Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

An idea is not responsible for the people who believe in it.


interests / alt.usage.english / Order of meanings in dictionaries

SubjectAuthor
* Order of meanings in dictionariesStefan Ram
`* Re: Order of meanings in dictionariesQuinn C
 `- Re: Order of meanings in dictionariesPeter T. Daniels

1
Order of meanings in dictionaries

<AHD-20220518155640@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=131558&group=alt.usage.english#131558

 copy link   Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: ram...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
Subject: Order of meanings in dictionaries
Date: 18 May 2022 15:34:47 GMT
Organization: Stefan Ram
Lines: 46
Expires: 1 Apr 2023 11:59:58 GMT
Message-ID: <AHD-20220518155640@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de FeupNTtqwFDcik74HG50PgWveLFSsZxkMoayKbNof+aL45
X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2022 Stefan Ram. All rights reserved.
Distribution through any means other than regular usenet
channels is forbidden. It is forbidden to publish this
article in the Web, to change URIs of this article into links,
and to transfer the body without this notice, but quotations
of parts in other Usenet posts are allowed.
X-No-Archive: Yes
Archive: no
X-No-Archive-Readme: "X-No-Archive" is set, because this prevents some
services to mirror the article in the web. But the article may
be kept on a Usenet archive server with only NNTP access.
X-No-Html: yes
Content-Language: en-US
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US, it, fr-FR
 by: Stefan Ram - Wed, 18 May 2022 15:34 UTC

I heard that the AHD was, when it was first published, to be
a "new" kind of dictionary, where the meanings of a word
were /not/ listed in historical order (as in Webster's), but
with the /current/ meaning listed first. Please allow me to
quote the AHD itself!

|Entries containing more than one sense are arranged for the
|convenience of /contemporary/ dictionary users with /the
|central and often the most commonly sought meanings first/.
Quotation from the AHD from 1996 (slashes added by me [S.R.]).

However, my personal experience is often quite the opposite!

For one example, what is your understanding of,
"the meal was terrific!"?

Longman's Dictionary of American English from 2008 has as
the first meaning:

|1 (informal) very good or enjoyable

, the AHD from 1996 has,

|1. Causing terror or great fear; terrifying:

and only as number "3." "very good". So to me this looks
exactly as if the AHD gives the meanings in /historical/ order!

For many other words I have found something similar, but I
have not kept records of those words, so I cannot list all
those cases here.

A quotation from the World-Wide Web:

|My Polish uncle used to relate a humorous anecdote of
|trying to compliment his Irish immigrant future
|mother-in-law by telling her "the meal was terrific."
|As you might imagine, confusion, hurt feelings, explanations,
|and apologies ensued
from the World-Wide Web.

We have "horrible", "horrific", "terrible", and "terrific",
but from those four words, only "terrific" can take a praising
meaning.

Re: Order of meanings in dictionaries

<1wjfdrq8y2d8j$.dlg@mid.crommatograph.info>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=131598&group=alt.usage.english#131598

 copy link   Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!feeder.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!posting.tweaknews.nl!fx10.ams1.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: lispamat...@crommatograph.info (Quinn C)
Subject: Re: Order of meanings in dictionaries
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.41
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: Computers don't get me 'cause I'm non-binary
References: <AHD-20220518155640@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Message-ID: <1wjfdrq8y2d8j$.dlg@mid.crommatograph.info>
X-Face: .f:ZE>c\~9oJ+1nK#>ntSHOQS~4x"Qx2m(<D<@p$G"tzb1lgWLUGY.zApKa@VL_?d$r(8=?VjrD9=uY:x!+H=hvj58Uw7)Y9<:KMYD.+^~#qMpeg2rvt`{#2a~7YoyFaFaBEdo4.TJzBqgtCZZ:mku4J|hey}DE}_"z(rl0N)\Pxh*0$"3B2mr\01&YPY7WJ:2kSe'I#PqiTxs1s49!S#W85'\zMXy*wRgD,,k.=4:3M{(P"i6S;\az~ut3z`;?*Y;&]11<(EPF-SN`|3PhyL%~AuZpoFjjE_oM1`znHPq_?uib2WXwE+q@m),cLq~B$r^5uO]u6?CEecn=%xsDXNVa(1DX.)O(
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kTNKQKSad7ocoe8/c95j9jaraWo=
Lines: 42
X-Complaints-To: abuse@tweaknews.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 17:31:42 UTC
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 13:31:42 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 2652
 by: Quinn C - Wed, 18 May 2022 17:31 UTC

* Stefan Ram:

> I heard that the AHD was, when it was first published, to be
> a "new" kind of dictionary, where the meanings of a word
> were /not/ listed in historical order (as in Webster's), but
> with the /current/ meaning listed first. Please allow me to
> quote the AHD itself!
>
>|Entries containing more than one sense are arranged for the
>|convenience of /contemporary/ dictionary users with /the
>|central and often the most commonly sought meanings first/.
> Quotation from the AHD from 1996 (slashes added by me [S.R.]).
>
> However, my personal experience is often quite the opposite!
>
> For one example, what is your understanding of,
> "the meal was terrific!"?
>
> Longman's Dictionary of American English from 2008 has as
> the first meaning:
>
>|1 (informal) very good or enjoyable
>
> , the AHD from 1996 has,
>
>|1. Causing terror or great fear; terrifying:
>
> and only as number "3." "very good". So to me this looks
> exactly as if the AHD gives the meanings in /historical/ order!

Collins Cobuild was, I believe, the first dictionary to do what you
describe in a really systematic manner, based on a corpus. The
"terrifying" meaning doesn't even make the cut:

<https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/terrific>

(The Cobuild entry is usually on top, followed by other dictionaries.)

--
No ... it's a good thing that one of the most famous bigots
in the country [now supports Bernie].
-- Page Kreisman, talking about Joe Rogan

Re: Order of meanings in dictionaries

<d713e5cf-12fa-4895-b5a3-f7970b4c249an@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=131619&group=alt.usage.english#131619

 copy link   Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:248c:b0:6a0:54f8:9077 with SMTP id i12-20020a05620a248c00b006a054f89077mr824861qkn.500.1652903200174;
Wed, 18 May 2022 12:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:2fc5:0:b0:2fe:d7d1:4315 with SMTP id
v188-20020a812fc5000000b002fed7d14315mr1086684ywv.87.1652903200020; Wed, 18
May 2022 12:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 12:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1wjfdrq8y2d8j$.dlg@mid.crommatograph.info>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=100.8.211.134; posting-account=tXYReAoAAABbl0njRzivyU02EBLaX9OF
NNTP-Posting-Host: 100.8.211.134
References: <AHD-20220518155640@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <1wjfdrq8y2d8j$.dlg@mid.crommatograph.info>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d713e5cf-12fa-4895-b5a3-f7970b4c249an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Order of meanings in dictionaries
From: gramma...@verizon.net (Peter T. Daniels)
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 19:46:40 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 4015
 by: Peter T. Daniels - Wed, 18 May 2022 19:46 UTC

On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 1:31:48 PM UTC-4, Quinn C wrote:
> * Stefan Ram:
>
> > I heard that the AHD was, when it was first published, to be
> > a "new" kind of dictionary, where the meanings of a word
> > were /not/ listed in historical order (as in Webster's), but
> > with the /current/ meaning listed first. Please allow me to
> > quote the AHD itself!
> >
> >|Entries containing more than one sense are arranged for the
> >|convenience of /contemporary/ dictionary users with /the
> >|central and often the most commonly sought meanings first/.
> > Quotation from the AHD from 1996 (slashes added by me [S.R.]).
> >
> > However, my personal experience is often quite the opposite!
> >
> > For one example, what is your understanding of,
> > "the meal was terrific!"?
> >
> > Longman's Dictionary of American English from 2008 has as
> > the first meaning:
> >
> >|1 (informal) very good or enjoyable
> >
> > , the AHD from 1996 has,
> >
> >|1. Causing terror or great fear; terrifying:
> >
> > and only as number "3." "very good". So to me this looks
> > exactly as if the AHD gives the meanings in /historical/ order!
>
> Collins Cobuild was, I believe, the first dictionary to do what you
> describe in a really systematic manner, based on a corpus. The
> "terrifying" meaning doesn't even make the cut:
>
> <https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/terrific>
>
> (The Cobuild entry is usually on top, followed by other dictionaries.)

(Will Stefan see this?)

No, "central and often the most commonly sought meanings" does
not mean 'with the /current/ meaning listed first'. AHD abandons
objectivity (it was created in reaction to the M-W Third International,
which was so _descriptive_ that it actually had an entry for the f-word
(I'm sure the Stasi wouldn't allow Stefan to see that spelled out). The
AHD preserves _opinion_ rather than data.

But what aroused the most ire in 1961 was that it recognized that
words take on new meanings over the decades. James Michener
(deservedly popular novelist) wrote a review -- in which he confessed
his chagrin that a sentence he'd written was used as evidence for
the 'happen' meaning of "transpire."

AHD's treatment of "terrific" is inexplicable. The meaning needs
to be registered, because traditionally non-specialist dictionaries
of English include every word in Shakespeare and the KJV; the
OED will be happy to tell you how long it was regularly used with
the 'terrifying' meaning.

But it's very reliable for etymologies, which were overseen by
Calvert Watkins, and in the back is a dictionary of IE roots that
are found in English. Long afterward, another one was added
for Semitic words that have been borrowed into English, prepared
by John Huehnergard.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor