On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:51:33 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:6u2ltihp4j1paflrrhtuucf4t4h8at4big@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 18:07:26 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:9lqjti9nvl2g85gc94l4s729n0311echbu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 03:35:30 -0800, KWills <kw19@kw.kw> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:42:19 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:01:02 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"KWills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:892htilsmod4tjide0inqa6osern83m5bg@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> This should be good. Post the MID where Klaus actually stated he
>>>>>>>> tasted a strawberry frosty. Not implied it. But where, according to
>>>>>>>> you, he actually said he had.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [Crickets]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Alright, here you go.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>news:4vnmsilrg7pgl7amsqge1raaccdglfvt6c@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In that message, klous says, QOUTE:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Obviously, I have HAD a strawberry shake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Note that it does NOT say I had a strawberry Frosty, making YOU the
>>>>>>liar.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't want to accept that Jenny's so stupid he doesn't know the
>>>>>difference between a shake and a frosty.
>>>>> Maybe he'll focus on the similarities. Like, both are dairy
>>>>>based.
>>>>
>>>> It's hard to accept. It's easier to accept that he's simply lying, as
>>>> usual.
>>>>
>>>>>>>See, that's the difference between klous and me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's right. You constantly lie, while I give only facts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When I demand klous to
>>>>>>>answer a question, he responds with silence or "Irrelevant" and he
>>>>>>>refues to
>>>>>>>directly asnwer the question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Jenny WISHES I were silent and didn't point out his CONSTANT lies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He's taken to expressing how his lying being exposed is happening
>>>>>so often, he's finding it boring. The exposure, which he's proved he
>>>>>also needs, causes him to yawn.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>I on the hand, ALWAYS supply a direect response. Such as this one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>TRANSLATION: Jenny will usually ALWAYS lie.
>>>>>
>>>>> If Jenny is honest, it's by accident.
>>>>>
>>>>> Additional, and not relevant to the post, I will be on vacation
>>>>>next week. I may post once or twice, but probably not. Proving *Wraal*
>>>>>the liar he is isn't that important to me.
>>>>
>>>> Unir n tbbq gevc naq or fnsr.
>>>
>>>
>>>that's great news, that certianly will help me to get cought up on the
>>>backlog of message's here. make sure you let me know when you post your
>>>last message to teh group before you leave, and also let us know the day
>>>you
>>>expect to return. I'll try to get cought up during that time.
>>>
>>
>> As usual, Jenny, you're replying to Klaus when it was KWIlls who said
>> he was going on vacation.
>
>What fucking difference does it make??

It makes a big difference, since I will be here watching you lie and
Kwills will not.

> I never said it was YOU who was
>leaving.

Yes, you did, liar.

"make sure you let me know when you post your
last message to teh group before you leave"
Message-ID: <wP2dnXNv7MM7GUf4nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@supernews.com>

You just can't stop, can you?

On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:48:32 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>
>> Note that it does NOT say I had a strawberry Frosty, making YOU the
>> liar.
>
>
>FUCK YOU klous, you know damn well that a frosty is wendy's version of a
>shake, therefore since we were discussing FROSTY'S and you used to the term
>shake, means that you MEANT frosty. Besides, there is ANOTHER post where
>you admitted having a FROSTY.
>
>news:n12ati5vttromqr0ji4ramh2fp7f1m2oqg@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com
>
>You said, QOUTE:
>
>>>>>Who ordered the frosty for you, or, if
>>>>>the strawberry Frosty wasn't ordered,
>>>>>how was it that it came to be in your
>>>>>possession.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Irrelevant.
>>>
>>>Yes, it is relevant.
>
>>No. When I had it, and who bought it, is irrelevant

And it still is.

>Note that we are CLEARLY discussing a frosty this time, not a shake, and you
>clearly said 'WHEN" I **HAD** it,

NO, I said it was irrelevant.

>not *IF* I had it.
>
>Let's see you use language this time to weasel out of THAT one.

Still trying to weasel out of your lie, Jenny?

LOL

::>>>>>>You made the claim that you tasted a strawberry
::>>>>>>frosty, yet never ordered one.
::>>>>>
::>>>>> Another JennyLieT
::>>>>
::>>>> Oh? What part of that is a Lie? The part where you said you tasted a
::>>>>strawberry frosty, or the part where you said you didn't order one?
::>>>>
::>>>
::>>> Show where I made the claim that I tasted a strawberry frosty, liar.
::>>
::>>Easy.
::>>
::>>news:4vnmsilrg7pgl7amsqge1raaccdglfvt6c@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com
::>>
::>>Why must you lie about this?
::>>
::>
::>Thanks for admitting you are a liar.
::>
::>What I said:
::>
::>:Jenny simply isn't very bright.
::>:Obviously, I have HAD a strawberry shake. I didn't like it.
::>
::>I didn't say I had a strawberry Frosty.
::>
::>Now, answer KWill's question:
::>"Why must you lie about this?"

On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:53:22 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
>news:klhmti1jct5abkbmlt0ph77qjdbjvov596@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 18:08:52 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>>>>>>You made the claim that you tasted a strawberry
>>>>>>>>>frosty, yet never ordered one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Another JennyLieT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh? What part of that is a Lie? The part where you said you tasted
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>strawberry frosty, or the part where you said you didn't order one?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Show where I made the claim that I tasted a strawberry frosty, liar.
>>>>>
>>>>>Easy.
>>>>>
>>>>>news:4vnmsilrg7pgl7amsqge1raaccdglfvt6c@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com
>>>>>
>>>>>Why must you lie about this?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for admitting you are a liar.
>>>>
>>>> What I said:
>>>>
>>>> :Jenny simply isn't very bright.
>>>> :Obviously, I have HAD a strawberry shake. I didn't like it.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't say I had a strawberry Frosty.
>>>>
>>>> Now, answer KWill's question:
>>>> "Why must you lie about this?"
>>>
>>>I never admitted I was a liar.
>>
>> Not in words, but effect. And you presented the PROOF of your
>> lying.
>>
>>>And to answer Kwill's question, I lied about
>>>NOTHING.
>>
>> You claim Klaus said he had tried a strawberry frosty. Yet you
>> PROVE he stated shake.
>
>When he said shake, he MEANT frosty... which I just proven.
>

NO, you haven't even come close to proving what I MEANT.
I SAID shake.

Don't you know a Frosty is NOT a shake?

Face it Jenny.

You were caught in ANOTHER lie!

ROFLMAO!!!!!

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:pquotitl3r863g8181ee0aigii8lkbbun3@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...

>>> As usual, Jenny, you're replying to Klaus when it was KWIlls who said
>>> he was going on vacation.
>>
>>What fucking difference does it make??
>
> It makes a big difference, since I will be here watching you lie and
> Kwills will not.
>
>> I never said it was YOU who was
>>leaving.
>
> Yes, you did, liar.

No I didn't, liar. True the message I was replying to was from you, however
I obviously was addresing KWILLS.

Just drop it. Stop wasting everyone's time.

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:19:30 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:pquotitl3r863g8181ee0aigii8lkbbun3@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>
>>>> As usual, Jenny, you're replying to Klaus when it was KWIlls who said
>>>> he was going on vacation.
>>>
>>>What fucking difference does it make??
>>
>> It makes a big difference, since I will be here watching you lie and
>> Kwills will not.
>>
>>> I never said it was YOU who was
>>>leaving.
>>
>> Yes, you did, liar.
>
>No I didn't, liar.

Yes, you did, liar, as I already proved.

> True the message I was replying to was from you, however
>I obviously was addresing KWILLS.

No, you were not. You responded to MY post.

After all this time and you STILL don't know how to use your news
reader?

LOL

On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:53:22 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
>news:klhmti1jct5abkbmlt0ph77qjdbjvov596@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 18:08:52 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>>>>>>You made the claim that you tasted a strawberry
>>>>>>>>>frosty, yet never ordered one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Another JennyLieT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh? What part of that is a Lie? The part where you said you tasted
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>strawberry frosty, or the part where you said you didn't order one?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Show where I made the claim that I tasted a strawberry frosty, liar.
>>>>>
>>>>>Easy.
>>>>>
>>>>>news:4vnmsilrg7pgl7amsqge1raaccdglfvt6c@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com
>>>>>
>>>>>Why must you lie about this?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for admitting you are a liar.
>>>>
>>>> What I said:
>>>>
>>>> :Jenny simply isn't very bright.
>>>> :Obviously, I have HAD a strawberry shake. I didn't like it.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't say I had a strawberry Frosty.
>>>>
>>>> Now, answer KWill's question:
>>>> "Why must you lie about this?"
>>>
>>>I never admitted I was a liar.
>>
>> Not in words, but effect. And you presented the PROOF of your
>> lying.
>>

Jenny?

>>>And to answer Kwill's question, I lied about
>>>NOTHING.
>>
>> You claim Klaus said he had tried a strawberry frosty. Yet you
>> PROVE he stated shake.
>
>When he said shake, he MEANT frosty...

I await the VALID, VERIFIABLE, CREDIBLE evidence that he meant
something other than what he wrote. Since you're lying, you will offer
only avoidance, if you don't run away from the truth.

>which I just proven.

Where is this fictional proof? You certainly haven't posted any
to this group. In a previous post you LIED about the matter. See
Message-ID: <HtidnU-F9ve9hEH4nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@supernews.com>
But that isn't proof of anything other than you NEED to lie.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:48:32 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>
>> Note that it does NOT say I had a strawberry Frosty, making YOU the
>> liar.
>
>
>FUCK YOU klous, you know damn well that a frosty is wendy's version of a
>shake,

Odd that Wendy's claims it's a dessert, not a shake.

"The Chocolate Frosty® was born out of Dave’s desire for a signature
dessert..."
https://order.wendys.com/product/30053/classic-chocolate-frosty?lang=en_US

"The vanilla version of our signature frozen dessert."
https://order.wendys.com/product/30054/vanilla-frosty?lang=en_US

>therefore since we were discussing FROSTY'S and you used to the term
>shake, means that you MEANT frosty.

Please get professional mental health care for your lying. I'm
being serious.

>Besides, there is ANOTHER post where
>you admitted having a FROSTY.
>
>news:n12ati5vttromqr0ji4ramh2fp7f1m2oqg@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com
>
>You said, QOUTE:
>
>>>>>Who ordered the frosty for you, or, if
>>>>>the strawberry Frosty wasn't ordered,
>>>>>how was it that it came to be in your
>>>>>possession.
>>>>
>>>> Irrelevant.
>>>
>>>Yes, it is relevant.
>
>>No. When I had it, and who bought it, is irrelevant
>
>Note that we are CLEARLY discussing a frosty this time, not a shake, and you
>clearly said 'WHEN" I **HAD** it,
>

But, as has been PROVED, Klaus mentioned trying a strawberry
shake. Your NEED to lie is so great, you couldn't be honest about it.

>not *IF* I had it.
>
>Let's see you use language this time to weasel out of THAT one.

And now we see what LIE you offered to continue feeding your NEED
to lie.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:51:33 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:6u2ltihp4j1paflrrhtuucf4t4h8at4big@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 18:07:26 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:9lqjti9nvl2g85gc94l4s729n0311echbu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 03:35:30 -0800, KWills <kw19@kw.kw> wrote:

[...]

>>>that's great news, that certianly will help me to get cought up on the
>>>backlog of message's here. make sure you let me know when you post your
>>>last message to teh group before you leave, and also let us know the day
>>>you
>>>expect to return. I'll try to get cought up during that time.
>>
>> As usual, Jenny, you're replying to Klaus when it was KWIlls who said
>> he was going on vacation.
>
>What fucking difference does it make??

Outside of your NEED to lie, we are two different people. Really.

>I never said it was YOU who was
>leaving.

As seen above, you did claim Klaus is leaving.

>And as you said many times yourself, this is a PUBLIC forum so I
>can reply to anyone I want.

This is not in dispute.

>Not to mention that FACT that if you weren't so
>fucking retarded you wouldv'e remember to re-translate

Did I post in a foreign language? No. I encoded it, but to the
honest, this isn't the same as a different language. But you NEED to
lie.

>the message before
>replying and I probably never would have cared about it!!!

That's almost funny. You whine and cry about encoding posts.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:52:29 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

[...]

>>> Like, for instance, when you lied by claiming I said I had ordered a
>>> strawberry frosty and, when I asked for proof, you supplied a link
>>> PROVING YOU LIED!
>>>
>>> That was so funny. It made me laugh.
>>>
>>> Laugh laugh laugh laugh.
>>
>> Now now, let's be fair -- to be a lie, there
>> has to be intent.
>
>Careful frank, or thier

What is "thier?"
If you mean their, explain their what? What, exactly, is theirs?

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

>going to start calling you a liar also.

Where do you propose there is a lie in Frank's post? There isn't
one, of course. You are simply feeding your NEED to lie.
Yes, you do have clear intent. This is PROVED by your refusal to
admit you're wrong when you are proved wrong. When absolute PROOF of
the truth is offered, you continue to make the false claim, proving
your intent to lie the whole time.

Your reader appears to have removed the following. Had you
snipped it, you would have pointed this out. Unless your intent was,
and is, to present the LIE that Frank posted nothing else. I restored
it so that you might address the remainder of Frank's post.

-----Begin C&P-----

Jerry apparently has a profound disability which prevents
him from differentiating between a shake and a
frosty -- so he is merely mistaken.

Though, he did actually lie once, and then
admitted it. IIRC, it was some email
he claimed to have gotten from a 'froup denizen.
(I guess he forgot about that.)

What I don't understand, though, is why he
turns "au" into "ou" in pretty much everything
he writes...except his own name. He should
change his name to "Souk" to be consistent,
don't you think?

(Though then again, he did spell your name as "Kloaus"
in the subject, which could be an honest attempt
to at least _try_ to get it right. Funny about that.)

-----End C&P-----

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:19:30 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:pquotitl3r863g8181ee0aigii8lkbbun3@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>
>>>> As usual, Jenny, you're replying to Klaus when it was KWIlls who said
>>>> he was going on vacation.
>>>
>>>What fucking difference does it make??
>>
>> It makes a big difference, since I will be here watching you lie and
>> Kwills will not.
>>
>>> I never said it was YOU who was
>>>leaving.
>>
>> Yes, you did, liar.
>
>No I didn't, liar. True the message I was replying to was from you, however
>I obviously was addresing KWILLS.
>

You would have replied to me then. No matter how many lies you
pile onto your lie, it will remain a lie.

>Just drop it. Stop wasting everyone's time.

Stop lying and Klaus, et al., won't have cause to constantly
prove you the liar you are.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:43:30 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:19:30 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:pquotitl3r863g8181ee0aigii8lkbbun3@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>
>>>>> As usual, Jenny, you're replying to Klaus when it was KWIlls who said
>>>>> he was going on vacation.
>>>>
>>>>What fucking difference does it make??
>>>
>>> It makes a big difference, since I will be here watching you lie and
>>> Kwills will not.
>>>
>>>> I never said it was YOU who was
>>>>leaving.
>>>
>>> Yes, you did, liar.
>>
>>No I didn't, liar.
>
>Yes, you did, liar, as I already proved.
>
>> True the message I was replying to was from you, however
>>I obviously was addresing KWILLS.
>
>No, you were not. You responded to MY post.
>
>After all this time and you STILL don't know how to use your news
>reader?
>
>LOL

Jenny is so stupid, he messes up his reader's configuration. He
couldn't get Live Mail to add attribution marks, and now he's screwed
up Outlook Express so that it does odd line breaks.
So, no, Jenny still does not know how to use his news reader.

--
"I most stonger than Darth Vapor!"
-- Zladko "Zlad" Vladcik

"KWills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
news:hchmtipmkidgihts045mfsli5asm37ats3@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 18:07:26 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"

> Klaus is leaving? Since you replied to him, you must think he's
> leaving. Or you've been caught in another lie.

No, I never thought that or said that at all.

I was obviously replying to YOU where klous very stupidly forgot to
re-translate YOUR text after he was so careful to translate his own reply.
bwahahahahaahaha

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:qvuotid63r5e007h8p2a64bdnm071mhl09@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:48:32 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>
>>
>>> Note that it does NOT say I had a strawberry Frosty, making YOU the
>>> liar.
>>
>>
>>FUCK YOU klous, you know damn well that a frosty is wendy's version of a
>>shake, therefore since we were discussing FROSTY'S and you used to the
>>term
>>shake, means that you MEANT frosty. Besides, there is ANOTHER post where
>>you admitted having a FROSTY.
>>
>>news:n12ati5vttromqr0ji4ramh2fp7f1m2oqg@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com
>>
>>You said, QOUTE:
>>
>>>>>>Who ordered the frosty for you, or, if
>>>>>>the strawberry Frosty wasn't ordered,
>>>>>>how was it that it came to be in your
>>>>>>possession.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Irrelevant.
>>>>
>>>>Yes, it is relevant.
>>
>>>No. When I had it, and who bought it, is irrelevant
>
> And it still is.

IOW, irrelevant = "proves klous was wrong"

Which STILL leaves us with the ORIGINAL question, did you or did you not
ACTUALLY HAVE a Wendy's strawberry frosty. Now that you've used up your
diversion/delay tactic of the difference between shake and frosty, the
origianl question is still unanswered.

a.) YES
b.) NO

"K Wills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
news:64hbtihludrc4ve1m5pq9usslns829bso9@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:23:28 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>>you don't need a court to take an oath, kwills.
>
> Only an officer of the court can place someone under oath.

In a court of law, that is is correct.

But this is not a court of law, this is USENET NEWSGROUP.

"KWills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
news:bg76uipo473otu7oa1pmjq8rfsjelh8va5@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:52:29 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> Like, for instance, when you lied by claiming I said I had ordered a
>>>> strawberry frosty and, when I asked for proof, you supplied a link
>>>> PROVING YOU LIED!
>>>>
>>>> That was so funny. It made me laugh.
>>>>
>>>> Laugh laugh laugh laugh.
>>>
>>> Now now, let's be fair -- to be a lie, there
>>> has to be intent.
>>
>>Careful frank, or thier
>
> What is "thier?"
> If you mean their, explain their what? What, exactly, is theirs?
>
> [Cue avoidance from Jenny.]
>
>>going to start calling you a liar also.
>
> Where do you propose there is a lie in Frank's post? There isn't
> one, of course. You are simply feeding your NEED to lie.

I never proposed that frank was lying, Kwills. You are simply feeding
your NEED to accuse me of lying.

On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 15:41:41 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"K Wills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
>news:64hbtihludrc4ve1m5pq9usslns829bso9@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:23:28 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>you don't need a court to take an oath, kwills.
>>
>> Only an officer of the court can place someone under oath.
>
>In a court of law, that is is correct.
>
>But this is not a court of law, this is USENET NEWSGROUP.
>

Thanks for admitting that nobody can place anyone under any kind of
oath in alt.f.f-f.

On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 15:50:42 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
>news:hchmtipmkidgihts045mfsli5asm37ats3@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 18:07:26 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>
>> Klaus is leaving? Since you replied to him, you must think he's
>> leaving. Or you've been caught in another lie.
>
>No, I never thought that or said that at all.

Yes, liar, you certainly did.

>
>I was obviously replying to YOU

You were obviously replying to me.

======================================
J_LIE >Message-ID: <wP2dnXNv7MM7GUf4nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@supernews.com>
J_LIE >
J_LIE >"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com>
wrote in message
J_LIE
>news:9lqjti9nvl2g85gc94l4s729n0311echbu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
J_LIE >
J_LIE >that's great news, that certianly will help me to get cought up
on the
J_LIE >backlog of message's here. make sure you let me know when you
post your
J_LIE >last message to teh group before you leave, and also let us
know the day you
J_LIE >expect to return. I'll try to get cought up during that time.
J_LIE >

On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 15:48:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:qvuotid63r5e007h8p2a64bdnm071mhl09@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:48:32 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>
>>>
>>>> Note that it does NOT say I had a strawberry Frosty, making YOU the
>>>> liar.
>>>
>>>
>>>FUCK YOU klous, you know damn well that a frosty is wendy's version of a
>>>shake, therefore since we were discussing FROSTY'S and you used to the
>>>term
>>>shake, means that you MEANT frosty. Besides, there is ANOTHER post where
>>>you admitted having a FROSTY.
>>>
>>>news:n12ati5vttromqr0ji4ramh2fp7f1m2oqg@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com
>>>
>>>You said, QOUTE:
>>>
>>>>>>>Who ordered the frosty for you, or, if
>>>>>>>the strawberry Frosty wasn't ordered,
>>>>>>>how was it that it came to be in your
>>>>>>>possession.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Irrelevant.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, it is relevant.
>>>
>>>>No. When I had it, and who bought it, is irrelevant
>>
>> And it still is.
>
>IOW, irrelevant = "proves klous was wrong"

ir·rel·e·vant: not connected with or relevant to something.
"an irrelevant comment"
>
> Which STILL leaves us with the ORIGINAL question, did you or did you not
>ACTUALLY HAVE a Wendy's strawberry frosty.

It's not revelant.

REVELANT: closely connected or appropriate to what is being done or
considered.

On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 15:41:41 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

Post edits restored to the original text and context.

>>>"K Wills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
>>>news:85dusidhhlcrl8887voedranjcfjiujcqh@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:06:11 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Quick question, Klous..
>>>>
>>>> Who is Klous?
>>
>>
>>Jenny?
>>
>>

Jenny?

>>>>>Have you, as a matter of historical fact, before this discussion began,
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you actually personally tasted a wendy's strawberry frosty.
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't care who ordered it. Just yes or no, UNDER OATH, have to had one
>>>>>yourself.
>>>>
>>>> As if you're an officer of the court who can place anyone under
>>>> oath.
>>>
>>>you don't need a court to take an oath, kwills.
>>
>> Only an officer of the court can place someone under oath. But
>>you know this. You're merely feeding your NEED to lie. You would have
>>learned this in fifth grade civics class.
>
>In a court of law, that is is correct.
>

Fifth grade civics class isn't held in a court room.

>But this is not a court of law, this is USENET NEWSGROUP.

So you agree. You have NO authority to place anyone under oath.
I'm glad we got that settled. Though I'm certain your accidental
honesty in this matter will cause you to have some sort of fit.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

>On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:52:29 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

Post edits restored to the original text and context.

>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>>> Like, for instance, when you lied by claiming I said I had ordered a
>>>>> strawberry frosty and, when I asked for proof, you supplied a link
>>>>> PROVING YOU LIED!
>>>>>
>>>>> That was so funny. It made me laugh.
>>>>>
>>>>> Laugh laugh laugh laugh.
>>>>
>>>> Now now, let's be fair -- to be a lie, there
>>>> has to be intent.
>>>
>>>Careful frank, or thier
>>
>> What is "thier?"
>> If you mean their, explain their what? What, exactly, is theirs?
>>

Jenny?

>>[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]
>>
>>>going to start calling you a liar also.
>>
>> Where do you propose there is a lie in Frank's post? There isn't
>>one, of course. You are simply feeding your NEED to lie.

Jenny?

>> Yes, you do have clear intent. This is PROVED by your refusal to
>>admit you're wrong when you are proved wrong. When absolute PROOF of
>>the truth is offered, you continue to make the false claim, proving
>>your intent to lie the whole time.
>>

Jenny?

>> Your reader appears to have removed the following. Had you
>>snipped it, you would have pointed this out. Unless your intent was,
>>and is, to present the LIE that Frank posted nothing else. I restored
>>it so that you might address the remainder of Frank's post.
>>
>>-----Begin C&P-----
>>
>>Jerry apparently has a profound disability which prevents
>>him from differentiating between a shake and a
>>frosty -- so he is merely mistaken.
>>
>>Though, he did actually lie once, and then
>>admitted it. IIRC, it was some email
>>he claimed to have gotten from a 'froup denizen.
>>(I guess he forgot about that.)
>>
>>What I don't understand, though, is why he
>>turns "au" into "ou" in pretty much everything
>>he writes...except his own name. He should
>>change his name to "Souk" to be consistent,
>>don't you think?
>>
>>(Though then again, he did spell your name as "Kloaus"
>>in the subject, which could be an honest attempt
>>to at least _try_ to get it right. Funny about that.)
>>
>>-----End C&P-----
>>
>>[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]
>
> I never proposed that frank was lying, Kwills.

You did. That you snipped it away when you replied (I restored
the original text) doesn't alter that you did make such a proposal.

>You are simply feeding
>your NEED to accuse me of lying.

In order for your claim of, "Careful frank, or thier [sic] going
to start calling you a liar also." there MUST be something you suggest
can be interpreted as a lie. Frank's erroneous position that you are
just profoundly stupid, so much so that you lack the intent to
deceive, can't be it. Unless you have something to point to that shows
he was less than honest in his claim.
If you have something, present it for review. If you're simply
furthering your NEED to lie, you will present only avoidance. If you
don't run away from the truth.
I do like your use of projection. You NEED to lie and so to
dishonestly deflect from it, you claim I somehow NEED to accuse you of
lying. Anyone who reads our interactions will see I simply point out
your lying when you lie. If you feel I'm doing this too often, you may
find some benefit in being honest. But, as you keep proving, honesty
isn't an option for you, unless you make a mistake.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 15:48:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:qvuotid63r5e007h8p2a64bdnm071mhl09@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:48:32 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>
>>>
>>>> Note that it does NOT say I had a strawberry Frosty, making YOU the
>>>> liar.
>>>
>>>
>>>FUCK YOU klous, you know damn well that a frosty is wendy's version of a
>>>shake, therefore since we were discussing FROSTY'S and you used to the
>>>term
>>>shake, means that you MEANT frosty. Besides, there is ANOTHER post where
>>>you admitted having a FROSTY.
>>>
>>>news:n12ati5vttromqr0ji4ramh2fp7f1m2oqg@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com
>>>
>>>You said, QOUTE:
>>>
>>>>>>>Who ordered the frosty for you, or, if
>>>>>>>the strawberry Frosty wasn't ordered,
>>>>>>>how was it that it came to be in your
>>>>>>>possession.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Irrelevant.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, it is relevant.
>>>
>>>>No. When I had it, and who bought it, is irrelevant
>>
>> And it still is.
>
>IOW, irrelevant = "proves klous was wrong"
>

Do cease your constant lying.

irrelevant adjective
ir·rel·e·vant

: not relevant : INAPPLICABLE

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irrelevant

> Which STILL leaves us with the ORIGINAL question, did you or did you not
>ACTUALLY HAVE a Wendy's strawberry frosty. Now that you've used up your
>diversion/delay tactic of the difference between shake and frosty, the
>origianl question is still unanswered.
>
>a.) YES
>b.) NO

Still not relevant.
What causes your OBSESSION with this? Can you express, in words,
what is behind your extended attempts to avoid the truth?

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 15:50:42 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

Post edits restored to the original.

>"KWills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
>news:hchmtipmkidgihts045mfsli5asm37ats3@4ax.com...
>>On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 18:07:26 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:9lqjti9nvl2g85gc94l4s729n0311echbu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 03:35:30 -0800, KWills <kw19@kw.kw> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:42:19 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:01:02 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>"KWills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:892htilsmod4tjide0inqa6osern83m5bg@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> This should be good. Post the MID where Klaus actually stated he
>>>>>>>> tasted a strawberry frosty. Not implied it. But where, according to
>>>>>>>> you, he actually said he had.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [Crickets]
>>>>>>>

Note I'm still waiting for the MID. Since Jenny claim was, and is, a
lie, he's run away from the truth he HATES so much.

>>>>>>>Alright, here you go.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>news:4vnmsilrg7pgl7amsqge1raaccdglfvt6c@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In that message, klous says, QOUTE:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Obviously, I have HAD a strawberry shake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Note that it does NOT say I had a strawberry Frosty, making YOU the
>>>>>>liar.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't want to accept that Jenny's so stupid he doesn't know the
>>>>>difference between a shake and a frosty.
>>>>> Maybe he'll focus on the similarities. Like, both are dairy
>>>>>based.
>>>>
>>>> It's hard to accept. It's easier to accept that he's simply lying, as
>>>> usual.
>>>>
>>>>>>>See, that's the difference between klous and me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's right. You constantly lie, while I give only facts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When I demand klous to
>>>>>>>answer a question, he responds with silence or "Irrelevant" and he
>>>>>>>refues to
>>>>>>>directly asnwer the question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Jenny WISHES I were silent and didn't point out his CONSTANT lies.
>>>>>
>>>>> He's taken to expressing how his lying being exposed is happening
>>>>>so often, he's finding it boring. The exposure, which he's proved he
>>>>>also needs, causes him to yawn.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>I on the hand, ALWAYS supply a direect response. Such as this one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>TRANSLATION: Jenny will usually ALWAYS lie.
>>>>>
>>>>> If Jenny is honest, it's by accident.
>>>>>
>>>>> Additional, and not relevant to the post, I will be on vacation
>>>>>next week. I may post once or twice, but probably not. Proving *Wraal*
>>>>>the liar he is isn't that important to me.
>>>>
>>>> Unir n tbbq gevc naq or fnsr.
>>>
>>>that's great news, that certianly will help me to get cought up on the
>>
>> What is "cought?"
>>

Jenny?

>>>backlog of message's here.
>>
>> You claimed there were only about 300 posts to get through. That
>>would take, at most, an afternoon. And you would need to read real
>>slow for it to take that long.
>>

Jenny?

>>>make sure you let me know when you post your
>>>last message to teh group before you leave,
>>
>> Klaus is leaving? Since you replied to him, you must think he's
>>leaving. Or you've been caught in another lie.
>> So, are you so delusional you think Klaus is also leaving, or
>>have you been caught in another lie? If you see a REALISTIC option I
>>don't, present it.
>>

Jenny?

>>>and also let us know the day you
>>>expect to return. I'll try to get cought up during that time.
>>
>> Again, what is "cought?"
>
>No, I never thought that or said that at all.
>

That makes NO sense. You didn't answer the question I asked of
you.

>I was obviously replying to YOU where klous very stupidly forgot to
>re-translate YOUR text after he was so careful to translate his own reply.
>bwahahahahaahaha

What does that have to do with your claim that Klaus and I are
the same person (the only way you could think we were both leaving)?
Or has another example of your NEED to lie been PROVED by you?

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

On Sun, 03 Mar 2024 15:38:31 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 15:41:41 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>"K Wills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
>>news:64hbtihludrc4ve1m5pq9usslns829bso9@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:23:28 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>you don't need a court to take an oath, kwills.
>>>
>>> Only an officer of the court can place someone under oath.
>>
>>In a court of law, that is is correct.
>>
>>But this is not a court of law, this is USENET NEWSGROUP.
>
>Thanks for admitting that nobody can place anyone under any kind of
>oath in alt.f.f-f.

Jenny will be most upset regarding his accidental honesty. I am
looking forward to how he will try, and fail, to divert from it.

--
The Aztec contribution to our multicultural feast
will be delayed, until the main course stops begging
for his life.

On Sun, 03 Mar 2024 15:41:45 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 15:50:42 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>"KWills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
>>news:hchmtipmkidgihts045mfsli5asm37ats3@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 18:07:26 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>
>>> Klaus is leaving? Since you replied to him, you must think he's
>>> leaving. Or you've been caught in another lie.
>>
>>No, I never thought that or said that at all.
>
>Yes, liar, you certainly did.
>

As he KNOWS. Jenny will often add more lies to his lies. It's how
he has PROVED he really does NEED to lie.

>>I was obviously replying to YOU
>
>You were obviously replying to me.
>

See above.

>======================================
>J_LIE >Message-ID: <wP2dnXNv7MM7GUf4nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@supernews.com>
>J_LIE >
>J_LIE >"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com>
>wrote in message
>J_LIE
>>news:9lqjti9nvl2g85gc94l4s729n0311echbu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>J_LIE >
>J_LIE >that's great news, that certianly will help me to get cought up
>on the
>J_LIE >backlog of message's here. make sure you let me know when you
>post your
>J_LIE >last message to teh group before you leave, and also let us
>know the day you
>J_LIE >expect to return. I'll try to get cought up during that time.
>J_LIE >

I'd still like Jenny to tell me what "cought" is.

--
Bless me, Father, for I have committed an original sin.
I poked a badger with a spoon.

"KWills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
news:pf8bui18gp53b20qom0pm2pmuo041rgkro@4ax.com...
> >On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:52:29 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Post edits restored to the original text and context.
>
>
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>>>> Like, for instance, when you lied by claiming I said I had ordered a
>>>>>> strawberry frosty and, when I asked for proof, you supplied a link
>>>>>> PROVING YOU LIED!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That was so funny. It made me laugh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Laugh laugh laugh laugh.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now now, let's be fair -- to be a lie, there
>>>>> has to be intent.
>>>>
>>>>Careful frank, or thier
>>>
>>> What is "thier?"
>>> If you mean their, explain their what? What, exactly, is theirs?
>>>
>
>
> Jenny?
>
>
>>>[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]
>>>
>>>>going to start calling you a liar also.
>>>
>>> Where do you propose there is a lie in Frank's post? There isn't
>>>one, of course. You are simply feeding your NEED to lie.
>
>
> Jenny?
>
>
>>> Yes, you do have clear intent. This is PROVED by your refusal to
>>>admit you're wrong when you are proved wrong. When absolute PROOF of
>>>the truth is offered, you continue to make the false claim, proving
>>>your intent to lie the whole time.
>>>
>
>
> Jenny?
>
>
>>> Your reader appears to have removed the following. Had you
>>>snipped it, you would have pointed this out. Unless your intent was,
>>>and is, to present the LIE that Frank posted nothing else. I restored
>>>it so that you might address the remainder of Frank's post.
>>>
>>>-----Begin C&P-----
>>>
>>>Jerry apparently has a profound disability which prevents
>>>him from differentiating between a shake and a
>>>frosty -- so he is merely mistaken.
>>>
>>>Though, he did actually lie once, and then
>>>admitted it. IIRC, it was some email
>>>he claimed to have gotten from a 'froup denizen.
>>>(I guess he forgot about that.)
>>>
>>>What I don't understand, though, is why he
>>>turns "au" into "ou" in pretty much everything
>>>he writes...except his own name. He should
>>>change his name to "Souk" to be consistent,
>>>don't you think?
>>>
>>>(Though then again, he did spell your name as "Kloaus"
>>>in the subject, which could be an honest attempt
>>>to at least _try_ to get it right. Funny about that.)
>>>
>>>-----End C&P-----
>>>
>>>[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]
>>
>> I never proposed that frank was lying, Kwills.
>
> You did. That you snipped it away when you replied (I restored
> the original text) doesn't alter that you did make such a proposal.

No I didn't. I never, not even once said, "Frank is lying." What I said
was, BE CAREFUL FRANK, or they will ACCUSE you of lying.