Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Old age is always fifteen years old than I am. -- B. Baruch


interests / soc.genealogy.medieval / Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William Bardolf, Knt. and IPM

SubjectAuthor
* Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir WilliamDarrell E. Larocque
`* Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir Williamtaf
 `* Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir WilliamDarrell E. Larocque
  `* Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir WilliamWill Johnson
   +- Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir WilliamWill Johnson
   `- Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William Bardolf, Knt. Darrell E. Larocque

1
Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William Bardolf, Knt. and IPM

<29447883-e15f-4d25-b495-43bca6e95dbcn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=3671&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#3671

 copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:22ed:: with SMTP id p13mr15960558qki.768.1640750306504;
Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:58:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5787:: with SMTP id v7mr21300690qta.79.1640750306314;
Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:58:26 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:58:26 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=204.210.178.207; posting-account=iUa9xgoAAADBmqfDkWJuwMcrkwxN72ux
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.210.178.207
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <29447883-e15f-4d25-b495-43bca6e95dbcn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William
Bardolf, Knt. and IPM
From: frenchco...@gmail.com (Darrell E. Larocque)
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 03:58:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 38
 by: Darrell E. Larocque - Wed, 29 Dec 2021 03:58 UTC

Hello all,

I was looking through sources to confirm the birth and death dates of Sir William Bardolf, Knt., son of Sir William Bardolf, 4th Lord Bardolf and Agnes de Poynings to add to the family profile I'm working on, and came across a discrepancy.

(1) Douglas Richardson. Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 4 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham, 2nd edition (Salt Lake City: the author, 2011), Vol. II, p. 106:

"SIR WILLIAM BARDOLF died in 1424."

(2) E-CIPM 22-324: WILLIAM BARDOLF, KNIGHT:

"WILLIAM BARDOLF, KNIGHT
324 [The fragment of the writ of diem clausit extremum, dated at St[?obton] does not include the county, tenant, date or clerk.]
NORFOLK. Inquisition. Cantley. 11 September 1423. [Wynter]"

....

"He died on 25 July last. Anne widow of William Clifford, knight , and Joan wife of William Phelipp, knight , are his kinswomen and next heirs as the daughters of Thomas his brother, Anne aged 34 years and more, Joan 33 years and more. William Clyfford died without heir of his body by Anne before the death of William Bardolf . The manors of Whinburgh, Cantley and Strumpshaw should thus remain to Anne and to William Philip and Joan according to the above."

https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/22-324/

Would the IPM not mean that Sir William died in 1422 or 1423 and not 1424? The phrase "25 July last" to me means 25 July 1422 but it could be 25 July 1423 but it couldn't be 1424 since the IPM is dated December 1423.

What say you all? Thanks!

Darrell E. Larocque

Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William Bardolf, Knt. and IPM

<6577538a-7675-436c-9bd1-ecb227c3df21n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=3675&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#3675

 copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2596:: with SMTP id x22mr18459624qko.408.1640791839515;
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 07:30:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a37:8d86:: with SMTP id p128mr18713952qkd.706.1640791839372;
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 07:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 07:30:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <29447883-e15f-4d25-b495-43bca6e95dbcn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=50.37.111.52; posting-account=ysT2WAoAAAD3tS1it3CP1N_fzqondDgH
NNTP-Posting-Host: 50.37.111.52
References: <29447883-e15f-4d25-b495-43bca6e95dbcn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6577538a-7675-436c-9bd1-ecb227c3df21n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William
Bardolf, Knt. and IPM
From: taf.medi...@gmail.com (taf)
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:30:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 19
 by: taf - Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:30 UTC

On Tuesday, December 28, 2021 at 7:58:27 PM UTC-8, Darrell E. Larocque wrote:
> NORFOLK. Inquisition. Cantley. 11 September 1423. [Wynter]"
> ...
> "He died on 25 July last. ...
>
> Would the IPM not mean that Sir William died in 1422 or 1423 and not 1424? The
> phrase "25 July last" to me means 25 July 1422 but it could be 25 July 1423 but
> it couldn't be 1424 since the IPM is dated December 1423.

The phrase "25 July last" refers to the most recently passed 25 July. With the ipm dated in September 1423, this would be 25 July 1423. There are sometimes scribal errors in inquisitions, such that the death date is placed in the wrong year, but there is nothing here to suggest that is the case. More importantly, as you indicate, the performance of an inquisition post mortem excludes any possibility that the subject died subsequently.

taf

Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William Bardolf, Knt. and IPM

<ef802244-2cdd-4c6b-b9d7-4cb5712e713cn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=3676&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#3676

 copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6714:: with SMTP id e20mr23811093qtp.664.1640805958993;
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 11:25:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5e8d:: with SMTP id jl13mr24993451qvb.109.1640805958728;
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 11:25:58 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 11:25:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6577538a-7675-436c-9bd1-ecb227c3df21n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=204.210.178.207; posting-account=iUa9xgoAAADBmqfDkWJuwMcrkwxN72ux
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.210.178.207
References: <29447883-e15f-4d25-b495-43bca6e95dbcn@googlegroups.com> <6577538a-7675-436c-9bd1-ecb227c3df21n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ef802244-2cdd-4c6b-b9d7-4cb5712e713cn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William
Bardolf, Knt. and IPM
From: frenchco...@gmail.com (Darrell E. Larocque)
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 19:25:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 27
 by: Darrell E. Larocque - Wed, 29 Dec 2021 19:25 UTC

On Wednesday, December 29, 2021 at 10:30:40 AM UTC-5, taf wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 28, 2021 at 7:58:27 PM UTC-8, Darrell E. Larocque wrote:
> > NORFOLK. Inquisition. Cantley. 11 September 1423. [Wynter]"
> > ...
> > "He died on 25 July last. ...
> >
> > Would the IPM not mean that Sir William died in 1422 or 1423 and not 1424? The
> > phrase "25 July last" to me means 25 July 1422 but it could be 25 July 1423 but
> > it couldn't be 1424 since the IPM is dated December 1423.
> The phrase "25 July last" refers to the most recently passed 25 July. With the ipm dated in September 1423, this would be 25 July 1423. There are sometimes scribal errors in inquisitions, such that the death date is placed in the wrong year, but there is nothing here to suggest that is the case. More importantly, as you indicate, the performance of an inquisition post mortem excludes any possibility that the subject died subsequently.
>
> taf

That's why I thought it needed correction in any case, but this does clear up the issue and I meant to say that I do not know if it was cleared up in a later publication, but 25 July 1423 is correct.

Thank you! Case closed it seems for Sir William.

Darrell E. Larocque

Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William Bardolf, Knt. and IPM

<3e020c4d-a66d-4d7f-953e-805fd7779ed7n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=3677&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#3677

 copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:120b:: with SMTP id y11mr24326104qtx.544.1640810675976;
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:44:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1789:: with SMTP id s9mr24476282qtk.604.1640810675829;
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:44:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ef802244-2cdd-4c6b-b9d7-4cb5712e713cn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.14.0.190; posting-account=nhBOTgoAAADuAcmu7lbftS3RTn3Edci0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.14.0.190
References: <29447883-e15f-4d25-b495-43bca6e95dbcn@googlegroups.com>
<6577538a-7675-436c-9bd1-ecb227c3df21n@googlegroups.com> <ef802244-2cdd-4c6b-b9d7-4cb5712e713cn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3e020c4d-a66d-4d7f-953e-805fd7779ed7n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William
Bardolf, Knt. and IPM
From: wjhonson...@gmail.com (Will Johnson)
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 20:44:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 7
 by: Will Johnson - Wed, 29 Dec 2021 20:44 UTC

The idea that he died a bit later is probably this

https://books.google.com/books?id=uHVbAAAAQAAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&dq=sir%20william%20bardolf%20%221424%22&pg=PA5#v=onepage&q=sir%20william%20bardolf%20%221424%22&f=false

That his widow and her new husband released this lordship to these two woman here named as heiress' in his IPM

That the author of this probably did not have access to the IPM itself implies the possibility that this was not a release in that sense, but a quit claim, she probably still holding as dower

Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William Bardolf, Knt. and IPM

<6fab6c07-afb2-4f8b-800e-1679f4b19fbfn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=3678&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#3678

 copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:45aa:: with SMTP id bp42mr20319276qkb.561.1640810777454;
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:46:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2a88:: with SMTP id jr8mr25040043qvb.125.1640810777368;
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:46:17 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:46:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3e020c4d-a66d-4d7f-953e-805fd7779ed7n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.14.0.190; posting-account=nhBOTgoAAADuAcmu7lbftS3RTn3Edci0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.14.0.190
References: <29447883-e15f-4d25-b495-43bca6e95dbcn@googlegroups.com>
<6577538a-7675-436c-9bd1-ecb227c3df21n@googlegroups.com> <ef802244-2cdd-4c6b-b9d7-4cb5712e713cn@googlegroups.com>
<3e020c4d-a66d-4d7f-953e-805fd7779ed7n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6fab6c07-afb2-4f8b-800e-1679f4b19fbfn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William
Bardolf, Knt. and IPM
From: wjhonson...@gmail.com (Will Johnson)
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 20:46:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 9
 by: Will Johnson - Wed, 29 Dec 2021 20:46 UTC

On Wednesday, December 29, 2021 at 12:44:36 PM UTC-8, Will Johnson wrote:
> The idea that he died a bit later is probably this
>
> https://books.google.com/books?id=uHVbAAAAQAAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&dq=sir%20william%20bardolf%20%221424%22&pg=PA5#v=onepage&q=sir%20william%20bardolf%20%221424%22&f=false
>
> That his widow and her new husband released this lordship to these two woman here named as heiress' in his IPM
>
> That the author of this probably did not have access to the IPM itself implies the possibility that this was not a release in that sense, but a quit claim, she probably still holding as dower

I mean to say that she quitclaimed her interest, in exchange for an annuity out of the same

Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William Bardolf, Knt. and IPM

<c8bcb1b6-03f5-4be5-bbe4-517dede62059n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=3679&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#3679

 copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5ad1:: with SMTP id d17mr25100370qtd.23.1640829156465; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 17:52:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4087:: with SMTP id f7mr20442575qko.632.1640829156257; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 17:52:36 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.uzoreto.com!tr3.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 17:52:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3e020c4d-a66d-4d7f-953e-805fd7779ed7n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=204.210.178.207; posting-account=iUa9xgoAAADBmqfDkWJuwMcrkwxN72ux
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.210.178.207
References: <29447883-e15f-4d25-b495-43bca6e95dbcn@googlegroups.com> <6577538a-7675-436c-9bd1-ecb227c3df21n@googlegroups.com> <ef802244-2cdd-4c6b-b9d7-4cb5712e713cn@googlegroups.com> <3e020c4d-a66d-4d7f-953e-805fd7779ed7n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c8bcb1b6-03f5-4be5-bbe4-517dede62059n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Correction to MCA, Vol. II, p. 106? Death date of Sir William Bardolf, Knt. and IPM
From: frenchco...@gmail.com (Darrell E. Larocque)
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 01:52:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 24
 by: Darrell E. Larocque - Thu, 30 Dec 2021 01:52 UTC

On Wednesday, December 29, 2021 at 3:44:36 PM UTC-5, wjhons...@gmail.com wrote:
> The idea that he died a bit later is probably this
>
> https://books.google.com/books?id=uHVbAAAAQAAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&dq=sir%20william%20bardolf%20%221424%22&pg=PA5#v=onepage&q=sir%20william%20bardolf%20%221424%22&f=false
>
> That his widow and her new husband released this lordship to these two woman here named as heiress' in his IPM
>
> That the author of this probably did not have access to the IPM itself implies the possibility that this was not a release in that sense, but a quit claim, she probably still holding as dower

I do see that Douglas used this as a reference as it is listed first and put together the supposed death year and relationship between Richard Selling and Sir William's widow, Joan and the annuity. The publication date of this source (1781) is as you said the probable reason why. Those two women, Anne (Bardolf) Cobham and Joan (Bardolf) Phelip, were the daughters of Thomas Bardolf, 5th Lord Bardolf just so you have an idea as to why.

Thank you for this additional information!

Darrell E. Larocque

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor