Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Experience is the worst teacher. It always gives the test first and the instruction afterward.

interests / alt.obituaries / In Memoriam In Memoriam?

SubjectAuthor
* In Memoriam In Memoriam?Louis Epstein
`* Re: In Memoriam In Memoriam?J.D. Baldwin
 +- Re: In Memoriam In Memoriam?Louis Epstein
 `- Re: In Memoriam In Memoriam?Adam H. Kerman

1
In Memoriam In Memoriam?

<t2grt7$oce$2@reader2.panix.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12426&group=alt.obituaries#12426

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.obituaries
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.main.put.com!not-for-mail
From: le...@top.put.com (Louis Epstein)
Newsgroups: alt.obituaries
Subject: In Memoriam In Memoriam?
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 07:42:31 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <t2grt7$oce$2@reader2.panix.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 07:42:31 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="main.put.com:12.144.5.2";
logging-data="24974"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
User-Agent: tin/2.4.4-20191224 ("Millburn") (FreeBSD/11.4-RELEASE-p9 (amd64))
 by: Louis Epstein - Tue, 5 Apr 2022 07:42 UTC

Are this newsgroup's rundowns of awards shows'
in-memoriam segments now a thing of the past?

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.

Re: In Memoriam In Memoriam?

<t2har0$p88$1@reader2.panix.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12427&group=alt.obituaries#12427

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.obituaries
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: INVALID_...@example.com.invalid (J.D. Baldwin)
Newsgroups: alt.obituaries
Subject: Re: In Memoriam In Memoriam?
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 11:57:21 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Revealed on a need-to-know basis
Message-ID: <t2har0$p88$1@reader2.panix.com>
References: <t2grt7$oce$2@reader2.panix.com>
Reply-To: news@baldwin.users.panix.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 11:57:21 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="panix3.panix.com:166.84.1.3";
logging-data="25864"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-PGP-Key-Info: Key number 869CC8A5, finger me for full key
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
 by: J.D. Baldwin - Tue, 5 Apr 2022 11:57 UTC

In the previous article, Louis Epstein <le@top.put.com> wrote:
> Are this newsgroup's rundowns of awards shows'
> in-memoriam segments now a thing of the past?

I was the first one to make a prediction list of the upcoming Oscars
show, back (I think) in the 1990s. And even I didn't bother to watch
even that segment this year. We still recap the TCM segment, because
it's put together by people who actually love and care about cinema
and its history, as opposed to the cheap, talentless hacks who put
together the Oscars thing.

I assume the same is true of the Emmys and Grammys, which I haven't
paid attention to in a lot of years.
--
_+_ From the catapult of |If anyone objects to any statement I make, I am
_|70|___:)=}- J.D. Baldwin |quite prepared not only to retract it, but also
\ / baldwin@panix.com|to deny under oath that I ever made it.-T. Lehrer
***~~~~----------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: In Memoriam In Memoriam?

<t2ia4l$21q$1@reader2.panix.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12430&group=alt.obituaries#12430

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.obituaries
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.main.put.com!not-for-mail
From: le...@top.put.com (Louis Epstein)
Newsgroups: alt.obituaries
Subject: Re: In Memoriam In Memoriam?
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:51:33 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <t2ia4l$21q$1@reader2.panix.com>
References: <t2grt7$oce$2@reader2.panix.com> <t2har0$p88$1@reader2.panix.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:51:33 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="main.put.com:12.144.5.2";
logging-data="2106"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
User-Agent: tin/2.4.4-20191224 ("Millburn") (FreeBSD/11.4-RELEASE-p9 (amd64))
 by: Louis Epstein - Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:51 UTC

J.D. Baldwin <INVALID_SEE_SIG@example.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> In the previous article, Louis Epstein <le@top.put.com> wrote:
>> Are this newsgroup's rundowns of awards shows'
>> in-memoriam segments now a thing of the past?
>
> I was the first one to make a prediction list of the upcoming Oscars
> show, back (I think) in the 1990s. And even I didn't bother to watch
> even that segment this year.

Nor did I.
When they muted the audience reactions they cut the soul out of
the segment,made it unwatchable.

> We still recap the TCM segment, because
> it's put together by people who actually love and care about cinema
> and its history, as opposed to the cheap, talentless hacks who put
> together the Oscars thing.

But no predictions?
> I assume the same is true of the Emmys and Grammys, which I haven't
> paid attention to in a lot of years.

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.

Re: In Memoriam In Memoriam?

<t2inlv$8q2$2@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12433&group=alt.obituaries#12433

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.obituaries
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ahk...@chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Newsgroups: alt.obituaries
Subject: Re: In Memoriam In Memoriam?
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 00:42:39 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <t2inlv$8q2$2@dont-email.me>
References: <t2grt7$oce$2@reader2.panix.com> <t2har0$p88$1@reader2.panix.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 00:42:39 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8a6475035fe34210a8b12c523c87dc38";
logging-data="9026"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18jrvPbYQLHIp22sfUvmVesIPFw5Cq7mIE="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:I35XP/82NKKso6dvDc1CI+JaBM8=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
 by: Adam H. Kerman - Wed, 6 Apr 2022 00:42 UTC

J.D. Baldwin <news@baldwin.users.panix.com> wrote:
>Louis Epstein <le@top.put.com> wrote:

>>Are this newsgroup's rundowns of awards shows'
>>in-memoriam segments now a thing of the past?

>I was the first one to make a prediction list of the upcoming Oscars
>show, back (I think) in the 1990s. And even I didn't bother to watch
>even that segment this year. We still recap the TCM segment, because
>it's put together by people who actually love and care about cinema
>and its history, as opposed to the cheap, talentless hacks who put
>together the Oscars thing.

I don't watch the Oscars, but if I did, I'm sure I'd have been offended.

>I assume the same is true of the Emmys and Grammys, which I haven't
>paid attention to in a lot of years.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor