Hello,

More of my philosophy about AES 256 encryption and TSMC and about China and about the Transformers and about Toyota and about China and about objective truth and about the objective and about the paper about the multiple universes and about quantum world and about consciousness and about mathematics and about the universe and about mathematical probability and about the positive behavior and about the positive mindset and about patience and about the positive energy and about the "packaging" or "presentation" and about the ideal and about the being idealistic and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I invite you to read the following web page from IBM that says that AES 256 encryption is safe from large quantum computers:

https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/key-protect?topic=key-protect-quantum-safe-cryptography-tls-introduction

And read the following so that to understand it correctly:

And IBM set to revolutionize data security with latest quantum-safe technology

Read more here in the following new article:

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/ibm-revolutionizes-data-security-with-quantum-safe-technology

And I have also just read the following article that says the following:

"AES-128 and RSA-2048 both provide adequate security against classical attacks, but not against quantum attacks. Doubling the AES key length to 256 results in an acceptable 128 bits of security, while increasing the RSA key by more than a factor of 7.5 has little effect against quantum attacks."

Read more here:

https://techbeacon.com/security/waiting-quantum-computing-why-encryption-has-nothing-worry-about

So i think that AES-256 encryption is acceptable encryption for quantum computers.

And Symmetric encryption, or more specifically AES-256, is believed to be quantum resistant. That means that quantum computers are not expected to be able to reduce the attack time enough to be effective if the key sizes are large enough, and to give you more proof of it, look at the following article from ComputerWorld where Lamont Wood is saying:

"But using quantum technology with the same throughput, exhausting the possibilities of a 128-bit AES key would take about six months. If a quantum system had to crack a 256-bit key, it would take about as much time as a conventional computer needs to crack a 128-bit key.
A quantum computer could crack a cipher that uses the RSA or EC algorithms almost immediately."

Read more here on ComputerWorld:

https://www.computerworld.com/article/2550008/the-clock-is-ticking-for-encryption.html

And about Symmetric encryption and quantum computers..

Symmetric encryption, or more specifically AES-256, is believed to be quantum resistant. That means that quantum computers are not expected to be able to reduce the attack time enough to be effective if the key sizes are large enough.

Read more here:

Is AES-256 Quantum Resistant?

https://medium.com/@wagslane/is-aes-256-quantum-resistant-d3f776163672

And it is why i have implemented Parallel AES encryption with 256 bit keys in my following interesting software project called Parallel Archiver, you can read about it and download it from here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-archiver

TSMC: Chinese curbs on rare metal exports will not have immediate effect

Read more here:

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/tsmc-export-curbs-on-rare-metal-exports-will-not-have-immediate-effect

And i invite you to read carefully about the new LongNet that scales sequence length of Transformers to 1,000,000,000 Tokens (and notice
in my below explanation that sequence length is not the context window):

https://huggingface.co/papers/2307.02486

So i say that you have to understand that the sequence length primarily refers to the input length during inference or when using the model for prediction. It determines the maximum length of the prompt or input text that the model can process at once.

During training, the context window or context size is used, which determines the length of the text that the model takes into account for predicting the next token in a sequence. The context window is typically smaller than the maximum sequence length.

So to clarify:

- Sequence length: Refers to the maximum length of the prompt or input text during inference or prediction.

- Context window: Refers to the length of the preceding text that the model considers during training to predict the next token in a sequence.

So i invite you to read in my following thoughts in the following web link about the limitations of Large Language Models such as GPT-4 etc.:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/SjBB8Wd-kGI

And OpenAI sets up a division responsible for creating an AI that will control the development of superintelligence

Read more here (and you can translate the article from french to english):

https://intelligence-artificielle.developpez.com/actu/346215/OpenAI-met-sur-pieds-une-division-chargee-de-creer-une-IA-qui-va-controler-le-developpement-de-la-superintelligence-supposee-etre-plus-intelligente-que-l-homme-Elle-pourrait-arriver-d-ici-2030/

Toyota Motor Corporation is a Japanese multinational automotive manufacturer headquartered in Toyota City, Aichi, Japan. It was founded by Kiichiro Toyoda and incorporated on August 28, 1937. Toyota is one of the largest automobile manufacturers in the world, producing about 10 million vehicles per year, so Toyota announces a battery with a range of 1,200 km and a recharge in 10 minutes! , and Toyota seems to have both definitively solved the problem of stability and production cost, and you can read about it in the following article (And you can translate the article from french to english):

Toyota announces a battery with a range of 1,200 km and a recharge in 10 minutes!

Read more here:

https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/voiture-electrique-toyota-annonce-batterie-autonomie-1-200-km-recharge-10-min-106302/

Since i am speaking about objectivity in my below previous thoughts, i will ask a philosophical question of:

What is the objective and what is objective truth ?

So i will now discover patterns with my fluid intelligence that answer
the above question, and here they are , so i will start by the objective truth:

What is objective truth and what is subjective truth ?

So for example when we look at the the following equality: a + a = 2*a,
so it is objective truth, since it can be made an acceptable general truth, so then i can say that objective truth is a truth that can be made an acceptable general truth, so then subjective truth is a truth that can not be made acceptable general truth, like saying that Jeff Bezos is the best human among humans is a subjective truth. So i can say that we are in mathematics also using the rules of logic so that to logically prove that a theorem or the like is truth or not.

So then from the above pattern that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence , i will say that the "objective" is not the truth, but it is the objective information or analysis that is based on factual evidence, verifiable data, and logical reasoning, but you are noticing that the objective is the "way" to find the truth, but it is not the truth that is the goal of the the way of the objective.

So i have to make you notice that the below paper of 2019 is in accordance with Hugh Everett III model, and when it says that the quantum experiment suggests there’s no such thing as objective reality, i think that it doesn't mean that there is no reality, but it means that the classical materialistic model is not the right objectivity, since the quantum world has a different way of behaving like with qubits of the register of quantum computers that can be in different states, so that doesn't mean that this being in different states is not objective, but i think that it means that the classical way of explaining becomes not objective, so in conclusion , i think that the below patterns that i am discovering about the multiple universes that create our tuned universe is still objective and i think it is correct, so i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand my views:.

So the previous pattern that i have just discovered was not so true, since a new paper of year 2019 showed that there is no collapse, and i invite you to look at the following video so that to understand it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h75DGO3GrF4

And you can read about the new paper of year 2019 in the following MIT technology review:

A quantum experiment suggests there’s no such thing as objective reality

https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/03/12/136684/a-quantum-experiment-suggests-theres-no-such-thing-as-objective-reality/

Other than that , i think the below patterns that i have just discovered are
true, so i invite you to read them carefully in my following thoughts:

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so now i have just
discovered another pattern with my fluid intelligence by looking at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

Is math discovered or invented? - Jeff Dekofsky

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_xR5Kes4Rs

So the important pattern that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence in
the above video is the following:

So i think that our universe is an evolutionary process, i mean that it is a random process , but it is not just a random process , since the random process is the "infinite" universes that have processed in like "Parallelly" and "Serially" and "Semi-Parallelly" in groups of a number of universes, by combining in a kind of manner, so that to create our tuned universe, and the Parallelly is like in parallel programming that accelerates much more the process of creating our tuned universe or other tuned universes like ours, and the "tuned" means that we are just discovering mathematics as patterns, as i am doing it below, that is the result of our tuned universe .