Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Two percent of zero is almost nothing.


interests / alt.politics / Re: Paranoid Schizophrenic Shan Panigrahi (Michael Kingham, Odesanya)

SubjectAuthor
* Paranoid Schizophrenic Shan Panigrahi (Michael Kingham, Odesanya)Prof. Steve H. Rudd
`- Re: Paranoid Schizophrenic Shan Panigrahi (Michael Kingham, Odesanya)Prof. Steve H. Rudd

1
Paranoid Schizophrenic Shan Panigrahi (Michael Kingham, Odesanya)

<bcc4d644d9aaa41a6947bb89c7aee80f@dizum.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=4481&group=alt.politics#4481

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.legal uk.politics.misc uk.rec.motorcycles alt.politics alt.psychology
From: u-psychi...@bible.ca (Prof. Steve H. Rudd)
Subject: Paranoid Schizophrenic Shan Panigrahi (Michael Kingham, Odesanya)
Message-ID: <bcc4d644d9aaa41a6947bb89c7aee80f@dizum.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 20:21:24 +0200 (CEST)
Newsgroups: uk.legal, uk.politics.misc, uk.rec.motorcycles, alt.politics,
alt.psychology
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!news.mixmin.net!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail
Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com
Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 2001::1/128
 by: Prof. Steve H. Rudd - Mon, 31 May 2021 18:21 UTC

REPORT BY PROFESSOR STEVE H. RUDD

PART I

Forgive us a small deception. Professor Bhardwaj is not a psychologist at the
Manipal IT in former Assam in India, but instead a learned law lecturer at any
IvY League university. He referred the very Curious Case of Benjamin, rather
Shantanu, Panigrahi-Buttons, to me, as we know each other from college days.
This Curious Case had, in turn, been referred to Nitin by a barrister in
England (initials JS) for whom Panigrahi had, years ago, caused some
considerable trouble in social media and with the Courts, Regulators and
Police.

The psychiatrist is me. My email address functions (forwarding), but my name
has been slightly adjusted here; I was doubly-named after a fish, just one
fish will have to do.

=================================================
CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF "DOCTOR" SHANTANU PANIGRAHI
=================================================

Allegedly suffering from F20.0/F20.2 "Schizophrenia with paranoia" (ref.
Appendix A below), here with catatonic thema, per the 24 May 2021 verdict of a
Dr Femi Odesanya, who prescribed PO:
1. Risperidone 4mg BD
2. Depakote 500mg BD
3. Sertraline 150mg
4. Finasteride 5mg
5. Tamsoulosin-MR 400ug
6. Atorvastatin 20mg
7. Thorazine (? surely an error)

As you may see below, treating schizophrenia with drugs is like smashing the
hardware of a computer because a software virus had been installed. Perhaps it
is as well that Panigrahi, as his wife suspects, flushes most or all of these
"free" gifts down the toilet and implies he auctions the rest online via his
supplies company (SSS) on the darkweb.

Mr. Odesanya MD of the UK's free National Health Service is woefully out of
date in her or his terminology (who uses "paranoid schizophrenia" nowadays?)
and appears to be a novice, at least at diagnosis. The other possibilities are
less flattering.

Odesanya has the small advantage of having met with the patient or subject
(note: not "sufferer", for it is others who do the suffering, not Panigrahi)
on multiple occasions, while I have had to rely solely on online published
material (ref. Appendix B below) for which I am grateful directly to Nitin and
indirectly to Mr. Michael Kingham, who is more proficient than Odesanya.

Here, the advantage derived from face to face diagnosis is illusory, because
Panigrahi is, like all F20.0 specimens, adept at deception and "playing the
victim", ad nauseam. One of the reasons he does this is to escape legal
consequences of his brutal bullying and manipulation. I suspect the only
reason his spouse is still with him is cultural, unless she too is "nuts" or
exhibits masochism.

Schizophrenia (Schizoaffective Disorder, a meaningless term for _apparent_
delusion and paranoia) is a cunning personal choice (i.e., a voluntary
decision) of extremely bad, antisocial behaviour, and not a disease or medical
condition. If Kingham were candid, he would admit that, because as an
intelligent man he must surely know it already. Schizophrenia is most
certainly not a disease, genetic defect or caused by a chemical or anatomical
abnormality in the brain, else the condition could be tested for with some
reliability, and treated with some medication, surgery, radiation etc.

So it is PERSONAL CHOICE OF EVIL MISCONDUCT - not "illness". It calls for and
merits punishment, not "treatment", which is crafted to keep the parasites and
carrion-birds of the psychiatric profession in clover. One needs only to look
at the history and roots of this sordid profession - Panigrahi himself
regularly explains it ("madarchod" is the Freudian term in the Oriya language
Panigrahi uses to describe Sigmund vis-a-vis his mother).

Schizophrenia with (affective) paranoia is an extreme example of the alleged
ailment, and the law must ALWAYS be used to imprison people exhibiting this
dangerous conduct, because the damage they cause to the innocent and to the
fabric of society is immense. This view is supported and justified in the
analysis below:

More broadly, various pseudoscientific terms are used to describe an
individual who has chosen to allow himself to form the habit of engaging in
outrageous behaviours that annoy, bother, offend, threaten, intimidate and
punish others and create his own false reality of self-delusion for the
purpose of escaping some personal life problem, usually wholly of his own
making and always at least partially deliberately constructed by him, which
they achieve through the control of others for personal gain through lies,
manipulation, criminal behaviours, forgery, theft and the eliciting of
sympathy through outward displays of self-created suffering, hardship and
victimhood.

Panigrahi is an extreme case; despite there apparently being an entire
"Association" of those he has victimised ("VOPA"), this habitual liar and
fraudster presents himself to the medical and nursing professions, law
enforcement and judiciary as if he Panigrahi is the victim. I have studied and
sampled a painfully long schedule of self-declared victims of Panigrahi and I
statistically conclude (c=98%, n=2000) that the vast majority of them are bona-
fide.

Historically, schizophrenia was known as "dementia praecox", insanity or
madness and is always associated with delusion and paranoia, almost always
affected (i.e., fake). "When, in 1911, Dr. Bleuler renamed dementia praecox
[as] 'schizophrenia,' he identified the disease not by its characteristic
histopathology, as was customary with diseases of the nervous system, but by
its incurability! That this is an utterly destructive way of describing a
disease - a disease that, moreover, has no objective bodily manifestations and
has never been known to be fatal - should be obvious." - page 165 of The Myth
Of Psychotherapy, by Dr. Thomas Szasz (1979).

Saying someone is "MAD" has its origin in the root for "uncontrolled anger".
When people launch into out-of-control acts of violence, they were said to be
mad.

In fact, it is self-chosen "BAD" conduct, constructed so as to evade legal and
personal consequences to the pernicious online perpetrator (Panigrahi).

Here are the real Laws of Psychiatry, known to all intelligent psychiatrists
and psychologists, though openly admitted by only a few:
FIRST THEOREM - Behaviour is a choice. Checklist behaviors. Determine the
benefit.
SECOND THEOREM - Psychotic behaviour is a solution. Determine the problem.

Schizophrenia, with or without paranoia or catatonia, is the solution of how
the mind rationalizes the irrational. Schizophrenia is a behaviour choice that
creates an escape from reality in order to achieve a goal or gain a personal
benefit. Schizophrenia with this extraordinarily deviant subject-patient who
benefited from a very privileged upbringing and background is a premeditated
behaviour choice to exact revenge for the lack of recognition of his self-
perceived, but in reality non-existent, genius, to which many references can
be found in the subject matter of Appendix B.

Emphatically, his schizophrenia with paranoia is a behaviour choice to escape
the unpleasant life situation he has created for himself by compelling the
University of Greenwich, a non Ivy League grade institution in England, to
expel him with prejudice. Schizophrenia is always an escape when all other
rational doors are closed. Furthermore, Panigrahi quite obviously enjoys this
and will use such intellect as he might possess to ensure the situation
continues and his "victimhood" (the word is used ironically) continues or its
trajectory increases.

I reiterate, and in the case of Panigrahi there is simply no other diagnostic
choice, unless one tries to "cop it" by attribution to idiopathy, a
contradiction if ever there was one:

1. Schizophrenia is a behaviour choice not a disease, genetic defect or caused
by a chemical imbalance or anatomical anomaly in the brain.

2. If schizophrenia were a disease rather than a deception, there would be at
least one medical test, like a blood test, but there are none that work with
even 50% false-positive thresholds.

3. Evidence as adduced here from the perpetrator (not "sufferer") of a genetic
component is severely flawed. It is learned behaviour. Panigrahi observed the
acute "madness" of his mother and older brother, and milder "madness" of his
father (websearch: KEW GOPINATH PANIGRAHI) and copied it, but in a far more
harmful manner. The mother and brother ("My elder brother suffered from
chronic schizophrenia since his late teens and had received electroconvulsive
therapy in India" - Panigrahi) destroyed themselves and mainly harmed only
close relatives; here the subject harms all society.

4. It can not be overstated that schizophrenia is not a disease that medicine
can detect, it is impossible to diagnose someone for schizophrenia unless they
talk. If the person stays silent, there is no way medicine can diagnose him as
a schizophrenic. Schizophrenia is thus behaviour not disease and those like
Kingham or Odesanya who feign otherwise are "mistaken".


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Paranoid Schizophrenic Shan Panigrahi (Michael Kingham, Odesanya)

<be6afd99d96240b12c4873fe64c451b8@dizum.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=4499&group=alt.politics#4499

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.legal uk.politics.misc uk.rec.motorcycles alt.politics alt.psychology
From: u-psychi...@bible.ca (Prof. Steve H. Rudd)
References: <bcc4d644d9aaa41a6947bb89c7aee80f@dizum.com>
Subject: Re: Paranoid Schizophrenic Shan Panigrahi (Michael Kingham, Odesanya)
Message-ID: <be6afd99d96240b12c4873fe64c451b8@dizum.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 04:00:41 +0200 (CEST)
Newsgroups: uk.legal, uk.politics.misc, uk.rec.motorcycles, alt.politics,
alt.psychology
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!news.mixmin.net!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail
Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com
Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 2001::1/128
 by: Prof. Steve H. Rudd - Tue, 1 Jun 2021 02:00 UTC

REPORT BY PROFESSOR STEVE H. RUDD

PART II

8. Despite repeated attempts to find chemical, structural or scanned
differences, schizophrenics have generally normal brains, except when taking
psychiatric drugs:

(a) "In 1978, Philip Seeman at the University of Toronto announced in Nature
that this was indeed the case. At autopsy, the brains of twenty schizophrenics
had 70 percent more D2 receptors than normal. At first glance, it seemed that
the cause of schizophrenia had been found, but Seeman cautioned that all of
the patients had been on neuroleptics prior to their deaths. "Although these
results are apparently compatible with the dopamine hypothesis of
schizophrenia in general," he wrote, the increase in D2 receptors might "have
resulted from the long-term administration of neuroleptics." [T. Lee, "Binding
of 31-1-neuroleptics and 3H-apomorphine in schizophrenic brains," Nature 374
(1978): 897-900.] � A variety of studies quickly proved that the drugs were
indeed the culprit. When rats were fed neuroleptics, their D2 receptors
quickly increased in number. [D. Burt, "Antischizophrenic drugs: chronic
treatment elevates dopamine receptor binding in brain," Science 196 (1977):
326-27.] � If rats were given a drug that blocked D, receptors, that receptor
subtype increased in density. [M. Porceddu, "[3H]SCH 23390 binding sites
increase after chronic blockade of d-1 dopamine receptors," European Journal
of Pharmacology 118 (1985): 367-70.] � "Finally, investigators in France,
Sweden, and Finland used positron emission topography to study D2-receptor
densities in living patients who had never been exposed to neuroleptics, and
all reported "no significant differences" between the schizophrenics and
"normal controls."" [J. Martinot, "Striatal D2 dopaminergic receptors assessed
with positron emission tomography and bromospiperone in untreated
schizophrenic patients," American Journal of Psychiatry 147 (1990): 44-50; L.
Farde, "D2 dopamine receptors in neuroleptic-naive schizophrenic patients,"
Archives of General Psychiatry 47 (1990): 213-19; J. Hietala, "Striatal D2
dopamine receptor characteristics in neurolepticna�ve schizophrenic patients
studied with positron emission tomography," Archives of General Psychiatry 51
(1994): 116-23.] - page 76 of Anatomy of an Epidemic, by Dr. Robert Whitaker
(2010)

(b) "The low-serotonin hypothesis of depression and the high-dopamine
hypothesis of schizophrenia had always been the twin pillars of the chemical-
imbalance theory of mental disorders, and by the late 1980s, both had been
found wanting. Other mental disorders have also been touted to the public as
diseases caused by chemical imbalances, but there was never any evidence to
support those claims." - Ibid, page 77

(c) "There is no compelling evidence that a lesion in the dopamine system is a
primary cause of schizophrenia" - page 392 of Molecular Neuropharmacology, by
E.Nestler & S.Hyman (2002)

9. No amount of repetition is sufficient - Schizophrenia, with or without
paranoia, is a voluntary behaviour choice, motivated by real or imagined
present or expected personal benefit, and assuredly not a disease - and
therefore cannot be treated. It can be punished with sufficient severity
(financial and deprivation of liberty) which will make it an unattractive
lifestyle choice for the perpetrator.

10. By blocking this happening, from the viewpoint of society, Panigrahi,
Odesanya and Kingham are co-conspirators. These shrinks are accessories
before, during and after the fact (this, per Bhardwaj) and I believe deserve
harsh condemnation.

For the greater good, any jurist would agree that Panigrahi (identified in
Appendix C below) himself must be locked up immediately. His "paranoid
schizophrenia" will then miraculously disappear. Remove this financial motive,
and the antisocial, deviant, selfish and damaging behaviour will cease.

Such a shame corporal punishment is currently out of vogue, or accelerated
cure could be effected.

Prof. S. Rudd
(Beware of Quacks)

Appendix A ---- DSM-V Classification (for use by Quacks)

F20-F29 Schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional,
and other non-mood psychotic disorders

F20 Schizophrenia
F20.0 Schizophrenia with paranoia
F20.1 Hebephrenic schizophrenia
F20.2 Catatonic schizophrenia
F20.3 Undifferentiated schizophrenia
F20.4 Postschizophrenic depression
F20.5 Residual schizophrenia
F20.6 Simple schizophrenia
F20.8 Other schizophrenia
F20.9 Schizophrenia, unspecified

F21 Schizotypal disorder

F22 Persistent delusional disorders
F22.0 Delusional disorder
F22.8 Other persistent delusional disorders
F22.9 Persistent delusional disorder, unspecified

F23 Acute and transient psychotic disorders
F23.0 Acute polymorphic psychotic disorder without symptoms of schizophrenia
F23.1 Acute polymorphic psychotic disorder with symptoms of schizophrenia
F23.2 Acute schizophrenia-like psychotic disorder
F23.3 Other acute predominantly delusional psychotic disorders
F23.8 Other acute and transient psychotic disorders
F23.9 Acute and transient psychotic disorder, unspecified

F24 Induced delusional disorder

F25 Schizoaffective disorders
F25.0 Schizoaffective disorder, manic type
F25.1 Schizoaffective disorder, depressive type
F25.2 Schizoaffective disorder, mixed type
F25.8 Other schizoaffective disorders
F25.9 Schizoaffective disorder, unspecified

F28 Other nonorganic psychotic disorders

F29 Unspecified nonorganic psychosis

Appendix B ---- Reference Material to support Clinical Diagnosis

https://www.theconservativelibertariansociety.com
https://shanpanigrahi.co.uk
http://alturl.com/kx7ma http://alturl.com/nuvq9
https://www.thelibertariandemocrats.com/forum
https://www.theallurementofrealityinreview.com
http://pub46.bravenet.com/forum/3871902446/
http://vishistaadvaitavedanta.bravesites.com/blog
http://alturl.com/gkwkf http://alturl.com/3un5d
https://towardsknowledgeforworldconservation.com
https://twitter.com/ShantanuPanigr8
https://www.facebook.com/shantanu.panigrahi.10
https://theconservativelibertarianpartyoftheunitedkingdom.com
https://the-conservative-libertarian-party-of-usa.odoo.com
https://t.co/Y4A0lmdxGr https://t.co/6dXxB3hTZV
https://t.co/88748B8HEk http://alturl.com/p4nho
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22Dr+Shantanu+Panigrahi%22
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.politics/UOpfj3x7Fec/d2VwpvZ3AQAJ
https://narkive.com/VT9xrlho https://narkive.com/ZE507Zte
https://narkive.com/MPLIJFCX https://narkive.com/Pu5jAiOd
https://shantanup.wordpress.com (at archive.org)
https://archive.org/details/@shantanu858

Appendix C ---- The Perpetrator/Subject

Name. "Doctor" Shantanu (Shan) Panigrahi
NHS No. 6284771487 Hospital No. R570808AD National Insurance No. YZ330724D
UK Passport 522465108 (naturalised 1/4/1984)
UK Phones: (+44)01634 379604, (+44)07967 789619
Addresses: Room D, First Floor Basement, 3 Hoath Lane, Wigmore, Gillingham,
Kent, ME8 0SL, UK, also Plot 2457/1 Gourinagar, Bhubaneswar 751002, Odisha,
India also Rashmi Niwas, A13/3 Kalindi Housing Estate, N. 24 Parganas, S. Dum
Dum, Kolkata 700089, W.Bengal, India
Known emails: shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk, shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com,
shantanupanigrahi@aol.com, shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com, panigrahi@gmail.com,
shanpanigrah5000@outlook.com, catlovers@hotmail.co.uk, aateurope2@gmail.com
Dates of Birth: January 15 and August 8 1957, but other dates depending on
benefit or waiver is being claimed; including as "Shan Praharaj'; Rupa
Panigrahi September 19 1990
Barclays Current Account Mr S Panigrahi & Mrs R R Panigrahi 20-54-11 90098086
and Savings H169296PAN TCLP-UK-VOPA (and paypal) 09-01-27 11199612 Natwest
60-17-44 Debit Card 4751 2902 3982 1523 exp 11/24

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor