On 2022-10-15, GM <gregorymorrowchicago07@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 7:30:07 PM UTC-5, Mike Duffy wrote:

>> On 2022-10-14, GM <gregorymorr...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> > Hard times create strong men
>> > Strong men create good times
>> > Good times create weak men
>> > Weak men create hard times
>>
>> For some reason, for me that brings to mind:
>>
>> d/dx (+ sin x) = + cos x
>> d/dx (+ cos x) = - sin x
>> d/dx (- sin x) = - cos x
>> d/dx (- cos x) = + sin x
>
> Mike, you are the "brain" of this here group...
> we are honoured to have ya here amongst our midst...
>
> O:-)

I know you're kidding because of the smiley.

But the above boil down to

d/dx (exp(x)) = exp(x)

if you define x as a complex number.

The exp function is the only function
that is both its own derivative and integral.

In other words, men and the times
they live in are both the cause and
the result of themselves.

It's like a propagating electromagnetic
wave where the electic field and
the magnetic field are both the cause
and effect of each other.

Always 90 degrees out of phase
between intent and result,
we are doomed by our very nature
to keep repeating ourselves.

On Sat, 15 Oct 2022 04:41:18 GMT, Mike Duffy <mxduffy@bell.net> wrote:

>On 2022-10-15, GM <gregorymorrowchicago07@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 7:30:07 PM UTC-5, Mike Duffy wrote:
>
>>> On 2022-10-14, GM <gregorymorr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> > Hard times create strong men
>>> > Strong men create good times
>>> > Good times create weak men
>>> > Weak men create hard times
>>>
>>> For some reason, for me that brings to mind:
>>>
>>> d/dx (+ sin x) = + cos x
>>> d/dx (+ cos x) = - sin x
>>> d/dx (- sin x) = - cos x
>>> d/dx (- cos x) = + sin x
>>
>> Mike, you are the "brain" of this here group...
>> we are honoured to have ya here amongst our midst...
>>
>> O:-)
>
>I know you're kidding because of the smiley.

Yup, clearly the brain.

--
Bruce
<https://emalm.com/?v=SQqZJ>

On 2022-10-14, dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
>
> My father-in-law was like Cindy. He was a crackerjack programmer
> but abstract thinking was not his bag.

Programming is _all_ abstract thinking.

> I see you referred to me in the third person - a faux pas. I can
> tell social interaction is not your bag.

Or it might just mean he doesn't think very much of you.

--
Cindy Hamilton

On Sat, 15 Oct 2022 09:08:40 GMT, Cindy Hamilton
<hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:

>On 2022-10-14, dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
>>
>> My father-in-law was like Cindy. He was a crackerjack programmer
>> but abstract thinking was not his bag.
>
>Programming is _all_ abstract thinking.
>
>> I see you referred to me in the third person - a faux pas. I can
>> tell social interaction is not your bag.
>
>Or it might just mean he doesn't think very much of you.

I had no dubious intentions.

--
Bruce
<https://emalm.com/?v=SQqZJ>

On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 8:02:49 PM UTC-5, Hank Rogers wrote:
> cshenk wrote:
> > dsi1 wrote:
> >
> >> On Thursday, October 13, 2022 at 3:27:47 PM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> >>> On 2022-10-13 8:44 p.m., dsi1 wrote:
> >>>> On Thursday, October 13, 2022 at 2:36:17 PM UTC-10, GM wrote:
> >>>>> Remember when "dsi1" chided us for being "mean" to John...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That we were "interfering" with him getting "employment"...???
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -- GM
> >>>>
> >>>> Indeed you could expose yourself to a lawsuit if you slander and
> >>>> prevent a person from getting gainful employment.
> >>> It is only slander if it is false.
> >>>> That's not a such a
> >>>> difficult concept, is it? Of course your defense would be that
> >>>> you're clinically insane and therefore not responsible for your
> >>>> actions. Luckily, you have all your posts on rfc to back up your
> >>>> defense.
> >>> Well, that's the thing about it. Referring to things he has posted
> >>> in an open forum is just ratting him out. Normally, that might be a
> >>> bad thing. Exsposing the guy's comments about French kissing with
> >>> old ladies and lascivious comments about young children might be
> >>> more of a public duty.
> >>
> >> You sound like you're unaware of some of the wacky things that people
> >> post here. A lot of it isn't true and most of it doesn't amount to a
> >> pile of doodoo. OTOH, preventing someone from getting a job is
> >> serious business and some people here may find themselves having to
> >> prove that the shit they're flinging is true. I doubt that reading
> >> something on rfc is proof of anything. This is not rocket science.
> >
> > Exactly. People tred a fine line here on this. Steve wertz is in my
> > permanent killfile because he actually called John's workplace to get
> > him fired and he was let go not long after. It was the lowest thing I
> > have ever seen anyone here do.
> >
> You are a phony.
>
> Why haven't *YOU* hired kuth as your live-in nurse?
>
> You damn sure need one, and he works cheap.
>
Hank, old Shinklehooper hasn't kicked the bucket yet.
She's still being serviced in the manner to which she
has become accustomed. John is the backup, and you
can bet that she'll love "every single lick and stroke."

--Bryan

Bryan Simmons wrote:
> Hank, old Shinklehooper hasn't kicked the bucket yet.
>
> --Bryan
>
What!? Your death wishes have failed you?!

On Saturday, October 15, 2022 at 5:23:26 AM UTC-5, Jarvis Greer wrote:
> Bryan Simmons wrote:
> > Hank, old Shinklehooper hasn't kicked the bucket yet.
> >
> > --Bryan
> >
> What!? Your death wishes have failed you?!
>
I didn't *wish* death upon old Shinklehooper, but like
Dave "Dead Man Posting" Smith, I doubt he's long for
this world. Besides:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIa_T4kERiI

--Bryan

On 10/14/2022 8:22 PM, cshenk wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>
>> On 10/13/2022 1:45 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2022-10-13 11:53 a.m., Gary wrote:
>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> Your speculation about Carol certainly is silly.  I would would
>>>>> call her more kind and very naive.  The fact is she completely
>>>>> missed (or ignored) his posts bragging about getting his
>>>>> medical marijuana card so he could buy "legal weed" from
>>>>> Jane's Dispensary.  He was not talking about CBD oil.
>>>>
>>>> Carol doesn't read all posts and neither do you.
>>>
>>> That's probably why Jill specifically said that Carole completely
>>> missed (or ignored)  those posts.
>>>
>> That's exactly why I said Carol completely missed or ignored them.
>>
>>>> You both often "jump" into conversations with an opinion, without
>>>> knowing what has been previously said.
>>>
>> I have a rather good memory. :)
>>
>>> That is an interesting comment but it seems to have missed mention
>>> any specifics about what she had missed in that or any other
>>> thread.
>>
>> Carol claimed he was talking about CBD oil (except, in her dislexia,
>> she called it CDB) and that he never said anything about getting a
>> medical marijuna license and buying "legal weed" from Jane's. I
>> don't know how this can be misconstrued since it was based on his own
>> posts. Except if she didn't bother to read them.
>>
>> Jill
>
> I never mentioned a medical marijuana license at at all. I do not read
> every post. I have a life, family and a full work schedule.

Yet you disputed my post when we were discussing him being drug-tested
after bragging about having a medical marijuana card and buying "legal
weed" at Jane's Dispensary and insisted he only ever mentioned CBD oil.
BTW, I have a family, too (albeit not a child), friends, a life. I also
have a job.

Jill

jmcquown wrote:

> On 10/14/2022 8:22 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > jmcquown wrote:
> >
> > > On 10/13/2022 1:45 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> > > > On 2022-10-13 11:53 a.m., Gary wrote:
> > > > > jmcquown wrote:
> > > > > > Your speculation about Carol certainly is silly.  I would
> > > > > > would call her more kind and very naive.  The fact is she
> > > > > > completely missed (or ignored) his posts bragging about
> > > > > > getting his medical marijuana card so he could buy "legal
> > > > > > weed" from Jane's Dispensary.  He was not talking about
> > > > > > CBD oil.
> > > > >
> > > > > Carol doesn't read all posts and neither do you.
> > > >
> > > > That's probably why Jill specifically said that Carole
> > > > completely missed (or ignored)  those posts.
> > > >
> > > That's exactly why I said Carol completely missed or ignored them.
> > >
> > > > > You both often "jump" into conversations with an opinion,
> > > > > without knowing what has been previously said.
> > > >
> > > I have a rather good memory. :)
> > >
> > > > That is an interesting comment but it seems to have missed
> > > > mention any specifics about what she had missed in that or any
> > > > other thread.
> > >
> > > Carol claimed he was talking about CBD oil (except, in her
> > > dislexia, she called it CDB) and that he never said anything
> > > about getting a medical marijuna license and buying "legal weed"
> > > from Jane's. I don't know how this can be misconstrued since it
> > > was based on his own posts. Except if she didn't bother to read
> > > them.
> > >
> > > Jill
> >
> > I never mentioned a medical marijuana license at at all. I do not
> > read every post. I have a life, family and a full work schedule.
>
> Yet you disputed my post when we were discussing him being
> drug-tested after bragging about having a medical marijuana card and
> buying "legal weed" at Jane's Dispensary and insisted he only ever
> mentioned CBD oil. BTW, I have a family, too (albeit not a child),
> friends, a life. I also have a job.
>
> Jill

When was that?

On 10/15/2022 8:57 AM, cshenk wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>
>> On 10/14/2022 8:22 PM, cshenk wrote:
>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/13/2022 1:45 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-10-13 11:53 a.m., Gary wrote:
>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>> Your speculation about Carol certainly is silly.  I would
>>>>>>> would call her more kind and very naive.  The fact is she
>>>>>>> completely missed (or ignored) his posts bragging about
>>>>>>> getting his medical marijuana card so he could buy "legal
>>>>>>> weed" from Jane's Dispensary.  He was not talking about
>>>>>>> CBD oil.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carol doesn't read all posts and neither do you.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's probably why Jill specifically said that Carole
>>>>> completely missed (or ignored)  those posts.
>>>>>
>>>> That's exactly why I said Carol completely missed or ignored them.
>>>>
>>>>>> You both often "jump" into conversations with an opinion,
>>>>>> without knowing what has been previously said.
>>>>>
>>>> I have a rather good memory. :)
>>>>
>>>>> That is an interesting comment but it seems to have missed
>>>>> mention any specifics about what she had missed in that or any
>>>>> other thread.
>>>>
>>>> Carol claimed he was talking about CBD oil (except, in her
>>>> dislexia, she called it CDB) and that he never said anything
>>>> about getting a medical marijuna license and buying "legal weed"
>>>> from Jane's. I don't know how this can be misconstrued since it
>>>> was based on his own posts. Except if she didn't bother to read
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>
>>> I never mentioned a medical marijuana license at at all. I do not
>>> read every post. I have a life, family and a full work schedule.
>>
>> Yet you disputed my post when we were discussing him being
>> drug-tested after bragging about having a medical marijuana card and
>> buying "legal weed" at Jane's Dispensary and insisted he only ever
>> mentioned CBD oil. BTW, I have a family, too (albeit not a child),
>> friends, a life. I also have a job.
>>
>> Jill
>
> When was that?

When was WHAT? John wrote in his subject line he believed he passed the
physical for his new job and someone else (Greg Morrow? then Bryan)
brought up the drug testing thing. I remember John boasting about
buying "legal weed". He even said he thought he could get a job at
Jane's Dispensary as a "Cannabis Nurse". That was about 5 months ago.
It's quite possible he made it all up but hey, he's the one who kept
yapping about it for all the world to see.

Jill

jmcquown wrote:

> On 10/15/2022 8:57 AM, cshenk wrote:
> > jmcquown wrote:
> >
> > > On 10/14/2022 8:22 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > > > jmcquown wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 10/13/2022 1:45 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> > > > > > On 2022-10-13 11:53 a.m., Gary wrote:
> > > > > > > jmcquown wrote:
> > > > > > > > Your speculation about Carol certainly is silly.  I
> > > > > > > > would would call her more kind and very naive.  The
> > > > > > > > fact is she completely missed (or ignored) his posts
> > > > > > > > bragging about getting his medical marijuana card so
> > > > > > > > he could buy "legal weed" from Jane's Dispensary.  He
> > > > > > > > was not talking about CBD oil.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Carol doesn't read all posts and neither do you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's probably why Jill specifically said that Carole
> > > > > > completely missed (or ignored)  those posts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > That's exactly why I said Carol completely missed or ignored
> > > > > them.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > You both often "jump" into conversations with an opinion,
> > > > > > > without knowing what has been previously said.
> > > > > >
> > > > > I have a rather good memory. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > > That is an interesting comment but it seems to have missed
> > > > > > mention any specifics about what she had missed in that or
> > > > > > any other thread.
> > > > >
> > > > > Carol claimed he was talking about CBD oil (except, in her
> > > > > dislexia, she called it CDB) and that he never said anything
> > > > > about getting a medical marijuna license and buying "legal
> > > > > weed" from Jane's. I don't know how this can be misconstrued
> > > > > since it was based on his own posts. Except if she didn't
> > > > > bother to read them.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jill
> > > >
> > > > I never mentioned a medical marijuana license at at all. I do
> > > > not read every post. I have a life, family and a full work
> > > > schedule.
> > >
> > > Yet you disputed my post when we were discussing him being
> > > drug-tested after bragging about having a medical marijuana card
> > > and buying "legal weed" at Jane's Dispensary and insisted he only
> > > ever mentioned CBD oil. BTW, I have a family, too (albeit not a
> > > child), friends, a life. I also have a job.
> > >
> > > Jill
> >
> > When was that?
>
> When was WHAT? John wrote in his subject line he believed he passed
> the physical for his new job and someone else (Greg Morrow? then
> Bryan) brought up the drug testing thing. I remember John boasting
> about buying "legal weed". He even said he thought he could get a
> job at Jane's Dispensary as a "Cannabis Nurse". That was about 5
> months ago. It's quite possible he made it all up but hey, he's the
> one who kept yapping about it for all the world to see.
>
> Jill

I made a recent post that was very short and only talked about cbd oil.
Jill, you aren't a bad person but you live and breathe 'John' way too
much, especially if you drag in a 5 month old conversation.

Can't you understand I read only what interests me and if I have time?

On Saturday, October 15, 2022 at 8:57:52 AM UTC-5, cshenk wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>
> > On 10/15/2022 8:57 AM, cshenk wrote:
> > > jmcquown wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 10/14/2022 8:22 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > > > > jmcquown wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 10/13/2022 1:45 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> > > > > > > On 2022-10-13 11:53 a.m., Gary wrote:
> > > > > > > > jmcquown wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Your speculation about Carol certainly is silly. I
> > > > > > > > > would would call her more kind and very naive. The
> > > > > > > > > fact is she completely missed (or ignored) his posts
> > > > > > > > > bragging about getting his medical marijuana card so
> > > > > > > > > he could buy "legal weed" from Jane's Dispensary. He
> > > > > > > > > was not talking about CBD oil.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Carol doesn't read all posts and neither do you.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's probably why Jill specifically said that Carole
> > > > > > > completely missed (or ignored) those posts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > That's exactly why I said Carol completely missed or ignored
> > > > > > them.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You both often "jump" into conversations with an opinion,
> > > > > > > > without knowing what has been previously said.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > I have a rather good memory. :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > That is an interesting comment but it seems to have missed
> > > > > > > mention any specifics about what she had missed in that or
> > > > > > > any other thread.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Carol claimed he was talking about CBD oil (except, in her
> > > > > > dislexia, she called it CDB) and that he never said anything
> > > > > > about getting a medical marijuna license and buying "legal
> > > > > > weed" from Jane's. I don't know how this can be misconstrued
> > > > > > since it was based on his own posts. Except if she didn't
> > > > > > bother to read them.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jill
> > > > >
> > > > > I never mentioned a medical marijuana license at at all. I do
> > > > > not read every post. I have a life, family and a full work
> > > > > schedule.
> > > >
> > > > Yet you disputed my post when we were discussing him being
> > > > drug-tested after bragging about having a medical marijuana card
> > > > and buying "legal weed" at Jane's Dispensary and insisted he only
> > > > ever mentioned CBD oil. BTW, I have a family, too (albeit not a
> > > > child), friends, a life. I also have a job.
> > > >
> > > > Jill
> > >
> > > When was that?
> >
> > When was WHAT? John wrote in his subject line he believed he passed
> > the physical for his new job and someone else (Greg Morrow? then
> > Bryan) brought up the drug testing thing. I remember John boasting
> > about buying "legal weed". He even said he thought he could get a
> > job at Jane's Dispensary as a "Cannabis Nurse". That was about 5
> > months ago. It's quite possible he made it all up but hey, he's the
> > one who kept yapping about it for all the world to see.
> >
> > Jill
> I made a recent post that was very short and only talked about cbd oil.
> Jill, you aren't a bad person but you live and breathe 'John' way too
> much, especially if you drag in a 5 month old conversation.
>
> Can't you understand I read only what interests me and if I have time?
>
You are a stupid cunt who acts like John is
innocent as the Virgin Mary, and is horribly
misunderstood.

--Bryan

On 2022-10-14 10:41 p.m., Mike Duffy wrote:
> On 2022-10-15, GM <gregorymorrowchicago07@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 7:30:07 PM UTC-5, Mike Duffy wrote:
>
>>> On 2022-10-14, GM <gregorymorr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Hard times create strong men
>>>> Strong men create good times
>>>> Good times create weak men
>>>> Weak men create hard times
>>>
>>> For some reason, for me that brings to mind:
>>>
>>> d/dx (+ sin x) = + cos x
>>> d/dx (+ cos x) = - sin x
>>> d/dx (- sin x) = - cos x
>>> d/dx (- cos x) = + sin x
>>
>> Mike, you are the "brain" of this here group...
>> we are honoured to have ya here amongst our midst...
>>
>> O:-)
>
> I know you're kidding because of the smiley.
>
> But the above boil down to
>
> d/dx (exp(x)) = exp(x)
>
> if you define x as a complex number.
>
>
> The exp function is the only function
> that is both its own derivative and integral.
>
> In other words, men and the times
> they live in are both the cause and
> the result of themselves.
>
> It's like a propagating electromagnetic
> wave where the electic field and
> the magnetic field are both the cause
> and effect of each other.
>
> Always 90 degrees out of phase
> between intent and result,
> we are doomed by our very nature
> to keep repeating ourselves.
>
I used to understand all that as an undergrad, many years ago.
I discussed this memory failure with a friend who used to be a uni maths
prof. He published many papers on "chaos theory" but told me that he had
recently looked at some of his old papers and couldn't understand them!!!

On 10/15/2022 10:04 AM, Bryan Simmons wrote:
> On Saturday, October 15, 2022 at 8:57:52 AM UTC-5, cshenk wrote:
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/15/2022 8:57 AM, cshenk wrote:
>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/14/2022 8:22 PM, cshenk wrote:
>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/13/2022 1:45 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2022-10-13 11:53 a.m., Gary wrote:
>>>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Your speculation about Carol certainly is silly. I
>>>>>>>>>> would would call her more kind and very naive. The
>>>>>>>>>> fact is she completely missed (or ignored) his posts
>>>>>>>>>> bragging about getting his medical marijuana card so
>>>>>>>>>> he could buy "legal weed" from Jane's Dispensary. He
>>>>>>>>>> was not talking about CBD oil.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Carol doesn't read all posts and neither do you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's probably why Jill specifically said that Carole
>>>>>>>> completely missed (or ignored) those posts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's exactly why I said Carol completely missed or ignored
>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You both often "jump" into conversations with an opinion,
>>>>>>>>> without knowing what has been previously said.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a rather good memory. :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That is an interesting comment but it seems to have missed
>>>>>>>> mention any specifics about what she had missed in that or
>>>>>>>> any other thread.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Carol claimed he was talking about CBD oil (except, in her
>>>>>>> dislexia, she called it CDB) and that he never said anything
>>>>>>> about getting a medical marijuna license and buying "legal
>>>>>>> weed" from Jane's. I don't know how this can be misconstrued
>>>>>>> since it was based on his own posts. Except if she didn't
>>>>>>> bother to read them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I never mentioned a medical marijuana license at at all. I do
>>>>>> not read every post. I have a life, family and a full work
>>>>>> schedule.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet you disputed my post when we were discussing him being
>>>>> drug-tested after bragging about having a medical marijuana card
>>>>> and buying "legal weed" at Jane's Dispensary and insisted he only
>>>>> ever mentioned CBD oil. BTW, I have a family, too (albeit not a
>>>>> child), friends, a life. I also have a job.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jill
>>>>
>>>> When was that?
>>>
>>> When was WHAT? John wrote in his subject line he believed he passed
>>> the physical for his new job and someone else (Greg Morrow? then
>>> Bryan) brought up the drug testing thing. I remember John boasting
>>> about buying "legal weed". He even said he thought he could get a
>>> job at Jane's Dispensary as a "Cannabis Nurse". That was about 5
>>> months ago. It's quite possible he made it all up but hey, he's the
>>> one who kept yapping about it for all the world to see.
>>>
>>> Jill
>> I made a recent post that was very short and only talked about cbd oil.
>> Jill, you aren't a bad person but you live and breathe 'John' way too
>> much, especially if you drag in a 5 month old conversation.
>>
>> Can't you understand I read only what interests me and if I have time?
>>
> You are a stupid
(snipped)

Bryan, again with the C-word which merely makes you come across as
severely lacking in vocabulary.

Jill

On 10/14/2022 7:24 PM, GM wrote:
> On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 6:02:58 PM UTC-5, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 5:54:16 PM UTC-5, GM wrote:
>>> On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 5:12:42 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
>>>> On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 10:24:13 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No need to become unpleasant again. I said you were right and I was
>>>>> wrong. I don't pretend to know better than a native speaker.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Bruce
>>>>> <https://emalm.com/?v=SQqZJ>
>>>> I am never unpleasant. I can only speak the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Sometimes people find that hard to accept.
>>>> My suggestion is that you never make a comment about my writing style. If it's annoying to you, I'm going to pick up on that right away. And then I'll use it... for years and years and years. Am I a bad person? Maybe. I'm mean, I'm not Jesus or anything.
>>> Hard times create strong men
>>> Strong men create good times
>>> Good times create weak men
>>> Weak men create hard times

>> And what about the women? Are they just supposed to,
>> whatever the times, make sure that dinner is on the table
>> on time?
>
> Sure, especially if the women's names are "Bruce" or "Steve"...

You forgot Bryan.

On Sat, 15 Oct 2022 08:35:07 -0400, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>
wrote:

>On 10/14/2022 8:22 PM, cshenk wrote:
>>
>> I never mentioned a medical marijuana license at at all. I do not read
>> every post. I have a life, family and a full work schedule.
>
>Yet you disputed my post when we were discussing him being drug-tested
>after bragging about having a medical marijuana card and buying "legal
>weed" at Jane's Dispensary and insisted he only ever mentioned CBD oil.
>BTW, I have a family, too (albeit not a child), friends, a life. I also
>have a job.

And, don't forget, you have John Kuthe.

--
Bruce
<https://emalm.com/?v=SQqZJ>

On 2022-10-15, Mike Duffy <mxduffy@bell.net> wrote:

> For some reason, for me that brings to mind:

> d/dx (+ sin x) = + cos x
> d/dx (+ cos x) = - sin x
> d/dx (- sin x) = - cos x
> d/dx (- cos x) = + sin x

I learned it as:

D to the X, DY, DX
D to the X, DX
secant, tangent, cosine, sine
3.14159
something
something
something
something
Go Purdue!

But that was in the Sixties.