On 28 Sep 2021, Limbaugh Whisperer <LimbaughWchisperer@jam.rr.com>
posted some news:sivn04$3ri$150@news.dns-netz.com:

> Jonathan wrote
>
> Shoot Tirien Steinbach in the head and then all the students who
> protested. Shoot their parents too.

The Washington Free Beacon schooled law students on freedom of the press

Last week, students at Stanford Law disrupted a Federalist Society event
that featured U.S. Circuit Court Judge Kyle Duncan. Duncan was prevented
from speaking by unruly protesters and berated by the school's associate
dean of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.

Now, some of the protest leaders, many of whom shared the names and
pictures of Federalist Society members online and in posters, are unhappy
because the Washington Free Beacon published their names.

"NEW: The same students who plastered the names and faces of the Stanford
Federalist Society all over the school are now demanding anonymity from
the Free Beacon. They say we've violated their right to privacy by
identifying them. You can't make it up," Aaron Sibarium, a journalist for
the Washington Free Beacon, tweeted Friday.

NEW AUDIO OFFERS INSIGHT INTO STANFORD STUDENTS' WILD DISRUPTION OF
FEDERAL JUDGE: �YOU DON�T RESPECT US!'

"On Sunday, I identified board members of the Stanford National Lawyers
Guild--one of the groups responsible for the posters--who in a public
statement described the protest as 'Stanford Law School at its best.' A
few hours later, the board demanded I redact their names," Sibarium
reported.

Sibarium said that Lily Bou, a board member of the Stanford National
Lawyers Guild, sent an email demanding the Free Beacon remove her name and
those of other students from their reporting. "Listing our names serves no
purpose other than to invite abuse and harassment," she wrote.

"I wonder what purpose the posters of the fedsoc board served," Sibarium
wrote.

"You do not have our permission to reference or quote any portion of this
email in a future piece," she added.

"Needless to say, that's not how the First Amendment works," Sibarium
commented.

NEW VIDEO SHOWS STANFORD PROTESTERS HECKLING FEDERAL JUDGE AS DEI DEAN
APPEARS TO SMIRK

He went on, "We've gotten similar complaints about publishing
images�pulled from social media�of Stanford Law School dean Jenny
Martinez's classroom, which protesters covered end to end in flyers after
she issued an apology to Judge Duncan."

"We received a note from Mary Cate Hickman demanding that we �anonymize
the face of the student in the red hoodie� because 'California is a two-
party consent state, and you have no right to publish this student's
identity/likeness/face without consent,'" he tweeted.

The reporter noted that two-party consent only applies to surreptitious
audio recordings and that there is no expectation of privacy during a
public protest at a public law school event where participants freely post
video and images. He also pointed out that the protest has been covered on
national television and publications, further eroding any expectation of
privacy.

"What's eminently clear from the drama unfolding in Palo Alto is that
while Stanford law students may be the vanguard of an anti-constitutional
revolution, they don't know much about the law. Where Stanford has failed
to educate them in the limits of privacy and the rights of a free press,
we will endeavor to fill the void with our continuing coverage of this
ugly affair."

Free speech is under attack on college campuses across America. At UC
Davis on Tuesday, conservative commentator Charlie Kirk's speech was
disrupted by protesters who smashed windows and clashed with police.

According to one survey, less than half Republican college students feel
safe expressing their political views on campus. Many students fear
retribution in personal and professional settings for sharing their
conservative beliefs.

<https://www.foxnews.com/media/stanford-law-protesters-demand-names-
redacted-news-reports-first-amendment-works>