France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.

Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.

Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.

Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.

Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.

Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.

Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.

No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.

No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.

In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.

>Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.

>Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.

>Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.

>Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.

>Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.

>Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.

If you're in the gulag do you still have to vote?

>No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.

All those democracies... I'm sure they'd love to vote out the Saud
family.

>No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.

>In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
>to get instituted everywhere.

Just because your pets got blank ballots in your state doesn't make it
poorly implemented everywhere else in the country. Republican party
officials are complete morons for NOT convincing their partisans to vote
by mail. It's votes in the bank!

Democrats don't get an advantage from mail-in voting.

On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:02:06 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>>France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>
>>Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>
>>Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.

Except if you live outside the country. Also everyone age 16 and older
is obligated to vote.

>>Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
>>Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
>>Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
>>Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>
>If you're in the gulag do you still have to vote?
>
>>No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>
>All those democracies... I'm sure they'd love to vote out the Saud
>family.
>
>>No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>
>>In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
>>to get instituted everywhere.
>
>Just because your pets got blank ballots in your state doesn't make it
>poorly implemented everywhere else in the country. Republican party
>officials are complete morons for NOT convincing their partisans to vote
>by mail. It's votes in the bank!
>
>Democrats don't get an advantage from mail-in voting.

On 2024-03-28 02:20:54 +0000, shawn said:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:02:06 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>
> Except if you live outside the country. Also everyone age 16 and older
> is obligated to vote.
>
>>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>
>> If you're in the gulag do you still have to vote?
>>
>>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>
>> All those democracies... I'm sure they'd love to vote out the Saud
>> family.
>>
>>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
>>> damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
>>
>> Just because your pets got blank ballots in your state doesn't make it
>> poorly implemented everywhere else in the country. Republican party
>> officials are complete morons for NOT convincing their partisans to vote
>> by mail. It's votes in the bank!
>>
>> Democrats don't get an advantage from mail-in voting.

In New Zealand there is mail-in voting for some 'lesser important
things', such as government referrendums on various, usually
ridiculous, topics.

For the election of government, mail-in voting is one option for
citizens overseas at the time, but those in New Zealand must visit a
voting station in person.

There is no e-voting system here either.

On 3/27/24 8:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>
> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>
> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>
> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>
> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>
> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>
> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
> to get instituted everywhere.

I thought you were a "patriot?" You're saying we're no better than
France or Mexico? How fucked in the head are you dude?

On 3/27/24 8:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>
> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>
> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>
> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>
> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>
> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>
> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
> to get instituted everywhere.

P.S. it sure looks like a whole bunch of other European countries were
left off the list.

atropos@mac.com wrote:

>France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>
>Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>
>Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>
>Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
>Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
>Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
>Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>
>No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>
>No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.

After AlGore failed to steal the election in 2000, a committee on preventing
voter fraud determined that there mail-in voting was exceptionally vulnerable
to fraud.

>In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
>damnedest to get instituted everywhere.

Voter fraud is how Democrats win elections.

--
Let's go Brandon!

ahk@chinet.com wrote:
>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>>France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>
>>Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>
>>Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>
>>Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>
>>Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>
>>Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>
>>Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>
>>No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>
>>No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>
>>In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
>>damnedestto get instituted everywhere.
>
>Just because your pets got blank ballots in your state doesn't make it
>poorly implemented everywhere else in the country. Republican party
>officials are complete morons for NOT convincing their partisans to vote
>by mail. It's votes in the bank!

No, mail-in voting is proven to be unreliable.

>Democrats don't get an advantage from mail-in voting.

TROLL-O-METER
5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9
2* *10
1* | *stuporous
0* -*- *catatonic
* |\ *comatose
* \ *clinical death
* \ *biological death
* _\/ *demonic apparition
* * *damned for all eternity

[Kerman's incorrect formatting fixed.]

On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 01:41:40 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>
>Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>
>Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>
>Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
>Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
>Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
>Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>
>No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>
>No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>
>In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
>to get instituted everywhere.
>

There is little to no need for mail in voting. Libs are for it
because it allows for nearly untraceable fraud.

On 3/28/24 6:31 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 01:41:40 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>
>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>
>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>
>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>
>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>
>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>
>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>
>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>
>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>
>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
>> to get instituted everywhere.
>>
>
> There is little to no need for mail in voting. Libs are for it
> because it allows for nearly untraceable fraud.

You prefer the traceable kind like the insurrection.

On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>
> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>
> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>
> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>
> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>
> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>
> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
> to get instituted everywhere.
>
>

Because it's legal to vote by mail, and it works fine. No fraud, except
in diseased minds.

Eight states: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah,
Vermont and Washington and the District of Columbia—allow all elections
to be conducted entirely by mail.

So what?

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 3/28/24 8:11 AM, trotsky wrote:
> On 3/28/24 6:31 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 01:41:40 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
>>> damnedest
>>> to get instituted everywhere.
>>>
>>
>> There is little to no need for mail in voting.  Libs are for it
>> because it allows for nearly untraceable fraud.
>
>
> You prefer the traceable kind like the insurrection.

Now he's found something he likes about all the Middle Eastern countries
and Russia.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>
> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>
> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>
> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>
> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>
> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>
> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>
> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
> to get instituted everywhere.
>
>

Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?

Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.

Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 3/28/24 9:20 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>
>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>
>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>
>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>
>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>
>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>
>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>
>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>
>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>
>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
>> damnedest
>> to get instituted everywhere.
>>
>>
>
> Because it's legal to vote by mail, and it works fine.  No fraud, except
> in diseased minds.
>
> Eight states: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah,
> Vermont and Washington and the District of Columbia—allow all elections
> to be conducted entirely by mail.
>
> So what?

I'm moderately amazed. Trump tried to coerce the Georgia SoS to find
"extra votes" for him and these stupid motherfuckers are talking about
voting by mail. If they don't have the fucking balls to talk about the
facts in evidence they should shut their fucking mouths.

On 3/28/24 9:21 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/28/24 8:11 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 3/28/24 6:31 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 01:41:40 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>>>
>>>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>>>
>>>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>>>
>>>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>>>
>>>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>>>
>>>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>>>
>>>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
>>>> damnedest
>>>> to get instituted everywhere.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There is little to no need for mail in voting.  Libs are for it
>>> because it allows for nearly untraceable fraud.
>>
>>
>> You prefer the traceable kind like the insurrection.
>
> Now he's found something he likes about all the Middle Eastern countries
> and Russia.
>

I heard Pubie is planning on voting for Netanyahu by mail.

On 3/28/24 9:48 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>
>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>
>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>
>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>
>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>
>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>
>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>
>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>
>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>
>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
>> damnedest
>> to get instituted everywhere.
>>
>>
>
> Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
> and put it in a big wine jar?
>
> Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
> out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
> it was received and accepted.
>
> Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
> are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
>

Hey do you think these putrid schmucks are trashing voting by mail
because Trump already put Louis DeJoy in place to trash the Post Office?

On 3/28/24 11:20 AM, trotsky wrote:
> On 3/28/24 9:48 AM, FPP wrote:
>> On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
>>> damnedest
>>> to get instituted everywhere.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
>> pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
>>
>> Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling
>> it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you
>> can see it was received and accepted.
>>
>> Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
>> are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
>>
>
>
> Hey do you think these putrid schmucks are trashing voting by mail
> because Trump already put Louis DeJoy in place to trash the Post Office?

P.S. I wonder if this uber retards are trying to say instead of vote by
mail there should be vote by border crossing.,

In article <uu3vv9$3kt4j$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

> > France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
> >
> > Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
> >
> > Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
> >
> > Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
> >
> > Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
> >
> > Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
> >
> > Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
> >
> > No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
> >
> > No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
> >
> > In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
> > their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
> >
> Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
> and put it in a big wine jar?

> Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
> out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
> it was received and accepted.
>
> Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
> are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.

And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.

How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:11:20 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

>On 3/28/24 6:31 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 01:41:40 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
>>> to get instituted everywhere.
>>>
>>
>> There is little to no need for mail in voting. Libs are for it
>> because it allows for nearly untraceable fraud.
>
>
>You prefer the traceable kind like the insurrection.

Analogy fail. Please try again.

On 3/29/24 6:24 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:11:20 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/28/24 6:31 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 01:41:40 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>>>
>>>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>>>
>>>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>>>
>>>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>>>
>>>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>>>
>>>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>>>
>>>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
>>>> to get instituted everywhere.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There is little to no need for mail in voting. Libs are for it
>>> because it allows for nearly untraceable fraud.
>>
>>
>> You prefer the traceable kind like the insurrection.
>
> Analogy fail. Please try again.

Intellectual bankruptcy as expected.

On 3/28/24 12:16 PM, trotsky wrote:
> On 3/28/24 9:20 AM, FPP wrote:
>> On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
>>> damnedest
>>> to get instituted everywhere.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Because it's legal to vote by mail, and it works fine.  No fraud,
>> except in diseased minds.
>>
>> Eight states: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah,
>> Vermont and Washington and the District of Columbia—allow all
>> elections to be conducted entirely by mail.
>>
>> So what?
>
>
> I'm moderately amazed.  Trump tried to coerce the Georgia SoS to find
> "extra votes" for him and these stupid motherfuckers are talking about
> voting by mail.  If they don't have the fucking balls to talk about the
> facts in evidence they should shut their fucking mouths.
>

They're going to fucking lose again. Thanny is just laying the
groundwork for when he storms the capitol.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 3/28/24 1:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uu3vv9$3kt4j$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>
>>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>>
>>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>
>>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>>
>>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
>>> their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
>>>
>> Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
>> and put it in a big wine jar?
>
>> Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
>> out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
>> it was received and accepted.
>>
>> Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
>> are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
>
> And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
> California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
> not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
> *losing* them.
>
> How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
>

By math, stupid. The same way they go up.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 3/29/24 9:27 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/28/24 12:16 PM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 3/28/24 9:20 AM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>>>
>>>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>>>
>>>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>>>
>>>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>>>
>>>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>>>
>>>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>>>
>>>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
>>>> damnedest
>>>> to get instituted everywhere.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Because it's legal to vote by mail, and it works fine.  No fraud,
>>> except in diseased minds.
>>>
>>> Eight states: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah,
>>> Vermont and Washington and the District of Columbia—allow all
>>> elections to be conducted entirely by mail.
>>>
>>> So what?
>>
>>
>> I'm moderately amazed.  Trump tried to coerce the Georgia SoS to find
>> "extra votes" for him and these stupid motherfuckers are talking about
>> voting by mail.  If they don't have the fucking balls to talk about
>> the facts in evidence they should shut their fucking mouths.
>>
>
> They're going to fucking lose again.  Thanny is just laying the
> groundwork for when he storms the capitol.

Without the Russian troll farms spewing disinformation like they did in
'16 I don't think Trump can win either.

In article <uu6j76$b577$14@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 3/28/24 1:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <uu3vv9$3kt4j$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >
> >>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
> >>>
> >>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
> >>>
> >>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
> >>>
> >>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
> >>>
> >>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
> >>>
> >>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
> >>>
> >>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
> >>>
> >>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
> >>>
> >>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
> >>>
> >>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
> >>> their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
> >>>
> >> Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
> >> and put it in a big wine jar?
> >
> >> Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
> >> out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
> >> it was received and accepted.
> >>
> >> Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
> >> are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
> >
> > And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
> > California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
> > not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
> > *losing* them.
> >
> > How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
> >
> By math, stupid. The same way they go up.

How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?

If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:27:17 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>In article <uu6j76$b577$14@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On 3/28/24 1:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> > In article <uu3vv9$3kt4j$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> >
>> >>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>> >>>
>> >>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>> >>>
>> >>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>> >>>
>> >>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>> >>>
>> >>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>> >>>
>> >>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>> >>>
>> >>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>> >>>
>> >>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>> >>>
>> >>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
>> >>> their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
>> >>>
>> >> Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
>> >> and put it in a big wine jar?
>> >
>> >> Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
>> >> out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
>> >> it was received and accepted.
>> >>
>> >> Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
>> >> are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
>> >
>> > And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
>> > California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
>> > not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
>> > *losing* them.
>> >
>> > How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
>> >
>> By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
>
>How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
>total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
>them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
>total?
>
>If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
>checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
>last check-in than there were at the first?

Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.