Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Nothing takes the taste out of peanut butter quite like unrequited love. -- Charlie Brown

interests / rec.games.backgammon / Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."

SubjectAuthor
* The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."peps...@gmail.com
+- Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."peps...@gmail.com
`* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
 `* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."peps...@gmail.com
  `* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
   `* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."peps...@gmail.com
    +* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
    |`* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."peps...@gmail.com
    | `* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
    |  `* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."peps...@gmail.com
    |   `* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
    |    `* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."peps...@gmail.com
    |     +* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
    |     |`* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."peps...@gmail.com
    |     | +- Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."peps...@gmail.com
    |     | `* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
    |     |  `* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Nasti Chestikov
    |     |   +* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."peps...@gmail.com
    |     |   |`- Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
    |     |   +* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
    |     |   |`* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Nasti Chestikov
    |     |   | `* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
    |     |   |  `* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Nasti Chestikov
    |     |   |   `* Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
    |     |   |    +- Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
    |     |   |    `- Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
    |     |   `- Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
    |     `- Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."Timothy Chow
    `- Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."MK

Pages:12
Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."

<tk1s3k$1j601$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=10380&group=rec.games.backgammon#10380

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tchow12...@yahoo.com (Timothy Chow)
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Subject: Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 22:06:44 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <tk1s3k$1j601$1@dont-email.me>
References: <bf5dc434-6e3b-48aa-a1db-082510c519een@googlegroups.com>
<tjdsnq$2ood7$1@dont-email.me>
<b5a2137f-b2a2-4079-a7bf-bd9542e1fcb1n@googlegroups.com>
<tjdvqt$2p5b5$1@dont-email.me>
<d2668250-d449-4108-90c0-dfb6dc9c11ccn@googlegroups.com>
<tjghkn$335t6$1@dont-email.me>
<0292f6b1-b34c-4aa6-9ef1-8a28003974e9n@googlegroups.com>
<tji3hs$3bagd$1@dont-email.me>
<04d219a0-23b1-41c3-bcdf-b1514e3438fdn@googlegroups.com>
<tjj4s6$3f986$1@dont-email.me>
<6371cf0e-df86-4e76-9f3d-91bfa45fae65n@googlegroups.com>
<tjktki$3usge$1@dont-email.me>
<734798a0-9acc-4c2b-b8f8-42e61a75a5ffn@googlegroups.com>
<tjlr9g$5deo$1@dont-email.me>
<65e60e22-c923-4d27-ad8c-7f46917d9876n@googlegroups.com>
<tjmnp2$98mk$1@dont-email.me>
<df45107f-21a5-44a9-b416-6a527e646a49n@googlegroups.com>
<tjpvnj$k589$1@dont-email.me>
<58399dd0-14d5-48f6-94cb-58c8a2b6ca4an@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 02:06:45 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="cc8d0aa4dcd3e2d94c07430dac6a9eb7";
logging-data="1677313"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19E3rAu5UXv0tFZfo4Kj/nCbQc28l8lJ4c="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.4.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:npkZS7HFDzt5OgR7mwXVEXGu+ok=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <58399dd0-14d5-48f6-94cb-58c8a2b6ca4an@googlegroups.com>
 by: Timothy Chow - Fri, 4 Nov 2022 02:06 UTC

On 11/3/2022 1:19 PM, Nasti Chestikov wrote:

> From my (aborted) law school days

Did you go to law school in the U.S.? Libel law in the U.S. is
rather different from that of many other countries because of the
First Amendment.

The burden of proof is on the plaintiff to prove that the defendant's
claim is false. You don't need to go to law school to know that this
is the way things work in the U.S.

---
Tim Chow

Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."

<tl1lpp$29ee6$2@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=10513&group=rec.games.backgammon#10513

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tchow12...@yahoo.com (Timothy Chow)
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Subject: Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 22:35:21 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <tl1lpp$29ee6$2@dont-email.me>
References: <bf5dc434-6e3b-48aa-a1db-082510c519een@googlegroups.com>
<tjdsnq$2ood7$1@dont-email.me>
<b5a2137f-b2a2-4079-a7bf-bd9542e1fcb1n@googlegroups.com>
<tjdvqt$2p5b5$1@dont-email.me>
<d2668250-d449-4108-90c0-dfb6dc9c11ccn@googlegroups.com>
<tjghkn$335t6$1@dont-email.me>
<0292f6b1-b34c-4aa6-9ef1-8a28003974e9n@googlegroups.com>
<tji3hs$3bagd$1@dont-email.me>
<04d219a0-23b1-41c3-bcdf-b1514e3438fdn@googlegroups.com>
<tjj4s6$3f986$1@dont-email.me>
<6371cf0e-df86-4e76-9f3d-91bfa45fae65n@googlegroups.com>
<tjktki$3usge$1@dont-email.me>
<734798a0-9acc-4c2b-b8f8-42e61a75a5ffn@googlegroups.com>
<tjlr9g$5deo$1@dont-email.me>
<65e60e22-c923-4d27-ad8c-7f46917d9876n@googlegroups.com>
<tjmnp2$98mk$1@dont-email.me>
<df45107f-21a5-44a9-b416-6a527e646a49n@googlegroups.com>
<tjpvnj$k589$1@dont-email.me>
<58399dd0-14d5-48f6-94cb-58c8a2b6ca4an@googlegroups.com>
<tk1s3k$1j601$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 03:35:21 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5667b6a8b1f2bce9b78fa46bda3520fd";
logging-data="2406854"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/kjyXomdFiSwh6LHmo/ZJzaYyxlEYeq/Q="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.4.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UEQoSqfaQYkJH8RLBF63SLpLoss=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <tk1s3k$1j601$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Timothy Chow - Wed, 16 Nov 2022 03:35 UTC

On 11/3/2022 10:06 PM, I wrote:
> On 11/3/2022 1:19 PM, Nasti Chestikov wrote:
>
>>  From my (aborted) law school days
>
> Did you go to law school in the U.S.?  Libel law in the U.S. is
> rather different from that of many other countries because of the
> First Amendment.
>
> The burden of proof is on the plaintiff to prove that the defendant's
> claim is false.  You don't need to go to law school to know that this
> is the way things work in the U.S.

Here's an interesting Legal Eagle video about the lawsuit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gkd1Q0Ntt9s&t=605s

On the topic of burden of proof, listen particularly to remarks starting
at 13:33, 14:18, 16:37.

I'm still curious which law school you attended?

---
Tim Chow

Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."

<tl1lun$29fvu$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=10514&group=rec.games.backgammon#10514

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tchow12...@yahoo.com (Timothy Chow)
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Subject: Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 22:37:59 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <tl1lun$29fvu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <bf5dc434-6e3b-48aa-a1db-082510c519een@googlegroups.com>
<tjdsnq$2ood7$1@dont-email.me>
<b5a2137f-b2a2-4079-a7bf-bd9542e1fcb1n@googlegroups.com>
<tjdvqt$2p5b5$1@dont-email.me>
<d2668250-d449-4108-90c0-dfb6dc9c11ccn@googlegroups.com>
<tjghkn$335t6$1@dont-email.me>
<0292f6b1-b34c-4aa6-9ef1-8a28003974e9n@googlegroups.com>
<tji3hs$3bagd$1@dont-email.me>
<04d219a0-23b1-41c3-bcdf-b1514e3438fdn@googlegroups.com>
<tjj4s6$3f986$1@dont-email.me>
<6371cf0e-df86-4e76-9f3d-91bfa45fae65n@googlegroups.com>
<tjktki$3usge$1@dont-email.me>
<734798a0-9acc-4c2b-b8f8-42e61a75a5ffn@googlegroups.com>
<tjlr9g$5deo$1@dont-email.me>
<65e60e22-c923-4d27-ad8c-7f46917d9876n@googlegroups.com>
<tjmnp2$98mk$1@dont-email.me>
<df45107f-21a5-44a9-b416-6a527e646a49n@googlegroups.com>
<tjpvnj$k589$1@dont-email.me>
<58399dd0-14d5-48f6-94cb-58c8a2b6ca4an@googlegroups.com>
<tk1s3k$1j601$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 03:37:59 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5667b6a8b1f2bce9b78fa46bda3520fd";
logging-data="2408446"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Z6QVDkgXnXLE6I3nMDEFvgz5RMUiTjto="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.4.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:D2n5i0ArI3G8D2J+9/gA8gGzyy4=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <tk1s3k$1j601$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Timothy Chow - Wed, 16 Nov 2022 03:37 UTC

On 11/3/2022 10:06 PM, I wrote:
> On 11/3/2022 1:19 PM, Nasti Chestikov wrote:
>
>>  From my (aborted) law school days
>
> Did you go to law school in the U.S.?  Libel law in the U.S. is
> rather different from that of many other countries because of the
> First Amendment.
>
> The burden of proof is on the plaintiff to prove that the defendant's
> claim is false.  You don't need to go to law school to know that this
> is the way things work in the U.S.

There's an interesting Legal Eagle video about Niemann's lawsuit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gkd1Q0Ntt9s&t=605s

As you'll see, for Niemann to prevail, he would need to prove a lot of
things that he probably can't prove.

I'm still curious which law school you attended? How many classes did
you complete?

---
Tim Chow

Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."

<u7g6q6$1lsr9$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12315&group=rec.games.backgammon#12315

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tchow12...@yahoo.com (Timothy Chow)
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Subject: Re: The hypothesis that XG "doesn't evaluate blotty boards well."
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 22:44:21 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <u7g6q6$1lsr9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <bf5dc434-6e3b-48aa-a1db-082510c519een@googlegroups.com>
<tjdsnq$2ood7$1@dont-email.me>
<b5a2137f-b2a2-4079-a7bf-bd9542e1fcb1n@googlegroups.com>
<tjdvqt$2p5b5$1@dont-email.me>
<d2668250-d449-4108-90c0-dfb6dc9c11ccn@googlegroups.com>
<tjghkn$335t6$1@dont-email.me>
<0292f6b1-b34c-4aa6-9ef1-8a28003974e9n@googlegroups.com>
<tji3hs$3bagd$1@dont-email.me>
<04d219a0-23b1-41c3-bcdf-b1514e3438fdn@googlegroups.com>
<tjj4s6$3f986$1@dont-email.me>
<6371cf0e-df86-4e76-9f3d-91bfa45fae65n@googlegroups.com>
<tjktki$3usge$1@dont-email.me>
<734798a0-9acc-4c2b-b8f8-42e61a75a5ffn@googlegroups.com>
<tjlr9g$5deo$1@dont-email.me>
<65e60e22-c923-4d27-ad8c-7f46917d9876n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 02:44:22 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="516939c975be26b4ece0c3fc78579c6c";
logging-data="1766249"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Ai0so8qBUPGHIzmZgVZdlvj1Htme2bZE="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.12.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:b+dKqlE9MG5lEU7/jwm4yCcT1r0=
In-Reply-To: <65e60e22-c923-4d27-ad8c-7f46917d9876n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Timothy Chow - Wed, 28 Jun 2023 02:44 UTC

On 10/30/2022 12:22 PM, Nasti Chestikov wrote:
> On Sunday, 30 October 2022 at 12:39:14 UTC, Tim Chow wrote:
>>
>> https://www.chess.com/blog/CHESScom/hans-niemann-report
>>
>> I find their evidence for Niemann's online cheating pretty strong.
>>
>> Tim Chow
>
> Your problem is that Carlsen and chess.com are staring down the barrels of a $100m libel lawsuit and "neither Carlsen nor Chess.com produced concrete evidence for their cheating accusations"
>
> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-63338375
>
> This isn't going to end nicely, I suspect Carlsen will be financially ruined unless he comes up with a lot more than suspicions.

Since Nasti Chestikov said this was my problem, I figured I should
alert r.g.b. that my problem has been solved. Niemann's lawsuit has
been dismissed, as you can easily confirm from any major news source.
Evidently Nasti's law school credentials didn't help him accurately
predict the future of Carlsen's finances.

---
Tim Chow

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor