On 12/4/2018 12:44 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> On 12/4/2018 12:36 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:> On 12/4/2018 12:26 PM, Rudy Canoza
> wrote:
>>> On 12/4/2018 12:20 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>> On 12/4/2018 12:03 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:> On 12/4/2018 11:16 AM, Bradley
>>>> K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/4/2018 10:01 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:> On 12/4/2018 9:06 AM, Bradley
>>>>>> K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 12/4/2018 8:47 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/4/2018 7:40 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <pu6224$d10$1@reader1.panix.com>, bks@panix.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And now that Michelle Obama's book is the best selling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> book of 2018 they should be comfortable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No it isn't, stop lying.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I *always* tell the truth:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Except when writing fuckwittery like this:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Oakland, the most successfully integrated city in the USA. Hella
>>>>>>>>>>> proud".
>>>>>>>>>>> Bradley K. Spermman
>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/bradleyksherman
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In that instance, you're just fuckwittedly blurting out an unfounded
>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit opinion about bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You keep saying that but you never say which city tops Oakland.

That's a lie, of course.

>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oakland is not a very successful city, and whatever success it enjoys
>>>>>>>>> is in
>>>>>>>>> no way due to integration.
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're misreading the quote and making sh.t up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And you still haven't said which city is more succeessfully integrated!

That's a lie, of course.

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You haven't offered any proof that Oakland is successfully integrated at
>>>>>>> all - it isn't - *NOR* that a high degree of racial integration is a
>>>>>>> good thing. The fact of the matter, Bradlee, you fucking proggie idiot,
>>>>>>> is that Oakland still is *highly* segregated, particularly in the schools.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oakland Public Schools Largely Segregated by Race, Class
>>>>>>> https://www.kqed.org/forum/2010101856569/oakland-public-schools-largely-segregated-by-race-class
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oakland Prides Itself on Being Diverse -- Until It Comes Time to Send
>>>>>>> Kids to School
>>>>>>> https://www.kqed.org/news/11061802/oakland-prides-itself-on-being-diverse-until-it-comes-time-to-send-kids-to-school
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Most Diverse Cities Are Often The Most Segregated
>>>>>>> https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-most-diverse-cities-are-often-the-most-segregated/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That last site makes very clear that Oakland is only moderately well
>>>>>>> integrated, compared with several other American cities. There are *11*
>>>>>>> California cities that are more successfully integrated according to the
>>>>>>> integration/segregation rankings there than Oakland.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're doing your usual proggie idiocy here, Bradlee. You are focused on
>>>>>>> blacks, and because Oakland has a large black population, you're calling
>>>>>>> that "successful integration." In fact, Bradlee, that excellent 538 site
>>>>>>> makes the excellent point that a highly diverse city "blessed" (huh)
>>>>>>> with several large non-black minority groups *still* can have a high
>>>>>>> degree of segregation among those groups...and Oakland does.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You don't even fucking live in Oakland, Bradlee - you're in the far less
>>>>>>> diverse and less integrated city of Berkeley. No, you don't get to count
>>>>>>> the transient student population for diversity/integration purposes,
>>>>>>> Bradlee.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still waiting for you to name the U.S. city that's more successfully
>>>>>> integrated.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did. It's in the 538 site, you stupid rancid cunt. Here are the
>>>>> *thirteen* cities in California *alone* that are more successfully
>>>>> integrated than Oakland, cuntflaps:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Irvine
>>>>> 2. Sacramento
>>>>> 3. Stockton
>>>>> 4. Fremont
>>>>> 5. Chula Vista
>>>>> 6. San Bernardino
>>>>> 7. Fresno
>>>>> 9. Riverside
>>>>> 10. Bakersfield
>>>>> 11. Anaheim
>>>>> 12. San Francisco
>>>>> 13. Long Beach
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Once again, Bradlee, you lying proggie rancid cunt, you aren't really
>>>>> talking about integration - you're singing the praises of "diversity", but
>>>>> Oakland's "diverse" population is *not* particularly well integrated. The
>>>>> numbers don't lie, but you do, you lying proggie rancid cunt.
>>>>
>>>> No, Rudy, those are more *diverse*.
>>>
>>> No, CuntFlaps, those are ones with *better* integration/segregation numbers
>>> than Oakland. Fuck, can't you read? The integration/segregation index is
>>> *the* measure of successful integration, CuntFlaps, and all thirteen of
>>> those cities have higher numbers than Oakland. Additionally, there are
>>> numerous cities outside of California that have higher numbers.
>>>
>>> You lose, CuntFlaps, as always.
>>
>> From the site, CuntFlaps:
>>
>> The integration-segregation index is determined by how far above or
>> below a city is from the (red) regression line. Cities below the line
>> are especially segregated. Chicago, which has a -19 score, is the most
>> segregated city in the country. It’s followed by Atlanta, Milwaukee,
>> Philadelphia, St. Louis, Washington and Baltimore.
>>
>> Cities above the red line have positive scores, which mean they’re
>> comparatively well-integrated. Sacramento’s score is a +10, for instance.
>>
>> Irvine: +11.0
>> Sacramento: +10.1
>> Stockton: +9.2
>> [skip a few]
>> San Francisco: +4.3
>> Long Beach: +4.3
>> Oakland: +3.6
>>
>> The "worst" non-CA city that is ahead of Oakland is St. Paul, MN, at +3.8%;
>> the best is Paradise, NV at 9.8%. Even four cities in fucking *Texas*, for
>> christallfuckingmighty, are more successfully integrated than Oakland: Irving
>> (+5.7), Arlington (+6.2), Plano (+6.7) and Garland (+8.3).
>>
>> You're stupid, Bradlee. You ran your mouth about Oakland's "successful
>> integration" without knowing one fucking thing about it. All you saw is "lots
>> of blacks", and from that you leapt - stupidly - to the unwarranted
>> conclusion they're well integrated. They are not, and the schools are as
>> segregated as 1950s Little Rock.
>
> No, even the 538 diversity index lists Oakland at #2 in the
> citywide diversity index and #7 at the Neighborhood level.