On 11/14/22 9:48 AM, RichA wrote:
> Inevitably, it goes into financial black holes like foreign aid, various forms of cancer research or climate and "peace" initiatives. These form of giving results in little progress against specific problems,

Hey, congrats, this is new: shitposting with vagaries. You have no
facts nor are even making sense, but its shitposting regardless. Well
played!

RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, 14 November 2022 at 17:57:47 UTC-5, gmsin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 11/14/22 9:48 AM, RichA wrote:
>>> Inevitably, it goes into financial black holes like foreign aid,
>>> various forms of cancer research or climate and "peace" initiatives.
>>> These form of giving results in little progress against specific problems,
>> Hey, congrats, this is new: shitposting with vagaries. You have no
>> facts nor are even making sense, but its shitposting regardless. Well
>> played!
>
> How about over $3 billion for breast cancer research over 25 years with
> almost nothing to show for it? Is that $3 billion well-spent, or could
> it have been more effective spent
> on ANY other thing the medical fields? Like $3 billion for strapped,
> under-served hospitals, or more nursing schools?
>
>

$3 billion over 25 years doesn’t sound like a lot of money. If you know
that you’re going to fail in advance, then any budget is going to sound
inflated. But how do you know they might not have found an answer six
months in?

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

On 11/14/22 5:30 PM, RichA wrote:
> On Monday, 14 November 2022 at 17:57:47 UTC-5, gmsin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 11/14/22 9:48 AM, RichA wrote:
>>> Inevitably, it goes into financial black holes like foreign aid, various forms of cancer research or climate and "peace" initiatives. These form of giving results in little progress against specific problems,
>> Hey, congrats, this is new: shitposting with vagaries. You have no
>> facts nor are even making sense, but its shitposting regardless. Well
>> played!
>
> How about over $3 billion for breast cancer research over 25 years with almost nothing to show for it?

This interesting, like watching a squirrel in my backyard. So you think
"billionaires" are funding breast cancer research and they should have
found a cure by now because cures for cancer are so prevalent? Dude,
your mind is FUCKED at what you just said doesn't make sense on any level.

Is that $3 billion well-spent, or could it have been more effective spent
> on ANY other thing the medical fields? Like $3 billion for strapped, under-served hospitals, or more nursing schools?

Go ahead and make three billion (but not Canadian, 'cause that isn't
worth shit) and spend it how you like. Meanwhile, rumor has it Elon
Musk spent 44 billion for Twitter and turned it into a shithole. What's
the cure for that?

Meanwhile, there's this:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7308500/

Breast Cancer Survivorship, Quality of Life, and Late Toxicities

I know you won't read it, of course, since knowledge is the enemy of all
right wing assholes.