If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what are the
chances you get in trouble for this?

On 21-May-22 9:56 am, Max wrote:
> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what are the
> chances you get in trouble for this?

None at all. No one knows that you have done this, and there is no way
to identify you from the ballot paper.

Sylvia.

On 21/05/2022 9:56 am, Max wrote:
> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what are the
> chances you get in trouble for this?

**None whatsoever.

Vote properly. Do not reward this miserable excuse for a Prime Minister.

On 21/05/2022 9:56 am, Max wrote:
> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what are the
> chances you get in trouble for this?

Zero chance. If you've ever voted before, you'd know that.

Max <max@val.morgan> wrote

> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what are the
> chances you get in trouble for this?

Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.

On 21/05/2022 12:18 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>
>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what are
>> the chances you get in trouble for this?
>
> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.

It is still an offence to vote informally, so if it could be proven, the
person could get in trouble.

Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote

>>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what are
>>> the chances you get in trouble for this?

>> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.

> It is still an offence to vote informally, so if it could be proven,

Not possible, it's a secret ballot, stupid.

> the person could get in trouble.

Nope, because it's a secret ballot, stupid.

On 21/05/2022 2:19 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>
>>>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what are
>>>> the chances you get in trouble for this?
>
>>>  Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.
>
>> It is still an offence to vote informally, so if it could be proven,
>
> Not possible, it's a secret ballot, stupid.
>
>> the  person could get in trouble.
>
> Nope, because it's a secret ballot, stupid.

If I took a video of myself voting informally, then it could be proof of
me committing an offence.

Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote

>>>>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what are
>>>>> the chances you get in trouble for this?

>>>> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.

>>> It is still an offence to vote informally, so if it could be proven,

>> Not possible, it's a secret ballot, stupid.

>>> the person could get in trouble.

>> Nope, because it's a secret ballot, stupid.

> If I took a video of myself voting informally, thenit could be proof of
> me committing an offence.

They wouldn't let you video yourself voting, stupid.

Max wrote:
============
>
> It is still an offence to vote informally, so if it could be proven, the
> person could get in trouble.
>

** Encouraging folk to vote informally is illegal.
Tearing up your ballot paper/s is illegal.
Discarding your unmarked ballot paper into the bin is too.
One advantage of electronic voting is that informal votes can be recognised and locked out.

....... Phil

On Sat, 21 May 2022 12:18:21 +1000 Rod Speed
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>
> > If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what are the
> > chances you get in trouble for this?
>
> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.

Is everyone you reply to either stupid or a fuckwit?

Wodney posted:

> Rod Speed ...

.... that Alzheimer ridden, ego mania and anger management issues plagued
rusted on LNP lover newsgroup disaster.
/snip/

>> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.
>
> Is everyone you reply to either stupid or a fuckwit?

Did you expect anything else from Rod Speed, the obvious stupid fuckwit,
who is only capable of posting "robotic" replies using his with huge
mental struggles cobbled together yet very limited selection of abusive
replies?

--
Ördög - - the one and only newsgroup Devil.

On 21/05/2022 1:57 pm, Max wrote:
> On 21/05/2022 12:18 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>
>>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what are
>>> the chances you get in trouble for this?
>>
>> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.
>
> It is still an offence to vote informally,

Cite? I'm pretty certain you are wrong about that claim but couldn't
be bothered to find out for sure.

so if it could be proven, the
> person could get in trouble.

On Sat, 21 May 2022 09:56:18 +1000, Max <max@val.morgan> wrote:

>If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what are the
>chances you get in trouble for this?
>
Never complained to me
I just draw a cock and balls on ballots (they get the most votes if
they were counted)
--
Petzl
If voting made any difference,
They wouldn't let us do it- Mark Twain

On 22/05/2022 5:58 am, Fran wrote:
> On 21/05/2022 1:57 pm, Max wrote:
>> On 21/05/2022 12:18 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>
>>>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what are
>>>> the chances you get in trouble for this?
>>>
>>> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.
>>
>> It is still an offence to vote informally,
>
> Cite?   I'm pretty certain you are wrong about that claim but couldn't
> be bothered to find out for sure.
>

You are right. Informal voting used to be illegal, but is no longer.

https://www.stacklaw.com.au/news/human-rights/voting-and-the-law/

On 21/05/2022 8:06 pm, Phil Allison wrote:
> Max wrote:
> ============
>>
>> It is still an offence to vote informally, so if it could be proven, the
>> person could get in trouble.
>>
>
> ** Encouraging folk to vote informally is illegal.
> Tearing up your ballot paper/s is illegal.
> Discarding your unmarked ballot paper into the bin is too.
> One advantage of electronic voting is that informal votes can be recognised and locked out.
>

"Informal votes are not actually illegal, and nor is trying to persuade
others to submit informal votes, although it used to be. While Mark
Latham’s advice on 60 Minutes to submit a blank paper may not be
illegal, some may argue that it is unconstitutional."

https://www.stacklaw.com.au/news/human-rights/voting-and-the-law/

On 22/05/2022 1:51 pm, Max wrote:
> On 22/05/2022 5:58 am, Fran wrote:
>> On 21/05/2022 1:57 pm, Max wrote:
>>> On 21/05/2022 12:18 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>>
>>>>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what
>>>>> are the chances you get in trouble for this?
>>>>
>>>> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.
>>>
>>> It is still an offence to vote informally,
>>
>> Cite?   I'm pretty certain you are wrong about that claim but couldn't
>> be bothered to find out for sure.
>>
>
> You are right. Informal voting used to be illegal, but is no longer.
>
> https://www.stacklaw.com.au/news/human-rights/voting-and-the-law/

Thanks. Suicide also used to be illegal. Dumb to make either of those
things 'illegal' IMO.

Fran <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
wrote in news:t6ce1p$fb6$4@dont-email.me:

> On 22/05/2022 1:51 pm, Max wrote:
>> On 22/05/2022 5:58 am, Fran wrote:
>>> On 21/05/2022 1:57 pm, Max wrote:
>>>> On 21/05/2022 12:18 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what
>>>>>> are the chances you get in trouble for this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.
>>>>
>>>> It is still an offence to vote informally,
>>>
>>> Cite?   I'm pretty certain you are wrong about that claim but
>>> couldn't be bothered to find out for sure.
>>>
>>
>> You are right. Informal voting used to be illegal, but is no longer.
>>
>> https://www.stacklaw.com.au/news/human-rights/voting-and-the-law/
>
>
> Thanks. Suicide also used to be illegal. Dumb to make either of
> those things 'illegal' IMO.
>

What was the penalty for Suicide ?

I take it not the death penalty

Max wrote more Google Monkey Fucking CRAP

===========================
> >>
> >> It is still an offence to vote informally, so if it could be proven, the
> >> person could get in trouble.
> >>
> >
> > ** Encouraging folk to vote informally is illegal.
> > Tearing up your ballot paper/s is illegal.
> > Discarding your unmarked ballot paper into the bin is too.
> > One advantage of electronic voting is that informal votes can be recognised and locked out.
> >
>
> "Informal votes are not actually illegal, and nor is trying to persuade
> others to submit informal votes, although it used to be. While Mark
> Latham’s advice on 60 Minutes to submit a blank paper may not be
> illegal, some may argue that it is unconstitutional."
>
> https://www.stacklaw.com.au/news/human-rights/voting-and-the-law/
>

** Some fool's drivel - not law.

The *illegality* IS that you simply have not voted - so the usual fine applies.

Any " how to vote" material to be used at elections must be approved by AEC or similar.

...... Phil

On 22/05/2022 3:04 pm, Whatawonderfulworld wrote:
> Fran <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
> wrote in news:t6ce1p$fb6$4@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 22/05/2022 1:51 pm, Max wrote:
>>> On 22/05/2022 5:58 am, Fran wrote:
>>>> On 21/05/2022 1:57 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>> On 21/05/2022 12:18 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what
>>>>>>> are the chances you get in trouble for this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is still an offence to vote informally,
>>>>
>>>> Cite?   I'm pretty certain you are wrong about that claim but
>>>> couldn't be bothered to find out for sure.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You are right. Informal voting used to be illegal, but is no longer.
>>>
>>> https://www.stacklaw.com.au/news/human-rights/voting-and-the-law/
>>
>>
>> Thanks. Suicide also used to be illegal. Dumb to make either of
>> those things 'illegal' IMO.
>>
>
> What was the penalty for Suicide ?
>
> I take it not the death penalty

**Since religion pervaded our society back then, probably eternal
damnation, or something similarly daft.

On 22/05/2022 3:04 pm, Whatawonderfulworld wrote:
> Fran <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
> wrote in news:t6ce1p$fb6$4@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 22/05/2022 1:51 pm, Max wrote:
>>> On 22/05/2022 5:58 am, Fran wrote:
>>>> On 21/05/2022 1:57 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>> On 21/05/2022 12:18 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what
>>>>>>> are the chances you get in trouble for this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is still an offence to vote informally,
>>>>
>>>> Cite?   I'm pretty certain you are wrong about that claim but
>>>> couldn't be bothered to find out for sure.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You are right. Informal voting used to be illegal, but is no longer.
>>>
>>> https://www.stacklaw.com.au/news/human-rights/voting-and-the-law/
>>
>>
>> Thanks. Suicide also used to be illegal. Dumb to make either of
>> those things 'illegal' IMO.
>>
>
> What was the penalty for Suicide ?

Dunno, IIRC correctly, it was considered to be self murder and even
murdering ones self was deemed to be unacceptable.
>
> I take it not the death penalty

:-))

In Sun, 22 May 2022 15:45:15 +1000, Trevor Wilson
<trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:

> On 22/05/2022 3:04 pm, Whatawonderfulworld wrote:
>> Fran <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>> wrote in news:t6ce1p$fb6$4@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> On 22/05/2022 1:51 pm, Max wrote:
>>>> On 22/05/2022 5:58 am, Fran wrote:
>>>>> On 21/05/2022 1:57 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>> On 21/05/2022 12:18 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what
>>>>>>>> are the chances you get in trouble for this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is still an offence to vote informally,
>>>>>
>>>>> Cite? I'm pretty certain you are wrong about that claim but
>>>>> couldn't be bothered to find out for sure.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You are right. Informal voting used to be illegal, but is no longer.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.stacklaw.com.au/news/human-rights/voting-and-the-law/
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks. Suicide also used to be illegal. Dumb to make either of
>>> those things 'illegal' IMO.
>>>
>> What was the penalty for Suicide ?
>> I take it not the death penalty

> Since religion pervaded our society back then, probably eternal
> damnation, or something similarly daft.

That isn't even possible for a govt to impose, stupid.

On Sun, 22 May 2022 16:40:29 +1000, Fran
<gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabefran.com> wrote:

> On 22/05/2022 3:04 pm, Whatawonderfulworld wrote:
>> Fran <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>> wrote in news:t6ce1p$fb6$4@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> On 22/05/2022 1:51 pm, Max wrote:
>>>> On 22/05/2022 5:58 am, Fran wrote:
>>>>> On 21/05/2022 1:57 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>> On 21/05/2022 12:18 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what
>>>>>>>> are the chances you get in trouble for this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is still an offence to vote informally,
>>>>>
>>>>> Cite?  I'm pretty certain you are wrong about that claim but
>>>>> couldn't be bothered to find out for sure.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You are right. Informal voting used to be illegal, but is no longer..
>>>>
>>>> https://www.stacklaw.com.au/news/human-rights/voting-and-the-law/
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks. Suicide also used to be illegal. Dumb to make either of
>>> those things 'illegal' IMO.
>>>
>> What was the penalty for Suicide ?
>
> Dunno, IIRC correctly, it was considered to be self murder

Nope.

> and even murdering ones self was deemed to be unacceptable.

>> I take it not the death penalty
>
> :-))

On 22/05/2022 4:59 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
> In Sun, 22 May 2022 15:45:15 +1000, Trevor Wilson
> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On 22/05/2022 3:04 pm, Whatawonderfulworld wrote:
>>> Fran <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>>> wrote in news:t6ce1p$fb6$4@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On 22/05/2022 1:51 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>> On 22/05/2022 5:58 am, Fran wrote:
>>>>>> On 21/05/2022 1:57 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>> On 21/05/2022 12:18 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what
>>>>>>>>> are the chances you get in trouble for this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is still an offence to vote informally,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cite?   I'm pretty certain you are wrong about that claim but
>>>>>> couldn't be bothered to find out for sure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You are right. Informal voting used to be illegal, but is no longer.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.stacklaw.com.au/news/human-rights/voting-and-the-law/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.  Suicide also used to be illegal.  Dumb to make either of
>>>> those things 'illegal' IMO.
>>>>
>>>  What was the penalty for Suicide ?
>>>  I take it not the death penalty
>
>> Since religion pervaded our society back then, probably eternal
>> damnation, or something similarly daft.
>
> That isn't even possible for a govt to impose, stupid.

How do you know? Maybe the PM can pray to God to make it happen?

On Sun, 22 May 2022 18:58:59 +1000, Max <max@val.morgan> wrote:

> On 22/05/2022 4:59 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>> In Sun, 22 May 2022 15:45:15 +1000, Trevor Wilson
>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> On 22/05/2022 3:04 pm, Whatawonderfulworld wrote:
>>>> Fran <gettingmoredelusionalbythedayistheforger@nutcasewannabeFran.com>
>>>> wrote in news:t6ce1p$fb6$4@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>> On 22/05/2022 1:51 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>> On 22/05/2022 5:58 am, Fran wrote:
>>>>>>> On 21/05/2022 1:57 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 21/05/2022 12:18 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you vote informally, ie. you don't fill in enough boxes, what
>>>>>>>>>> are the chances you get in trouble for this?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Zero, nada, ziltch, not a chance. It's a secret ballot, stupid.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is still an offence to vote informally,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cite? I'm pretty certain you are wrong about that claim but
>>>>>>> couldn't be bothered to find out for sure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are right. Informal voting used to be illegal, but is no longer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.stacklaw.com.au/news/human-rights/voting-and-the-law/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks. Suicide also used to be illegal. Dumb to make either of
>>>>> those things 'illegal' IMO.
>>>>>
>>>> What was the penalty for Suicide ?
>>>> I take it not the death penalty
>>
>>> Since religion pervaded our society back then, probably eternal
>>> damnation, or something similarly daft.

>> That isn't even possible for a govt to impose, stupid.

> How do you know?

That is pathetic even for you.

> Maybe the PM can pray to God to make it happen?

There is no god, fuckwit child.