novaBBS - alt.politics - Re: "Supreme Court To Decide Whether to Take 14th Amendment CaseInvolving Trump"

Re: "Supreme Court To Decide Whether to Take 14th Amendment CaseInvolving Trump"

<pX7MM.543$quJ8.523@fx18.iad>

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=31391&group=alt.politics#31391

copy link Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics.trump sac.politics alt.politics.republicans talk.politics.guns alt.poltics.democrats.d talk.politics.misc can.politics alt.global-warming alt.elections alt.society.liberalism alt.atheism alt.tv.pol-incorrect alt.politics.elections alt.politics.usa alt.politics
Followup: alt.fan.rush-limbaurgh,alt.socially.liberalism,alt.athieism,alt.fucknozzles,alt.poltics.democrats.d,talk.poltics.guns

Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx18.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.15.0
Subject: Re: "Supreme Court To Decide Whether to Take 14th Amendment
CaseInvolving Trump"
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,sac.politics,alt.politics.republicans,talk.politics.guns,alt.poltics.democrats.d,talk.politics.misc,can.politics,alt.global-warming,alt.elections,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.tv.pol-incorrect,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics
References: <qxKdnRc9tJFoGGf5nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<1rbnfi9qjmb219ujsdlqrec6iesm3cl167@4ax.com> <udgj32$3t3ll$1@dont-email.me>
<udhv9e$3uhe$3@dont-email.me> <udi320$4aq6$5@dont-email.me>
<ke2qfip8p7vmjunh0ffmkr83vtvni6ikni@4ax.com> <udj4mc$92bu$1@dont-email.me>
<dtrsfild2stkovlodecrna4l1chvidd9is@4ax.com> <udm1pu$tngu$1@dont-email.me>
<inqtfipk5r3gsjs439hmusqdac9t1u37j3@4ax.com> <udn9o3$13f31$1@dont-email.me>
<s4h0giduqr8hi8336dt7ouo5d6sj2mc3ca@4ax.com>
<h812gi5il7quiqpmr96bdg6dr95ialkp3o@4ax.com>
<MPG.3f6ab89751a3bc8d98f250@usnews.blocknews.net>
Followup-To: alt.fan.rush-limbaurgh,alt.socially.liberalism,alt.athieism,alt.fucknozzles,alt.poltics.democrats.d,talk.poltics.guns
From: mike.am....@earthlink.nut (Michael A Terrell)
In-Reply-To: <MPG.3f6ab89751a3bc8d98f250@usnews.blocknews.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <pX7MM.543$quJ8.523@fx18.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:07:33 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 3786

by: Michael A Terrell - Wed, 13 Sep 2023 01:07 UTC

On 9/12/2023 6:04 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <h812gi5il7quiqpmr96bdg6dr95ialkp3o@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 07:01:50 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 07:54:55 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
>>> <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/11/2023 3:25 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 20:33:14 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Your argument fails because even if Trump is disqualified under 14/3
>>>>>> without a conviction,
>>>>>
>>>>> He can't be disqualified for something he didn't do.
>>>>
>>>> Whether he did it or not does not require a conviction.
>>>
>>> If you're going to prevent a person from being on a ballot and
>>> interfering with elections, you'd better DAMN WELL have a conviction.

No conviction needed

>>> It's easy to throw charges around as the Cons have demonstrated.
>>
>> Fixed that typo for you, bitch.
>>
>> And before you complain, I'll remind you that over the past THIRTY YEARS the GOP has spent
>> MILLIONS of TAXPAYER DOLLARS trying to pin something on the Clintons and the Bidens. So
>> far not one conviction, arrest, indictment or even as strong talking to has come of it.
>>
>> Oh, wait, one indictment of Bill Clinton for lying to a judge about whether or not he
>> cheated on his wife. As if that was anybody else's business.
>
>
> You seems [sic] to think it is when it comes to Trump.

"You seems" — ha ha ha ha ha!

No one is going after Trump for having cheated on his wife.

>>
>> Thirty years and millions wasted by the GOP trying to bring down legitimately elected
>> governments. We could send Ukraine a brand new F-16V with enough change left over to arm
>> it to the teeth, train the pilot *and* send a couple of months worth of artillery shells
>> to the Kherson front.
>>
>> Think about that, for a while.
>>
>> Swill
>
>

Subject	Author
Re: "Supreme Court To Decide Whether to Take 14th Amendment	Michael A Terrell

Laughing at you is like drop-kicking a wounded humming bird.

interests / alt.politics / Re: "Supreme Court To Decide Whether to Take 14th Amendment CaseInvolving Trump"