Hello,

More of my philosophy about the Transformers and about Toyota and about China and about objective truth and about the objective and about the paper about the multiple universes and about quantum world and about consciousness and about mathematics and about the universe and about mathematical probability and about the positive behavior and about the positive mindset and about patience and about the positive energy and about the "packaging" or "presentation" and about the ideal and about the being idealistic and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I invite you to read carefully about the new LongNet that scales sequence length of Transformers to 1,000,000,000 Tokens (and notice
in my below explanation that sequence length is not the context window):

https://huggingface.co/papers/2307.02486

So i say that you have to understand that the sequence length primarily refers to the input length during inference or when using the model for prediction. It determines the maximum length of the prompt or input text that the model can process at once.

During training, the context window or context size is used, which determines the length of the text that the model takes into account for predicting the next token in a sequence. The context window is typically smaller than the maximum sequence length.

So to clarify:

- Sequence length: Refers to the maximum length of the prompt or input text during inference or prediction.

- Context window: Refers to the length of the preceding text that the model considers during training to predict the next token in a sequence.

So i invite you to read in my following thoughts in the following web link about the limitations of Large Language Models such as GPT-4 etc.:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/SjBB8Wd-kGI

And OpenAI sets up a division responsible for creating an AI that will control the development of superintelligence

Read more here (and you can translate the article from french to english):

https://intelligence-artificielle.developpez.com/actu/346215/OpenAI-met-sur-pieds-une-division-chargee-de-creer-une-IA-qui-va-controler-le-developpement-de-la-superintelligence-supposee-etre-plus-intelligente-que-l-homme-Elle-pourrait-arriver-d-ici-2030/

Toyota Motor Corporation is a Japanese multinational automotive manufacturer headquartered in Toyota City, Aichi, Japan. It was founded by Kiichiro Toyoda and incorporated on August 28, 1937. Toyota is one of the largest automobile manufacturers in the world, producing about 10 million vehicles per year, so Toyota announces a battery with a range of 1,200 km and a recharge in 10 minutes! , and Toyota seems to have both definitively solved the problem of stability and production cost, and you can read about it in the following article (And you can translate the article from french to english):

Toyota announces a battery with a range of 1,200 km and a recharge in 10 minutes!

Read more here:

https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/voiture-electrique-toyota-annonce-batterie-autonomie-1-200-km-recharge-10-min-106302/

Since i am speaking about objectivity in my below previous thoughts, i will ask a philosophical question of:

What is the objective and what is objective truth ?

So i will now discover patterns with my fluid intelligence that answer
the above question, and here they are , so i will start by the objective truth:

What is objective truth and what is subjective truth ?

So for example when we look at the the following equality: a + a = 2*a,
so it is objective truth, since it can be made an acceptable general truth, so then i can say that objective truth is a truth that can be made an acceptable general truth, so then subjective truth is a truth that can not be made acceptable general truth, like saying that Jeff Bezos is the best human among humans is a subjective truth. So i can say that we are in mathematics also using the rules of logic so that to logically prove that a theorem or the like is truth or not.

So then from the above pattern that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence , i will say that the "objective" is not the truth, but it is the objective information or analysis that is based on factual evidence, verifiable data, and logical reasoning, but you are noticing that the objective is the "way" to find the truth, but it is not the truth that is the goal of the the way of the objective.

So i have to make you notice that the below paper of 2019 is in accordance with Hugh Everett III model, and when it says that the quantum experiment suggests there’s no such thing as objective reality, i think that it doesn't mean that there is no reality, but it means that the classical materialistic model is not the right objectivity, since the quantum world has a different way of behaving like with qubits of the register of quantum computers that can be in different states, so that doesn't mean that this being in different states is not objective, but i think that it means that the classical way of explaining becomes not objective, so in conclusion , i think that the below patterns that i am discovering about the multiple universes that create our tuned universe is still objective and i think it is correct, so i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand my views:.

So the previous pattern that i have just discovered was not so true, since a new paper of year 2019 showed that there is no collapse, and i invite you to look at the following video so that to understand it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h75DGO3GrF4

And you can read about the new paper of year 2019 in the following MIT technology review:

A quantum experiment suggests there’s no such thing as objective reality

https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/03/12/136684/a-quantum-experiment-suggests-theres-no-such-thing-as-objective-reality/

Other than that , i think the below patterns that i have just discovered are
true, so i invite you to read them carefully in my following thoughts:

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so now i have just
discovered another pattern with my fluid intelligence by looking at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

Is math discovered or invented? - Jeff Dekofsky

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_xR5Kes4Rs

So the important pattern that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence in
the above video is the following:

So i think that our universe is an evolutionary process, i mean that it is a random process , but it is not just a random process , since the random process is the "infinite" universes that have processed in like "Parallelly" and "Serially" and "Semi-Parallelly" in groups of a number of universes, by combining in a kind of manner, so that to create our tuned universe, and the Parallelly is like in parallel programming that accelerates much more the process of creating our tuned universe or other tuned universes like ours, and the "tuned" means that we are just discovering mathematics as patterns, as i am doing it below, that is the result of our tuned universe .

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just looked at the following video of Monte Carlo Simulation, and i invite you to look at it, and my answer to this video is just below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ESK5SaP-bc

So i think that the above video is not so smart, since i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence in the above video, so the first important pattern that i am discovering is that when you want for example to find the average height of people world wide as is saying it the above video, so you have by logical analogy to look at the people world wide like a dice game, i mean even if the people distribution of height of the world is mixed up, it is by logical analogy like a dice, i mean that they are distributed with a weight that we call height , so when you select randomly a person , you are like, by logical analogy, playing at a dice game, so the selected person has a weight of height from the distribution that looks, by logical analogy, like a dice, so now you are understanding that when you select randomly more and more persons until for example 10000 persons, it will have the tendency to well approximate the distribution of all the heights of all the people around the world, so i also say that we have to select randomly since, by logical analogy, we have like to play at for example the game of dice "randomly".

And so that to know my other pattern that i have discovered with my fluid intelligence that explains the logical implication in mathematical logic, you can read my thoughts about it in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/yEMTeWhBmQA

I have just said yesterday the following:

"So i think you are understanding more my philosophy, so you can
say to me how can we be patience in front of life?, but i am a philosopher that says that my philosophy says that you have to be patience with a positive mindset , so patience in front of life can "appear" to be foolishness, but patience organized like a group with a positive mindset easy the things for you and it is the pleasant and attractive that brings the positive things, so i think that it is the way to go."

So i invite you to read my following thoughts about the positive mindset and behavior so that to notice that it also makes you empathic and kind and it permits to solve the problem that i am talking about in my below thoughts: