On 15/09/2023 8:32 am, Thomas Joseph wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 2:33:23 AM UTC-4, Raul TW wrote:
>> On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 9:13:08 PM UTC-7, Thomas Joseph wrote:
>>
>>> No matter what the laws are they are not the same thing to everyone.
>>> The Constitution or whatever is necessary could come into play if a
>>> defendant has money for a decent lawyer. Even then............. Whether
>>> a law is on the books or not, a lot of people are stopped and detained
>>> for the moola in some states, maybe all. Or maybe that no longer
>>> happens.
>> It should be noted that the Supreme Court case which ruled anti-sodomy laws to be unconstitutional was in 2003.
>> So until 2003, many states had anti-sodomy laws on the books. But they were very rarely enforced.
>> So yes, enforcement was relevant. Today there are 12 states with anti-sodomy laws. Those laws should have been repealed **IMMEDIATELY** upon the 2003 Supreme Court decision. Not doing so is inexcusable and makes a mockery of the whole justice system.
>>
>> Why the hell does it take 20 years for states to repeal their unconstitutional laws?
>>
>> As to whether people are still victimized by these unconstitutional laws, the answer is yes. See the 2022 Idaho case below.
>> Wiki
>>
>> As of October 1, 2023, the following jurisdictions (12 US states) had statutes criminalizing consensual sodomy: Florida, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas.
>>
>> Idaho repealed its sodomy law in March 2022. The repeal was a result of a lawsuit brought on in September 2020 by a plaintiff known as John Doe. John Doe alleged his constitutional rights were violated when he was forced to register as a sex offender upon moving to Idaho due to a conviction for "oral sex" two decades prior
>
>
> Funny. I picture hundreds of people toting placards and chanting, "Legalize
> sodomy now!" These are law abiding citizens, but they love screwing other
> people up the ass and getting screwed as well. Certainly sodomy should not
> be against the law. On the other hand it is against my law as I am not a fan
> of sodomy either way. However, I do enjoy sticking my nose betwixt a nice
> round set of bouncing female ass cheeks, reveling in the stink contained
> therein. I wonder, is asscheek smelling against the law too? If so it's probably
> some iffy thing like, "You can smell it as long as it's 5 feet or more away, anything
> closer is against the law." The body of the smeller must be at least 5 feet from
> the smellee. But I've got that law beat. I met a plastic surgeon who swears
> he can elongate my nose to 5 feet. So by law I will be able to stand 5 feet from
> the source of my favorite smell with a 5 and 1/2 foot long nose probing deep
> into the flouncing cheek meat.

lol

On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 4:27:37 AM UTC-4, Whisper wrote:
> On 15/09/2023 8:32 am, Thomas Joseph wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 2:33:23 AM UTC-4, Raul TW wrote:
> >> On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 9:13:08 PM UTC-7, Thomas Joseph wrote:
> >>
> >>> No matter what the laws are they are not the same thing to everyone.
> >>> The Constitution or whatever is necessary could come into play if a
> >>> defendant has money for a decent lawyer. Even then............. Whether
> >>> a law is on the books or not, a lot of people are stopped and detained
> >>> for the moola in some states, maybe all. Or maybe that no longer
> >>> happens.
> >> It should be noted that the Supreme Court case which ruled anti-sodomy laws to be unconstitutional was in 2003.
> >> So until 2003, many states had anti-sodomy laws on the books. But they were very rarely enforced.
> >> So yes, enforcement was relevant. Today there are 12 states with anti-sodomy laws. Those laws should have been repealed **IMMEDIATELY** upon the 2003 Supreme Court decision. Not doing so is inexcusable and makes a mockery of the whole justice system.
> >>
> >> Why the hell does it take 20 years for states to repeal their unconstitutional laws?
> >>
> >> As to whether people are still victimized by these unconstitutional laws, the answer is yes. See the 2022 Idaho case below.
> >> Wiki
> >>
> >> As of October 1, 2023, the following jurisdictions (12 US states) had statutes criminalizing consensual sodomy: Florida, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas.
> >>
> >> Idaho repealed its sodomy law in March 2022. The repeal was a result of a lawsuit brought on in September 2020 by a plaintiff known as John Doe. John Doe alleged his constitutional rights were violated when he was forced to register as a sex offender upon moving to Idaho due to a conviction for "oral sex" two decades prior
> >
> >
> > Funny. I picture hundreds of people toting placards and chanting, "Legalize
> > sodomy now!" These are law abiding citizens, but they love screwing other
> > people up the ass and getting screwed as well. Certainly sodomy should not
> > be against the law. On the other hand it is against my law as I am not a fan
> > of sodomy either way. However, I do enjoy sticking my nose betwixt a nice
> > round set of bouncing female ass cheeks, reveling in the stink contained
> > therein. I wonder, is asscheek smelling against the law too? If so it's probably
> > some iffy thing like, "You can smell it as long as it's 5 feet or more away, anything
> > closer is against the law." The body of the smeller must be at least 5 feet from
> > the smellee. But I've got that law beat. I met a plastic surgeon who swears
> > he can elongate my nose to 5 feet. So by law I will be able to stand 5 feet from
> > the source of my favorite smell with a 5 and 1/2 foot long nose probing deep
> > into the flouncing cheek meat.
> lol

Thanks. I just read my post and you're right, it is funny. It
can always be funnier, but I'm not into trying. My 5 foot nose
concept reminds me of something similar I thought of years
ago. I am not a cartoonist, can't draw a lick, but I see things
in a cartoonish way.

Remember the old days when restaurants had smoking and
non-smoking sections? I picture a really snobby looking guy
sitting in the smoking section with a cigaret in a 15 foot
cigaret holder extending out into the non-smoking section.
The same guy has a car parked outside the restaurant. It's
a one seater, just for the driver. The car ends at the driver's
back. But the hood of the car is 20 feet long. He is the
"Get out of my way" guy. I picture it as a single-frame
cartoon. No words, just the smoking and non-smoking
signs and the expressions of outrage and disgust on people's
faces along with the beaming face of the law bending smoker.