Expert predicts failure as China eyes a move into Afghanistan: 'This is going to be fun to watch' - the British failed, Russia failed, U.S. failed, will China's BRI fail in Afghanistan?? Wouldn't it surprise the Western nations when China succeeded in connecting Afghanistan with the rest of the world with China's BRI???

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/expert-predicts-failure-as-china-eyes-a-move-into-afghanistan-this-is-going-to-be-fun-to-watch/ar-AALVQge?ocid=msedgntp

Rusty Wyse <yale.mar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Expert predicts failure as China eyes a move into Afghanistan: 'This
> is going to be fun to watch' - the British failed, Russia failed,
> U.S. failed, will China's BRI fail in Afghanistan?? Wouldn't it
> surprise the Western nations when China succeeded in connecting
> Afghanistan with the rest of the world with China's BRI???
>
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/expert-predicts-failure-as-china-eyes-a-move-into-afghanistan-this-is-going-to-be-fun-to-watch/ar-AALVQge?ocid=msedgntp

Have you ruled out moves as subtle as supporting a carefully chosen
side/fraction of Afghan power struggle? IMHO Direct military
intervention is not likely (to be cost effective). I assume PRC is
capable to learn *without (strong) evidence otherwise*.

Najibullah lasted 3 years after soviet military withdrawal [A].

[A] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet%E2%80%93Afghan_War#Civil_war

--
A. Filip : Big Tech Brother is watching you.
| Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a
| rigged demo. (Andy Finkel, computer guy)

On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 9:24:19 AM UTC-7, A. Filip wrote:
> Rusty Wyse <yale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Expert predicts failure as China eyes a move into Afghanistan: 'This
> > is going to be fun to watch' - the British failed, Russia failed,
> > U.S. failed, will China's BRI fail in Afghanistan?? Wouldn't it
> > surprise the Western nations when China succeeded in connecting
> > Afghanistan with the rest of the world with China's BRI???
> >
> > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/expert-predicts-failure-as-china-eyes-a-move-into-afghanistan-this-is-going-to-be-fun-to-watch/ar-AALVQge?ocid=msedgntp
> Have you ruled out moves as subtle as supporting a carefully chosen
> side/fraction of Afghan power struggle? IMHO Direct military
> intervention is not likely (to be cost effective). I assume PRC is
> capable to learn *without (strong) evidence otherwise*.
>
> Najibullah lasted 3 years after soviet military withdrawal [A].
>
> [A] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet%E2%80%93Afghan_War#Civil_war
>
> --
> A. Filip : Big Tech Brother is watching you.
> | Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a
> | rigged demo. (Andy Finkel, computer guy)

All previous would-be conquerors came with weapons to kill and destroy.
China will come with construction equipment instead of guns/bombs...
Highways, railroads, airports, housing,... to make lives easier for the Afghans...

Rusty Wyse <yale.mar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Expert predicts failure as China eyes a move into Afghanistan: 'This
> is going to be fun to watch' - the British failed, Russia failed,
> U.S. failed, will China's BRI fail in Afghanistan?? Wouldn't it
> surprise the Western nations when China succeeded in connecting
> Afghanistan with the rest of the world with China's BRI???
>
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/expert-predicts-failure-as-china-eyes-a-move-into-afghanistan-this-is-going-to-be-fun-to-watch/ar-AALVQge?ocid=msedgntp

If they nuked Kabul, you wouldn't hear me complain...

On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 12:18:36 PM UTC-7, Byker wrote:
> Rusty Wyse <yale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Expert predicts failure as China eyes a move into Afghanistan: 'This
> > is going to be fun to watch' - the British failed, Russia failed,
> > U.S. failed, will China's BRI fail in Afghanistan?? Wouldn't it
> > surprise the Western nations when China succeeded in connecting
> > Afghanistan with the rest of the world with China's BRI???
> >
> > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/expert-predicts-failure-as-china-eyes-a-move-into-afghanistan-this-is-going-to-be-fun-to-watch/ar-AALVQge?ocid=msedgntp
> If they nuked Kabul, you wouldn't hear me complain...

You can't read, can you, Byker? Western nations come with guns/bombs to kill and destroy.
China goes to Afghanistan to build with construction materials and equipment...

On 9/7/2021 10:47 am, Rusty Wyse wrote:
> Expert predicts failure as China eyes a move into Afghanistan: 'This is going to be fun to watch' - the British failed, Russia failed, U.S. failed, will China's BRI fail in Afghanistan?? Wouldn't it surprise the Western nations when China succeeded in connecting Afghanistan with the rest of the world with China's BRI???
>
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/expert-predicts-failure-as-china-eyes-a-move-into-afghanistan-this-is-going-to-be-fun-to-watch/ar-AALVQge?ocid=msedgntp
>

Western nations went to countries to kill and destroy the economic life
in the country.

They went on the pretext of helping the people and country to upholding
democracy of the people of upholding government in power or to replace
the opposed government or of their favored government to power.

They did not bring investment of tool and equipment and material to help
in the productivity of economic life. Instead, they bring guns to kill
and destroy, and upturn the economic life.

China's foreign policy does not interfere in the politics of life in other
country. China is invited by countries to help and assist them to whatever
economic development needs.

With that in mind, one can safely China said can now safely say China is
invited by Afghanistan for investment. Investment brings jobs and economy to
the people.

Henceforth, Afghanistan will get help from China.

"Rusty Wyse" wrote in message
news:b1ba901a-2116-43c3-9df5-5d4fff6442ccn@googlegroups.com...

Expert predicts failure as China eyes a move into Afghanistan: 'This is
going to be fun to watch' - the British failed, Russia failed, U.S. failed,
will China's BRI fail in Afghanistan?? Wouldn't it surprise the Western
nations when China succeeded in connecting Afghanistan with the rest of the
world with China's BRI???

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/expert-predicts-failure-as-china-eyes-a-move-into-afghanistan-this-is-going-to-be-fun-to-watch/ar-AALVQge?ocid=msedgntp

Before China could begin helping Afghanistan, the western media and
American's anti-China politicians are eager to predict the downfall of it.
This show how America has degraded themselves to the pit.

"Rusty Wyse" wrote in message
news:b6ac28bd-f91f-4085-baf9-86778d01bf79n@googlegroups.com...

On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 9:24:19 AM UTC-7, A. Filip wrote:
> Rusty Wyse <yale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Expert predicts failure as China eyes a move into Afghanistan: 'This
> > is going to be fun to watch' - the British failed, Russia failed,
> > U.S. failed, will China's BRI fail in Afghanistan?? Wouldn't it
> > surprise the Western nations when China succeeded in connecting
> > Afghanistan with the rest of the world with China's BRI???
> >
> > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/expert-predicts-failure-as-china-eyes-a-move-into-afghanistan-this-is-going-to-be-fun-to-watch/ar-AALVQge?ocid=msedgntp
> Have you ruled out moves as subtle as supporting a carefully chosen
> side/fraction of Afghan power struggle? IMHO Direct military
> intervention is not likely (to be cost effective). I assume PRC is
> capable to learn *without (strong) evidence otherwise*.
>
> Najibullah lasted 3 years after soviet military withdrawal [A].
>
> [A] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet%E2%80%93Afghan_War#Civil_war
>
> --
> A. Filip : Big Tech Brother is watching you.
> | Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a
> | rigged demo. (Andy Finkel, computer guy)

All previous would-be conquerors came with weapons to kill and destroy.
China will come with construction equipment instead of guns/bombs...
Highways, railroads, airports, housing,... to make lives easier for the
Afghans...