Hello,

More of my philosophy about our today world..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I am a techno-optimist and i think by looking at the exponential
progress of our humanity i think that we have to be optimistic about it,
also you have to read my following thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/2ws8UPouQbE

So a you notice my above previous thoughts in the above link are
in accordance with the following new interesting article, and i invite
you to read it carefully:

Life in 2050: A Glimpse at Medicine in the Future

https://interestingengineering.com/life-in-2050-a-glimpse-at-medicine-in-the-future

And there is still an important thing to say and it is that
of the intellectual taste that we have to enhance much more so that
to push the quality of products and services upward and i think it is a
process that is so important, and you have to read about it here in my
thoughts of my philosophy about Adam Smith economist and philosopher:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

More of my philosophy about the way of how i am solving the problem of
egoism and materialism..

I think i am a smart philosopher, you have to understand more
how i am solving the problem of egoism and materialism, so
i am showing you(read below) that egoism comes from normal
desire of being rich, since when you are not rich you are
not positive and not happy, so this causes that you are "egoistic" with
others, so then the problem becomes: How to make the not rich being
happy without being rich so that to not be egoistic with others?, and
this is what is explaining my philosophy, read it below:

More philosophy about the way of solving the problem of egoism and
materialism..

Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

I have just written the following:

---

More philosophy about the human desire and human egoism..

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that
the problem comes not only from egoism but from the human "desire",
but here again we have to logically "distinguish", since we can
ask a philosophical question of what is the normal desire ?
so you can for example say that the constraints of human life
require from us to be rich so that to be happy, so the normal desire
becomes the desire of being rich, so this kind of normal desire makes us
egoist, so as you are noticing this becomes a psychologically normal
behavior, so then as you are noticing that we have to be smart and think
more, so how can we solve the problem ? i think that i am a smart
philosopher and i have solved the problem by bringing my thoughts of my
philosophy, and you can read how i have solved the problem here in my
thoughts of my philosophy, read it carefully here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And i have talked above about human desire and about egoism, and to
understand more about human egoism, i invite you to read my thoughts of
my philosophy about Adam Smith economist and philosopher:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

and here:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw

Also read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/nBO-dfRVMII

----

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i am explaining above that
egoism comes from the psychologically normal desire of wanting to be
rich, but you have to understand that the way of indian meditation is to
require to stop seeking pleasure of the senses to also try
to solve the problem of egoism that comes from the "desire", but
i don't think it is the right way to do, so the way of my new philosophy
is to seek much more a kind of pleasure of the senses and here it is:

Am i a philosopher that is a materialistic ?

No, i am not materialistic , i am a philosopher that is seeking like a
"balance" between being materialistic and not being materialistic , and
i am pragmatic, i will give you an example so that you understand my
philosophy:

I think that looking at the videos of youtube is like being not
materialistic, since a video on youtube is like the immaterial, so then
you can enjoy those pleasures of life on internet by looking at the
videos of youtube or by reading facebook etc. by being not
materialistic, so then i am a philosopher that is convinced that we can
be happy even if we are not "rich", since with the sophistication of
internet and such tools, i say that we can be happy without being rich
by accessing internet and enjoying pleasures of life of internet and
such tools with a very low price, and what i predict that in about 10
years from now, and with the exponential progress of our humanity, we
will be happy and much more happy without being rich since this
exponential progress will provide us with much more powerful tools that
enhance much more the quality of our lives.

The Consoomer: Consumerism is Nihilism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zZJ1BFQ1hw

I think the person that is talking in the above video is low IQ, i have
a high IQ and i answer the following:

Capitalism is a "tool" and you have to know how to use this tool and
capitalism is an "engine" that permits to create pleasures of life that
we enjoy (as services or products) so that to be happy(and this being
happy is the meaning of human life in my philosophy below), but notice
that this permits also the not rich to be happy because Mass production
in capitalism resulted in lower prices of consumer goods. Eventually,
economies of scale resulted in the most affordable price of any product
for the consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits,
and also look at how we are taking advantage of youtube videos or the
like in internet with a low price, and this low prices in capitalism
allows the not rich to be happy, and this at the same time avoids
totalitarianism such as communism and neo-nazism and nazism(because they
are "Fascism" of socialism that is against capitalism), read my below
philosophy to understand more, and notice that dictatorship of communism
of China is not communism, because it is using capitalism as an engine
that permits the people to be happy, so communism of China is not like
communism

More philosophy about R&D and economic growth and more..

I invite you to read the following interesting article that says
that in the last 50 years, R&D has not increased much economic growth,
but we have not to think just economic growth since we have to think the
standard of living, so then we have to understand that the standard of
living generally refers to wealth, comfort, material goods, and
necessities of certain classes in certain areas. So i think that R&D has
increased much the standard of living, so it is good for happiness.

How important is R&D for economic growth?

Read more here:

https://www.rdworldonline.com/how-important-is-rd-for-economic-growth/

More philosophy about why Globalization has become so important and more..

Why has Globalization become so important?

Read more here:

https://smallbusiness.chron.com/globalization-become-important-77671.html

And read the following study to know more about globalization:

The Economic Benefits of Globalization for Business and Consumers

http://ecipe.org/publications/the-economic-benefits-of-globalization-for-business-and-consumers/

More philosophy about venture capital in Silicon Valley and about the
future of financial stability and cyber risk and more..

I invite you to look at the following video, and i am not in accordance
with the english man that is speaking on the following video, because he
is too pessimistic by saying that the culture of venture capital in
Silicon Valley in USA has seen a dramatic shift, and it is that
investors care much less about investing in companies with the potential
to create a massive value and they care much more about investing in
companies that can scale quickly so that they can sell after that and
get more profit, so i think that it is not realistic to say so and it is
too pessimistic to say so, since i think that it is not at all so
problematic and i think that it just needs a more "smarter" culture of
investing and i think that USA is in a good economic shape, look at the
following video to notice how it is pessimistic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydeuxF0AkR8

And i invite you to read the following interesting article
about venture capital so that to understand:

http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/silicon-valley-a-cluster-of-venture-capitalists

More political philosophy about Ray Dalio and about happiness..

Read about Ray Dalio here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Dalio

And look at the following video of him:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tw0wtyzW6nA

I think that Ray Dalio is not thinking correctly, since he speaks like
an economist and he is not a philosopher, and this way of doing is
lacking intelligence, so i will explain with my smartness: