On 4/9/2023 12:54 AM, dolf wrote:
>
> On 4/9/2023 12:34 AM, dolf wrote:
>> My dear countrymen and women! We are quite used to being generally
>> referred to as monsters. And we are considered particularly monstrous
>> because, in a question that certain gentlemen in Germany are nervous
>> about, we are marching at the head – namely in the question of the
>> opposition to the Jews.
>>
>> Our people understand many things but this one problem nobody wants to
>> understand, and in particular because, as a worker explained: “What
>> connection is there at all between the workers and the Jewish Problem,
>> when in reality most of the people have no idea what this problem
>> means.” Most people let themselves be guided by feelings and say: “I
>> have seen good and bad people among them, just like among ourselves.”
>>
>> Very few have learned to view the problem free of emotion, in its
>> clean form. I will at once begin with the word “work”.
>>
>>  What does it mean – work?
>>
>> Work is an activity performed not of one’s free will, but for the sake
>> of one’s fellowmen. If there is a difference between man and animals,
>> so it is particularly regarding work, which does not originate in an
>> instinct but comes from an understanding of a necessity. Hardly any
>> revolution had so deep an effect as the slow one which gradually
>> transformed the lazy man of primeval time into the man who works.
>>
>>  Talking of work, we can assume that this activity followed these
>> three phases:
>>
>> First, it was an effect of a simple instinct of self-preservation
>> which we also see in animals. Later, it developed into the second form
>> of work – the one from pure egoism. Also this form became gradually
>> replaced by the third: Work out of ethical sense of duty, where an
>> individual does not work because he is forced to it. We see it at
>> every turn. Millions of people work without being constantly forced to
>> it. Thousands of intellectuals are sometimes bound to their studies
>> for whole nights on end, day after day, although they may not do it
>> for material gains. The hundreds of thousands of German workers after
>> the end of their work tend their gardens. And, generally, we see today
>> that millions of people cannot imagine living without some sort of
>> occupation.
>>
>> When I said that this process represents a slow but perhaps also the
>> greatest of all revolutions in human history, then one must assume
>> that also this revolution had to have a cause, and this cause was the
>> greatest Goddess of this Earth, the one who is able to whip men to the
>> uttermost – the Goddess of Hardship.
>>
>> We can see this hardship in early prehistory, above all in the
>> northern part of the world, in those enormous ice deserts where only
>> the meagrest existence was possible. Here, men were forced to fight
>> for their existence, for things which were, in the smiling South,
>> available without work, and in abundance. In those times man made
>> perhaps his first groundbreaking discovery: In those cold stretches
>> man was forced to find a substitute for the only gift of Heaven which
>> makes life possible – the Sun. And the man who produced the first
>> artificial sparks later appeared to Humanity as a god – Prometheus,
>> the fire-bringer. The North forced men to further activity –
>> production of clothes, building of abodes. First, it was simple caves,
>> later huts and houses. In short, he created a principle, the principle
>> of work. Life would not have been possible without it.
>>
>> Although work was still simple, it had already to be planned
>> beforehand and each individual knew that if he has not done his part,
>> he will die of hunger in the coming winter. At the same time another
>> development followed – the terrible hardship became a means for
>> breeding of a race. Whoever was weak or sickly could not survive the
>> terrible winter period and died prematurely. What remained was a race
>> of strong and healthy giants. Yet another trait of this race was born.
>> Where man is externally muzzled, where his radius of action is
>> limited, he begins to develop internally. Externally limited,
>> internally he becomes unlimited. The more man, due to external forces,
>> must depend on himself, the deeper internal life he develops and the
>> more he turns inward.
>>
>>  These three achievements: The recognized principle of work as a duty,
>> the necessity, not only out of egoism but for preservation of the
>> whole group of people – a small clan; second – the necessity of bodily
>> health and thereby also of normal mental health; and third – the deep
>> spiritual life. All these gave the northern races the ability to go to
>> the world and build states.
>>
>> If this power could not find its full expression in the high North, it
>> became apparent when the ice shackles fell and man turned south to the
>> happier, freer nature. We know that all these northern peoples had one
>> symbol in common – the symbol of the Sun. They created cults of Light
>> and they’ve created the symbols of the tools for making fire – the
>> drill and the cross. You will find this cross as a Hakenkreuz as far
>> as India and Japan, carved in the temple pillars. It is the Swastika,
>> which was once a sign of established communities of Aryan Culture.
>>
>>
>> Those races, today called Aryans, created all the great cultures of
>> the ancient world. We know that Egypt was brought upon its high
>> cultural level by Aryan immigrants. Similarly, Persia and Greece; the
>> immigrants were blond, blue eyed Aryans. And we know that outside of
>> these Aryan states no civilized states have been founded. There
>> emerged mixed races between the black, dark eyed and dark colored,
>> southern races and the immigrants, but they failed to create any
>> large, creative culture states.
>>
>> Why is it that only Aryans possessed the ability to create states? It
>> was due, almost exclusively, to their attitude toward work. Those
>> races which, as the first, stopped seeing work as the result of
>> coercion and saw it rather as a necessity born out of hundreds of
>> thousands of years of hardship, had to become superior to other
>> people. And, besides, it was work that made people come together and
>> divide the work among them. We know that the moment the individual
>> work to sustain oneself turned into work within communities, the
>> community tended to assign a particular work to those particularly
>> talented, and with increasing division of work it became necessary for
>> still greater joining together into still bigger groups. So, it is
>> work which created kinships at first, later tribes, and still later,
>> led to the creation of states.
>>
>> If we see, as the first prerequisite for creating states, the
>> conception of work as social duty, so the second necessary ingredient
>> is racial health and purity. And nothing helped the northern
>> conquerors more against the lazy and rotten southern races than the
>> refined strength of their race.
>>
>> States would remain an empty vessel if not decorated with that which
>> we normally call culture. If we removed everything and kept just
>> railways, ships, etc.; if we removed everything we consider art and
>> sciences, such a state would in reality become empty and we would
>> understand the creative power of the northern tribes. The moment their
>> great, inborn imagination could act in great, free areas, it created
>> everywhere immortal works. We see this process repeated continuously
>> even in the smallest scale. Similarly, we know that great minds are
>> often born at the bottom of society, unable to develop there but,
>> given an opportunity, they begin to grow and become leaders in arts,
>> sciences, and also in politics.
>>
>> We know today that there are extensive interrelations between the
>> state, nation, culture, art and work and it would be madness to think
>> that any of them could exist independently of the others. Let us take
>> art – considered as an international domain – and we shall see that it
>> is unconditionally dependent on the state. Art blossomed in those
>> areas where the political development made it possible. The art of
>> Greece reached its highest level when the young state had triumphed
>> over invading Persian armies. Construction of the Acropolis began at
>> that time. Rome became the city of art after the end of the Punic
>> Wars, and Germany built her cathedrals, as in Worms, Speyer and
>> Limburg, when the German Empire under Salians had achieved its
>> greatest triumphs. We can follow this connection to our time. We know
>> that art, for example the beauty of German towns, always depended on
>> political development of these towns; that it was political
>> considerations which moved Napoleon III to regulating of the
>> Boulevards and Friedrich the Great to establishing Unter den Linden.
>> Similarly in Munich where it was obvious that the city could not
>> become an industrial center and so art was chosen to elevate the rank
>> of the city, which now everyone who wants to get to know Germany must
>> visit. Similar were the origins of today’s Wien (Vienna).
>>
>> The case was similar with other arts. The moment the small, powerless
>> statelets began to unite into one state, then also one German art,
>> proud of itself, began to grow. The works of Richard Wagner appeared
>> in the period when shame and powerlessness were replaced by a unified,
>> great German Reich.
>>
>> And so, not just art is dependent on the state, on the politics of the
>> state; the same is the case with work itself because only a sound
>> state is in the position to give the opportunity of working to its
>> citizens and let them use their talents. The opposite is the case with
>> the race in relation to everything else. A state with a rotten, sick
>> and unsound race will never produce great works of art or make great
>> politics, or at least bask in abundance. Each of these factors depends
>> on the others. And only when all of them complement each other, can we
>> say: There is harmony in the state, the way we Germanics understand
>> it.
>>
>> Can the Jew build a state?
>>
>> Now we have to ask ourselves the question: How about the Jew as a
>> state builder? Does the Jew possess the power to create a state? First
>> we must examine his attitude to work, find out how he perceives the
>> principle of work, and excuse me if I now take a book called The
>> Bible. I am not claiming that all its contents are necessarily true,
>> as we know that Jewry was very liberal in writing it. One thing,
>> however, is certain: it has not been written by an antisemite.
>> (Laughter) It is very important because no antisemite would have been
>> able to write a more terrible indictment against the Jewish race than
>> the Bible, the Old Testament. Let us take a look at a sentence: “By
>> the sweat of thy brow shalt thou eat bread.” And it says that it was
>> to be a punishment for the Fall of Man.
>>
>> Ladies and Gentlemen! Already here we see that the whole world lies
>> between us; we could never conceive of work as a punishment –
>> otherwise we would all have been convicts. We do not want to conceive
>> of work as punishment. I must confess: I would not have been able to
>> exist without work, and hundreds of thousands and millions would have
>> been able to withstand perhaps 3 or 5 days, maybe even 10, but not 90
>> or 100 days without any activity. If Paradise really existed, the Land
>> of Plenty, then our people would have been unhappy in it. (Calls:
>> Hear, hear) We Germans seek constantly a possibility to do something
>> and if we cannot find anything, at least from time to time we hit one
>> another in the face. (Laughter) We are unable to bear absolute rest.
>>
>> Thus we see, already here, a big difference. Because a Jew has written
>> this, true or not is unimportant because it still reflects the opinion
>> which Jewry has about work. For them work is not an obvious ethical
>> duty but at most a means to sustenance. In our eyes, this is not work
>> because in this case any activity serving self-preservation, without
>> regard to fellow men, might be called work. And we know that this
>> work, in the past, consisted of plundering of caravans, and today in
>> planned plundering of indebted farmers, industrialists and workers.
>> The form has changed but the principle is the same. We do not call it
>> work, but robbery. (Calls: Hear, hear)
>>
>> When already such a basic notion separates us, here comes another. I
>> have already explained that in the long period in the North the races
>> became purified. This means that all the inferior and weak gradually
>> died out and only the soundest remained. Also, here the Jew differs
>> from us because he has not become purified but instead practiced
>> inbreeding; he multiplied greatly but only in narrow circles, and
>> without selection. And therefore we see a generation which is plagued
>> by defects caused by inbreeding.
>>
>> Finally, the Jew does not possess the third factor: The inner
>> spiritual life. I do not need to explain here what a Jew generally
>> looks like. You all know him. (Laughter) You know his constant
>> restlessness that never gives him a possibility to concentrate and
>> have a spiritual experience. In the most solemn moments he flickers
>> his eyes and one can see that even during the most beautiful opera he
>> is calculating dividends. (Laughter) The Jew has never had his own
>> art. (Hear, hear) His own temple has been built by foreign builders:
>> The first was the Assyrians, and for the building of the second – the
>> Roman artists. He has not left anything which might be called art, no
>> buildings, nothing. In music, we know that he is only able to
>> skillfully copy the others’ art. We shall not conceal that today he
>> has many famous conductors whose fame he can thank the well-organized
>> Jewish Press for. (Laughter)
>>
>> When a nation does not possess these three traits, it is not able to
>> create states. And that is true because throughout centuries the Jew
>> was always a nomad. He has never had what we might call a state. It’s
>> a mistake which is spreading widely today to say that Jerusalem was a
>> capital of a Jewish state of a Jewish nation. On the one side, there
>> was always a great chasm between the tribes of Judah and Caleb and the
>> northern Israeli tribes, and only David, for the first time, succeeded
>> in gradually bridging the chasm through the unitary cult of Yahweh. We
>> know precisely that this cult has at a very late time chosen for
>> itself Jerusalem as its sole seat. Only from that moment have the
>> Jewish people gotten a center, like Berlin or New York or Warsaw
>> today. (Hear, hear) This was a town in which the Jew, thanks to his
>> talents and traits, gradually achieved predominance, partly through
>> the force of arms, partly through the “power of trombones.” Besides,
>> the Jews, already in those times, lived as a parasite in the body of
>> other peoples and it had to be so. Because a people which does not
>> want to work – the often hard work of building and maintaining a state
>> – to work in mines, factories, in construction etc.; all this was
>> unpleasant to the Hebrew. Such a people will never establish a state
>> but prefers to live in some other state where others work and he acts
>> as an intermediary in business, a dealer in the best case, or in good
>> German – a robber, a nomad who undertakes robbing raids just like in
>> ancient times. (Lively bravo! and hand clapping)
>>
>> And so we can now understand why the whole Zionist state and its
>> establishing is nothing but a comedy. Herr Chief Rabbi has now said in
>> Jerusalem: “Establishment of this state is not the most important; it
>> is far from certain if it will at all be possible.” However, it is
>> necessary that Jewry has this city as its spiritual headquarters
>> because Jewry “materially and in fact are the masters of several
>> states; we control them financially, economically and politically.”
>> And so the Zionist state is going to be a harmless corn of sand in the
>> eye. Efforts are made to explain that so and so many Jews have been
>> found that want to go there as farmers, workers, even soldiers.
>> (Laughter) If these people really have this urge in themselves,
>> Germany today needs these ideal men as turf cutters and coal miners;
>> they could take part in building our water power plants, our lakes
>> etc. but it does not occur to them. The whole Zionist state will be
>> nothing else than the perfect high school for their international
>> criminals, and from there they will be directed. And every Jew will,
>> of course, have immunity as a citizen of the Palestinian state
>> (Laughter) and he will of course keep our citizenship. But when caught
>> red-handed, he will not be a German Jew any longer but a citizen of
>> Palestine. (Laughter)
>>
>> One can almost say that the Jew cannot help it because everything
>> stems from his race. He cannot do anything about it and, besides, it
>> doesn’t matter whether he is good or bad for he must act according to
>> the laws of his race, just as do members of our people. A Jew is
>> everywhere a Jew; consciously or unconsciously, he resolutely
>> represents the interests of his race.
>>
>> Thus we can see the two great differences between races: Aryanism
>> means ethical perception of work and that which we today so often hear
>> – socialism, community spirit, common good before own good. Jewry
>> means egoistic attitude to work and thereby mammonism and materialism,
>> the opposite of socialism. (Hear, hear) And due to these traits, which
>> he cannot ‘overstep’ as they are in his blood and, as he himself
>> admits, in these traits alone lays the necessity for the Jew to behave
>> unconditionally as a destroyer of states. He cannot do otherwise,
>> whether he wants to or not. And thereby he is unable to create his own
>> state because it requires a lot of social sense. He is only able to
>> live as a parasite in the states of others. He lives as a race amongst
>> other races, in a state within others states. And we can see very
>> precisely that when a race does not possess certain traits which must
>> be hereditary, it not only cannot create a state but must act as a
>> destroyer, no matter if a given individual is good or evil.
>>
>> The Jewish path of destruction
>>
>> We can follow this fate of Jewry from the earliest prehistory. It is
>> not important if there is truth in every word of the Bible. In
>> general, it gives us at least an extract of the history of Jewry. We
>> see how the Jews present themselves because the Jew wrote these words
>> quite innocuously. It did not appear to him as outrageous when a race,
>> through cunning and deceit, invaded and despoiled other races, was
>> always finally expelled and, unoffended, sought to repeat the same
>> elsewhere. They pimped and haggled even when it came to their ideals,
>> always ready to offer even their own families. We know that not long
>> ago a gentleman was staying here, Sigmund Fraenkel, who has just
>> written that it is quite unjust to accuse Jews of a materialistic
>> spirit. One should only look at their sunny family life. However, this
>> intimate family life did not prevent Grandfather Abraham from pimping
>> off his own wife to the Pharaoh of Egypt in order to be able to do
>> business. (Laughter) As was the grandfather, so was the father and so
>> were the sons who never neglected their business. And you can be sure
>> that they are not neglecting the business even as we speak. Who among
>> you was a soldier, he will remember Galicia or Poland: There, at the
>> train stations, these Abrahams were everywhere. (Laughter and hand
>> clapping)
>>
>> They penetrated into other races for millennia. And we know very well
>> that wherever they stayed long enough symptoms of decay appeared and
>> the peoples could do nothing else than to liberate themselves from the
>> uninvited guest or to disappear themselves. Heavy plagues came over
>> the nations, no less then ten in Egypt – the same plague we experience
>> today firsthand – and finally the Egyptians lost their patience. When
>> the chronicler describes that the Jews were suffering when they
>> finally left, we know differently, for as soon as they were out, they
>> began to long after coming back. (Laughter) It seems that they did not
>> have it so badly. On the other hand, if it’s true they had been forced
>> to help build pyramids, it would mean today forcing them to earn their
>> bread by working in our mines, stone quarries etc. And just as you are
>> not going to see this race voluntarily do it, so there was nothing
>> left to the Egyptians but to force them. What hundreds of thousands of
>> others do as a matter of course, means for the Jew another chapter of
>> suffering and persecution.
>>
>> Still later, the Jew was able to infiltrate the then soaring Roman
>> Empire. We can still see his traces in southern Italy. Already 250
>> years before Christ he was there in all places, and people began to
>> avoid them. Already, then and there, he made the most important
>> decision and became a trader. From numerous Roman texts we know that
>> he traded, like today, with everything from shoelaces to girls. (Hear,
>> hear) And we know that the danger grew, and that the insurrection
>> after the murder of Julius Caesar was mainly fomented by the Jews.
>>
>> The Jew knew even then how to make friends with the masters of the
>> Earth. Only when they became shaky in their rule, he suddenly became a
>> populist and discovered his wide open heart for the needs of the broad
>> masses. So it was in Rome, as we know. We know that the Jew used
>> Christianity, not out of love for Christ, but partly because he knew
>> that this new religion questioned all earthly power and so it became
>> an axe at the root of the Roman state, the state which was built on
>> the authority of the public servant. And he became its chief bearer
>> and propagator, without becoming a Christian – he couldn’t, he
>> remained a Jew, precisely as today when he, never stooping to the
>> level of worker, remains a master pretending to be a socialist.
>> (Bravo!) He did the same 2000 years ago, and we know that this new
>> Teaching was nothing else than a resurrection of the old truism that
>> people in a state should have legal rights and, above all, that equal
>> duties should give equal rights. This obvious Teaching was gradually
>> turned against the Jew himself, as the similar Teaching of socialism
>> has to turn on the Hebrew race today, its distorters and corrupters.
>> We know that throughout the middle Ages the Jew infiltrated all
>> European states, behaving like a parasite, using new principles and
>> ways which the people did not know then. And from a nomad he became a
>> greedy and bloodthirsty robber of our time. And he went so far that
>> people after people rebelled and attempted to shake him off.
>>
>> We know it is untrue when people say that the Jew was forced to this
>> activity; he could easily acquire land. And he did acquire land but
>> not to work it but in order to use it as a trade object, just as he
>> does today. Our forefathers were wiser; they knew that land was holy
>> and they excluded the Jew from it, (Lively ovation) and if the Jew
>> ever had the intention to tend the land and build a state, he could
>> easily have done so at the time when whole new continents were
>> discovered. He could easily have done it if only he used a small part
>> of his power, craftiness, cunning, brutality and ruthlessness, as well
>> as some of his financial resources. Because if this power was
>> sufficient to subdue whole peoples, it would have been more than
>> sufficient to build their own state. If only he had had the basic
>> condition for this, which is a will to work, but not in the sense of
>> usurious trade but in the sense in which millions work in order to
>> keep a state going. Instead, we see him also today as a destroyer. In
>> these days we see a great transformation: the Jew was once a Court
>> Jew, submissive to his master he knew how to make the master pliable
>> in order to dominate his subjects. For this purpose he whetted the
>> appetites of these great men for unattainable things, extended the
>> credit and soon turned them into debtors. In this way he himself got
>> power over peoples. And he played this game with the same cruelty as,
>> a few years later, the humanistic and philanthropic Jew whose wealth
>> did not suffer at all when he showed his humanitarianism and his
>> spirit of sacrifice to our people. (Big laughter) I said that he
>> transformed from Court Jew (Hofjude) to Populist Jew (Volksjude). Why?
>> Because he felt that the ground began to burn under his feet.
>>
>> The ethical duty to work
>>
>> Gradually, he also had to lead an existential struggle against the
>> growing awakening and anger of the people. This forced him to lay his
>> hands on the inner structure of the states if he wanted to remain the
>> master of the peoples.We see the resulting destruction in three areas,
>> namely those same three areas which were preserving and developing the
>> states.
>>
>> The first area was the fight against the principle of the ethical duty
>> to work. The Jew had found another kind of work for himself where he
>> could earn gold without practically moving a finger. He developed a
>> principle which, throughout millennia, made it possible for him to
>> amass fortunes without sweat and toil, unlike all other mortals, and
>> above all – without taking risk.
>>
>> What does the word “industrial capital” really mean? Ladies and
>> Gentlemen! People often accuse us, particularly in the factories: “You
>> don’t fight against the industrial capital, just against finance and
>> loan capital.” And most people don’t understand that one must not
>> fight against industrial capital. What is industrial capital? It is a
>> constantly changing factor, a relative concept. Once it was a needle
>> and thread, a workshop and a couple of cents in ready money which a
>> tailor in Nurnberg possessed in the 13th century. It was a sum that
>> made work possible, that is: tools, workshops and a certain amount of
>> money in order to survive for a period of time. Gradually, this small
>> workshop became a big factory. But workshops and tools, machines and
>> factories have, per se, no value able to produce value but are a means
>> to an end. What produces value is work, and the few cents which made
>> it possible to survive difficult times and buy some fabrics,
>> multiplied through time, stand before us today – we call it Capital
>> for continued operation in bad times, that is Working Capital.
>>
>> Here I want to emphasize one thing: Tools, workshop, machine, factory
>> – or working capital, that is, industrial capital – against this you
>> cannot fight at all. You can perhaps make sure that it is not abused
>> but you cannot fight against it. This is the first major scam that one
>> makes to our people, and they make it to distract us  from the real
>> fight, to pull it off from the capital which should and must be fought
>> – from the loan and financial capital. (Stormy bravo! and applause).
>> This capital arises in a very different way. The smallest master
>> craftsman was dependent on the fate that might affect him every day,
>> on the general situation in the middle Ages, perhaps on the size of
>> his city and its prosperity, the security in this city. Also today is
>> this capital, that is, the industrial capital tied to the state and to
>> the people, depending on the will of the people to work, but depending
>> also on the possibility to procure raw materials in order to be able
>> to offer work and find buyers who will really buy the product. And we
>> know that a collapse of the state, under certain circumstances,
>> renders the greatest values worthless, devalues them, as distinguished
>> from the other capital, the finance and loan capital, which accrues
>> interest very evenly without any regard to whether the owner, for
>> example, of these 10,000 Mark himself passes away or not. The debt
>> remains on the estate. We experience that a state has debts, for
>> example, the German Reich’s bonds for Alsace-Lorraine railways; these
>> bonds must bear interest although the railways are no longer in our
>> possession. We know that this railway fortunately has now a 20 billion
>> deficit but their bonds must bear interest, and even though they were
>> sold, in part, more than 60 years ago and have already been repaid
>> four times, the debt, the interest, runs further, and while a great
>> nation gains nothing on this company, it still must bleed; the loan
>> capital continues to grow completely irrespective of any outside
>> disturbance.
>>
>> Here we already see the first possibility, namely that this kind of
>> money-making, which is independent of all the events and incidents of
>> daily life, must necessarily, because it is never hindered and always
>> runs evenly, gradually lead to huge capitals which are so enormous
>> that they ultimately have only one fault, namely the difficulty of
>> their further accommodation.To accommodate this capital, you have to
>> proceed to destroying whole states, to destroy entire cultures, to
>> abolish national industries – not to socialize, but to throw all into
>> the jaws of this international capital – because this capital is
>> international, as the only thing on this Earth that is truly
>> international. It is international because its carrier, the Jews, are
>> international through their distribution across the world. (Consent)
>>
>> And already here one should knock oneself on the head and say: if this
>> capital is international because its carrier is distributed
>> internationally, it must be madness to think that this capital can be
>> fought internationally with the help of the members of the same race
>> which possesses it. (Hear, hear) Fire is not extinguished by fire but
>> by water and the international capital belonging to the international
>> Jew can only be broken by a national force. (Bravo and applause!) So,
>> this capital has grown to incredibly large proportions and today
>> virtually rules the Earth, still eerily growing and – the worst! – is
>> completely corrupting all honest work. For it is appalling that the
>> common man who has to bear the burden in order to return the capital
>> sees that, despite his hard work, diligence, thrift and in spite of
>> the real work, he is hardly able to nourish himself and still less to
>> dress, while this international capital devours billions just in
>> interest, which he also must supply, and at the same time a whole
>> racial stratum which does no other work than collect interest and cut
>> coupons, spreads in the state. This is a degradation of any honest
>> work, for every honestly working man must ask today: Does it have a
>> purpose at all that I work? I will really never accomplish anything,
>> and there are people who, practically without work, can not only live,
>> but in practice even dominate us, and that’s their goal.
>>
>> Yes, one of the foundations of our strength is being destroyed, namely
>> the ethical concept of work, and that was the brilliant idea of Karl
>> Marx to falsify the ethical concept of work, and the whole mass of the
>> people who groan under the Capital are to be organized for the
>> destruction of the national economy and for the protection of
>> international finance-and-loan capital. (Stormy applause) We know that
>> today 15 billion of industry capital is facing 500 billion of loan
>> capital. These 15 billion of industry capital is invested in creative
>> values, while this 500 billion loan capital, which we always get in
>> spoonful rates of 6 and 7 billion and which we use in periods of 1 to
>> 2 months to supplement our rations a little, these 6 to 7 billion
>> today which are decreed almost worthless scraps of paper, at a later
>> date, should we ever recover, will have to be repaid in high quality
>> money i.e. in a money behind which lies practical work. This is not
>> only the destruction of a state, but already the application of a
>> chain, of a neck collar for later times.
>>
>> National purity as a source of strength
>>
>> The second pillar against which the Jew as a parasite turns, and must
>> turn, is the national purity as a source of the strength of a nation.
>> The Jew, who is himself a nationalist more than any other nation, who
>> through millennia did not mix with any other race, uses intermingling
>> just for others to degenerate them in the best case; this same Jew
>> preaches every day with thousands of tongues, from 19,000 papers in
>> Germany alone, that all nations on Earth are equal, that international
>> solidarity should bind all the peoples, that no people can lay a claim
>> to a special status etc., and, above all, that no nation has a reason
>> to be proud of anything that is called or is national. What a nation
>> means, he, who himself never dreams of climbing down to those to whom
>> he preaches internationalism, knows well.
>>
>> First a race must be denationalized. First it must unlearn that its
>> power is in its blood, and when it has reached the level where it has
>> no more pride, the result is a product, a second race, which is lower
>> than the previous one and the Jew needs the lower one in order to
>> organize his final world domination. In order to build it and keep it,
>> he lowers the racial level of the other peoples, so that only he is
>> racially pure and able to eventually rule over all the others. That’s
>> race degradation, the effects of which we can see today in a number of
>> peoples of the world. We know that the Hindus in India are a mixed
>> people, stemming from the high Aryan immigrants and from the dark
>> aborigines. And this nation bears the consequences, for it is a slave
>> nation of a race that may seem in many ways almost as a second Jewry.
>>
>> Another problem is the problem of physical decomposition of races. The
>> Jew is trying to eliminate all of which he knows that is somehow
>> strengthening, muscle-steeling, and eliminate above all everything of
>> that which he knows may keep a race so healthy that it will remain
>> determined not to tolerate among themselves national criminals, pests
>> to the national community, but under some circumstances, punish them
>> with death. And that is his great fear and worry; for even the
>> heaviest latches of the safest prison are not so tough, and the prison
>> is not so safe that a few million could not open it eventually. Only
>> one lock is permanent, and that is death, and in front of it he has
>> the most awe. And therefore he seeks to abolish this barbaric
>> punishment everywhere where he lives as a parasite. But wherever he
>> already is, Lord, it is used ruthlessly. (Loud applause)
>>
>> And, for the breaking of physical strength, he has excellent means at
>> hand. First of all, he has the trade that should be nothing more than
>> distribution of foodstuffs and other necessary items for daily use. He
>> uses it to withdraw these articles of daily life, when necessary, in
>> order to raise the price on the one hand, but also to withdraw in
>> order to create the conditions for physical weakening which have
>> always worked best: hunger.
>>
>> Thus we see them brilliantly organize, from a Joseph in Egypt up to a
>> Rathenau* today. Everywhere, what we see behind these organizations is
>> not the desire to make a shining organization for food supply, but
>> through them gradually to create hunger. We know that as a politician
>> he never had reason and cause to shun the hunger, on the contrary,
>> wherever the Jew appeared in political parties, hunger and misery was
>> the only soil in which he could grow. He desires it, and therefore he
>> does not even think of easing social misery. That’s the bed in which
>> it thrives.*Walther Rathenau’s mother was Jewish. He became Foreign
>> Minister of Germany during the Weimar Republic, was assassinated on
>> June 24, 1922, two months after signing the Rappalo Treaty. He was a
>> leading proponent of a policy of assimilation for German Jews ]
>>
>> Hand in hand with this goes a battle against the health of the people.
>> He knows how to turn all the healthy normal manners, the obvious
>> hygienic rules of a race on its head, from night he makes day; he
>> creates the notorious nightlife and knows exactly that it works slowly
>> but surely, gradually destroying the healthy strength of a race,
>> making it soft; the one is destroyed physically, the other
>> spiritually, and into the heart of the third it puts the hatred as he
>> has to see the others feast.
>>
>> And finally, as a last resort, he destroys the productive capacity,
>> and if necessary, in connection with it, the productive resources of a
>> nation. That is the great mystery of Russia. They have destroyed
>> factories, not because they knew they would no longer be needed, but
>> because they knew that the people would be forced, with enormous
>> hardships, to replace what had been destroyed. So the Jew succeeds in
>> harnessing the people, instead of the former 9 and 10 hours, for 12
>> hours. For at the moment when the Jew becomes Lord, he knows no 8-hour
>> day, he recognizes his Sabbath for his cattle, but not for the Goyim,
>> for the Akum [words for non-Jews].
>>
>> The destruction of culture
>>
>> Finally, he reaches for the last method: The destruction of all
>> culture, of all that we consider as belonging in a state which we
>> consider civilized. Here is his work perhaps most difficult to
>> recognize, but here the actual effect is the most terrible. We are
>> familiar with his activity in the arts, like today’s paintings which
>> became a caricature of all that we call true inner perception.
>> (Prolonged applause) They always explain that you don’t understand the
>> inner experience of the artist. Don’t you think that also a Moritz
>> Schwind and Ludwig Richter experienced internally when they created?
>> (Stormy bravo! and applause)
>>
>> Don’t you, finally, believe that, for example, Beethoven’s chords also
>> came from inner experience and feeling and that a Beethoven symphony
>> reflects his inner experience? This is true inner experience, unlike
>> the other ones, which are only superficial swindle (Applause), set in
>> the world with an intent to gradually destroy in the people any
>> healthy idea and to whip the people into a state in which no one can
>> understand whether the times are crazy, or whether he himself is mad.
>> (Big laughter and applause.)
>>
>> Just as he works in painting, sculpture and music, so he does in
>> poetry and especially in literature. Here he has a great advantage. He
>> is the editor and, above all, publisher of more than 95% of all
>> newspapers. He uses this power, and he who has become such a brutal
>> antisemite as myself (Laughter) smells out, even as he takes the paper
>> in his hand, where the Jew begins; (Laughter) he knows already from
>> the title page that it is again not one of us, but one of the “folks
>> behind.” (Laughter) We know full well that all his contortions and
>> wordplays only serve to conceal the inner emptiness of his mind and
>> hide the fact that the man has no real spiritual life, and what he
>> lacks in true spirit he replaces with bombast phrases, word twists and
>> turns that seem unreasonable, but he cautiously explains from the
>> outset that he who does not understand them is not sufficiently
>> mentally developed. (Laughter)
>>
>> When we talk about literature, we also need to jump straight to
>> another chapter where we can admire in excess Moritz and Salomon Wolf
>> and Bear: Our theater, the places which a Richard Wagner wanted once
>> to have darkened to create the highest degree of consecration and
>> seriousness, in which he wanted to perform works which it would be
>> shameful to call shows, so he named them “consecration plays;” the
>> place where there should be nothing else but the highest elevation, a
>> detachment of the individual from all the grief and misery, but also
>> from all the rot which surrounds us in life, to lift the individual
>> into a purer air. What has become of it? A place which today you are
>> ashamed to enter unless someone might notice you the moment you go in.
>> (Hear, hear) We see that although a Friedrich Schiller received just
>> 346 thalers for “Mary Stuart,” for “Merry Widow”* people today receive
>> 5 1/2 million, that the greatest kitsch today makes ??millions for
>> which an author in ancient Greece would probably have been expelled
>> from the state by ostracism. (Loud applause) *Hitler later changed his
>> mind about “The Merry Widow” (composed by fellow Austrian Franz Lehár)
>> and endorsed it, along with Operetta in general.
>>
>> And if theater has become a hotbed of vice and shamelessness, then a
>> thousand times more so that new invention which perhaps comes from
>> genial inspiration, but which the Jew understood right away to remodel
>> into the filthiest business that you can imagine: the cinema.
>> (Thunderous applause and clapping.) At first people attached greatest
>> hopes to this brilliant invention. It could become an easy mediator of
>> profound knowledge for the entire people of the world. And what has
>> become of it? It became the mediator of the greatest and the most
>> shameless filth. The Jew works on.
>>
>> For him there is no spiritual sensitivity, and just as his forefather
>> Abraham was selling his wife, he finds nothing special about the fact
>> that today he sells girls, and through the centuries we find him
>> everywhere, in North America as in Germany, Austria-Hungary and all
>> over the East, as the merchant of the human commodity and it can not
>> be denied away; even the greatest Jew defender cannot deny that all of
>> these girl-dealers are Hebrews. This subject is atrocious. According
>> to Germanic sentiment there would be only one punishment for this:
>> death. For people that play fast and loose, regarding as a business,
>> as a commodity, what for millions of others means greatest happiness
>> or greatest misfortune. For them love is nothing more than business in
>> which they make money. They are always ready to tear apart the
>> happiness of any marriage, if only 30 pieces of silver can be made.
>> (Stormy bravo! and applause)
>>
>> They tell us today that all that which was known as family life is a
>> completely outlived notion, and who only saw the play “Castle
>> Wetterstein”* could see how the holiest that still remained to the
>> people was shamelessly called “brothel”. *An anti-bourgeoise play
>> written in 1912 by Frank Wedekind, pre-figuring the “new realism,” in
>> which a young woman is corrupted. It was played up by the Jews and
>> became very popular. So we should not be surprised when he also
>> attacks what many people even today are not indifferent to, and what
>> to many at least can give inner peace – religion. Also here we see the
>> same Jew who himself has enough religious customs which others could
>> easily mock, but no one does, as we, in principle, never ridicule
>> religion because it is sacred to us. But he tries to destroy
>> everything without offering a substitute. Who today, in this age of
>> the vilest deceit and swindle, is detached from it; for him there are
>> just two more possibilities, either he hangs himself in despair or
>> becomes a crook.
>>
>> The “authority of the majority”
>>
>> When the Jew has destroyed the state according to these three major
>> aspects, when he has undermined the state-forming and sustaining
>> power, the ethical conception of work, the racial purity of a people
>> and its spiritual life, he puts to the ax the authority of reason in
>> the state and puts in its place the so-called authority of the
>> majority of the crowd, and he knows that this majority will dance as
>> he whistles because he has the means to direct it: He has the Press,
>> not perhaps for registering of public opinion, but for forgery of it,
>> and he knows how to harness public opinion through the Press in order
>> to dominate the state. Instead of the authority of reason, there
>> enters the authority of the great spongy majority led by the Jew,
>> because the Jew is always going through three periods.
>>
>> First, autocratically-minded, ready to serve any prince, he then
>> descends to the people, fighting for democracy, of which he knows that
>> it will be in his hand, and steered by him; he owns it, he becomes a
>> dictator. (Hear, hear) And we see this today in Russia, where a Lenin
>> has just assured that the councils are already outlived, and that now
>> it is not absolutely necessary that a proletarian state be led through
>> one council or parliament, that it is sufficient that 2 or 3
>> proletarian-minded people govern this country. These
>> proletarian-minded persons are some Jewish billionaires, and we know
>> very well that behind 2 or 3 proletarians ultimately stands another
>> organization which is outside of the state: the Alliance Israelite and
>> their grandiose propaganda organization and the organization of
>> Freemasonry. (Loud applause and clapping of hands)
>>
>> And in all these things we must understand that there are no good or
>> evil Jews. Here everyone works exactly according to the instincts of
>> his race, because the race, or should we say, the nation and its
>> character, as the Jew himself explains, lies in blood, and this blood
>> is forcing everyone to act according to these principles, whether he
>> is the leading mind in a party that calls itself democratic, or calls
>> itself socialist, or a man of science, literature, or just an ordinary
>> exploiter. He is a Jew; he works aglow with one thought: How do I get
>> my people to become the Master Race.
>>
>> The political organization
>>
>> And when we see, for example, in these Jewish magazines, that it is
>> specified that every Jew everywhere is obligated to fight against any
>> antisemite, wherever and whoever he is, then it follows by deduction
>> that every German, wherever and whoever he is, will become an
>> antisemite. (Stormy bravo! and prolonged applause) For if the Jew has
>> a racial determination, so have we, and we are also obliged to act
>> accordingly. Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we
>> do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner
>> health if it is not built on internal social justice, and so we have
>> joined forces with this knowledge and when we finally united, there
>> was only one big question: How should we actually baptize ourselves? A
>> party? A bad name! Notorious, discredited in the mouth of everyone,
>> and hundreds told us, “Why have you called yourselves a party? When I
>> hear that word I go mad.” And others told us, “It’s not necessary for
>> us to organize ourselves more closely, it is sufficient that the
>> scientific knowledge of the danger of Jewry gradually deepens and the
>> individual, on the basis of this knowledge, begins to remove the Jews
>> from himself.” But I very much fear that this whole beautiful line of
>> thought was designed by none other than a Jew himself. (Laughter.)
>>
>> Then we were told further, “It is not necessary that you are
>> politically organized, it is sufficient to take away from the Jews
>> their economic power. Economic organizing only – here lies the
>> salvation and the future.” Here, too, I have the same suspicion that a
>> Jew sowed this idea the first time because one thing has become clear:
>> In order to liberate our economy from this fix it is necessary to
>> combat the pathogen, the politically organized struggle of the masses
>> against their oppressors. (Stormy applause) Since it is clear that
>> scientific knowledge is worthless as long as this knowledge is not a
>> basis for an organization of the masses for the implementation of what
>> we consider necessary, and it is further clear that for this
>> organization only the broad masses of our people can be considered.
>> Because it sets us apart from all those who today are ‘saviors of
>> Germany,’ whether Bothmer or Ballerstedt*, that we believe that the
>> future strength of our people is not to be found in Odeon bar or
>> Bonbonniére** but in the countless workshops, in which they work every
>> day – that here we find the millions of hardworking, healthy people
>> whose lives are the only hope of our people for the future. (Loud
>> applaus.) *Opponents of Hitler ** Places of frivolity in Munich
>>
>> Furthermore, we realized that if this movement does not penetrate into
>> the masses, to organize them, then everything will be in vain; then we
>> will never be able to liberate our people and we will never be able to
>> think of rebuilding our country. The salvation can never come from
>> above, it can and will only come from the masses, from the bottom up.
>> (Applause)
>>
>> And as we came to this realization and decided to form a party, a
>> political party that wants to enter into the ruthless political
>> struggle for the future, then we heard a voice: Do you believe that
>> you few can do it, do you really believe that a couple of guys can do
>> it? Because we understood that we had an immense battle ahead of us
>> but also that anything created by men can be destroyed by other men.
>> And another conviction has arisen within us, that this can not be a
>> matter of whether we think we can do it, but only a question of
>> whether we believe that it is right and that it is necessary, and if
>> it is right and necessary, then it is no longer a question of whether
>> we want to, but rather it is our duty to do what we feel is necessary.
>> (Stormy bravo!) We did not ask after money and supporters, but we
>> decided to go forth.
>>
>> And while others are working a whole generation, perhaps in order to
>> get a small house or to have a carefree retirement, we put our lives
>> at stake and have begun this difficult struggle. If we win, and we are
>> convinced we will, though we may die penniless we will have helped
>> create the biggest movement which will now extend over all Europe and
>> the whole world. (Loud applause)
>>
>> The first three principles were clear, and they are inseparable from
>> each other. Socialism as the final concept of duty, the ethical duty
>> of work, not just for oneself but also for one’s fellow man’s sake,
>> and above all the principle: Common good before own good, a struggle
>> against all parasitism and especially against easy and unearned
>> income. And we were aware that in this fight we can rely on no one but
>> our own people. We are convinced that socialism in the right sense
>> will only be possible in nations and races that are Aryan, and there
>> in the first place we hope for our own people and are convinced that
>> socialism is inseparable from nationalism. (Loud applause)
>>
>> To be nationalist does not mean for us to belong to one party or
>> another, but to show with every action that one benefits the people;
>> it means love for all the people without exception. From this point of
>> view we will realize that it is necessary to preserve the most
>> precious thing a people has, the sum of all active creative powers of
>> its workers, to keep it healthy in body and soul.(Cheers) And this
>> view of nationalism compels us to immediately form a front against its
>> opposite, the Semitic conception of the idea of people (Volk), and
>> especially against the Semitic concept of work. Since we are
>> socialists, we must necessarily also be antisemites because we want to
>> fight against the very opposite: materialism and mammonism. (Lively
>> bravo!)
>>
>> And when today the Jew still runs into our factories and says: How can
>> you be a socialist antisemite? Are not you ashamed? - there comes a
>> time in which we will ask: How can you not be an antisemite, being a
>> socialist! (Hear, hear) There comes a time when it will be obvious
>> that socialism can only be carried out accompanied by nationalism and
>> antisemitism. The three concepts are inseparably connected. They are
>> the foundations of our program and therefore we call ourselves
>> National Socialists. (Cheers)
>>
>> How to proceed
>>
>> Finally, we know how great the social reforms must be so that Germany
>> may recover. If it doesn’t happen, perhaps the only reason will be too
>> modest efforts. We know that one will have to cut deep. We will not be
>> able to come around the national problem and the issue of land reform,
>> and the problem of care for all those who, day after day, are working
>> for the community and in their old age this care must not be a
>> pittance, but they have a right to have their old days be still worth
>> living.
>>
>> If we wish to make these social reforms, this must go hand in hand
>> with the fight against the enemy of every social institution: Jewry.
>> Here too we know that scientific knowledge can only be the groundwork,
>> but that behind this knowledge must stand an organization which one
>> day will be able to go over into action. And in this action we will
>> remain adamant, which means: removal of Jews from amongst our people
>> (Loud and long sustained applause and clapping), not because we
>> begrudge them their existence – we congratulate the rest of the world
>> on account of their visits (great hilarity) – but because we value the
>> existence of our own people a thousand times higher than that of an
>> alien race. (Bravo!)
>>
>> And since we are convinced that this scientific antisemitism that
>> clearly recognizes the terrible danger of this race for any people can
>> only be a guide, and the masses will always perceive them emotionally
>> – for they know the Jew first and foremost as the man in daily life
>> who always and everywhere sticks out – our concern must be to arouse
>> in our people the instinct against Jewry and whip it up and stir,
>> until they come to the decision to join the movement which is willing
>> to take the consequences. (Bravo and applause.)
>>
>> Some people tell us: Whether you succeed depends eventually on whether
>> you have the sufficient money and so on. To this, I think I can say
>> the following: Even the power of money is somehow limited; there is a
>> certain limit beyond which, eventually, not the money rules but the
>> truth. And we are all aware that, once the millions of our workers
>> realize who are the leaders who now promise them a blissful future
>> kingdom, when they recognize that everywhere gold is at play, they
>> will throw the gold in their face and declare: Keep your gold and
>> don’t think that you can buy us. (Bravo!)
>>
>> And we do not despair if we maybe still stand alone, if we today,
>> wherever we go, do see potential supporters but nowhere the courage to
>> join the organization. That should not lead us astray; we have
>> accepted the fight and we must win it. I have assured you before the
>> election that this election would not decide Germany’s fate, that
>> after this election no recovery would come and, already today, I think
>> most of you will agree with me. I could predict it back then because I
>> knew that the courage and the will to act were absent everywhere.
>>
>> We have proclaimed as our election platform only one thing: Let the
>> others go to the polls today, to the Reichstag, to the parliaments and
>> loll in their club chairs; we want to climb up the beer tables and
>> pull the masses with us. We’ve kept this promise and will keep it in
>> the future. Tirelessly and constantly, as long as we have a spark of
>> strength and a breath in the lungs, we will come out and call all our
>> people; and always tell the truth until we can begin to hope that this
>> truth will prevail. Till the day finally comes when our words fall
>> silent and action begins. (Stormy bravo! and long-lasting applause.)
>>
>> (Pause and discussion)
>>
>> Closing remarks of the speaker Hitler:
>>
>> Ladies and gentlemen! We are not as dreadful as our primary enemy and
>> we cannot shatter Jewry by ourselves; we do not imagine it is so easy.
>> However, we have decided not to come with any buts and ifs. But once
>> the matter comes to the solution, it will be done, and done
>> thoroughly.
>>
>> What the gentleman said, that for him it doesn’t matter – any person
>> is a human being – I agree, as long as that person does not get in the
>> way. But when a great race systematically destroys the life conditions
>> of my race, I say no, no matter where they ‘belong.’ In that case, I
>> say that I am one of those who, when they get a blow on the left
>> cheek, they return two or three. (Bravo!)
>>
>> Then a gentleman said that our movement would mean a battle into which
>> the working class would be drawn. Yes, and we (the social democrats
>> and communists?) will promise our people Heaven on Earth, and after
>> the fools have fought for forty years, then instead of the Heaven
>> they’ll have nothing but a pile of rubble and misery. That mistake we
>> will not make. (Bravo!) We do not promise any Heaven but the one
>> thing, that if you are determined to carry out this program in
>> Germany, maybe once again the time will come in which you will be able
>> to have a life. If you carry out the glorious reform which these
>> gentlemen here wish, you will in an even shorter time face the need to
>> embellish this life with the very same decrees which their leaders
>> Trotsky and Lenin issue now: Those who are not willing to fight for
>> the blessings of that State, die.
>>
>> Finally, he said that they opposed any capitalism. My esteemed
>> audience! The communists have so far merely been fighting industrial
>> capital and have only hung industrial capitalists. But name me one
>> Jewish capitalist whom they have hung. (That’s right! says the crowd)
>> 300,000 Russians have been murdered in Russia. The Soviet Government
>> itself admits this now. Among those 300,000 is not a single Jew! But
>> in the leadership more than 90% are Jews. Is that persecution of Jews
>> or rather, in the truest sense of the word, persecution of Christians?
>> (Hear, hear)
>>
>> Then you said you fought against both the loan capital and industrial
>> capital. But you have so far combated neither the one nor the other.
>> You cannot fight the industrial capital, at most destroy it, and then
>> you must again start with a 12-hour working day to rebuild it. (Hear,
>> hear) And the other you’ve so far never fought! This one is paying
>> you. (Thunderous applause and clapping of hands)
>>
>> Then the second speaker stated the cause of the revolution should be
>> looked for in poverty. We prefer to put it this way: Poverty has made
>> Germany ripe for those who wanted the revolution. You can read the
>> piece written by their Lord and Master who was then ruling Germany,
>> Rathenau, where he explained precisely that the revolution had a real
>> and deliberate purpose: Displacement of the feudal system and its
>> replacement by plutocracy. These men have been the financiersof this
>> glorious movement. If their revolution would have been even the
>> slightest threat to Capital, then the Frankfurter Zeitung would not
>> have triumphantly announced on the 9th November: “The German people
>> have made a revolution.” When we make our revolution, the Frankfurter
>> Zeitung will whistle a very different tune. (Loud applause)
>>
>> Then you said further: Before the war one has not heard anything of
>> Jews. That is a sad fact that we have heard so little. This does not
>> mean, however, that he was not there. But above all, it is not true,
>> because this movement did not begin after the war but has been there
>> just as long as there are Jews. If you go back and read in Jewish
>> history, the Jews gradually exterminated the original tribes in
>> Palestine by the sword, so you can imagine that there has been
>> antisemitism as a logical reaction. And it existed the whole time till
>> this day, and the pharaohs in Egypt were probably just as antisemitic
>> as we are today. If you had, before the war, not only read their
>> famous writers Moritz, Salomon, and others – I do not even mention
>> newspapers which, a priori, carry the stamp of approval of the
>> Alliance Israelite- you would have heard that in Austria there was a
>> huge anti-Semitic movement, but also the Russia people constantly
>> attempted to rise up against the Jewish bloodsuckers. That in Galicia,
>> the Poles groaned and no longer worked, and sometimes rose in despair
>> against those crazy idealists who were hell-bound to send the people
>> to their early graves. Unfortunately, too late we have begun to
>> understand this there, but you say: Before the war, one has not heard
>> of it. But really deplorable are only those who hear it now and still
>> cannot get the courage to answer our call. (Stormy bravo! and
>> applause)
>>
>> Then you declare further that Lenin made some mistakes. We are
>> grateful that at least you admit that your pope has made mistakes.
>> (Laughter) But then you declare you would not make these mistakes. For
>> one thing, when 300,000 people are hanged in Germany and when our
>> whole economy is shattered after their pattern, then your statement
>> that you would not make the same mistakes is not enough. You seem to
>> have a poor idea of what the Bolshevik system really means. It will
>> not improve the situation, but it is put there in order to destroy the
>> races with these errors. (Hear, hear) When you declare today that one
>> did so in Russia up until now, this is a sorry excuse; when you first
>> exterminate a race, first totally ruin a national economy; and finally
>> this state lives practically only by the mercy of Tsarist officers
>> who, driven by force make conquests for it, then, in my opinion, it’s
>> a strange policy. (Hear, hear.) One thing I know is that if we do not
>> have the iron will to stop war madness – that mutual tearing one
>> another to pieces – we’ll perish.
>>
>> Finally, you explain, since the loan capital is international, we
>> cannot fight it nationally, otherwise the international world will
>> shut us off. These are the consequences of relying on international
>> solidarity! (Loud applause.) Had you not made us so powerless, we
>> could not have cared less if the other world is happy with us or not.
>> But when you yourself admit that this International, which practically
>> dominates Britain, France and North America, is able to shut us off,
>> do you believe then that the fight against Capital is being fought
>> over there? So long as this Earth exists, nations have never been
>> freed by the will and the deed of other nations, but either by their
>> own force or they remained in bondage. (Cheers)
>>
>> And then, finally, you also turn to the Bible, and that’s, after all,
>> a good sign in a Communist. (Laughter) And you explain that, because
>> of a peculiar conformity of Bible and our Party program, I am a
>> Communist. What you are telling me here, Dr. Gerlich has already said,
>> and Mr. Hohmann has called me too: If you stand up for what you have
>> in the program, you are a communist. On the other hand, the “Post”
>> says all the time, I am an arch-reactionary, a completely diseased,
>> militaristic reactionary.
>>
>> (Interruption: The “Post” is itself reactionary.)
>>
>> Would you please confront the chief editor with this and allow me to
>> listen? (Big laughter and applause) Also, the “Kampf” emphasizes again
>> and again that we are the bastion of the counter-reaction. So I
>> recommend that you first go to the “Post ” and to “Kampf” and tell
>> them that we are Communists because I myself couldn’t care less how I
>> am called, whether reactionary, Pan-German, a Junker, big
>> industrialist or a communist – I am and will remain a German national
>> socialist. I have my program in front of me and, as I said earlier, I
>> will pursue it to the last spark of my strength and the last breath in
>> my lungs. (Long sustained stormy bravo! and applause)
>>
>> The Chairman thanks for the numerous attendance and closes the
>> meeting.
>>
>> Translation from German by Hasso Castrup (Copenhagen, Denmark),
>> January, 2013, from the original published in Vierteljahrshefte für
>> Zeitgeschichte, 16. Jahrg., 4. H. (Oct., 1968), pp. 390-420.
>> http://www.ifz-muenchen.de/heftarchiv/1968_4.pdf
>>