https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10101953/Beijing-mocks-America-saying-new-21-000mph-nuclear-capable-missile-new-blow-US.html

'It is inevitable that China will take an upper hand
over the US': Chinese state media celebrates new
nuclear-capable 21,000mph missile that can circle Earth
in low orbit before striking anywhere from space in MINUTES

Report from Financial Times said test showed China had made
'astounding progress' on hypersonic weapons Hypersonic missile
launched in August, circled the globe at low orbit and missed
target by two dozen miles

- - -

Two dozen miles ... well ... that means you just put a
bigger warhead in it.

This isn't a "hypersonic missile" per-se, it's a space
rocket aimed at a very low orbit, with a little
maneuvering capability. Elon Musk could duplicate this
easy - and be within feet on target.

Actually Xi could destroy the USA simply by refusing
to lend anymore money, and "encouraging" other lenders
to act the same. No need to waste expensive missiles.

In any case, this is just further evidence that Xi
is about to make his Big Move.

Is Joe up to it ? HaHaHaHaHa .....

You're REALLY gonna miss Trump.

On 10/17/21 9:21 PM, SevenOverSix wrote:
> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10101953/Beijing-mocks-America-saying-new-21-000mph-nuclear-capable-missile-new-blow-US.html
>
>
> 'It is inevitable that China will take an upper hand
> over the US': Chinese state media celebrates new
> nuclear-capable 21,000mph missile that can circle Earth
> in low orbit before striking anywhere from space in MINUTES
>
> Report from Financial Times said test showed China had made
> 'astounding progress' on hypersonic weapons Hypersonic missile
> launched in August, circled the globe at low orbit and missed
> target by two dozen miles
>

For a different perspective on the Chinese hypersonic missile . . . .

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2021/10/the-new-chinese-wonder-weapon-which-likely-isnt-one.html#more

moonofalabama.org
The New Chinese Wonder Weapon Which Likely Isn't One
21-27 minutes

October 18, 2021
The New Chinese Wonder Weapon Which Likely Isn't One

On Saturday the Financial Times published a sensational piece on alleged
Chinese testing of a new weapon system:

China tests new space capability with hypersonic missile
Launch in August of nuclear-capable rocket that circled the globe took
US intelligence by surprise

China tested a nuclear-capable hypersonic missile in August that
circled the globe before speeding towards its target, demonstrating an
advanced space capability that caught US intelligence by surprise.

Five people familiar with the test said the Chinese military
launched a rocket that carried a hypersonic glide vehicle which flew
through low-orbit space before cruising down towards its target.

The missile missed its target by about two-dozen miles, according
to three people briefed on the intelligence. But two said the test
showed that China had made astounding progress on hypersonic weapons and
was far more advanced than US officials realised.

The test has raised new questions about why the US often
underestimated China’s military modernisation.

“We have no idea how they did this,” said a fourth person.

That fourth person must be part of the U.S. 'intelligence' community
which is know for its lack thereof. Or some know nothing political editor:

Blake Hounshell @blakehounshell 10:00 PM · Oct 16, 2021
Incredible. This has all the elements of a Sputnik moment:

Demetri Sevastopulo @Dimi · Oct 16
SCOOP – #China has stunned US intelligence and military
officials by testing a #nuclear capable #hypersonic missile that
traveled through low orbit in space, making a full circle around the
globe before speeding towards its target.
https://on.ft.com/3vqpXx1

What the FT describes is a Fractional Orbital Bombardment System which
the USSR once developed but never deployed in larger numbers:

The Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) was a
nuclear-weapons delivery system developed in the 1960s by the Soviet
Union. One of the first Soviet efforts to use space to deliver weapons,
FOBS envisioned launching nuclear warheads into low Earth orbit before
bringing them down on their targets.

Like a kinetic bombardment system but with nuclear weapons, FOBS
had several attractive qualities: it had no range limit, its flight path
would not reveal the target location, and warheads could be directed to
North America over the South Pole, evading detection by NORAD's
north-facing early warning systems.

bigger

The reason for developing FOBS was the U.S. deployment of anti ballistic
missile systems (ABM) that threatened to take out Soviet
Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles. Missile defense would allow the
U.S. to launch a first strike onto the USSR as it could theoretically
destroy a responding wave of retaliatory Soviet missiles.

In 1972 the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty was signed. It restricted U.S.
and Soviet missile defense systems to one on each side. That solved the
problem of a first strike capability and made the Soviet FOBS unnecessary.

In June 2002 the GW Bush administration withdrew from the ABM treaty.
(One of its members, the lying former Secretary of State Collin Powell,
has died today, unfortunately not in an Iraqi prison.)

The U.S. has since deployed missile defense systems. While these are of
dubious quality all its potential enemies, Russia, North Korea and
China, have since reacted by developing new weapon delivery systems
which can circumvent U.S. missile defenses.

The development of a Chinese FOBS should therefore not astonish anyone -
if it indeed has happened.

China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson today denied that the reported
flight was of a nuclear capable system:

Bloomberg: The Financial Times has reported that China tested a
nuclear-capable hypersonic missile. Could the foreign ministry confirmed
if China has such a missile?

Zhao Lijian: As we understand, this was a routine test of space
vehicle to verify technology of spacecraft's reusability. It is of great
significance to reducing the cost of using space vehicle and providing a
convenient and cheap way for mankind's two-way transportation in the
peaceful use of space. Several companies around the world have conducted
similar tests.

After separating from the space vehicle before its return, the
supporting devices will burn up when it's falling in the atmosphere and
the debris will fall into the high seas. China will work with other
countries in the world for the peaceful use of space for the benefit of
mankind.

AFP: Is the missile you mentioned the same missile reported by the
Financial Times?

Zhao Lijian: As I just said, it's not missile, but a space vehicle.
...
Bloomberg: I'm going to follow on the routine test of the space
vehicle. And could you confirm when the test happened and what kind of
space vehicles it was?

Zhao Lijian: As I understand, it was in July. This is a test of
space vehicle to verify the technology of spacecraft's reusability.

Reuters: The Financial Times reported that it's hypersonic missile.
Are you saying that the missile mentioned in the report should be a
space vehicle?

Zhao Lijian: Yes.

It is not assured that the FT report and the Chinese account are of the
same system. But back in July China had indeed tested a reusable spacecraft:

The state-run China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation,
or CASC, released a statement earlier today stating that it had
successfully carried out the first suborbital test of a reusable space
vehicle that can land in a similar fashion to a traditional plane.
Details about the test and the spaceplane itself are limited, but CASC
has been publicly working on such technologies, ostensibly for
commercial use, for years now and had previously said it expected to
carry out such a flight test last year.

bigger

The space plane system China is developing would be launched by a
traditional missile and, like the former U.S. Space Shuttle, glide back
to earth. When reentering the atmosphere the space plane would reach,
like the space shuttle, speeds beyond Mach 5 and could therefore be
called hypersonic.

While such a system could have a military mission its large size means
that it would be a waste to use it for the delivery of nuclear war heads.

It might of course be that whoever briefed the officials who talked to
the Financial Times has exaggerated the Chinese intent and its capabilities.

Such talks of 'missile gaps' and of purported super weapons an adversary
allegedly has is useful when one wants Congress to cough up more money
for weapons development.

The FT report may well have been part of such a campaign.

Posted by b on October 18, 2021 at 15:41 UTC | Permalink

Comments

China's biggest problem is how to keep a straight face while falling
over themselves laughing. If it really was a FOBS they can issue bland
denials until the cows come home and watch western "intelligence" and
its presstitutes go into paroxysms of xenophobia and paranoia. If it
really was a space plane test, they can blandly assert it was a space
plane test with the same result. Win-win for China.

Posted by: pasha | Oct 18 2021 15:59 utc | 1

thanks b.... you are very masterful at breaking apart the information
given in the msm! to the point one has to ask a lot more questions of
the motives.. i agree with your hypothesis - more money for weapon
developments in the usa... that is of course a given! people's party to
the rescue, lol - not!

wonder where gordog disappeared to??

Posted by: james | Oct 18 2021 16:01 utc | 2

This will result in massive fund raising effort for the US military. The
whole thing sounds like a wet dream for MIC in USofA. "We have to keep
up with an imaginary foe." That can go on for a long time.
I did LOL at China's response, but realize what is going on here. Fund
raising....

Posted by: horatio | Oct 18 2021 16:02 utc | 3

@ pasha... until such time as the msm is not completely full of shite or
beholden to the intel agencies, it is also a win win for these same 24/7
bullshit artists too.. there might be some truth out their, but one
would be hard pressed to know what it is reading the western media..

On 10/18/21 8:27 PM, Bruce Jender wrote:
> On 10/17/21 9:21 PM, SevenOverSix wrote:
>> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10101953/Beijing-mocks-America-saying-new-21-000mph-nuclear-capable-missile-new-blow-US.html
>>
>>
>> 'It is inevitable that China will take an upper hand
>> over the US': Chinese state media celebrates new
>> nuclear-capable 21,000mph missile that can circle Earth
>> in low orbit before striking anywhere from space in MINUTES
>>
>> Report from Financial Times said test showed China had made
>> 'astounding progress' on hypersonic weapons Hypersonic missile
>> launched in August, circled the globe at low orbit and missed
>> target by two dozen miles
>>
>
> For a different perspective on the Chinese hypersonic missile . . . .
>
> https://www.moonofalabama.org/2021/10/the-new-chinese-wonder-weapon-which-likely-isnt-one.html#more
>
>
>
> moonofalabama.org
> The New Chinese Wonder Weapon Which Likely Isn't One
> 21-27 minutes
>
> October 18, 2021
> The New Chinese Wonder Weapon Which Likely Isn't One
>
> On Saturday the Financial Times published a sensational piece on alleged
> Chinese testing of a new weapon system:
>
> China tests new space capability with hypersonic missile
> Launch in August of nuclear-capable rocket that circled the globe took
> US intelligence by surprise
>
>     China tested a nuclear-capable hypersonic missile in August that
> circled the globe before speeding towards its target, demonstrating an
> advanced space capability that caught US intelligence by surprise.
>
>     Five people familiar with the test said the Chinese military
> launched a rocket that carried a hypersonic glide vehicle which flew
> through low-orbit space before cruising down towards its target.
>
>     The missile missed its target by about two-dozen miles, according
> to three people briefed on the intelligence. But two said the test
> showed that China had made astounding progress on hypersonic weapons and
> was far more advanced than US officials realised.
>
>     The test has raised new questions about why the US often
> underestimated China’s military modernisation.
>
>     “We have no idea how they did this,” said a fourth person.
>
> That fourth person must be part of the U.S. 'intelligence' community
> which is know for its lack thereof. Or some know nothing political editor:
>
>     Blake Hounshell @blakehounshell 10:00 PM · Oct 16, 2021
>     Incredible. This has all the elements of a Sputnik moment:
>
>         Demetri Sevastopulo @Dimi · Oct 16
>         SCOOP – #China has stunned US intelligence and military
> officials by testing a #nuclear capable #hypersonic missile that
> traveled through low orbit in space, making a full circle around the
> globe before speeding towards its target.
>         https://on.ft.com/3vqpXx1
>
> What the FT describes is a Fractional Orbital Bombardment System which
> the USSR once developed but never deployed in larger numbers:
>
>     The Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) was a
> nuclear-weapons delivery system developed in the 1960s by the Soviet
> Union. One of the first Soviet efforts to use space to deliver weapons,
> FOBS envisioned launching nuclear warheads into low Earth orbit before
> bringing them down on their targets.
>
>     Like a kinetic bombardment system but with nuclear weapons, FOBS
> had several attractive qualities: it had no range limit, its flight path
> would not reveal the target location, and warheads could be directed to
> North America over the South Pole, evading detection by NORAD's
> north-facing early warning systems.
>
>
> bigger
>
> The reason for developing FOBS was the U.S. deployment of anti ballistic
> missile systems (ABM) that threatened to take out Soviet
> Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles. Missile defense would allow the
> U.S. to launch a first strike onto the USSR as it could theoretically
> destroy a responding wave of retaliatory Soviet missiles.
>
> In 1972 the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty was signed. It restricted U.S.
> and Soviet missile defense systems to one on each side. That solved the
> problem of a first strike capability and made the Soviet FOBS unnecessary.
>
> In June 2002 the GW Bush administration withdrew from the ABM treaty.
> (One of its members, the lying former Secretary of State Collin Powell,
> has died today, unfortunately not in an Iraqi prison.)
>
> The U.S. has since deployed missile defense systems. While these are of
> dubious quality all its potential enemies, Russia, North Korea and
> China, have since reacted by developing new weapon delivery systems
> which can circumvent U.S. missile defenses.
>
> The development of a Chinese FOBS should therefore not astonish anyone -
> if it indeed has happened.
>
> China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson today denied that the reported
> flight was of a nuclear capable system:
>
>     Bloomberg: The Financial Times has reported that China tested a
> nuclear-capable hypersonic missile. Could the foreign ministry confirmed
> if China has such a missile?
>
>     Zhao Lijian: As we understand, this was a routine test of space
> vehicle to verify technology of spacecraft's reusability. It is of great
> significance to reducing the cost of using space vehicle and providing a
> convenient and cheap way for mankind's two-way transportation in the
> peaceful use of space. Several companies around the world have conducted
> similar tests.
>
>     After separating from the space vehicle before its return, the
> supporting devices will burn up when it's falling in the atmosphere and
> the debris will fall into the high seas. China will work with other
> countries in the world for the peaceful use of space for the benefit of
> mankind.
>
>     AFP: Is the missile you mentioned the same missile reported by the
> Financial Times?
>
>     Zhao Lijian: As I just said, it's not missile, but a space vehicle.
>     ...
>     Bloomberg: I'm going to follow on the routine test of the space
> vehicle. And could you confirm when the test happened and what kind of
> space vehicles it was?
>
>     Zhao Lijian: As I understand, it was in July. This is a test of
> space vehicle to verify the technology of spacecraft's reusability.
>
>     Reuters: The Financial Times reported that it's hypersonic missile.
> Are you saying that the missile mentioned in the report should be a
> space vehicle?
>
>     Zhao Lijian: Yes.
>
> It is not assured that the FT report and the Chinese account are of the
> same system. But back in July China had indeed tested a reusable
> spacecraft:
>
>     The state-run China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation,
> or CASC, released a statement earlier today stating that it had
> successfully carried out the first suborbital test of a reusable space
> vehicle that can land in a similar fashion to a traditional plane.
> Details about the test and the spaceplane itself are limited, but CASC
> has been publicly working on such technologies, ostensibly for
> commercial use, for years now and had previously said it expected to
> carry out such a flight test last year.
>
>
> bigger
>
> The space plane system China is developing would be launched by a
> traditional missile and, like the former U.S. Space Shuttle, glide back
> to earth. When reentering the atmosphere the space plane would reach,
> like the space shuttle, speeds beyond Mach 5 and could therefore be
> called hypersonic.
>
> While such a system could have a military mission its large size means
> that it would be a waste to use it for the delivery of nuclear war heads.
>
> It might of course be that whoever briefed the officials who talked to
> the Financial Times has exaggerated the Chinese intent and its
> capabilities.
>
> Such talks of 'missile gaps' and of purported super weapons an adversary
> allegedly has is useful when one wants Congress to cough up more money
> for weapons development.
>
> The FT report may well have been part of such a campaign.
>
> Posted by b on October 18, 2021 at 15:41 UTC | Permalink
>
> Comments
>
> China's biggest problem is how to keep a straight face while falling
> over themselves laughing. If it really was a FOBS they can issue bland
> denials until the cows come home and watch western "intelligence" and
> its presstitutes go into paroxysms of xenophobia and paranoia. If it
> really was a space plane test, they can blandly assert it was a space
> plane test with the same result. Win-win for China.
>
> Posted by: pasha | Oct 18 2021 15:59 utc | 1
>
> thanks b.... you are very masterful at breaking apart the information
> given in the msm! to the point one has to ask a lot more questions of
> the motives.. i agree with your hypothesis - more money for weapon
> developments in the usa... that is of course a given! people's party to
> the rescue, lol - not!
>
> wonder where gordog disappeared to??
>
> Posted by: james | Oct 18 2021 16:01 utc | 2
>
> This will result in massive fund raising effort for the US military. The
> whole thing sounds like a wet dream for MIC in USofA. "We have to keep
> up with an imaginary foe." That can go on for a long time.
> I did LOL at China's response, but realize what is going on here. Fund
> raising....
>
> Posted by: horatio | Oct 18 2021 16:02 utc | 3
>
> @ pasha... until such time as the msm is not completely full of shite or
> beholden to the intel agencies, it is also a win win for these same 24/7
> bullshit artists too.. there might be some truth out their, but one
> would be hard pressed to know what it is reading the western media..
>
> Posted by: james | Oct 18 2021 16:03 utc | 4
>
> Following up on the entertainment (comedic) value of this news item:
> This dude has linked it to Hillary Clinton.
>
> Posted by: Maracatu | Oct 18 2021 16:04 utc | 5
>
> b's conclusion is spot-on.
>
> !!
>
> Posted by: Jackrabbit | Oct 18 2021 16:15 utc | 6
>
> I'm sure a lot of the world hoped it was weapons system, anything to
> blunt US military adventurism. Mineshaft gap did sadly seem more likely.
>
> Posted by: RZ | Oct 18 2021 16:20 utc | 7
>
> good coverage.
>
> Empire is throwing all of its eggs into the China is Hitler basket. But
> what choice does Empire have? China must be assimilated for the 'plan'
> to work. One People/One World. China's militarism, oppression,
> aggression and strangulation of Empire's grift, creates 'our' next
> 'enemy' to cover for the reckoning of the off-shoring of entire
> economies for the sole sake of profit.
>
> It's the folks in the USA who are about to be strangled for an
> irresponsible and immoral consumer economy of narcissistic locusts.
>
> Posted by: gottlieb | Oct 18 2021 16:29 utc | 8
>
> Just a slight aside: The space plane that China tested in July landed on
> a regular runway. It did not miss that runway by dozens of miles but
> instead landed properly and in perfect condition. The space plane that
> was tested was a scaled down version of a larger space plane that is to
> be tested some time later. The test model that landed in July, if it
> were to be put into production, would only have room for something like
> six passengers, so it is relatively small. The full-sized version is
> supposed to be airliner-sized.
>
> This recent test was preceded by a test of a glide-back booster back in
> 2019. While the recent test plane did ride into orbit on a regular
> launcher, the plane is intended to be one component of a two part
> system: Space plane and glide-back booster. This system is intended to
> be fully reusable. Considering the success of the tests to date we are
> likely to see, or at least hear about, tests of the complete system
> fairly soon.
>
> Posted by: William Gruff | Oct 18 2021 16:37 utc | 9
>
> Unfortunately, it seems not to be a hypersonic missile. Unless it is top
> secret, I don't see any reason for the Chinese to lie about this.
>
> But I hope I'm wrong and the FT report is correct.
>
> Posted by: vk | Oct 18 2021 16:54 utc | 10
>
>
> Thanks Pasha, for this comment
>
> pasha | Oct 18 2021 15:59 utc | 1
>
> "China's biggest problem is how to keep a straight face while falling
> over themselves laughing."
>
> So true, so true! But not that they can't overcome this "problem" if
> there are even more fun to be expected:
>
> In 1974 or 1965 some of us Scaninavians (and Finns) at Peking Uni
> (Bê'Dà) went wisiting a fellow Finn at Nánkāi U in Tiānjīn. Returning to
> that campus, one German doctor of Sinology approached on hi bycycle,
> slipped in the mud and got dirty all over. A Chinese crowd wathed the
> episode and no-one laughed. Then he remounted his mount and started
> treading. But hat not checked whether the bike was in order: The chain
> was broken and he once again splashed into the mud. THEN came the gross
> roar of lauphter.
> Der Herr Doktor became a professsor in Chinese mentality Studies and in
> Chinese Naval Strategy (blue-collar sea navy, not brown. Coincidence? --
> maybe naught.
>
> Posted by: Tollef Ås/秋涛乐/טלפ וש | Oct 18 2021 16:58 utc | 11
>
> By the way, China has issued an extraofficial warning to the USA:
>
> US should stop eyeing too much on China’s hypersonic missiles and
> broaden its horizons: Global Times editorial
>
>     The US is very concerned about China's nuclear development. There
> is no doubt that China has no plans to build a nuclear force of the same
> size as that of the US. In other words, we have no intention of
> launching a "nuclear arms race" with the US. However, China will
> certainly improve the quality of its nuclear deterrence to ensure that
> the US completely eliminates the idea of nuclear blackmail against China
> at any critical moment and its idea of using nuclear forces to make up
> for the weakness that US' conventional forces cannot crush China.
>
> That is, even though China doesn't have the hypersonic missile, the
> American people should not feed itself the illusion it will not be
> extinct by a Chinese nuclear counterattack. The USA will become a
> radioactive wasteland and all of its prized stallions (i.e. the members
> of the American capitalist class) will die, with or without hypersonic
> weapons.
>
> Posted by: vk | Oct 18 2021 16:59 utc | 12
>
> Now we have a competition between State Capitalism and Private
> Capitalism. Which system will now prevail? With the USSR State
> Capitalism failed beacuse of the total emphasis in the wasteful
> military. China is way different and is ahead.
>
> Posted by: Viktor K | Oct 18 2021 17:21 utc | 13
>
> The Chinese have had a hypersonic glide vehicle for years: The DF-ZF.
> This has been deployed and is active. The range and whether it goes into
> orbit as part of its mission profile is dependent upon the booster it is
> launched on. Whether what the Financial Times is working itself into a
> lather over was actually a missile test or a reusable spacecraft test
> seems to be beside the point. The Chinese certainly have already
> demonstrated HGV capability so why is this supposed missile test causing
> such an uproar?
>
> Someone may have mixed up the test in July with a more recent test, but
> why would the Chinese lie about it? The HGV delivery system is intended
> as a deterrence, and a secret deterrence cannot deter anything.
>
> Posted by: William Gruff | Oct 18 2021 17:30 utc | 14
>
> Thanks b. Martanyanov states that currently there is a joint naval
> exercise in the sea of Japan where Russia and China are testing both
> offensive and defensive weapons systems. He thinks that the integration
> of both countries militaries may have reached an advanced stage of
> alliance.
>
> Posted by: Michael Crockett | Oct 18 2021 18:12 utc | 15
>
> So "hypersonic" is the new buzzword, how cool. We have a "hypersonic
> gap". Our patriotic national defense industries will get right on it
> (for a small fee).
>
> To summarize, this story seems to be marketing drivel. The question is
> why bring it out now? It's got to be to drum up business for the MIC.
>
> Anything in orbit is hypersonic, or would be if there were air up there,
> so anything of size incoming from up there is hypersonic.
>
> I suppose they mean maneuverable hypersonic, they can steer the
> hypersonic, that is the difference. Two long words, so just call it
> hypersonic. Who cares right?
>
> So I think Gruff is probably right.
>
> Posted by: Bemildred | Oct 18 2021 18:56 utc | 16
>
> They are talking about a hypersonic delivery vehicle. It is very hard to
> keep a vehicle going through thick atmosphere this fast from burning up
> from the friction. Normal orbital vehicles slow down as they enter the
> atmosphere.
>
> Posted by: Michael Weddington | Oct 18 2021 19:48 utc | 18
>
> Whether this is real or not, since US withdrawal from the INF treaty in
> 2018-2019, there hasn't been any doubt about this weapons race.
>
> The main technical challenge, AFAIK, is sending targeting commands to
> the hypersonic projectile to make it good for anti-ship use, since
> projectiles are effectively blinded by the plasma and shockwaves
> when flying through air at these speeds. My understanding is that the
> act of maneuvering at hypersonic speed is not a groundbreaking thing
> now, and therefore getting within tens of km is already possible with
> inertial navigation. I'd be happy to hear insights on this from others!
>
> What is described in the news story seems to be already possible with
> "standard" space / rocket / missile technology, of the kind China has
> already demonstrated (IMO more impressively) with space program.
>
> Posted by: ptb | Oct 18 2021 20:14 utc | 19
>
> IMO, Tom Fowdy';s angle is correct:
>
> "On the other hand, it’s worth bearing in mind that this story
> originated as a leak from the US government, and it always has an agenda
> to promote. Leaks that highlight the capabilities of enemies, with a
> view to lobbying for more defence spending and funding, are an extremely
> common tactic employed within domestic politics. Fear sells. Indeed, one
> member of the RAND Corporation think tank called the missile development
> China’s 'Sputnik moment.'" [My Emphasis]
>
> Currently within the Outlaw US Empire there's a (perhaps contrived) big
> battle going on over Biden's BBB policy proposal and the huge national
> debt which has left the MIC out in the cold, a position it loathes as it
> thinks it must be central to all budget planning. And given the very
> limited minds within Congress, a little bit of FUD concerning China can
> go a long way. And as someone mentioned, "hypersonic" is the current
> fear-promotion buzzword. And we must recall that 90% of the Outlaw US
> Empire's propaganda is aimed at the domestic audience. And a second
> thing to remember: with the Empire, guns always come before butter.
>
> Posted by: karlof1 | Oct 18 2021 20:22 utc | 20
>
> The real tough thing about hypersonic glide vehicles is that they
> generate a plasma field around themselves. This not only blocks but
> absorbs EM radiation. On the one hand this makes a hypersonic vehicle
> invisible to radar. On the other hand guidance systems on the vehicle
> cannot "see" through the plasma to know where the vehicle is going. For
> example, a vehicle shrouded in plasma will not be able to receive
> GPS/BeiDou signals. The Chinese, and apparently the Russians as well,
> have apparently found a way for the vehicle's navigation system to "see"
> through the plasma in order to adjust the vehicle's course. In fact, the
> Chinese hypersonic glide vehicles were first deployed as "carrier
> killers" and required extremely fine terminal guidance. Aircraft
> carriers move, and the hypersonic glide vehicle might be embedded in a
> plasma cloud for many hundreds of miles. There is no way that the HGV
> could hit an aircraft carrier unless it could somehow detect where the
> carrier has moved to and update its course, so they have to be able to
> "see" through the plasma. That right there is a super big deal.
>
> Posted by: William Gruff | Oct 18 2021 20:25 utc | 21
>
> Tom_Q_Collins | Oct 18 2021 18:58 utc | 17
> is there anything funnier than the surveillance state bitching that its
> security cams come from China? oh no! the CCP are watching fat US asses
> hove around Wal Mart. what will we do? what we will ever do????
> -------
> the MIC has to create the event that justifies the budget. 9/11 was the
> magic act to initiate the GWOT. Cold War 2 and WW3 require even superior
> supervillains. Even if China now has a nuclear hypersonic missile,
> anything like this can only ever mean the US needs more bombers, subs,
> and of course the ADD/ADHD-, autistic- and LGBTQXYZ-friendly Space
> Force. Service guarantees insulin!
>
> Posted by: rjb1.5 | Oct 18 2021 20:38 utc | 22
>
> We are going to need a bigger budget - h/t "Jaws"
>
> when i 1st heard this, i was too overcome w/delight at the prospect of
> listening to all the complaining and whining and blaming in the
> US...until i realized that, whether this story is true or not doesn't
> matter, as far as the budgeting goes. PR is all.
>
> when i think of washington dc, i think of one thing, another classic
> movie line: Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
>
> Posted by: rjb1.5 | Oct 18 2021 20:47 utc | 23
>
> Just more stolen tech. China is incapable of original thought. X37B.
>
> Posted by: yee haw | Oct 18 2021 21:21 utc | 24
>
> >>Posted by: William Gruff | Oct 18 2021 20:25 utc | 21<<
>
> Loved this post Gruff, I was waiting to here ... 'quantum based
> communications' (want to day radio but could you call such a thing a
> radio?) The Gordon Changs would have a fit. We in the U.S. would now be
> cavemen.
>
> Posted by: Christian J. Chuba | Oct 18 2021 21:21 utc | 25
>
> I was referring to China having to use 'quantum based communications' to
> get past the plasma bubble. At that point, we might as well be trying to
> fight extra-terrestrials.
>
> Posted by: Christian J. Chuba | Oct 18 2021 21:23 utc | 26
>
> Posted by: rjb1.5 | Oct 18 2021 20:38 utc | 22
>
> According to The Atlant(a)ic(ist), these Chinese cameras are installed
> at secret US Air Force bases and other strategic military installations
> too, but many different companies bought them wholesale from the Chinese
> company and re-branded them, so finding them and removing them has been
> extra difficult. LMAO, the Yankees no doubt hired a specialty contractor
> at taxpayer expense to carry out this operation.
>
> Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Oct 18 2021 21:53 utc | 27
>
> The missile missed its target by about two-dozen miles, according to
> three people briefed on the intelligence
>
> If the reusable space vehicle landed as traditional planes do, should
> these leaks not from 'not-so-intelligence" sources?
>
> I notice the story seems to have disappeared from MSM pages this morning.
>
> Posted by: Menz | Oct 18 2021 22:15 utc | 28
>
> I think karlof1 captured the sentiment with the Guns versus Butter meme
>
> This definitely reads like a guns before butter marketing
> scheme.....hypersonic everything will be the new buzzword before the end
> of the year...prepare for hypersonic war with China......OOOOGAAAA
> BOOOOOGGAAAA and all that FEAR stuff.
>
> I hope the Covid BIG LIE blows up soon so that The Great Unraveling can
> begin to put an end to the global private finance designed shit show we
> are living in the West.
>
> Posted by: psychohistorian | Oct 18 2021 22:34 utc | 29
>
> how does a plasma shrouded missile without access to GPS reposition
> itself in relation to moving target such as a carrier? for that matter,
> how does it monitor its environment if it cannot receive signals in
> return? mind blown. I don't even understand the principle behind this tech.
>
> Posted by: mastameta | Oct 18 2021 22:58 utc | 30
>
> This duck has no wings
>
> FT claims China put something in orbit, that did not stay there very
> long. FT is not telling us when this supposed test happened. If the
> device had been in orbit, then it would have been picked up by tens of
> satellite tracking stations. Even worse, it could have alerted the US
> early warning system.
>
> First they said it was a "missile". Then they said it was carried by a
> normal space launch vehicle. Now it looks like the thing never reached
> orbit. I suspect the whole FT story is a canard.
>
> Posted by: Petri Krohn | Oct 18 2021 23:26 utc | 31
>
> For quantum positioning you will need two independent blobs the glider
> can receive. So you can find out position and even information. Actually
> best would be six for orbital coordinates. quantum entanglement could be
> a useful tool. Mankind will become now hypersonic monkeys.

SevenOverSix wrote on 10/18/2021 11:17 PM:
>
> But WE can make one too, quite easily.

Then why is your military still using Russian heavy-lift rocket engines?

https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2021/05/space-force-only-6-more-launches-russian-rocket-engines/174336/