only assume
>>>>the mozzarella sticks are the same deal.
>>>>
>>>>I'll never make that mistake again.
>>>
>>> That sure doesn't sound like the picture
>>> https://fastfoodnutrition.org/item-photos/full/8894_s.jpg
>>> No wonder they're getting sued.
>>
>> Believe me, they looked absolutely delicious. The reality is that 85% of
>> the bite is air, at least from my experience. Next time I order
>> something with those ingredients somewhere else, I'll order a larger
>> size than "bites".
>
> well instead of complaing, why don't you just go "somewhere else" and
>review the food thier?
>

Do you know what a "review" is, Jenny?

"Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:9KednSkXtLnHxCb_nZ2dnUU7-RXNnZ2d@supernews.com:

>
> "Scott Oaf - (I'm really Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote in
> message news:XnsAE9F8590E48F5CowardlyChadRunsAway@144.76.35.252...
>> KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:8rmk8h5fgq4ud1rvngo80rjuitd9aljjco@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sun, 22 May 2022 15:06:49 -0000 (UTC), "Scott Oaf - (I'm really
>>> Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Got the large size (8). Every one of then was little more than a
>>>>hollow shell with a tiny bit of the original cheese and jalapeno
>>>>filling left. It had been microwaved or fried out. I can only assume
>>>>the mozzarella sticks are the same deal.
>>>>
>>>>I'll never make that mistake again.
>>>
>>> That sure doesn't sound like the picture
>>> https://fastfoodnutrition.org/item-photos/full/8894_s.jpg
>>> No wonder they're getting sued.
>>
>> Believe me, they looked absolutely delicious. The reality is that 85%
>> of the bite is air, at least from my experience. Next time I order
>> something with those ingredients somewhere else, I'll order a larger
>> size than "bites".
>
> well instead of complaing, why don't you just go "somewhere else"
> and review the food thier?

That wasn't a review? How stupid are you, Jenny?

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4npmbhd6f2qn13rnq2rsf8uv45lmdt6ae8@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:29:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Scott Oaf - (I'm really Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:XnsAE9F8590E48F5CowardlyChadRunsAway@144.76.35.252...
>>> KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:8rmk8h5fgq4ud1rvngo80rjuitd9aljjco@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2022 15:06:49 -0000 (UTC), "Scott Oaf - (I'm really
>>>> Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Got the large size (8). Every one of then was little more than a
>>>>>hollow shell with a tiny bit of the original cheese and jalapeno
>>>>>filling left. It had been microwaved or fried out. I can only assume
>>>>>the mozzarella sticks are the same deal.
>>>>>
>>>>>I'll never make that mistake again.
>>>>
>>>> That sure doesn't sound like the picture
>>>> https://fastfoodnutrition.org/item-photos/full/8894_s.jpg
>>>> No wonder they're getting sued.
>>>
>>> Believe me, they looked absolutely delicious. The reality is that 85% of
>>> the bite is air, at least from my experience. Next time I order
>>> something with those ingredients somewhere else, I'll order a larger
>>> size than "bites".
>>
>> well instead of complaing, why don't you just go "somewhere else" and
>>review the food thier?
>>
>
> Do you know what a "review" is, Jenny?

YES, I do. My orignal request stands, instead of complaing, why don't you
just go "somewhere else" and review the food thier? and the rason I mention
"somewhere else" is becouse that's specfiically what YOU said.

"Scott Oaf - (I'm really Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote in message
news:XnsAEC4BFFBBCD4BCowardlyChadRunsAway@88.198.57.247...
> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:9KednSkXtLnHxCb_nZ2dnUU7-RXNnZ2d@supernews.com:
>
>>
>> "Scott Oaf - (I'm really Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote in
>> message news:XnsAE9F8590E48F5CowardlyChadRunsAway@144.76.35.252...
>>> KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:8rmk8h5fgq4ud1rvngo80rjuitd9aljjco@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2022 15:06:49 -0000 (UTC), "Scott Oaf - (I'm really
>>>> Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Got the large size (8). Every one of then was little more than a
>>>>>hollow shell with a tiny bit of the original cheese and jalapeno
>>>>>filling left. It had been microwaved or fried out. I can only assume
>>>>>the mozzarella sticks are the same deal.
>>>>>
>>>>>I'll never make that mistake again.
>>>>
>>>> That sure doesn't sound like the picture
>>>> https://fastfoodnutrition.org/item-photos/full/8894_s.jpg
>>>> No wonder they're getting sued.
>>>
>>> Believe me, they looked absolutely delicious. The reality is that 85%
>>> of the bite is air, at least from my experience. Next time I order
>>> something with those ingredients somewhere else, I'll order a larger
>>> size than "bites".
>>
>> well instead of complaing, why don't you just go "somewhere else"
>> and review the food thier?
>
> That wasn't a review? How stupid are you, Jenny?

That wasn't a reviews of "somewhere else", which was where I suggested he go
instead of bitching. He himslef mentiponed it. he himself should GO there.

On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 05:09:56 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4npmbhd6f2qn13rnq2rsf8uv45lmdt6ae8@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:29:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Scott Oaf - (I'm really Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:XnsAE9F8590E48F5CowardlyChadRunsAway@144.76.35.252...
>>>> KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>> news:8rmk8h5fgq4ud1rvngo80rjuitd9aljjco@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2022 15:06:49 -0000 (UTC), "Scott Oaf - (I'm really
>>>>> Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Got the large size (8). Every one of then was little more than a
>>>>>>hollow shell with a tiny bit of the original cheese and jalapeno
>>>>>>filling left. It had been microwaved or fried out. I can only assume
>>>>>>the mozzarella sticks are the same deal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'll never make that mistake again.
>>>>>
>>>>> That sure doesn't sound like the picture
>>>>> https://fastfoodnutrition.org/item-photos/full/8894_s.jpg
>>>>> No wonder they're getting sued.
>>>>
>>>> Believe me, they looked absolutely delicious. The reality is that 85% of
>>>> the bite is air, at least from my experience. Next time I order
>>>> something with those ingredients somewhere else, I'll order a larger
>>>> size than "bites".
>>>
>>> well instead of complaing, why don't you just go "somewhere else" and
>>>review the food thier?
>>>
>>
>> Do you know what a "review" is, Jenny?
>
>
>YES, I do.

No, apparently, you do not. Here, let me explain it to you.

REVIEW
critique of a restaurant, rating of a restaurant's qualities (food,
service, prices, etc.)

One the reasons this newsgroup exists is for reviewing fast food,
Jenny. I don't know if you knew that. And a review may be favorable or
critical. Both are equally useful.

In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
someone posts a review you don't agree with, because you don't seem to
be capable of posting reviews any more anyway.

Thanks!

------------------------------------------

When will Jenny confess that he lied when he made this claim?

:JENNY_LIE: Many week's [sic] ago, he [Kwills] personally
:JENNY_LIE:emailed me after I refused his re-admission,
:JENNY_LIE:and he admitted he was in teh [sic] wrong and
:JENNY_LIE:that he is just a troll. He also suggested
:JENNY_LIE:I killfile [sic] Klous [sic] as well, which prove's
:JENNY_LIE: [sic] how much respect for the killfiling [sic] program.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...

> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
> someone posts a review you don't agree with,

Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.

However, it is NOT for sharing opinion's that are the oppostite of FACT.

Therefore, if a person posts a review that I don't agree with, I am welcome
to post.

However, if I post a FACT such as taco bell is public property, you have NO
RIGHT to demand your opinion once teh debate has been closed.

On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>
>
>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>
>
>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>
>However, it is NOT for sharing opinion's that are the oppostite of FACT.

Which is why I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if someone
posts a review you don't agree with, since your posts are almost
ALWAYS opposite of fact.

>Therefore, if a person posts a review that I don't agree with, I am welcome
>to post.
>
>However, if I post a FACT such as taco bell is public property, you have NO
>RIGHT to demand your opinion once teh debate has been closed.

How can I "demand my opinion?" That doesn't make any sense.

The debate about Taco Bell being private property is closed. You're
the only one who thinks it's public property.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6189jh5qjrgupcv68qrfv6vmb9itsomsch@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>>
>>
>>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>>
>>However, it is NOT for sharing opinion's that are the oppostite of FACT.
>
> Which is why I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if someone
> posts a review you don't agree with, since your posts are almost
> ALWAYS opposite of fact.
>
>
>>Therefore, if a person posts a review that I don't agree with, I am
>>welcome
>>to post.
>>
>>However, if I post a FACT such as taco bell is public property, you have
>>NO
>>RIGHT to demand your opinion once teh debate has been closed.
>
> How can I "demand my opinion?" That doesn't make any sense.
>
> The debate about Taco Bell being private property is closed.

Good. Thank you for agreeing that it is public, thereby closing the debate.

On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 19:54:45 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:6189jh5qjrgupcv68qrfv6vmb9itsomsch@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>>>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>>>
>>>
>>>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>>>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>>>
>>>However, it is NOT for sharing opinion's that are the oppostite of FACT.

CRICKETS

>> Which is why I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if someone
>> posts a review you don't agree with, since your posts are almost
>> ALWAYS opposite of fact.
>>
>>
>>>Therefore, if a person posts a review that I don't agree with, I am
>>>welcome
>>>to post.
>>>
>>>However, if I post a FACT such as taco bell is public property, you have
>>>NO
>>>RIGHT to demand your opinion once teh debate has been closed.
>>
>> How can I "demand my opinion?" That doesn't make any sense.

CRICKETS

>> The debate about Taco Bell being private property is closed.
>
>Good. Thank you for agreeing that it is public, thereby closing the debate.
>

The vast majority of Taco Bell's are private property, which you know.

On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:29:37 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>>
>>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>>
>>
>>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>>
>>However, it is NOT for sharing opinion's that are the oppostite of FACT.
>
>Which is why I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if someone
>posts a review you don't agree with, since your posts are almost
>ALWAYS opposite of fact.
>

You've replied to a post OVER a year old, stupid. If you don't
want a topic discussed, don't bring it up a year AFTER it's been
abandoned.

>
>>Therefore, if a person posts a review that I don't agree with, I am welcome
>>to post.
>>
>>However, if I post a FACT such as taco bell is public property, you have NO
>>RIGHT to demand your opinion once teh debate has been closed.
>
>How can I "demand my opinion?" That doesn't make any sense.
>
>The debate about Taco Bell being private property is closed. You're
>the only one who thinks it's public property.

Do cease lying. Everyone, except you, who has commented has
stated it is private property. The actual, legal definition has been
posted MANY times. And every time, it proves that Taco Bell is, most
of the time, private property. If it is on a government installation
(airports have been used as a perfect example), then it can be said to
be on public property.
But you already know this. You're simply lying.

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/

"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
news:1qnajh1foc8jul1rkm953srqribce56lgb@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>>
>>
>>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>>
>
> No it's not. It's for the discussion of fast food.

WHICH INCLUDES DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.

> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
> property.

THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.

"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
news:8hoihi1agnvesa9bl2umoqp0pprkpljljr@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:29:37 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>>>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>>>
>>>
>>>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>>>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>>>
>>>However, it is NOT for sharing opinion's that are the oppostite of FACT.
>>
>>Which is why I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if someone
>>posts a review you don't agree with, since your posts are almost
>>ALWAYS opposite of fact.
>>
>
> You've replied to a post OVER a year old, stupid. If you don't
> want a topic discussed, don't bring it up a year AFTER it's been
> abandoned.

Hasn't been abandoned. It's still on supernews. Sorry is you use as
crappier news server, but mine still has it.

On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:19:32 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>news:8hoihi1agnvesa9bl2umoqp0pprkpljljr@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:29:37 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>>>>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>>>>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>>>>
>>>>However, it is NOT for sharing opinion's that are the oppostite of FACT.
>>>
>>>Which is why I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if someone
>>>posts a review you don't agree with, since your posts are almost
>>>ALWAYS opposite of fact.
>>>
>>
>> You've replied to a post OVER a year old, stupid. If you don't
>> want a topic discussed, don't bring it up a year AFTER it's been
>> abandoned.
>
>Hasn't been abandoned. It's still on supernews. Sorry is you use as
>crappier news server, but mine still has it.
>

He didn't say that, idiot. He said you ABANDONED IT. Now, A YEAR
LATER, you're bring it up again AFTER you abandoned it

On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>> property.
>
>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.

Nobody said they don't.

On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>news:1qnajh1foc8jul1rkm953srqribce56lgb@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>>>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>>>
>>>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>>>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>>
>> No it's not. It's for the discussion of fast food.
>
>WHICH INCLUDES DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>

But in contrast to your claim above, it's not the sole purpose.

>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>> property.
>
>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>

That you waited over a year to offer your deception, doesn't
reduce the deception.
The LEGAL definitions of public and private property have been
posted many times. You running away from the truth you HATE so much
will never result in the truth being altered.

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/

On Tue, 03 Oct 2023 11:58:01 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>>> property.
>>
>>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>
>Nobody said they don't.

Jenny is trying to claim that the public being allowed access
means it's public property. He KNOWS this is not so. Jenny KNOWS the
truth, but has a very real NEED to lie.

--
You might be a king or a little street sweeper,
but sooner or later you dance with the reaper.

On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:19:32 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>news:8hoihi1agnvesa9bl2umoqp0pprkpljljr@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:29:37 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>>>>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>>>>
>>>>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>>>>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>>>>
>>>>However, it is NOT for sharing opinion's that are the oppostite of FACT.
>>>
>>>Which is why I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if someone
>>>posts a review you don't agree with, since your posts are almost
>>>ALWAYS opposite of fact.
>>
>> You've replied to a post OVER a year old, stupid. If you don't
>> want a topic discussed, don't bring it up a year AFTER it's been
>> abandoned.
>
>Hasn't been abandoned.

With no follow up for over a year, yes it was.
Please get professional mental health care for your pathological
lying.

>It's still on supernews. Sorry is you use as
>crappier news server, but mine still has it.

I didn't say it wasn't, and isn't, on the servers. Way to LIE
about what was posted, liar.
BTW, easynews is considered one of the best servers available. So
explain just why you thought LYING about it would benefit you.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny]

Jenny! You accidentally RAN AWAY from the TRUTH seen below.
Please address it now, unless you are unable to bring forth the
requisite honesty.

>>>Therefore, if a person posts a review that I don't agree with, I am welcome
>>>to post.
>>>
>>>However, if I post a FACT such as taco bell is public property, you have NO
>>>RIGHT to demand your opinion once teh debate has been closed.
>>
>>How can I "demand my opinion?" That doesn't make any sense.
>>
>>The debate about Taco Bell being private property is closed. You're
>>the only one who thinks it's public property.
>
> Do cease lying. Everyone, except you, who has commented has
>stated it is private property. The actual, legal definition has been
>posted MANY times. And every time, it proves that Taco Bell is, most
>of the time, private property. If it is on a government installation
>(airports have been used as a perfect example), then it can be said to
>be on public property.
> But you already know this. You're simply lying.

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/

On Tue, 03 Oct 2023 11:55:54 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:19:32 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>>news:8hoihi1agnvesa9bl2umoqp0pprkpljljr@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:29:37 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>>>>>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>>>>>
>>>>>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>>>>>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>>>>>
>>>>>However, it is NOT for sharing opinion's that are the oppostite of FACT.
>>>>
>>>>Which is why I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if someone
>>>>posts a review you don't agree with, since your posts are almost
>>>>ALWAYS opposite of fact.
>>>
>>> You've replied to a post OVER a year old, stupid. If you don't
>>> want a topic discussed, don't bring it up a year AFTER it's been
>>> abandoned.
>>
>>Hasn't been abandoned. It's still on supernews. Sorry is you use as
>>crappier news server, but mine still has it.
>
>He didn't say that, idiot. He said you ABANDONED IT. Now, A YEAR
>LATER, you're bring it up again AFTER you abandoned it

Jenny really does have a NEED to lie.

--
Bless me, Father, for I have committed an original sin.
I poked a badger with a spoon.

"KWills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
news:t18qhidcs8tkepoa94sc0a9i0o6anvoh8i@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:19:32 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>>news:8hoihi1agnvesa9bl2umoqp0pprkpljljr@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:29:37 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>>>>>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>>>>>
>>>>>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>>>>>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>>>>>
>>>>>However, it is NOT for sharing opinion's that are the oppostite of
>>>>>FACT.
>>>>
>>>>Which is why I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if someone
>>>>posts a review you don't agree with, since your posts are almost
>>>>ALWAYS opposite of fact.
>>>
>>> You've replied to a post OVER a year old, stupid. If you don't
>>> want a topic discussed, don't bring it up a year AFTER it's been
>>> abandoned.
>>
>>Hasn't been abandoned.
>
> With no follow up for over a year, yes it was.
> Please get professional mental health care for your pathological
> lying.

Yawn.

On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 04:16:36 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>news:t18qhidcs8tkepoa94sc0a9i0o6anvoh8i@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:19:32 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>>>news:8hoihi1agnvesa9bl2umoqp0pprkpljljr@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:29:37 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>>>>>>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>>>>>>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>However, it is NOT for sharing opinion's that are the oppostite of
>>>>>>FACT.
>>>>>
>>>>>Which is why I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if someone
>>>>>posts a review you don't agree with, since your posts are almost
>>>>>ALWAYS opposite of fact.
>>>>
>>>> You've replied to a post OVER a year old, stupid. If you don't
>>>> want a topic discussed, don't bring it up a year AFTER it's been
>>>> abandoned.
>>>
>>>Hasn't been abandoned.
>>
>> With no follow up for over a year, yes it was.
>> Please get professional mental health care for your pathological
>> lying.
>
>Yawn.
>

ibid.

How is that whole magic kill file thing working out for you?

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9uoohitcgeqtgth0v4otp1aik4smrrnj3i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>>> property.
>>
>>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>
> Nobody said they don't.

Thank you for admitting that Taco Bell is public property.