On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 19:08:49 -0600, Hank Rogers <hank@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>jmcquown wrote:
>> On 12/25/2023 6:25 PM, Janet wrote:
>>> In article <yShiN.31331$LONb.13986@fx08.iad>,
>>> j_mcquown@comcast.net says...
>>>>
>>>> On 12/25/2023 10:00 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>> On 2023-12-24 1:26 p.m., Graham wrote:
>>>>>> On 2023-12-24 8:04 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Â Â  For the same reason she encouraged Sheldon, whose
>>>>>>>> sex-
>>>>>>>> porn posts laid out the welcome mat for Kuthe.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sheldon was just being Sheldon and that was his version
>>>>>>> of humour.
>>>>>>> While it may not have been appropriate he was just trying
>>>>>>> to be funny.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really? He was/is a disgusting old git who couldn't
>>>>>> restrain himself
>>>>>> from writing filth!
>>>>>
>>>>>    Yeah. Really. He was being Sheldon. I didn't say it was
>>>>> a good thing.
>>>>> It was was often filth. It was bad taste and inappropriate
>>>>> and I am not
>>>>> trying to defend it. I am just saying that it doesn't
>>>>> compare to a 60
>>>>> year old man frequently boasting about shaving his balls,
>>>>> injecting his
>>>>> penis with drugs to help him get an erection just to be
>>>>> able to
>>>>> masturbate. It didn't slip out once. It was a regular
>>>>> theme.  That is sick.
>>>>>
>>>> People will (and apparently do) interpret it differently.
>>>> All I know is
>>>> Sheldon never started any "LOOK AT ME!" posts about
>>>> masturbating.
>>>
>>>    You must have missed his boast posts about ejaculations
>>> splattering the headboard.
>>>
>>>    Janet UK
>>>
>> I certainly did not see those.  Are you sure it wasn't posts by
>> our resident forger?
>>
>> Jill
>
>Popeye definitely posted it your majesty. You probably couldn't
>read it because you were licking his ass at the time.
>
Yes I can verify he posted it, caused a dispute between me and Shenk
as I called him revolting and she claimed he was a 'navy man' and not
like that! After awhile she began to see what we all meant.

On Tue, 26 Dec 2023 10:55:13 -0000, Janet <nobody@home.com> wrote:

>In article <2PoiN.27194$GX69.12164@fx46.iad>,
>j_mcquown@comcast.net says...
>>
>> On 12/25/2023 6:25 PM, Janet wrote:
>> > In article <yShiN.31331$LONb.13986@fx08.iad>,
>> > j_mcquown@comcast.net says...
>> >>
>> >> On 12/25/2023 10:00 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> >>> On 2023-12-24 1:26 p.m., Graham wrote:
>> >>>> On 2023-12-24 8:04 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>>    For the same reason she encouraged Sheldon, whose sex-
>> >>>>>> porn posts laid out the welcome mat for Kuthe.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Sheldon was just being Sheldon and that was his version of humour.
>> >>>>> While it may not have been appropriate he was just trying to be funny.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Really? He was/is a disgusting old git who couldn't restrain himself
>> >>>> from writing filth!
>> >>>
>> >>>  Yeah. Really. He was being Sheldon. I didn't say it was a good thing.
>> >>> It was was often filth. It was bad taste and inappropriate and I am not
>> >>> trying to defend it. I am just saying that it doesn't compare to a 60
>> >>> year old man frequently boasting about shaving his balls, injecting his
>> >>> penis with drugs to help him get an erection just to be able to
>> >>> masturbate. It didn't slip out once. It was a regular theme.  That is sick.
>> >>>
>> >> People will (and apparently do) interpret it differently. All I know is
>> >> Sheldon never started any "LOOK AT ME!" posts about masturbating.
>> >
>> > You must have missed his boast posts about ejaculations
>> > splattering the headboard.
>> >
>> > Janet UK
>> >
>> I certainly did not see those
>
>
>> Are you sure it wasn't posts by our
>> resident forger?
>
> Yes. Sheldon took proud ownership.
>
> Janet UK

True!

lucretia@florence.it wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 19:08:49 -0600, Hank Rogers <hank@nospam.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 12/25/2023 6:25 PM, Janet wrote:
>>>> In article <yShiN.31331$LONb.13986@fx08.iad>,
>>>> j_mcquown@comcast.net says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/25/2023 10:00 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>> On 2023-12-24 1:26 p.m., Graham wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2023-12-24 8:04 a.m., Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Â Â  For the same reason she encouraged Sheldon, whose
>>>>>>>>> sex-
>>>>>>>>> porn posts laid out the welcome mat for Kuthe.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sheldon was just being Sheldon and that was his version
>>>>>>>> of humour.
>>>>>>>> While it may not have been appropriate he was just trying
>>>>>>>> to be funny.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Really? He was/is a disgusting old git who couldn't
>>>>>>> restrain himself
>>>>>>> from writing filth!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Yeah. Really. He was being Sheldon. I didn't say it was
>>>>>> a good thing.
>>>>>> It was was often filth. It was bad taste and inappropriate
>>>>>> and I am not
>>>>>> trying to defend it. I am just saying that it doesn't
>>>>>> compare to a 60
>>>>>> year old man frequently boasting about shaving his balls,
>>>>>> injecting his
>>>>>> penis with drugs to help him get an erection just to be
>>>>>> able to
>>>>>> masturbate. It didn't slip out once. It was a regular
>>>>>> theme.  That is sick.
>>>>>>
>>>>> People will (and apparently do) interpret it differently.
>>>>> All I know is
>>>>> Sheldon never started any "LOOK AT ME!" posts about
>>>>> masturbating.
>>>>
>>>>    You must have missed his boast posts about ejaculations
>>>> splattering the headboard.
>>>>
>>>>    Janet UK
>>>>
>>> I certainly did not see those.  Are you sure it wasn't posts by
>>> our resident forger?
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> Popeye definitely posted it your majesty. You probably couldn't
>> read it because you were licking his ass at the time.
>>
> Yes I can verify he posted it, caused a dispute between me and Shenk
> as I called him revolting and she claimed he was a 'navy man' and not
> like that! After awhile she began to see what we all meant.
>
Jill secretly enjoyed that sexy talk from Popeye, of course
she will never admit to that in here.
--
GM

jmcquown wrote:

> On 12/25/2023 3:19 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > Bruce wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 09:52:58 -0500, jmcquown
> > > <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 12/22/2023 10:23 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > > > > We don't need a link to jlaforums site. It's full of trolls
> > > > > like
> >>GM >> (Greg Morrow) and Bryan Simmons. Cune I forum is probably one
> >>of those >> 2 but you've trimmed out at the top how we can see it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Trolls live to get a reaction from you. Best of all for them
> > > > > is to drive off new users. They get a reall belly laugh from
> > > > > it.
> > > >
> > > > I'm getting a real belly laugh out of you not realizing
> > > > Mummychunks is a troll, not some newbie who just happened to
> > > > stumble upon RFC.
> > > >
> > > You may be right, but then you call everybody who disagrees with
> > > you or makes a joke, a troll. Your troll radar's a bit too
> > > sensitive.
> >
> > Yup. My kf is quite small.
>
> The proof in that is you continuously encourage them (including
> Bruce, who contributes absolutely nothing on topic to this group).
>
> Jill

Jill, we will never agree on 'troll lists' so just forget about it.

Bruce wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 16:42:59 -0500, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> > On 12/25/2023 3:19 PM, cshenk wrote:
> >> Bruce wrote:
> >>
> >>> You may be right, but then you call everybody who disagrees with
> you >>> or makes a joke, a troll. Your troll radar's a bit too
> sensitive. >>
> >> Yup. My kf is quite small.
> >
> > The proof in that is you continuously encourage them (including
> > Bruce, who contributes absolutely nothing on topic to this group).
>
> You miss all my wonderfully on topic contributions, because you have
> me killfiled. Duh. The things you have to explain to this biddy!

LOL, it would help if you didn't call her a biddy. She's actually a
nice lady if you give her a chance. Radically different type of cook
from me but I like reading her recipes.

She's more of an 'elegant cook' and I look more like someone who
learned to cook from folks who barely spoke English. (in fact, I've
done exactly that at various times).

cshenk wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>
>> On 12/25/2023 3:19 PM, cshenk wrote:
>>> Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 09:52:58 -0500, jmcquown
>>>> <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/22/2023 10:23 PM, cshenk wrote:
>>>>>> We don't need a link to jlaforums site. It's full of trolls
>>>>>> like
>>>> GM >> (Greg Morrow) and Bryan Simmons. Cune I forum is probably one
>>>> of those >> 2 but you've trimmed out at the top how we can see it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trolls live to get a reaction from you. Best of all for them
>>>>>> is to drive off new users. They get a reall belly laugh from
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm getting a real belly laugh out of you not realizing
>>>>> Mummychunks is a troll, not some newbie who just happened to
>>>>> stumble upon RFC.
>>>>>
>>>> You may be right, but then you call everybody who disagrees with
>>>> you or makes a joke, a troll. Your troll radar's a bit too
>>>> sensitive.
>>>
>>> Yup. My kf is quite small.
>>
>> The proof in that is you continuously encourage them (including
>> Bruce, who contributes absolutely nothing on topic to this group).
>>
>> Jill
>
> Jill, we will never agree on 'troll lists' so just forget about it.
>

Maybe kuth will give you a soothing anal licking.

On Wed, 27 Dec 2023 01:37:31 +0000, "cshenk"
<cshenk@virginia-beach.net> wrote:

>Bruce wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 16:42:59 -0500, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On 12/25/2023 3:19 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> >> Bruce wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> You may be right, but then you call everybody who disagrees with
>> you >>> or makes a joke, a troll. Your troll radar's a bit too
>> sensitive. >>
>> >> Yup. My kf is quite small.
>> >
>> > The proof in that is you continuously encourage them (including
>> > Bruce, who contributes absolutely nothing on topic to this group).
>>
>> You miss all my wonderfully on topic contributions, because you have
>> me killfiled. Duh. The things you have to explain to this biddy!
>
>LOL, it would help if you didn't call her a biddy. She's actually a
>nice lady if you give her a chance.

When people killfile me, I don't feel I have to treat them with
respect either.

On 2023-12-27, cshenk <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>
>> On 12/25/2023 3:19 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> > Bruce wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 09:52:58 -0500, jmcquown
>> > > <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On 12/22/2023 10:23 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> > > > > We don't need a link to jlaforums site. It's full of trolls
>> > > > > like
>> >>GM >> (Greg Morrow) and Bryan Simmons. Cune I forum is probably one
>> >>of those >> 2 but you've trimmed out at the top how we can see it.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Trolls live to get a reaction from you. Best of all for them
>> > > > > is to drive off new users. They get a reall belly laugh from
>> > > > > it.
>> > > >
>> > > > I'm getting a real belly laugh out of you not realizing
>> > > > Mummychunks is a troll, not some newbie who just happened to
>> > > > stumble upon RFC.
>> > > >
>> > > You may be right, but then you call everybody who disagrees with
>> > > you or makes a joke, a troll. Your troll radar's a bit too
>> > > sensitive.
>> >
>> > Yup. My kf is quite small.
>>
>> The proof in that is you continuously encourage them (including
>> Bruce, who contributes absolutely nothing on topic to this group).
>>
>> Jill
>
> Jill, we will never agree on 'troll lists' so just forget about it.

For me, it's not just trolls. My killfile also includes people who
are so unutterably stupid that I'm at risk of spraining an eye as
I roll them.

--
Cindy Hamilton

On 27/12/2023 10:13, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

> For me, it's not just trolls. My killfile also includes people who
> are so unutterably stupid that I'm at risk of spraining an eye as
> I roll them.
>
Mine, too.

On 12/26/2023 8:37 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Bruce wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 16:42:59 -0500, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/25/2023 3:19 PM, cshenk wrote:
>>>> Bruce wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You may be right, but then you call everybody who disagrees with
>> you >>> or makes a joke, a troll. Your troll radar's a bit too
>> sensitive. >>
>>>> Yup. My kf is quite small.
>>>
>>> The proof in that is you continuously encourage them (including
>>> Bruce, who contributes absolutely nothing on topic to this group).
>>
>> You miss all my wonderfully on topic contributions, because you have
>> me killfiled. Duh. The things you have to explain to this biddy!
>
> LOL, it would help if you didn't call her a biddy. She's actually a
> nice lady if you give her a chance. Radically different type of cook
> from me but I like reading her recipes.
>
It's very sweet of you to say so. The name-calling certainly doesn't
endear anyone to me nor does it make me think they have anything much to
contribute. Since when does Bruce talk about cooking? Other than to
criticize and post ingredients lists because he thinks everyone in the
USA eats crappy boxed foods and tons of sugar or things that contain HFCS.

> She's more of an 'elegant cook' and I look more like someone who
> learned to cook from folks who barely spoke English. (in fact, I've
> done exactly that at various times).

I wouldn't call it "elegant". Just different from yours.

Happy New Year, Carol!

Jill

On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 18:45:56 -0500, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>
wrote:

>On 12/26/2023 8:37 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> Bruce wrote:
>>
>>> You miss all my wonderfully on topic contributions, because you have
>>> me killfiled. Duh. The things you have to explain to this biddy!
>>
>> LOL, it would help if you didn't call her a biddy. She's actually a
>> nice lady if you give her a chance. Radically different type of cook
>> from me but I like reading her recipes.
>>
>It's very sweet of you to say so. The name-calling certainly doesn't
>endear anyone to me nor does it make me think they have anything much to
>contribute. Since when does Bruce talk about cooking? Other than to
>criticize and post ingredients lists because he thinks everyone in the
>USA eats crappy boxed foods and tons of sugar or things that contain HFCS.

When people killfile me, I'll disrespect them right back, McBiddy :)

jmcquown wrote:
> It's very sweet of you to say so.  The name-calling certainly
> doesn't endear anyone to me nor does it make me think they have
> anything much to contribute.

Your highness has certainly done a hell of a lot of that
name-calling yourself.

But that's Ok. You are entitled by gawd himself.