"Shadow" <Sh@dow.br> wrote in message
news:j8tecd972ie7mgijs87ov84mirh0ds6p6b@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 02:28:21 -0400, "Scout"
> <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Shadow" <Sh@dow.br> wrote in message
>>news:3f8dcdhk86o6ag8ieqo8llnp7rpv73escr@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 22:14:06 -0400, "Scout"
>>> <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Shadow" <Sh@dow.br> wrote in message
>>>>news:823sbdt77bu0erfrqorvvev33r3qru9e3l@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 22:29:10 -0400, Rhino
>>>>> <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 2018-03-29 6:47 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/29/2018 6:23 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 20:50:12 +0000 (UTC), RW NRA Gunloon
>>>>>>>> <RichGunloon@trump.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Swiss authorities have a list of about 2,000 individuals they
>>>>>>>>> suspect
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> being willing to commit shootings. All of them are frequently
>>>>>>>>> approached
>>>>>>>>> by authorities, along with psychologists, and are forced to hand
>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>> their weapons immediately or are barred from purchasing new ones.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's probably the most important reason for the extreme
>>>>>>>> difference.
>>>>>>>> The Swiss State does background checks and psych and medical
>>>>>>>> evaluations on ALL it's citizens.
>>>>>>>> I would have thought those numbers would be higher. Psychotics
>>>>>>>> make up a little over 1% of a population. Which would be almost
>>>>>>>> 100.000 people (half of which would be male). They are probably
>>>>>>>> exempt
>>>>>>>> from military service, and hence also not allowed to own guns.
>>>>>>>> Stop the loony's "right to buy guns" and the problem
>>>>>>>> disappears.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 'Loony'. Hmm. The devil is in the definition...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>To many on the left, the mere desire to own a gun is proof positive
>>>>>>that
>>>>>>the person desiring the gun *is* a loony.
>>>>>
>>>>> Crazy people on the "left" too. They would not be allowed to
>>>>> purchase guns either if they were screened by mandatory mental
>>>>> examinations.
>>>>> I maintain that mandatory mental screening should be
>>>>> implemented for ANYONE that wants to buy a gun.
>>>>
>>>>Similarly they should be mandated for anyone that wishes to exercise
>>>>free
>>>>speech, publish without censorship, meet in any assembly, would require
>>>>a
>>>>warrant before any search, etc.
>>>>
>>>>After all, if it's so vital, then such a condition should apply to the
>>>>exercise of ANY Constitutional right.
>>>
>>> Hey, your statement would make a great text for the exam.
>>> People would have to analyze if there is a link between carrying guns
>>> and free speech.
>>
>>They are both rights protected by the Bill of Rights within the
>>Constitution
>>of the United States of America.
>
> You "forgot" to answer the question. In fact, you deleted it.

The question is what other rights can be subjected to an arbitrary test....