novaBBS - soc.culture.china - More of my philosophy about the essence of a Timer and about solar cells and about AES 256 encryption and TSMC and about China and about the Transformers and about Toyota and about China and about objective truth and about the objective and about the

Hello,

More of my philosophy about the essence of a Timer and about solar cells and about AES 256 encryption and TSMC and about China and about the Transformers and about Toyota and about China and about objective truth and about the objective and about the paper about the multiple universes and about quantum world and about consciousness and about mathematics and about the universe and about mathematical probability and about the positive behavior and about the positive mindset and about patience and about the positive energy and about the "packaging" or "presentation" and about the ideal and about the being idealistic and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just discovered an important pattern by constructing my below StopWatch, so the pattern is that you have to look at the following equation in my source code that decently approximate in microhretz:

FCPUclock := ((Fend - Fstart)/(t2 - t1)) * 1e-3; //microhertz

So i think i am smart, and i say that in my StopWatch the microhertz is decently approximated , but the nanohertz can not be decently approximated, since "Fend - Fstart" in the above equation is
in CPU's cycle count and the "t2 - t1" in the above equation is in milliseconds, so then i think when you divide , it decently approximate in microhertz, but it does not in nanohertz, so if you need to lower the timing to nanohertz , you better use the timing in CPU clocks that i am supporting too in my SopWatch below.

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just looked at the following software project of a StopWatch in Delphi:

https://github.com/LaKraven/LKSL/blob/master/Source/Lib/Pascal/LKSL.Common.Stopwatch.pas

So i think that the above StopWatch is not so good, so it supports milliseconds only, so i have just written a much more sophisticated
one that gets the CPU's cycle count from the CPU timestamp counter (TSC)
in assembler, and it does some calculation so that to approximate in
microseconds, so i am using the following equation that well approximate
in microhertz, so it can easily be changed to approximate in nanohertz too:

FCPUclock := ((Fend - Fstart)/(t2 - t1)) * 1e-3; //microhertz

And of course i am supporting the timing in both microseconds and in CPU clocks too, and i have just made it support both x86 32 bit and x64 64 bit
CPUs and it supports both Delphi and Freepascal compilers and it works in both Windows and Linux, so you can download my new software from my web site here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/a-portable-timer-for-delphi-and-freepascal

Tandem cells using perovskites and silicon make solar power more efficient and affordable

"Research into 'miracle material' perovskite in the past decade is now bearing fruit with more labs crossing the 30 percent barrier for solar cells. Solar is already a cost-effective method for harnessing renewable energy and is deployed across large parts of the planet in a bid to move away from fossil fuels."

And Toyota Motor Corporation is a Japanese multinational automotive manufacturer headquartered in Toyota City, Aichi, Japan. It was founded by Kiichiro Toyoda and incorporated on August 28, 1937. Toyota is one of the largest automobile manufacturers in the world, producing about 10 million vehicles per year, so Toyota announces a battery with a range of 1,200 km and a recharge in 10 minutes! , and Toyota seems to have both definitively solved the problem of stability and production cost, and you can read about it in the following article (And you can translate the article from french to english):

Toyota announces a battery with a range of 1,200 km and a recharge in 10 minutes!

I invite you to read the following web page from IBM that says that AES 256 encryption is safe from large quantum computers:

https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/key-protect?topic=key-protect-quantum-safe-cryptography-tls-introduction

And read the following so that to understand it correctly:

And IBM set to revolutionize data security with latest quantum-safe technology

Read more here in the following new article:

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/ibm-revolutionizes-data-security-with-quantum-safe-technology

And I have also just read the following article that says the following:

"AES-128 and RSA-2048 both provide adequate security against classical attacks, but not against quantum attacks. Doubling the AES key length to 256 results in an acceptable 128 bits of security, while increasing the RSA key by more than a factor of 7.5 has little effect against quantum attacks."

So i think that AES-256 encryption is acceptable encryption for quantum computers.

And Symmetric encryption, or more specifically AES-256, is believed to be quantum resistant. That means that quantum computers are not expected to be able to reduce the attack time enough to be effective if the key sizes are large enough, and to give you more proof of it, look at the following article from ComputerWorld where Lamont Wood is saying:

"But using quantum technology with the same throughput, exhausting the possibilities of a 128-bit AES key would take about six months. If a quantum system had to crack a 256-bit key, it would take about as much time as a conventional computer needs to crack a 128-bit key.
A quantum computer could crack a cipher that uses the RSA or EC algorithms almost immediately."

Read more here:

Is AES-256 Quantum Resistant?

https://medium.com/@wagslane/is-aes-256-quantum-resistant-d3f776163672

And it is why i have implemented Parallel AES encryption with 256 bit keys in my following interesting software project called Parallel Archiver, you can read about it and download it from here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-archiver

TSMC: Chinese curbs on rare metal exports will not have immediate effect

And i invite you to read carefully about the new LongNet that scales sequence length of Transformers to 1,000,000,000 Tokens (and notice
in my below explanation that sequence length is not the context window):

https://huggingface.co/papers/2307.02486

So i say that you have to understand that the sequence length primarily refers to the input length during inference or when using the model for prediction. It determines the maximum length of the prompt or input text that the model can process at once.

During training, the context window or context size is used, which determines the length of the text that the model takes into account for predicting the next token in a sequence. The context window is typically smaller than the maximum sequence length.

So to clarify:

- Sequence length: Refers to the maximum length of the prompt or input text during inference or prediction.

- Context window: Refers to the length of the preceding text that the model considers during training to predict the next token in a sequence.

So i invite you to read in my following thoughts in the following web link about the limitations of Large Language Models such as GPT-4 etc.:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/SjBB8Wd-kGI

And OpenAI sets up a division responsible for creating an AI that will control the development of superintelligence

Read more here (and you can translate the article from french to english):

https://intelligence-artificielle.developpez.com/actu/346215/OpenAI-met-sur-pieds-une-division-chargee-de-creer-une-IA-qui-va-controler-le-developpement-de-la-superintelligence-supposee-etre-plus-intelligente-que-l-homme-Elle-pourrait-arriver-d-ici-2030/

Since i am speaking about objectivity in my below previous thoughts, i will ask a philosophical question of:

What is the objective and what is objective truth ?

So i will now discover patterns with my fluid intelligence that answer
the above question, and here they are , so i will start by the objective truth:

What is objective truth and what is subjective truth ?

So for example when we look at the the following equality: a + a = 2*a,
so it is objective truth, since it can be made an acceptable general truth, so then i can say that objective truth is a truth that can be made an acceptable general truth, so then subjective truth is a truth that can not be made acceptable general truth, like saying that Jeff Bezos is the best human among humans is a subjective truth. So i can say that we are in mathematics also using the rules of logic so that to logically prove that a theorem or the like is truth or not.

Click here to read the complete article

Subject	Author
More of my philosophy about the essence of a Timer and about solar	Amine Moulay Ramdane

Art is either plagiarism or revolution. -- Paul Gauguin

interests / soc.culture.china / More of my philosophy about the essence of a Timer and about solar cells and about AES 256 encryption and TSMC and about China and about the Transformers and about Toyota and about China and about objective truth and about the objective and about the