at the highest levels of government with no repercussions.

https://truthsocial.com/@justthenews/posts/111857326400730989
--
"There are none so blind as liberals who will not see"

On 2/1/2024 6:34 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
> at the highest levels of government with no repercussions.
>
> https://truthsocial.com/@justthenews/posts/111857326400730989

I posted this before I saw Senor Smoke's post. But my point is valid.
--
"There are none so blind as liberals who will not see"

In article <uphdfb$29nec$2@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
>
> On 2/1/2024 6:34 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
> > at the highest levels of government with no repercussions.
> >
> > https://truthsocial.com/@justthenews/posts/111857326400730989
>
> I posted this before I saw Senor Smoke's post. But my point is valid.

You are just an amazingly dumb shit. Maybe, if I was dumb enough to
sign up for that propaganda source I might see what you're talking
about. I don't.

Even if you can prove the Democrats have been racking up a lot of
unexcused absences there is likely to be a simple explaination. They
must have done it before we passed measure 113.

TB

On 2/2/2024 11:01 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
> In article <uphdfb$29nec$2@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
>>
>> On 2/1/2024 6:34 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
>>> at the highest levels of government with no repercussions.
>>>
>>> https://truthsocial.com/@justthenews/posts/111857326400730989
>>
>> I posted this before I saw Senor Smoke's post. But my point is valid.
>
> You are just an amazingly dumb shit.

Ever look into the mirror lately? As the saying goes, it takes one to
know one.

Maybe, if I was dumb enough to
> sign up for that propaganda source I might see what you're talking
> about. I don't.

Well you are apparently dumb enough to read the "propaganda". I've never
seen anyone who could talk himself into a corner like you can.

>
> Even if you can prove the Democrats have been racking up a lot of
> unexcused absences there is likely to be a simple explaination. They
> must have done it before we passed measure 113.
>
> TB

"...Democrats have been racking up a lot of unexcused absences". I can't
find that anywhere in my post. I may have to again change your moniker.
This time to "TB Schiff". You make up as much as old Adam did.

FYI. I'm a stay and fight guy. I don't think either side should be
walking out when they disagree. Maybe arm wrestling, tug-of-war, or even
tiddly winks could be a way of solving differences. Name calling, e.g.,
"amazingly dumb shit" would be an amazingly dumb shit way though.

By the way, I wasn't referring to just The Garden of Oregon:

https://www.texastribune.org/2021/07/14/texas-democrats-walkout-quorum/

https://tennesseelookout.com/2023/08/28/democrats-walk-out-over-jones-silencing-as-house-senate-remain-in-stalemate/

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408920-democrats-walk-out-of-hearing-room-in-protest/

https://www.wunc.org/politics/2021-11-02/nc-democrats-walk-out-protest-republican-house-loftis-gaston-insurrection
--
"There are none so blind as liberals who will not see"

In article <upjnvu$2pb3a$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
>
> On 2/2/2024 11:01 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
> > In article <uphdfb$29nec$2@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
> >>
> >> On 2/1/2024 6:34 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
> >>> at the highest levels of government with no repercussions.
> >>>
> >>> https://truthsocial.com/@justthenews/posts/111857326400730989
> >>
> >> I posted this before I saw Senor Smoke's post. But my point is valid.
> >
> > You are just an amazingly dumb shit.
>
> Ever look into the mirror lately? As the saying goes, it takes one to
> know one.
>
> Maybe, if I was dumb enough to
> > sign up for that propaganda source I might see what you're talking
> > about. I don't.
>
> Well you are apparently dumb enough to read the "propaganda". I've never
> seen anyone who could talk himself into a corner like you can.
>
> >
> > Even if you can prove the Democrats have been racking up a lot of
> > unexcused absences there is likely to be a simple explaination. They
> > must have done it before we passed measure 113.
> >
> > TB
>
>
> "...Democrats have been racking up a lot of unexcused absences". I can't
> find that anywhere in my post. I may have to again change your moniker.
> This time to "TB Schiff". You make up as much as old Adam did.
>
> FYI. I'm a stay and fight guy. I don't think either side should be
> walking out when they disagree. Maybe arm wrestling, tug-of-war, or even
> tiddly winks could be a way of solving differences. Name calling, e.g.,
> "amazingly dumb shit" would be an amazingly dumb shit way though.
>
> By the way, I wasn't referring to just The Garden of Oregon:
>
> https://www.texastribune.org/2021/07/14/texas-democrats-walkout-quorum/
>
> https://tennesseelookout.com/2023/08/28/democrats-walk-out-over-jones-silencing-as-house-senate-remain-in-stalemate/
>
> https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408920-democrats-walk-out-of-hearing-room-in-protest/
>
> https://www.wunc.org/politics/2021-11-02/nc-democrats-walk-out-protest-republican-house-loftis-gaston-insurrection

LOL, hey dumbass, where are your Democrats who "do it"? As usual,
I don't expect a real answer, just more bullshit. Because, as you may or
may not have figured out by now, they don't exist. You thought this was
so important that you posted about retrumplicans playing hookey twice. I
had already posted about this. This is the reason we passed #113 by a
wide margin.

TB

On 2/2/2024 6:12 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
> In article <upjnvu$2pb3a$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
>>
>> On 2/2/2024 11:01 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
>>> In article <uphdfb$29nec$2@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2/1/2024 6:34 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
>>>>> at the highest levels of government with no repercussions.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://truthsocial.com/@justthenews/posts/111857326400730989
>>>>
>>>> I posted this before I saw Senor Smoke's post. But my point is valid.
>>>
>>> You are just an amazingly dumb shit.
>>
>> Ever look into the mirror lately? As the saying goes, it takes one to
>> know one.
>>
>> Maybe, if I was dumb enough to
>>> sign up for that propaganda source I might see what you're talking
>>> about. I don't.
>>
>> Well you are apparently dumb enough to read the "propaganda". I've never
>> seen anyone who could talk himself into a corner like you can.
>>
>>>
>>> Even if you can prove the Democrats have been racking up a lot of
>>> unexcused absences there is likely to be a simple explaination. They
>>> must have done it before we passed measure 113.
>>>
>>> TB
>>
>>
>> "...Democrats have been racking up a lot of unexcused absences". I can't
>> find that anywhere in my post. I may have to again change your moniker.
>> This time to "TB Schiff". You make up as much as old Adam did.
>>
>> FYI. I'm a stay and fight guy. I don't think either side should be
>> walking out when they disagree. Maybe arm wrestling, tug-of-war, or even
>> tiddly winks could be a way of solving differences. Name calling, e.g.,
>> "amazingly dumb shit" would be an amazingly dumb shit way though.
>>
>> By the way, I wasn't referring to just The Garden of Oregon:
>>
>> https://www.texastribune.org/2021/07/14/texas-democrats-walkout-quorum/
>>
>> https://tennesseelookout.com/2023/08/28/democrats-walk-out-over-jones-silencing-as-house-senate-remain-in-stalemate/
>>
>> https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408920-democrats-walk-out-of-hearing-room-in-protest/
>>
>> https://www.wunc.org/politics/2021-11-02/nc-democrats-walk-out-protest-republican-house-loftis-gaston-insurrection
>
> LOL, hey dumbass, where are your Democrats who "do it"? As usual,
> I don't expect a real answer, just more bullshit. Because, as you may or
> may not have figured out by now, they don't exist. You thought this was
> so important that you posted about retrumplicans playing hookey twice. I
> had already posted about this. This is the reason we passed #113 by a
> wide margin.
>
> TB

Can you not read? Who do you think the stories in those links are
referencing? Good Lord Almighty. And you have the nerve to call me a
dumbass.
--
"There are none so blind as liberals who will not see"

In article <upk960$2vhmf$2@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
>
> On 2/2/2024 6:12 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
> > In article <upjnvu$2pb3a$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
> >>
> >> On 2/2/2024 11:01 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
> >>> In article <uphdfb$29nec$2@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2/1/2024 6:34 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
> >>>>> at the highest levels of government with no repercussions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://truthsocial.com/@justthenews/posts/111857326400730989
> >>>>
> >>>> I posted this before I saw Senor Smoke's post. But my point is valid.
> >>>
> >>> You are just an amazingly dumb shit.
> >>
> >> Ever look into the mirror lately? As the saying goes, it takes one to
> >> know one.
> >>
> >> Maybe, if I was dumb enough to
> >>> sign up for that propaganda source I might see what you're talking
> >>> about. I don't.
> >>
> >> Well you are apparently dumb enough to read the "propaganda". I've never
> >> seen anyone who could talk himself into a corner like you can.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Even if you can prove the Democrats have been racking up a lot of
> >>> unexcused absences there is likely to be a simple explaination. They
> >>> must have done it before we passed measure 113.
> >>>
> >>> TB
> >>
> >>
> >> "...Democrats have been racking up a lot of unexcused absences". I can't
> >> find that anywhere in my post. I may have to again change your moniker.
> >> This time to "TB Schiff". You make up as much as old Adam did.
> >>
> >> FYI. I'm a stay and fight guy. I don't think either side should be
> >> walking out when they disagree. Maybe arm wrestling, tug-of-war, or even
> >> tiddly winks could be a way of solving differences. Name calling, e.g.,
> >> "amazingly dumb shit" would be an amazingly dumb shit way though.
> >>
> >> By the way, I wasn't referring to just The Garden of Oregon:
> >>
> >> https://www.texastribune.org/2021/07/14/texas-democrats-walkout-quorum/
> >>
> >> https://tennesseelookout.com/2023/08/28/democrats-walk-out-over-jones-silencing-as-house-senate-remain-in-stalemate/
> >>
> >> https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408920-democrats-walk-out-of-hearing-room-in-protest/

lol You couldn't read a simple paragraph correctly. But you
managed to come up with a small amount of dirt on Democrats, without
Fakes News providing an answer. I am impressed. I didn't think you had
it in you.

However, none of those people live in Oregon and they don't have
anything to do with our solution to the problem. This is yet more
irrelevant bullshit.

TB

Technobarbarian <technobarbarian@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article <upk960$2vhmf$2@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
>>
>> On 2/2/2024 6:12 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
>>> In article <upjnvu$2pb3a$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2/2/2024 11:01 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
>>>>> In article <uphdfb$29nec$2@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/1/2024 6:34 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
>>>>>>> at the highest levels of government with no repercussions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://truthsocial.com/@justthenews/posts/111857326400730989
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I posted this before I saw Senor Smoke's post. But my point is valid.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are just an amazingly dumb shit.
>>>>
>>>> Ever look into the mirror lately? As the saying goes, it takes one to
>>>> know one.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe, if I was dumb enough to
>>>>> sign up for that propaganda source I might see what you're talking
>>>>> about. I don't.
>>>>
>>>> Well you are apparently dumb enough to read the "propaganda". I've never
>>>> seen anyone who could talk himself into a corner like you can.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Even if you can prove the Democrats have been racking up a lot of
>>>>> unexcused absences there is likely to be a simple explaination. They
>>>>> must have done it before we passed measure 113.
>>>>>
>>>>> TB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "...Democrats have been racking up a lot of unexcused absences". I can't
>>>> find that anywhere in my post. I may have to again change your moniker.
>>>> This time to "TB Schiff". You make up as much as old Adam did.
>>>>
>>>> FYI. I'm a stay and fight guy. I don't think either side should be
>>>> walking out when they disagree. Maybe arm wrestling, tug-of-war, or even
>>>> tiddly winks could be a way of solving differences. Name calling, e.g.,
>>>> "amazingly dumb shit" would be an amazingly dumb shit way though.
>>>>
>>>> By the way, I wasn't referring to just The Garden of Oregon:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.texastribune.org/2021/07/14/texas-democrats-walkout-quorum/
>>>>
>>>> https://tennesseelookout.com/2023/08/28/democrats-walk-out-over-jones-silencing-as-house-senate-remain-in-stalemate/
>>>>
>>>> https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408920-democrats-walk-out-of-hearing-room-in-protest/
>
> lol You couldn't read a simple paragraph correctly. But you
> managed to come up with a small amount of dirt on Democrats, without
> Fakes News providing an answer. I am impressed. I didn't think you had
> it in you.
>
> However, none of those people live in Oregon and they don't have
> anything to do with our solution to the problem. This is yet more
> irrelevant bullshit.
>
> TB
>

Well, I guess you’re back to being Señor Dodge. Old habits are hard to
break.

--
Everyone has the right to be stupid but liberals tend to abuse that right.

In article <uplis2$35jm8$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.net says...
>
> Well, I guess you?re back to being Señor Dodge. Old habits are hard to
> break.
>

LOL. dodging? Your orignal post, that was so important that you had
to post the same link twice--is pointless. It was doubly pointless
because you can't read and comprehend simple English. Your latest post
is further proof of how pointless it was. I'm not going to ask what you
think your point was, because I know that would be pointless.

But hey, you be you. Just keep dancing and dodging.

TB

On 2/3/2024 11:58 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
> In article <uplis2$35jm8$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.net says...
>>
>> Well, I guess you?re back to being Señor Dodge. Old habits are hard to
>> break.
>>
>
> LOL. dodging? Your orignal post, that was so important that you had
> to post the same link twice--is pointless. It was doubly pointless
> because you can't read and comprehend simple English. Your latest post
> is further proof of how pointless it was. I'm not going to ask what you
> think your point was, because I know that would be pointless.
>
> But hey, you be you. Just keep dancing and dodging.
>
> TB

Yawn.
--
"There are none so blind as liberals who will not see"