Rudy Canoza wrote:

> On 6/8/2021 2:40 PM, uiop@pol.com wrote:
> > Rudy Canoza wrote:
> >
> > > On 6/8/2021 5:24 AM, uiop@pol.com wrote:
> > > > Rudy Canoza wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm probably wasting my time, because stupid, plodding,
> > > > > knuckle-dragging right-wingnuts are not amenable to
> > > > > instruction and learning. Nonetheless, ethics and decency
> > > > > compel me to attempt it.
> > > > >
> > > > > typo — a simple keying error. You mean to key, for example,
> > > > > "error," but your fingers malfunction and instead you key
> > > > > "eror," "errot," "errir," or something like that. It often
> > > > > comes from striking an adjacent key, or from thinking you
> > > > > pressed the correct key but you didn't press it firmly
> > > > > enough. These are usually excusable. They are not excusable
> > > > > when the correct key is on the opposite side of the keyboard.
> > > > > Hartung does a lot of these. He'll key 'i' for 'e' or
> > > > > vice-versa, and those are on opposite sides of the keyboard
> > > > > and struck with fingers on different hands. Keying 'i' for
> > > > > 'e' or vice-versa is not a typo — it's a fuck-up.
> > > > >
> > > > > thoughto — this occurs most often with homonyms (which,
> > > > > contrary to most right-wingnuts' beliefs, are not pseudonyms
> > > > > for homos). For example, I absolutely and without any
> > > > > rational dispute know the difference between
> > > > > there/their/they're, to/too/two, your/you're, etc.
> > > > > Nonetheless, I occasionally absent mindedly key the wrong
> > > > > one. That's a thoughto. When you see a complete illiterate
> > > > > like little matteeeeB, who always uses the wrong one, you
> > > > > know it's not a thoughto, but illiteracy.
> > > > >
> > > > > grammaro — for me, these are almost always due to incomplete
> > > > > editing and revision. I'll sometimes key up a sentence with a
> > > > > singular subject, and of course my adjectives and verb tenses
> > > > > always agree with the number and gender of the subject.
> > > > > However, I then revise the text, and — for example — change
> > > > > the subject from singular to plural. On occasion, I forget
> > > > > to change the person/number of the adjectives or verbs. I'll
> > > > > start with a third person singular subject and third person
> > > > > singular verb, then revise the subject to third person plural
> > > > > but forget to change the verb. This is a grammaro.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughto and grammaro are my excellent neologisms. People
> > > > > like Kurtsie Nicklas, the boy whore of Burlington NC, or
> > > > > AlleyPussyBitch, who piss and moan about my neologisms (on
> > > > > which I have already instructed them), and who don't know the
> > > > > word "neologism," are only demonstrating their ignorance when
> > > > > they piss and moan about the excellent neologisms. If they
> > > > > had a lick of sense, which clearly they don't, they would
> > > > > adopt the neologisms and use them, because they fuck up their
> > > > > text all the time, and in a few cases, they could possibly
> > > > > explain away the fuck-ups by invoking the neologisms. But
> > > > > they're too fucking stupid for that.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm smarter — by far — than both Kurtsie and AlleyPussyBitch.
> > > > > And they KNOW it, too.
> > > >
> > > > Your neologisms are not legit if you're the only person on
> > > > Earth who uses them.
> > >
> > > I'm not the only one who uses them, "Fix-it guy at Citco." Pretty
> > > obviously, Stain, you don't know what a neologism is.
> >
> > Oh really- who else then?
> >
>
> Some English professors I know and a couple of economists, "Fix it
> guy at Citco."

Are they all you?