Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

In just seven days, I can make you a man! -- The Rocky Horror Picture Show


interests / rec.games.backgammon / Long and weird mutual backgame

SubjectAuthor
* Long and weird mutual backgameAxel Reichert
`* Re: Long and weird mutual backgameTimothy Chow
 `* Re: Long and weird mutual backgameAxel Reichert
  `- Re: Long and weird mutual backgameTimothy Chow

1
Long and weird mutual backgame

<875y0hqqrv.fsf@axel-reichert.de>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=13281&group=rec.games.backgammon#13281

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mai...@axel-reichert.de (Axel Reichert)
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Subject: Long and weird mutual backgame
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 10:52:52 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 133
Message-ID: <875y0hqqrv.fsf@axel-reichert.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cd08a7ccb16625516aeeb710fc9efe22";
logging-data="845448"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19rUqbiv8tS4cFTGZ9dje+RIe8wN2XqC+U="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NsTJ/SnT/669Q9JviE0UHTe/yhA=
sha1:vmSOojbmlnBlxBh2JDGUs4Qlhhk=
 by: Axel Reichert - Fri, 29 Dec 2023 09:52 UTC

Hello,

yesterday during a 9-point match I played a long game against GNU
Backgammon. It took 101 moves per player (by the way, it seems that in
the "Game record" panel there is space reserved only for two-digit
numbers, so the final two moves are numbered as "00" and "01").

At some point both players had 3 anchors, later on GNU Backgammon had 4
anchors against my 2, and still later all but one checker were on my
side of the board. While the starting position has a pip count of 2 x
167 = 334, we managed to get to 517 pips in total. The maximum pip count
for one player was 321, and the maximum pip lead for one player was
212.

Pretty extreme. For such a weird game I did quite well by my standards
and lost only 16 millipoints per unforced move (that should roughly be
PR 8).

For the record, here is the record (make a Snowie match file from
it). There are some big swings in the game. (-:

[snip]
9 point match

Game 4
gnubg : 2 axel : 6
1) 53: 8/3 6/3
2) 62: 24/18 13/11 51: 6/1* 8/7*
3) 61: 25/24* 66:
4) Doubles => 2 Takes
5) 65: 25/20 24/18* 33: 25/22 25/22 13/10 8/5*
6) 41: 25/21 21/20* 11: 25/24 24/23 24/23 6/5*
7) 54: 25/20* 13/9 61: 25/24 13/7*
8) 21: 25/24 20/18* 62: 25/23 13/7*
9) 52: 25/23 23/18* 43: 25/21 10/7*
10) 54: 25/20 8/4* 62: 25/23 22/16*
11) 66: 52: 23/18 23/21*
12) 43: 25/21 51: 21/16 23/22
13) 62: 25/23 24/18* 63: 25/22 13/7*
14) 11: 25/24 13/12* 6/5 6/5 53: 25/22 18/13*
15) 41: 25/21 13/12* 64: 25/21 22/16
16) 64: 24/18* 8/4* 41: 25/21* 25/24
17) 54: 25/20 8/4* 11: 25/24 22/21* 16/15 15/14*
18) 51: 25/24 25/20 61: 14/13* 13/7*
19) 62: 25/23 53: 23/18 24/21
20) 52: 25/23 23/18* 33: 25/22 24/21 18/15 15/12*
21) 43: 25/21 20/17 54: 16/11 11/7*
22) 32: 25/23 21/18* 42: 25/23 12/8*
23) 43: 25/21 20/17* 41: 25/21 24/23
24) 62: 17/11 11/9* 43: 25/21 21/18
25) 41: 6/5 5/1* 42: 25/21 18/16*
26) 54: 25/20 18/14 51: 16/11* 22/21
27) 43: 25/21 21/18 64: 21/15 11/7*
28) 62: 25/23 24/18* 42: 25/23 21/17
29) 22: 18/16 16/14 14/12 12/10* 61: 25/24* 21/15*
30) 21: 25/24 25/23 41: 22/18 23/22
31) 51: 6/1* 21/20 43: 25/21 17/14
32) 21: 20/18 18/17 51: 14/9 9/8*
33) 41: 25/21 21/20 43: 15/11 11/8
34) 43: 23/20 20/16 55: 22/17 22/17 21/16 21/16
35) 21: 16/15 5/3 42: 16/12 12/10*
36) 21: 25/24 20/18 64: 16/10 18/14
37) 22: 18/16 16/14 14/12 12/10 55: 17/12 17/12 12/7 12/7
38) 53: 21/16 24/21 62: 21/15* 21/19*
39) 32: 25/23 44: 15/11 14/10 11/7 10/6
40) 44: 25/21 24/20 20/16 16/12 41: 23/22* 22/18
41) 53: 25/20 23/20 31: 23/20* 10/9*
42) 64: 25/21 41: 18/14 14/13*
43) 53: 25/20 54: 20/15 13/9
44) 53: 25/20 23/20 61: 19/13 15/14
45) 53: 20/15* 15/12* 61: 25/19 25/24*
46) 42: 25/23 12/8 43: 24/20 20/17*
47) 51: 25/24 20/15 51: 14/9 19/18
48) 54: 24/20 20/15 52: 18/13 9/7
49) 64: 15/11 21/15 42: 13/9 9/7
50) 61: 15/14 20/14 32: 17/14* 14/12
51) 32: 25/23 15/12 54: 12/7 7/3
52) 32: 14/12 14/11 61: 9/3 9/8
53) 43: 20/16 16/13 65: 7/1 8/3
54) 41: 20/16 13/12 54: 6/1 7/3
55) 43: 11/8 12/8 31: 6/3 7/6
56) 64: 21/15 15/11 54: 8/3 7/3
57) 43: 21/17* 21/18* 55: 25/20 25/20 20/15 20/15
58) 41: 17/16 11/7 61: 15/14 14/8
59) 54: 18/14 14/9 62: 8/6
60) 32: 12/10* 10/7 41: 25/21 21/20
61) 54: 16/12 23/18 32: 6/3 3/1
62) 53: 20/15 12/9 44:
63) 65: 16/10 15/10 65: 20/14 14/9
64) 33: 23/20 20/17 17/14 14/11 42: 9/5* 5/3
65) 53: 25/20 18/15 32: 3/0 3/1
66) 42: 15/11 23/21 22: 6/4* 6/4 3/1 3/1
67) 43: 51: 4/0 4/3
68) 63: 25/19 19/16 31: 3/0 1/0
69) 66: 16/10 12/6 11/5 10/4 41: 3/0 1/0
70) 51: 11/6 10/9 22: 3/1 3/1 3/1 3/1
71) 41: 23/22* 9/5 64: 25/21* 21/15*
72) 62: 25/23 25/19 42: 15/11 11/9
73) 32: 19/16* 23/21 65:
74) 41: 20/19 19/15 42: 25/21
75) 62: 22/16 21/19 32:
76) 21: 23/21 21/20 51:
77) 22: 8/6 8/6 6/4* 6/4 31: 25/22
78) 62: 19/13 16/14 44:
79) 61: 20/19 19/13 52: 22/17 17/15
80) 52: 15/10* 10/8 65:
81) 66: 14/8 13/7 9/3 9/3 31: 25/24
82) 43: 13/10 10/6 42:
83) 55: 16/11 11/6 7/2 6/1* 52: 25/23*
84) 55: 25/20 7/2* 7/2 6/1 54:
85) 21: 8/7 8/6 31:
86) 53: 20/15 15/12 65:
87) 64: 12/6 7/3 63:
88) 33: 6/3 6/3 3/0 3/0 32:
89) 42: 4/2 4/0 61:
90) 43: 6/2 6/3 51:
91) 51: 5/4 5/0 41: 25/21* 21/20
92) 21: 25/23 23/22 53: 20/15 15/12
93) 21: 3/1 2/1 63: 12/6 6/3*
94) 43: 25/22* 22/18 22:
95) 43: 18/14 14/11 52: 25/20 20/18
96) 61: 11/5 1/0 43: 18/14 14/11
97) 42: 5/3 3/0 53: 11/6 6/3
98) 31: 1/0 3/0 54: 3/0 1/0
99) 61: 1/0 3/0 54: 1/0 1/0
100) 32: 3/0 2/0 33: 1/0 1/0 1/0 1/0
101) 65: 2/0 2/0 43: 1/0
Wins 2 points
[snip]

Best regards

Axel

Re: Long and weird mutual backgame

<ummhrj$rg9r$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=13283&group=rec.games.backgammon#13283

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tchow12...@yahoo.com (Timothy Chow)
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Subject: Re: Long and weird mutual backgame
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 08:33:38 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <ummhrj$rg9r$1@dont-email.me>
References: <875y0hqqrv.fsf@axel-reichert.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 13:33:39 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d55a310becedf1020a0cfd392ec0b33d";
logging-data="901435"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19EiGQU75CAgTbWJ7Ip9fcndfm/fNHmI+c="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5swvgpu7StMlgY9oS1SVocsrDeg=
In-Reply-To: <875y0hqqrv.fsf@axel-reichert.de>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Timothy Chow - Fri, 29 Dec 2023 13:33 UTC

On 12/29/2023 4:52 AM, Axel Reichert wrote:
> Pretty extreme. For such a weird game I did quite well by my standards
> and lost only 16 millipoints per unforced move (that should roughly be
> PR 8).

Your true performance might be even better than what the bot says it is.
I would not trust the bot's opinions of all the decisions in such a
game. Here's a game played by XG 3-ply. XGR+ said that XG 3-ply had a
PR of 17.41!

http://timothychow.net/cg/Games/7pt2015-05-24e_Game_2.htm

---
Tim Chow

Re: Long and weird mutual backgame

<87plypovtu.fsf@axel-reichert.de>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=13287&group=rec.games.backgammon#13287

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mai...@axel-reichert.de (Axel Reichert)
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Subject: Re: Long and weird mutual backgame
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 16:46:37 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <87plypovtu.fsf@axel-reichert.de>
References: <875y0hqqrv.fsf@axel-reichert.de> <ummhrj$rg9r$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cd08a7ccb16625516aeeb710fc9efe22";
logging-data="932614"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18KE4UhpbQGxMaVq5S0Q8S/UVQXdpCEfWE="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vn8Gf/g7IK7d8N0nqJYhlyhc6Qs=
sha1:qw/4wO0Iuwop99CtEYsJjXqzgpY=
 by: Axel Reichert - Fri, 29 Dec 2023 15:46 UTC

Timothy Chow <tchow12000@yahoo.com> writes:

> Your true performance might be even better than what the bot says it is.
> I would not trust the bot's opinions of all the decisions in such a
> game.

.... which is why I rolled out all my moves with an equity loss > 0.04
("doubtful" in gnubg's terminology). My rating already includes these
results.

> Here's a game played by XG 3-ply. XGR+ said that XG 3-ply had a PR of
> 17.41!

Impressive! Or rather not. (-;

Best regards

Axel

Re: Long and weird mutual backgame

<umo86c$168mb$2@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=13292&group=rec.games.backgammon#13292

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tchow12...@yahoo.com (Timothy Chow)
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Subject: Re: Long and weird mutual backgame
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 00:01:01 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <umo86c$168mb$2@dont-email.me>
References: <875y0hqqrv.fsf@axel-reichert.de> <ummhrj$rg9r$1@dont-email.me>
<87plypovtu.fsf@axel-reichert.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 05:01:00 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="19045fde51ef52db74ae41c9c6de37c0";
logging-data="1254091"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ljsbdasamS3/WCYHwHTNMmvw1y29hDe0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zL5+rEhT+TgKTgHkwxUIYKms3gI=
In-Reply-To: <87plypovtu.fsf@axel-reichert.de>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Timothy Chow - Sat, 30 Dec 2023 05:01 UTC

On 12/29/2023 10:46 AM, Axel Reichert wrote:
> Timothy Chow <tchow12000@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> Your true performance might be even better than what the bot says it is.
>> I would not trust the bot's opinions of all the decisions in such a
>> game.
>
> ... which is why I rolled out all my moves with an equity loss > 0.04
> ("doubtful" in gnubg's terminology). My rating already includes these
> results.

Depending on the position, I wouldn't necessarily trust a rollout
either. See this discussion on BGOnline for example.

https://www.bgonline.org/forums/webbbs_config.pl?noframes;read=211255

---
Tim Chow


interests / rec.games.backgammon / Long and weird mutual backgame

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor