US and its allies
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/china-has-no-allies-us-has-many-defense-secretary-lloyd-austin/articleshow/83035525.cms

Nothing much to boast about. Its only natural that richest, strongest and mightiest USA has the most “friends and allies”. They want to share the US power and wealth. The US in turn uses them to serve its national interest such as to be its cannon fodders. Rather than “friends and allies”, it would be more accurate to term them as USs’ “dependents, parasites and suckers”.

The US anti-China strategy has blinded it to the evil intentions of its allies. India is becoming a South-Asian hegemony. It has annexed Jammu-Kashmir. It is emboldened by its military alliance with the US to expand its territory toward China. Japan is feverishly re-militarising itself with the pretext of defending itself against the “China threat”. The Japanese Self-Defence force is becoming the 21st century Japanese Imperial Army. It can now be dispatched overseas to engage in wars.

While those USs’ “dependents, parasites and suckers” get their ways by sucking up to the US, they are also sucking the US dry. It takes a businessman-turned-President Donald Trump to realise the latter. He wanted those suckers to pay their dues to the US. Luckily for those suckers, he’s out of power. But he may be back, his power in the Republic Party has not ebbed.

For China, what is the main implication of a US with many allies? It is this. Considering the strength of the US and its suckers, it means that China has to be strong enough to fight off not only the US but also all its suckers, from conventional to nuclear wars. In its plan for a nuclear war, China must remember that the US has passed a Law to enable it to nuke China anytime, preemptively. Therefore China’s nuclear arsenal must be large enough to withstand a US initiated attack as well as able to counter-nuke the US and everyone of its suckers.

On 3/6/2021 3:36 pm, frodo sam0 wrote:
> US and its allies
> https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/china-has-no-allies-us-has-many-defense-secretary-lloyd-austin/articleshow/83035525.cms
>
>
> Nothing much to boast about. Its only natural that richest, strongest and mightiest USA has the most “friends and allies”. They want to share the US power and wealth. The US in turn uses them to serve its national interest such as to be its cannon fodders. Rather than “friends and allies”, it would be more accurate to term them as USs’ “dependents, parasites and suckers”.
>
> The US anti-China strategy has blinded it to the evil intentions of its allies. India is becoming a South-Asian hegemony. It has annexed Jammu-Kashmir. It is emboldened by its military alliance with the US to expand its territory toward China. Japan is feverishly re-militarising itself with the pretext of defending itself against the “China threat”. The Japanese Self-Defence force is becoming the 21st century Japanese Imperial Army. It can now be dispatched overseas to engage in wars.
>
>
> While those USs’ “dependents, parasites and suckers” get their ways by sucking up to the US, they are also sucking the US dry. It takes a businessman-turned-President Donald Trump to realise the latter. He wanted those suckers to pay their dues to the US. Luckily for those suckers, he’s out of power. But he may be back, his power in the Republic Party has not ebbed.
>
> For China, what is the main implication of a US with many allies? It is this. Considering the strength of the US and its suckers, it means that China has to be strong enough to fight off not only the US but also all its suckers, from conventional to nuclear wars. In its plan for a nuclear war, China must remember that the US has passed a Law to enable it to nuke China anytime, preemptively. Therefore China’s nuclear arsenal must be large enough to withstand a US initiated attack as well as able to counter-nuke the US and everyone of its suckers.
>

Not to depend entirely on friends, but to depend on own capability and
capacity to build and replace and supply by your own strengths and
prowess with your own advances of technology in order to maintain and
sustain a continuous war if needs to be extended and done.

On 03/06/21 18.26, samakon wrote:
> On 3/6/2021 3:36 pm, frodo sam0 wrote:
>> US and its allies
>> https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/china-has-no-allies-us-has-many-defense-secretary-lloyd-austin/articleshow/83035525.cms
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Nothing much to boast about. Its only natural that richest,
>> strongest and mightiest USA has the most “friends and allies”. They
>> want to share the US power and wealth. The US in turn uses them to
>> serve its national interest such as to be its cannon fodders.
>> Rather than “friends and allies”, it would be more accurate to term
>> them as USs’ “dependents, parasites and suckers”.
>>
>> The US anti-China strategy has blinded it to the evil intentions of
>> its allies. India is becoming a South-Asian hegemony. It has
>> annexed Jammu-Kashmir. It is emboldened by its military alliance
>> with the US to expand its territory toward China. Japan is
>> feverishly re-militarising itself with the pretext of defending
>> itself against the “China threat”. The Japanese Self-Defence force
>> is becoming the 21st century Japanese Imperial Army. It can now be
>> dispatched overseas to engage in wars.
>>
>>
>> While those USs’ “dependents, parasites and suckers” get their ways
>> by sucking up to the US, they are also sucking the US dry. It takes
>> a businessman-turned-President Donald Trump to realise the latter.
>> He wanted those suckers to pay their dues to the US. Luckily for
>> those suckers, he’s out of power. But he may be back, his power in
>> the Republic Party has not ebbed.
>>
>> For China, what is the main implication of a US with many allies?
>> It is this. Considering the strength of the US and its suckers, it
>> means that China has to be strong enough to fight off not only the
>> US but also all its suckers, from conventional to nuclear wars. In
>> its plan for a nuclear war, China must remember that the US has
>> passed a Law to enable it to nuke China anytime, preemptively.
>> Therefore China’s nuclear arsenal must be large enough to withstand
>> a US initiated attack as well as able to counter-nuke the US and
>> everyone of its suckers.
>>
>
>
>
> Not to depend entirely on friends, but to depend on own capability
> and capacity to build and replace and supply by your own strengths
> and prowess with your own advances of technology in order to maintain
> and sustain a continuous war if needs to be extended and done.
>
>

Are you sure CCP want a real war?

--
-alien-
~ Work like you don't need the money. ~
~ Love like you've never been hurt. ~
~ Dance like nobody is looking. ~

On Thursday, June 3, 2021 at 3:36:28 PM UTC+8, frodo sam0 wrote:
> US and its allies
> https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/china-has-no-allies-us-has-many-defense-secretary-lloyd-austin/articleshow/83035525.cms
>
>
> Nothing much to boast about. Its only natural that richest, strongest and mightiest USA has the most “friends and allies”. They want to share the US power and wealth. The US in turn uses them to serve its national interest such as to be its cannon fodders. Rather than “friends and allies”, it would be more accurate to term them as USs’ “dependents, parasites and suckers”.
>
> The US anti-China strategy has blinded it to the evil intentions of its allies. India is becoming a South-Asian hegemony. It has annexed Jammu-Kashmir. It is emboldened by its military alliance with the US to expand its territory toward China. Japan is feverishly re-militarising itself with the pretext of defending itself against the “China threat”. The Japanese Self-Defence force is becoming the 21st century Japanese Imperial Army. It can now be dispatched overseas to engage in wars.
>
>
> While those USs’ “dependents, parasites and suckers” get their ways by sucking up to the US, they are also sucking the US dry. It takes a businessman-turned-President Donald Trump to realise the latter. He wanted those suckers to pay their dues to the US. Luckily for those suckers, he’s out of power. But he may be back, his power in the Republic Party has not ebbed.
>
> For China, what is the main implication of a US with many allies? It is this. Considering the strength of the US and its suckers, it means that China has to be strong enough to fight off not only the US but also all its suckers, from conventional to nuclear wars. In its plan for a nuclear war, China must remember that the US has passed a Law to enable it to nuke China anytime, preemptively. Therefore China’s nuclear arsenal must be large enough to withstand a US initiated attack as well as able to counter-nuke the US and everyone of its suckers.
-------

Wahahahahohoho! Outside the US vassal states (the EU, UK, Canada, Australia, Japan and Quad member India), the US has no friends. But it's good for China that the US is as delusional as their ex-president Donald Trump, who seriously believes he will be reinstated as president within a few months.

Wakalukong