trader_4 <trader4@optonline.net> writes:
>On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 9:10:27 PM UTC-4, T wrote:

>>American
>> Pravda told you so and we all know they NEVER lie
>> about anything?
>
>This Pravda thing is really getting old.

What's really ironic is that the Russian word Pravda
means 'truth', and the only person using "Truth"
in the context of political rhetoric is Donald Trump
with his "Truth Social".

On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 12:45:13 PM UTC-4, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> trader_4 <tra...@optonline.net> writes:
> >On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 9:10:27 PM UTC-4, T wrote:
>
> >>American
> >> Pravda told you so and we all know they NEVER lie
> >> about anything?
> >
> >This Pravda thing is really getting old.
> What's really ironic is that the Russian word Pravda
> means 'truth', and the only person using "Truth"
> in the context of political rhetoric is Donald Trump
> with his "Truth Social".

Yeah and that isn't going so well for Trump either. I think Mr. T
is the only subscriber on Truth Social. I don't think anyone will be
paying $40 bil for that any time soon.

On 4/28/22 21:00, Bob F wrote:
> Or a lifetime of covid brain fog like we see here all the time.
Oh Bob, in my research on Brain Fog:
1) it clears up on it own in a year if untreated
2) it is treatable by OMD's and cleaver allpaths
looking to help and not to make a buck off you
3) and the Covid fog is caused by two different things:
SIT DOWN AS YOUR KNEE IS GOING TO REALLY JERK HARD
WHEN YOU READ THIS:
A) by Covid itself, but you already knew that.
B) by the Messenger RNA Gene Therapy. No virus
necessary. Did not know that, did you.
It is one of the many after effects of the
therapy.

On 4/28/22 20:58, Bob F wrote:
> And she is fully vaccinated. despite the trumptard lies.
Not following you. Are you referring to Kamala
"is he dead yet" Harris? During the fraudulent
election, Kamala stated she would not get Trump's
jab. After the election, I presume she changed
her tune and got the jab.
Question for you Bob, as I presume she is jabbed,
why is it again she caught the virus anyway?
Maybe the jab does not work all that well?
You suppose?

On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 10:08:00 PM UTC-4, T wrote:
> On 4/28/22 20:58, Bob F wrote:
> > And she is fully vaccinated. despite the trumptard lies.
> Not following you. Are you referring to Kamala
> "is he dead yet" Harris? During the fraudulent
> election, Kamala stated she would not get Trump's
> jab. After the election, I presume she changed
> her tune and got the jab.
>
> Question for you Bob, as I presume she is jabbed,
> why is it again she caught the virus anyway?
> Maybe the jab does not work all that well?
> You suppose?

I already explained it to you. Oh wait...my post included
actual facts. You probably ignored it.

On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 9:38:48 PM UTC-4, T wrote:
> On 4/28/22 21:00, Bob F wrote:
> > Or a lifetime of covid brain fog like we see here all the time.
> Oh Bob, in my research on Brain Fog:
>
> 1) it clears up on it own in a year if untreated
>
> 2) it is treatable by OMD's and cleaver allpaths
> looking to help and not to make a buck off you
>
> 3) and the Covid fog is caused by two different things:
>
> SIT DOWN AS YOUR KNEE IS GOING TO REALLY JERK HARD
> WHEN YOU READ THIS:
>
> A) by Covid itself, but you already knew that.
>
> B) by the Messenger RNA Gene Therapy. No virus
> necessary. Did not know that, did you.
> It is one of the many after effects of the
> therapy.

Amazing that you have this all figured out, while everything I've heard
from doctors and researchers actually investigating it is that they really don't
understand what is going on at this point. I've certainly not heard anyone
actually treating or working with these patients claim that it's related
to the vaccines. If it was caused by the vaccines, not Covid, with all
the hundreds of millions of people vaccinated, why is the Covid brain
fog and other long Covid problems only seen in people that actually have
Covid, not in people that are just vaccinated? Just more of the usual Mr. T BS.

All you covidiots should go get your free booster.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-vaccine-injuries-covid-shot-cdc-data/

On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 10:08:00 PM UTC-4, T wrote:
> On 4/28/22 20:58, Bob F wrote:
> > And she is fully vaccinated. despite the trumptard lies.
> Not following you. Are you referring to Kamala
> "is he dead yet" Harris? During the fraudulent
> election, Kamala stated she would not get Trump's
> jab. After the election, I presume she changed
> her tune and got the jab.

There you go again, doing exactly what you claim others that
you disagree with are doing. You;ve taken what Harris said out of
context and are spinning it. Here is what she actually said:

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jul/23/tiktok-posts/biden-harris-doubted-trump-covid-19-vaccines-not-v/

Harris was asked in a Sept. 6, 2020, interview whether she would take a vaccine if it was approved before the election. She replied:

"Well, I think that's going to be an issue for all of us. I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump. And it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he's talking about. I will not take his word for it. He wants us to inject bleach. I — no, I will not take his word."

Harris was asked in an Oct. 7, 2020, vice presidential debate if she would take a vaccine if the Trump administration approved one. Referring to the leading government epidemiologist Dr. Anthony Fauci, she said:

"If the public health professionals, if Dr. Fauci, if the doctors tell us that we should take it, I’ll be the first in line to take it. Absolutely. But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it, I’m not taking it."

That was my position at the time and I think the position of any reasonable person.

>
> Question for you Bob, as I presume she is jabbed,
> why is it again she caught the virus anyway?
> Maybe the jab does not work all that well?
> You suppose?

Let's review for you one more time. The vaccines were created and approved during
the Trump administration. Were you bitching about this then, when Trump was bragging
and trying to take all the credit? Of course not. At the time they were approved in late 2020,
the testing data for Pfizer and Moderna showed something like 95% efficacy against the Covid
strain at that time in preventing SYMPTOMATIC Covid. Since then, we've had mutations, two new
widespread variants. The current data shows that if you are vaccinated and boosted,
you are about 25 times less likely to be hospitalized and 100 times less likely to die from Covid.
A vaccinated person is also less likely to be infected at all, but I haven't seen good numbers
on that and it's irrelevant to the fact that the vaccines are highly effective in preventing serious
illness and death.

On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 1:54:25 PM UTC-4, trader_4 wrote:
> On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 10:08:00 PM UTC-4, T wrote:
> > On 4/28/22 20:58, Bob F wrote:
> > > And she is fully vaccinated. despite the trumptard lies.
> > Not following you. Are you referring to Kamala
> > "is he dead yet" Harris? During the fraudulent
> > election, Kamala stated she would not get Trump's
> > jab. After the election, I presume she changed
> > her tune and got the jab.
> There you go again, doing exactly what you claim others that
> you disagree with are doing. You;ve taken what Harris said out of
> context and are spinning it. Here is what she actually said:
>
> https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jul/23/tiktok-posts/biden-harris-doubted-trump-covid-19-vaccines-not-v/
>
> Harris was asked in a Sept. 6, 2020, interview whether she would take a vaccine if it was approved before the election. She replied:
>
> "Well, I think that's going to be an issue for all of us. I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump. And it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he's talking about. I will not take his word for it. He wants us to inject bleach. I — no, I will not take his word."
>
> Harris was asked in an Oct. 7, 2020, vice presidential debate if she would take a vaccine if the Trump administration approved one. Referring to the leading government epidemiologist Dr. Anthony Fauci, she said:
>
> "If the public health professionals, if Dr. Fauci, if the doctors tell us that we should take it, I’ll be the first in line to take it. Absolutely. But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it, I’m not taking it."
>
> That was my position at the time and I think the position of any reasonable person.
> >
> > Question for you Bob, as I presume she is jabbed,
> > why is it again she caught the virus anyway?
> > Maybe the jab does not work all that well?
> > You suppose?
> Let's review for you one more time. The vaccines were created and approved during
> the Trump administration. Were you bitching about this then, when Trump was bragging
> and trying to take all the credit? Of course not. At the time they were approved in late 2020,
> the testing data for Pfizer and Moderna showed something like 95% efficacy against the Covid
> strain at that time in preventing SYMPTOMATIC Covid. Since then, we've had mutations, two new
> widespread variants. The current data shows that if you are vaccinated and boosted,
> you are about 25 times less likely to be hospitalized and 100 times less likely to die from Covid.
> A vaccinated person is also less likely to be infected at all, but I haven't seen good numbers
> on that and it's irrelevant to the fact that the vaccines are highly effective in preventing serious
> illness and death.

Oh. My. God. Facts!

Todd will probably ignore your post (he ignored mine when I said the same thing using different
words) or he'll claim that you are just brainwashed by...wait for it...the American Pravda.

Todd was probably first in line when the vaccine came out. I heard he choose the band aid with
Buzz Lightyear's picture on it.

On 4/30/22 10:44, Ronda Johns wrote:
> All you covidiots should go get your free booster.
>
> https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-vaccine-injuries-covid-shot-cdc-data/
>

https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2022/04/918/516/cartoon.jpg

On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 8:09:23 PM UTC-4, Marilyn Manson wrote:
> On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 1:54:25 PM UTC-4, trader_4 wrote:
> > On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 10:08:00 PM UTC-4, T wrote:
> > > On 4/28/22 20:58, Bob F wrote:
> > > > And she is fully vaccinated. despite the trumptard lies.
> > > Not following you. Are you referring to Kamala
> > > "is he dead yet" Harris? During the fraudulent
> > > election, Kamala stated she would not get Trump's
> > > jab. After the election, I presume she changed
> > > her tune and got the jab.
> > There you go again, doing exactly what you claim others that
> > you disagree with are doing. You;ve taken what Harris said out of
> > context and are spinning it. Here is what she actually said:
> >
> > https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jul/23/tiktok-posts/biden-harris-doubted-trump-covid-19-vaccines-not-v/
> >
> > Harris was asked in a Sept. 6, 2020, interview whether she would take a vaccine if it was approved before the election. She replied:
> >
> > "Well, I think that's going to be an issue for all of us. I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump. And it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he's talking about. I will not take his word for it. He wants us to inject bleach. I — no, I will not take his word."
> >
> > Harris was asked in an Oct. 7, 2020, vice presidential debate if she would take a vaccine if the Trump administration approved one. Referring to the leading government epidemiologist Dr. Anthony Fauci, she said:
> >
> > "If the public health professionals, if Dr. Fauci, if the doctors tell us that we should take it, I’ll be the first in line to take it. Absolutely. But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it, I’m not taking it."
> >
> > That was my position at the time and I think the position of any reasonable person.
> > >
> > > Question for you Bob, as I presume she is jabbed,
> > > why is it again she caught the virus anyway?
> > > Maybe the jab does not work all that well?
> > > You suppose?
> > Let's review for you one more time. The vaccines were created and approved during
> > the Trump administration. Were you bitching about this then, when Trump was bragging
> > and trying to take all the credit? Of course not. At the time they were approved in late 2020,
> > the testing data for Pfizer and Moderna showed something like 95% efficacy against the Covid
> > strain at that time in preventing SYMPTOMATIC Covid. Since then, we've had mutations, two new
> > widespread variants. The current data shows that if you are vaccinated and boosted,
> > you are about 25 times less likely to be hospitalized and 100 times less likely to die from Covid.
> > A vaccinated person is also less likely to be infected at all, but I haven't seen good numbers
> > on that and it's irrelevant to the fact that the vaccines are highly effective in preventing serious
> > illness and death.
> Oh. My. God. Facts!
>
> Todd will probably ignore your post (he ignored mine when I said the same thing using different
> words) or he'll claim that you are just brainwashed by...wait for it...the American Pravda.
>
> Todd was probably first in line when the vaccine came out. I heard he choose the band aid with
> Buzz Lightyear's picture on it.

Mr. T put me on his banned list years ago, after I took him to the woodshed with
his diabetes and low carb BS. He was as whacked out on that as he is on Covid
and most everything else. As I remember it, while being very pro low carb, he was
attacking Dr. Atkins. I tried to find out why and it came down to the concept of
net carbs. Not a hard concept to grasp, it's that fiber doesn't get digested like a
carb, it doesn't impact blood glucose levels and it's actually beneficial for you.
So Atkins said that you could deduct fiber carbs from the total carb count.
Like a vegetable has 6g of carb, 2g of fiber, so the net carb count is 4g. Somehow
Mr. T just couldn't get his head around that and stuck to his Atkins is no good BS.
He also made the false claim that all type 2 diabetes can be reversed with a low
carb diet. So, since that go around, I've been on his banned list. Which is interesting
in itself, because he always claims here that's what libs do and that conservatives
are capable of competing in the arena of ideas.

The above also points to his black and white world, where there is no middle ground.
I agree that a low carb diet is beneficial for people with diabetes, that some of them
can get it under control just by doing low carb, losing weight, etc. and could get off
diabetes drugs. But he has to have it where it's a universal truth, no room for any
complexities in his simple mind.