jmcquown wrote:
> On 9/20/2022 11:56 PM, Michael Trew wrote:
>> On 9/20/2022 19:20, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 9/20/2022 6:01 PM, Michael Trew wrote:
>>>> On 9/20/2022 7:45, Gary wrote:
>>>>> On 9/20/2022 3:41 AM, fos wrote:
>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>> Michael, it's not attractive when you try to stir up someone
>>>>>>> whose
>>>>>>> posts you claim you don't want to see.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> you mean like you do with kuthe's posts daily, hypocrite?
>>>>>
>>>>> No kidding. Jill isn't
>>>>
>>>> You're not replying to the real FOS.  Either way, CB's is correct
>>>> here.  It's massively hypocritical for someone to say that you
>>>> shouldn't comment on someone who you don't want to see, then do
>>>> the
>>>> *very same* thing with JK's posts.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry, I don't have any idea who you're talking about when you
>>> mention CB. I also was not aware there is a "real" FOS whose
>>> comments
>>> should be credited.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> The poster FOS, is being forged by CB, as happens on occasion.Â
>> I left it quoted above.  FOS did not make the post above, it's
>> forged.
>>
>> Were you not a member of RFC when Casa Bona was posting under his
>> own name?  He only forgers active member's nyms from time to
>> time.  He's used both yours and mine in the recent past.
>
> Oh... you were referring to the Casa Boner troll.  Sorry, I don't
> think about him and I sure as heck never referred to him as "CB".
>
> Jill
>

Thanks for clearing that up YRH.

On 9/22/2022 5:16 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 9/20/2022 11:56 PM, Michael Trew wrote:
>> On 9/20/2022 19:20, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 9/20/2022 6:01 PM, Michael Trew wrote:
>>>> On 9/20/2022 7:45, Gary wrote:
>>>>> On 9/20/2022 3:41 AM, fos wrote:
>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>> Michael, it's not attractive when you try to stir up someone whose
>>>>>>> posts you claim you don't want to see.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> you mean like you do with kuthe's posts daily, hypocrite?
>>>>>
>>>>> No kidding. Jill isn't
>>>>
>>>> You're not replying to the real FOS.  Either way, CB's is correct
>>>> here.  It's massively hypocritical for someone to say that you
>>>> shouldn't comment on someone who you don't want to see, then do the
>>>> *very same* thing with JK's posts.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry, I don't have any idea who you're talking about when you
>>> mention CB. I also was not aware there is a "real" FOS whose comments
>>> should be credited.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> The poster FOS, is being forged by CB, as happens on occasion.  I left
>> it quoted above.  FOS did not make the post above, it's forged.
>>
>> Were you not a member of RFC when Casa Bona was posting under his own
>> name?  He only forgers active member's nyms from time to time.  He's
>> used both yours and mine in the recent past.
>
> Oh... you were referring to the Casa Boner troll.  Sorry, I don't think
> about him and I sure as heck never referred to him as "CB".
>
> Jill
>

By the way, I don't see those posts and don't give Casa Boner a thought
because my killfiles work just fine. Those include 'fos' and the
interations since there is nothing of interest there. Okay with you?

Jill

jmcquown wrote:
> On 9/20/2022 11:53 PM, Michael Trew wrote:
>> On 9/20/2022 19:19, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 9/20/2022 7:45 AM, Gary wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Her Queen of 70 years just died, Michael.
>>>
>>> So JanetUK has gone into a non-posting mourning? That's an odd
>>> thought.
>>> Haven't seen Ophelia, either. Do you suppose those two nemeses
>>> are both
>>> in UK mourning? Certainly not together. Heh.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> I doubt it, with either of them.  Ophelia is probably sick of
>> constantly being harassed on here.  She only pops in on
>> occasion.  It's unusual that I haven't seen a Janet UK posted
>> quoted in like a month.  She's normally on John posts like a fly
>> on you-know-what.
>
>
> Ophelia was quite prolific and being "harrassed" never stopped her.
> Then again, she and her husband tend to split their time between
> England and Scotland.
>
> Jill
>

Your majesty will surely shit if she buys a vacation home on dataw.

What will your neighbors think?

Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2022-09-22 5:16 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
>> On 9/20/2022 11:56 PM, Michael Trew wrote:
>>> On 9/20/2022 19:20, jmcquown wrote:
>>>> On 9/20/2022 6:01 PM, Michael Trew wrote:
>>>>> On 9/20/2022 7:45, Gary wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/20/2022 3:41 AM, fos wrote:
>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>> Michael, it's not attractive when you try to stir up
>>>>>>>> someone whose
>>>>>>>> posts you claim you don't want to see.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> you mean like you do with kuthe's posts daily, hypocrite?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No kidding. Jill isn't
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not replying to the real FOS.  Either way, CB's is
>>>>> correct
>>>>> here.  It's massively hypocritical for someone to say that you
>>>>> shouldn't comment on someone who you don't want to see, then
>>>>> do the
>>>>> *very same* thing with JK's posts.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, I don't have any idea who you're talking about when you
>>>> mention CB. I also was not aware there is a "real" FOS whose
>>>> comments
>>>> should be credited.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>
>>> The poster FOS, is being forged by CB, as happens on occasion.Â
>>> I left it quoted above.  FOS did not make the post above, it's
>>> forged.
>>>
>>> Were you not a member of RFC when Casa Bona was posting under
>>> his own name?  He only forgers active member's nyms from time
>>> to time.  He's used both yours and mine in the recent past.
>>
>> Oh... you were referring to the Casa Boner troll.  Sorry, I
>> don't think about him and I sure as heck never referred to him as
>> "CB".
>>
>>
>
> Curious that Michael would know about him because he was a major
> asshole years ago, long before Michael showed up here.
>

He learns fast. Hell, he knows about you.

On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 19:33:18 -0400, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>
wrote:

>On 9/22/2022 5:16 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>
>> Oh... you were referring to the Casa Boner troll.  Sorry, I don't think
>> about him and I sure as heck never referred to him as "CB".
>>
>> Jill
>
>By the way, I don't see those posts and don't give Casa Boner a thought
>because my killfiles work just fine. Those include 'fos' and the
>interations since there is nothing of interest there. Okay with you?
>
>Jill

Why do you ask yourself that?

On 9/22/2022 19:25, jmcquown wrote:
> On 9/22/2022 6:21 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2022-09-22 5:16 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 9/20/2022 11:56 PM, Michael Trew wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Were you not a member of RFC when Casa Bona was posting under
>>>> his own name? He only forgers active member's nyms from time
>>>> to time. He's used both yours and mine in the recent past.
>>>
>>> Oh... you were referring to the Casa Boner troll. Sorry, I don't
>>> think about him and I sure as heck never referred to him as
>>> "CB".
>>
>> Curious that Michael would know about him because he was a major
>> asshole years ago, long before Michael showed up here.

Still is, and is still posting, but under other people's nyms. You've
mistake several posts of his in the past for me, forged under my nym.

> Micheal Googles things. Steve occasionally mentions the Casa Boner
> troll; I didn't equate the initials "CB".
>
> Jill

I did search several old posts to compare, but yes, I have seen the name
posted here before. I don't know what else to call him, but the posting
style matches up many of the forged posts. He gets a bee in his bonnet
over a specific poster, and uses their Nym for a few weeks until he gets
bored. Same one who continually shares a photo-shopped Sheldon picture
(and sometimes a photo-shopped picture of Sheldon's wife).

On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:00:56 -0400, Michael Trew
<michael.trew@att.net> wrote:

>On 9/22/2022 19:25, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 9/22/2022 6:21 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> Curious that Michael would know about him because he was a major
>>> asshole years ago, long before Michael showed up here.
>
>Still is, and is still posting, but under other people's nyms. You've
>mistake several posts of his in the past for me, forged under my nym.
>
>> Micheal Googles things. Steve occasionally mentions the Casa Boner
>> troll; I didn't equate the initials "CB".
>>
>> Jill
>
>I did search several old posts to compare, but yes, I have seen the name
>posted here before. I don't know what else to call him, but the posting
>style matches up many of the forged posts. He gets a bee in his bonnet
>over a specific poster, and uses their Nym for a few weeks until he gets
>bored. Same one who continually shares a photo-shopped Sheldon picture
>(and sometimes a photo-shopped picture of Sheldon's wife).

And a picture of Greg, but that one hasn't been photoshopped.

On 9/23/2022 12:00 AM, Michael Trew wrote:
> On 9/22/2022 19:25, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 9/22/2022 6:21 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2022-09-22 5:16 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
>>>> On 9/20/2022 11:56 PM, Michael Trew wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Were you not a member of RFC when Casa Bona was posting under
>>>>> his own name?  He only forgers active member's nyms from time
>>>>> to time. He's used both yours and mine in the recent past.
>>>>
>>>> Oh... you were referring to the Casa Boner troll.  Sorry, I don't
>>>>  think about him and I sure as heck never referred to him as
>>>> "CB".
>>>
>>> Curious that Michael would know about him because he was a major
>>> asshole years ago, long before Michael showed up here.
>
> Still is, and is still posting, but under other people's nyms.  You've
> mistake several posts of his in the past for me, forged under my nym.
>
>> Micheal Googles things. Steve occasionally mentions the Casa Boner
>> troll; I didn't equate the initials "CB".
>>
>> Jill
>
> I did search several old posts to compare, but yes, I have seen the name
> posted here before.  I don't know what else to call him, but the posting
> style matches up many of the forged posts.  He gets a bee in his bonnet
> over a specific poster, and uses their Nym for a few weeks until he gets
> bored.  Same one who continually shares a photo-shopped Sheldon picture
> (and sometimes a photo-shopped picture of Sheldon's wife).

Sorry, I don't see those posts. I've never seen a photo-shopped picture
of Sheldon or his wife. Killfiles exist for a reason. If I have
accidentally replied to a forged post which was allegedly from you, my bad.

Jill

On 2022-09-23, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

> Sorry, I don't see those posts. I've never seen a photo-shopped picture
> of Sheldon or his wife. Killfiles exist for a reason. If I have
> accidentally replied to a forged post which was allegedly from you, my bad.

Michael never changes his email address.

consider using that information for filtering. i never see the forgeries
using his name.

news server admins will nuke the accounts of people who forge legit email
addresses once the addresses are verified.

HTH

--
fos@sdf.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - https://sdf.org

On Saturday, September 17, 2022 at 1:46:34 AM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:
> On Friday, September 16, 2022 at 6:06:26 PM UTC-10, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, September 16, 2022 at 4:12:38 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > > On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 7:10:50 AM UTC-10, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> > > > Saw something on line that to make a fluffy scrambled egg, put a dash of
> > > > lemon juice in. The acid reacts with the way the protein in the albumen
> > > > reacts. Tried it this morning.
> > > >
> > > > My eggs are usually fluffy but just a squeeze of lemon seemed to make a
> > > > little difference. Stirred as usual but I could see a difference as thy
> > > > were setting up.
> > > >
> > > > I'll try it again just to see. As it is, my eggs are fluffy enough that
> > > > I enjoy them anyway.
> > > Breakfast this morning was Mexican chorizo and eggs. I like to wrap it in a tortilla and fry it.
> > >
> > > https://photos.app.goo.gl/RFze3sCQKphpFBX7A
> > >
> > Was it *real* Mexican chorizo? Was it lymph nodes
> > and salivary glands? Was it beef lymph nodes and
> > salivary glands?
> > https://meatified.com/home-made-chorizo-paleo-style/grocery-store-chorizo/
> > Or was it pork lymph nodes and salivary glands?
> > https://i.stack.imgur.com/AYGFe.png
> >
> > --Bryan
> It was pork. It's gotta be pork in my book. It looked like they were using extra lymph nodes in the chorizo these days. It was the Reynaldo's brand chorizo. There's also soy chorizo for Mexicans that are squeamish.

I think chorizo is just Salami packaged and seasoned differently.

On Friday, September 23, 2022 at 8:39:45 AM UTC-10, bruce bowser wrote:
>
> I think chorizo is just Salami packaged and seasoned differently.

Some chorizo are smoked and dried like salami. The Mexican chorizo is an entirely different animal. I don't even know how they call call it a "sausage."

https://photos.app.goo.gl/5BzruELY9ra62Y5C9

On 9/23/2022 10:21, jmcquown wrote:
> On 9/23/2022 12:00 AM, Michael Trew wrote:
>>
>> I did search several old posts to compare, but yes, I have seen the
>> name posted here before. I don't know what else to call him, but the
>> posting style matches up many of the forged posts. He gets a bee in
>> his bonnet over a specific poster, and uses their Nym for a few weeks
>> until he gets bored. Same one who continually shares a photo-shopped
>> Sheldon picture (and sometimes a photo-shopped picture of Sheldon's
>> wife).
>
> Sorry, I don't see those posts. I've never seen a photo-shopped picture
> of Sheldon or his wife. Killfiles exist for a reason. If I have
> accidentally replied to a forged post which was allegedly from you, my bad.
>
> Jill

It wasn't you, my comment about accidental replies was directed at Dave.
Once or twice is a mistake. I don't mean to go on, but Dave mistook
them at least half a dozen times in the past; probably more.

I don't think that my version of Thunderbird has the same kill-file
capabilities that yours does, which is unfortunate. I can filter e-mail
addresses and nym, that's about it. I really like my version, so that
isn't a big enough deal breaker to merit me upgrading.