I'm generally pro immigration.
But I feel the government needs to control it.

from
https://www.politico.eu/article/euco-council-eu-viktor-orban-charles-michel-hungary-poland-migration-mutiny-eu-summit-deadlocks/

Migration mutiny: EU summit deadlocks
Hungary and Poland took a stand against a recent migration deal during
Thursday’s EU summit, blocking any EU leaders’ statement on the issue.

BELGIUM-EU-POLITICS-SUMMIT
European Council Summit, at the EU headquarters in Brussels | Ludovic
Marin/AFP via Getty Images
BY JACOPO BARIGAZZI, SUZANNE LYNCH, HANS VON DER BURCHARD, BARBARA
MOENS, CLEA CAULCUTT AND CORY BENNETT
JUNE 30, 2023 2:51 AM CET
6 MINUTES READ

BRUSSELS — EU leaders were ticking through their agenda items with
alacrity on Thursday. Rumors were circulating they might even cancel
Friday’s meeting, having nothing left to talk about.

Then Viktor Orbán stepped in.

Our approach to migration is unacceptable, the Hungarian leader
fulminated. Exactly, echoed the Polish prime minister, Mateusz
Morawiecki. We won’t move forward with the summit’s final statement
until our concerns are addressed, they vowed.

In the end, they got their way — kind of. The entire summit stalled as
the leaders of France and Germany, plus European Council President
Charles Michel, negotiated with Hungary and Poland. Eventually, everyone
just gave up. Shortly after 1 a.m., EU leaders called off the summit and
went home, vowing to try again Friday morning.

It was exactly what everyone had been hoping to avoid: Yet another
migration mutiny.

The talks had been “difficult” and “complicated,” Belgian Prime Minister
Alexander De Croo conceded on his way out. “We hope the night brings
some advice.”

In many ways, the failure to produce a final statement is merely
cosmetic. The underlying reason behind Hungary and Poland’s 11th-hour
intervention was a protest over a migration deal EU countries pushed
through this month to relocate migrants across the Continent.

Statement or not, that deal will remain in place. Yet Hungary and Poland
wanted to use the summit to express their discontent — and that, they
certainly did.

The late-night obstruction, described to POLITICO by numerous diplomats
familiar with the talks, is just the latest indication that migration is
becoming an increasingly unavoidable subject at every EU summit. And
with migrants continuing to arrive via dangerous Mediterranean routes
and horrific tragedies like the recent migrant boat sinking off the
Greek coast, the issue is not going away.

We’re always talking migration now
In the room, Dutch leader Mark Rutte suggested leaders discuss it again
at their next summit, while De Croo argued it should simply always be on
the agenda, according to one of the people familiar with the discussions
who, like others, spoke anonymously to share details of the private talks.

Others pointed to the rise in anti-immigrant attacks in their home
countries — including in places like Ireland which have traditionally
escaped anti-immigration trends — as well as the rise in popularity of
far-right parties, fuelled by xenophobic sentiment.

Migration has long been one of the thorniest issues for the EU. Since
the 2015 migration crisis, the bloc has tried and failed to overhaul the
bloc’s process for welcoming and relocating asylum seekers.

Until last month that is. In May, EU countries finally — after months of
tense negotiations — reached an agreement that did both.

The deal, in a nutshell, would install a stricter asylum procedure at
the border for migrants deemed unlikely to be accepted. It would also
create a system that gives EU countries the choice of either accepting a
certain number of migrants each year or paying into a joint EU fund.

Hungary and Poland detest the mandatory relocations and have vowed not
to cooperate.

And at Thursday’s gathering, they also expressed anger that the deal was
pushed through via majority support — not unanimity. They pushed to
adopt a joint statement committing to making EU migration decisions only
by consensus (even though the EU doesn’t require that).

The text of one potential compromise version of the statement, seen by
POLITICO, calls for the EU to “find consensus on an effective asylum and
migration policy.”

Despite Hungarian and Polish protestations, the deal is not going away.

“The migration deal stands,” Rutte said as he left the summit. “What has
been the issue today was not the migration pact … but that Hungary and
Poland don’t like the way the migration pact was decided.”

And that frustration spilled over into Thursday’s meeting.

“They’re so angry about this that they say that they want no conclusions
[on migration] at all now,” Rutte said.

Moments after leaders broke up for the night, Orbán’s political
director, Balázs Orbán, summed up the sentiment on Twitter: “Heavy fight
against the pro-migration forces of Brussels!”

A sign of things to come
Summit organizers had been hoping to avoid such a prolonged conversation
on migration, worried that it might turn heated.

They took several steps in the run-up to try and ensure the joint
statement’s language placated everyone. To start, the drafts circulating
ahead of time only indirectly referenced the migration agreement.

The drafts also tried to skirt another point of contention: a push from
several hawkish countries to include a reference to finding “innovative
solutions” on migration.

Though no one wanted to say it publicly, three officials familiar with
the talks said the vague term included the prospect of sending asylum
seekers to non-EU countries — a model akin to a controversial U.K. plan
to fly asylum seekers to Rwanda. By coincidence, the U.K. proposal was
dramatically struck down by the U.K. Court of Appeal Thursday just as EU
leaders were arriving in Brussels.

Instead of mentioning the controversial phrase, drafters instead slipped
in a reference to a letter EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen,
the EU’s top executive, circulated to EU leaders this week, pledging
that her European Commission was “ready to continue developing new ways
of advancing on … objectives including through out-of-the-box thinking.”

The term “out-of-the-box thinking” — essentially a euphemism that keeps
the door open for a range of migration options — got positive mentions
from several leaders during Thursday’s meeting, according to the
official familiar with the discussions.

One country that appeared satisfied all day: Italy.

Far-right leader Giorgia Meloni has successfully pulled much of the EU
in her direction on migration and was the clear victor of the recent
migration deal.

“It was a unique approach that fixed everyone’s problems,” she said as
she arrived at the summit.

And De Croo, the Belgian leader, even praised her role as an
intermediary with Hungary and Poland on Thursday.

But it remains far from clear if leaders will be able to reach a deal
after a night’s sleep.

“There is really, really, really a desire to be able to come to
conclusions,” De Croo stressed.

MORE FROM ... JACOPO BARIGAZZI, SUZANNE LYNCH, HANS VON DER BURCHARD,
BARBARA MOENS, CLEA CAULCUTT AND CORY BENNETT
Related Content
Putin remains strong despite Wagner rebellion, Hungary’s Orbán says
The aborted rebellion led to questions in Western countries about how
much damage had been done to Putin’s regime | Mikhail
Tereshchenko/Sputnik/AFP via Getty Images
Britain’s plan to deport migrants to Rwanda will cost £169,000 per person
The relocation agreement with Rwanda last year was part of efforts to
curb high-levels of cross-Channel migration in small boats | Dan
Kitwood/Getty Images
Russia is ‘cracking’ after Wagner rebellion, EU’s top diplomat says
A member of Wagner Group stands guard in Rostov-on-Don, on June 24, 2023
| Roman Romokhov/AFP via Getty Images
‘The people are silent’: The main reason the Wagner mutiny bodes ill for
Putin
Members of Wagner group looks from a military vehicle with the sign read
as "Brother" | Roman Romokhov/AFP via Getty Images
Prigozhin’s Wagner mutiny is over. What now?
Warlord Yevgeny Prigozhin’s short-lived mutiny over the weekend exposed
Putin's tenuous grip on power | Roman Romokhov/AFP via Getty Images