On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 10:49:05 -0600, Phil Hendry's Chop shop wrote:

> On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:32:44 -0700
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2024-04-14 07:46, Phil Hendry's Chop shop wrote:
>> > On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:16:02 -0700
>> > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 2024-04-13 14:51, Phil Hendry's Chop shop wrote:
>> >>> On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:56:32 -0700
>> >>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I didn't
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Another solar micronova epochal site found close to your home:
>> >>>
>> >>> https://ro.uow.edu.au/era/73/
>> >>>
>> >>> Australia’s oldest human remains, found at Lake Mungo, include the
>> >>> world’s oldest ritual ochre burial (Mungo III) and the first
>> >>> recorded cremation (Mungo I). Until now, the importance of these
>> >>> finds has been constrained by limited chronologies and
>> >>> palaeoenvironmental information. Mungo III, the source of the
>> >>> world’s oldest human mitochondrial DNA, has been variously
>> >>> estimated at 30 thousand years (kyr) old, 42–45 kyr old and 62 +/-
>> >>> 6 kyr old. while radiocarbon estimates placed theMungo I cremation
>> >>> near 20–26 kyr ago. Here we report a new series of 25 optical ages
>> >>> showing that both burials occurred at 40 +/- 2 kyr ago and that
>> >>> humans were present at Lake Mungo by 50–46 kyr ago, synchronously
>> >>> with, or soon after, initial occupation of northern and western
>> >>> Australia. Stratigraphic evidence indicates fluctuations between
>> >>> lake-full and drier conditions from 50 to 40 kyr ago,
>> >>> simultaneously with increased dust deposition, human arrival and
>> >>> continent-wide extinction of the megafauna. This was followed by
>> >>> sustained aridity between 40 and 30 kyr ago. This new chronology
>> >>> corrects previous estimates for human burials at this important
>> >>> site and provides a new picture of Homo sapiens adapting to
>> >>> deteriorating climate in the world’s driest inhabited continent.
>> >>
>> >> Micronovas are phenomenon of white dwarf stars, doofus.
>> >
>> > Not exclusively, not at all!
>> >
>> >
>> >> And what you just quoted about doesn't even mention then.
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
>> >>>
>> >>> Earth has magnetic reversals and magnetic excursions. Reversals
>> >>> include a flip of Earth’s magnetic field after long (100,000s of
>> >>> years) epochs, while excursions are rapid flips and flips-back of
>> >>> the magnetic pole. Both events include an intensity minimum during
>> >>> the flip that allows space energy to penetrate into the Earth
>> >>> system. Excursions occur much more frequently than full reversals,
>> >>> somewhere around 10,000 - 15,000 years apart on average. While
>> >>> some researchers believe the cycle to be relatively exact,
>> >>> everything from ~11,500 years (Walker) to exactly 12,068 years
>> >>> (Douglas Vogt), to 21,000 - 26,000 years (axial/apsidal
>> >>> precession catastrophism theory), the geologic evidence available
>> >>> today tells a slightly more complex story of the processes
>> >>> involved. In modern science, there are some recognized events
>> >>> that paint a scary picture of the near-term future. Excursions
>> >>> have taken place ~12,000 - 13,000 years ago (Gothenburg), ~24,000
>> >>> - 28,000 years ago (Lake Mungo), ~33,000 - 37,000 years ago (Mono
>> >>> Lake), ~41,000 - 46,000 years ago (Laschamp), ~60,000 years ago
>> >>> (Greenland/Vostok), and ~72,000 years ago (Toba). A rapid look at
>> >>> the most recent events shows ~12,000 to 13,000 years between
>> >>> them, meaning that the cycle is approximately due to reset now.
>> >>> While the exact dating of these events has endured considerable
>> >>> disagreement (as evidenced by the uncertainty of time in which
>> >>> they are supposed to have occurred) they tell a story of a
>> >>> recurring magnetic change on our planet, one that matches other
>> >>> cycle timelines and the evidence of disaste
>> >>
>> >> I'm fully aware that the Earth has had magnetic reversals, doofus.
>> >>
>> >> But where does that say anything about there being any connection
>> >> to changes in climate?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Dense, aren't ya?
>> >
>> >
>> > https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
>> >
>> > There has been at least some level of biosphere stress with all the
>> > recent geomagnetic excursions, but some are definitely worse than
>> > others. During some, a tremendous amount of the biosphere
>> > disappears, for others, it might be several bad surge deposits with
>> > perhaps only 10% to 20% of species’ population numbers being lost-
>> > and few extinctions. One piece of excellent news is that we have
>> > not seen two of the terrible ones in a row, and the last one was a
>> > terrible one. In the next chart, we find the known geomagnetic
>> > excursions dating back to the “Blake” event, with a biosphere
>> > impact score for each. A 10/10 would be a complete extermination of
>> > life on Earth. 9/10 is catastrophic/extreme, like Toba, when as
>> > little as a few dozen reproducing human females survived. For
>> > comparison, a major hurricane or earthquake is unlikely to even
>> > register a “1” on this chart, and a volcanic eruption that cools
>> > the planet 2-3 degrees might be a “1-3”. Excursion Name Estimate
>> > Time Biosphere Impact /10 Gothenburg ~12,000 years ago 8/10
>> > (Severe) Lake Mungo 24 - 28,000 years ago 4/10 Mono Lake 33 -
>> > 37,000 years ago 5/10 Laschamp 41 - 46,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)
>> > Vostok/Greenland ~60,000 years ago 5/10 Toba ~72,000 years ago 9/10
>> > (Extreme) ??? ~84,000 years ago <4/10
>> > ??? ~96,000 years ago <4/10
>> > Blake 105-115,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)
>> >
>>
>> See my previous hint.
>
> I see only your denialsm.

Al is an Anocrat: denial is their raison'd'etre.
You won't see anything else.

Dhu

>
> "Previously, researchers estimated the field was weakening about 5
> percent per century, but the new data revealed the field is actually
> weakening at 5 percent per decade, or 10 times faster than thought. As
> such, rather than the full flip occurring in about 2,000 years, as was
> predicted, the new data suggest it could happen sooner."

--
Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglais.
C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-)
Duncan Patton a Campbell