On Tuesday, October 4, 2005 at 2:48:54 PM UTC-7, Day Brown wrote:
> The Harbinger wrote:
> > Something is stirring in the cosy confines of the trendy liberalist
> > dinner party circuit. An unwelcome reality is beginning to creep in.
> > Largely driven by current events and the relentless dripping of
> > statistical evidence that consistently produces the same results, it
> > becomes clearer by the day that there actually are real racial
> > differences in factors such as IQ, innate aggression, and the tendency
> > to antisocial behaviour.
> >
> > There are now sufficient pools of detailed historical data in the U.S.
> > specifically and to a lesser extent in other western countries to
> > provide indisputable proof that *racial origin is a predominant factor
> > in crime*.
> >
> > With the recent anarchy in New Orleans and the distinctly un-P.C.
> > comments of ex-Education Secretary William Bennet, it all makes for
> > some interesting after-dinner conversation.
> >
> > For an incisive perspective on all of this Theodore Dalrymple has
> > recently published an article entitled "Is the Guardian
> > Institutionally racist?"
> > http://www.socialaffairsunit.org.uk/blog/archives/000586.php
> >
> > Here are the findings of the "Color of Crime" report from New
> > Century that analyses Federal Data.
> >
> > http://www.nc-f.org/findings.htm
> >
> > Crime Rates
> > · Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to
> > commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
> >
> > · When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times
> > more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely
> > to use a knife.
> >
> > · Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white
> > rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white
> > rate.
> >
> > · The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the
> > percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.
> > Interracial Crime
> >
> > · Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every
> > year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites
> > commit 15 percent.
> >
> > · Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against
> > blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are
> > black, and 10 percent are Hispanic.
> >
> > *****
> > When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims
> > are black
> > *****
> >
> > · Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent
> > crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to
> > commit robbery.
> >
> > · Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated
> > hate crimes against whites than vice versa.
> > Gangs
> >
> > · Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.
> >
> > · Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of
> > youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times
> > more likely.
> > Incarceration
> >
> > · Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled,
> > from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from
> > 320,000 to 1.39 million.
> >
> > · Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites.
> > Hispanics are three times more likely.
> Did you receive anything besides ad hominum in reply?
> Anyway, we have the DNA bloodwork, can do the hormone analysis, give the
> personality assessment and talent tests, and identify *individuals*, of
> any race who are likely to become criminal, as well as identify blacks,
> hispanics, or whites who pose no risk to the public. And that is what we
> should be doing, not counting how many cases we have to prove that black
> or hispanic men are more likely to be criminal. I dont *care*.
> What I do care about, is that we recognize talent and character where it
> exists, and promote that appropriately without regard to quotas. We dont
> need to use skin color. We have more accurate tools to use. Lets return
> to the meaning of the law, and respond to *individuals* appropriately.
> The numbers of prisoners is also increasing because contaminants have
> affected mental development. Whites have nearly 3 times the autism rate
> as blacks. There are other responses which lower rationality and thus
> increase crime.
Good read.

In reply to "KP2 KP2" who wrote the following:

> On Tuesday, October 4, 2005 at 2:48:54�PM UTC-7, Day Brown wrote:
> > The Harbinger wrote:
> > > Something is stirring in the cosy confines of the trendy liberalist
> > > dinner party circuit. An unwelcome reality is beginning to creep in.
> > > Largely driven by current events and the relentless dripping of
> > > statistical evidence that consistently produces the same results, it
> > > becomes clearer by the day that there actually are real racial
> > > differences in factors such as IQ, innate aggression, and the tendency
> > > to antisocial behaviour.
> > >
> > > There are now sufficient pools of detailed historical data in the U.S.
> > > specifically and to a lesser extent in other western countries to
> > > provide indisputable proof that *racial origin is a predominant factor
> > > in crime*.
> > >
> > > With the recent anarchy in New Orleans and the distinctly un-P.C.
> > > comments of ex-Education Secretary William Bennet, it all makes for
> > > some interesting after-dinner conversation.
> > >
> > > For an incisive perspective on all of this Theodore Dalrymple has
> > > recently published an article entitled "Is the Guardian
> > > Institutionally racist?"
> > > http://www.socialaffairsunit.org.uk/blog/archives/000586.php
> > >
> > > Here are the findings of the "Color of Crime" report from New
> > > Century that analyses Federal Data.
> > >
> > > http://www.nc-f.org/findings.htm
> > >
> > > Crime Rates
> > > � Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to
> > > commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
> > >
> > > � When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times
> > > more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely
> > > to use a knife.
> > >
> > > � Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white
> > > rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white
> > > rate.
> > >
> > > � The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the
> > > percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.
> > > Interracial Crime
> > >
> > > � Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every
> > > year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites
> > > commit 15 percent.
> > >
> > > � Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against
> > > blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are
> > > black, and 10 percent are Hispanic.
> > >
> > > *****
> > > When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims
> > > are black
> > > *****
> > >
> > > � Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent
> > > crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to
> > > commit robbery.
> > >
> > > � Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated
> > > hate crimes against whites than vice versa.
> > > Gangs
> > >
> > > � Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.
> > >
> > > � Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of
> > > youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times
> > > more likely.
> > > Incarceration
> > >
> > > � Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled,
> > > from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from
> > > 320,000 to 1.39 million.
> > >
> > > � Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites.
> > > Hispanics are three times more likely.
> > Did you receive anything besides ad hominum in reply?
> > Anyway, we have the DNA bloodwork, can do the hormone analysis, give the
> > personality assessment and talent tests, and identify *individuals*, of
> > any race who are likely to become criminal, as well as identify blacks,
> > hispanics, or whites who pose no risk to the public. And that is what we
> > should be doing, not counting how many cases we have to prove that black
> > or hispanic men are more likely to be criminal. I dont *care*.
> > What I do care about, is that we recognize talent and character where it
> > exists, and promote that appropriately without regard to quotas. We dont
> > need to use skin color. We have more accurate tools to use. Lets return
> > to the meaning of the law, and respond to *individuals* appropriately.
> > The numbers of prisoners is also increasing because contaminants have
> > affected mental development. Whites have nearly 3 times the autism rate
> > as blacks. There are other responses which lower rationality and thus
> > increase crime.
> Good read.

No one disputes that different populations have different crime rates, although it's certainly possible that discrimination and limited economic
opportunities and other factors can play a bigger role than DNA. What people object to is treating ALL memobers of a group as though they are the
worst of the group.

And other aspects of PC, like avoiding racial slurs, will be with us as long as some of us have a conscience.