Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

6 May, 2024: The networking issue during the past two days has been identified and may be fixed. Will keep monitoring.


interests / soc.genealogy.medieval / Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]

SubjectAuthor
* Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]Wibs
`* Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]Johnny Brananas
 `* Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]charles...@gmail.com
  +- Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]Johnny Brananas
  `* Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]taf
   `* Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]Peter Stewart
    `- Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]Peter de Loriol Chandieu

1
Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]

<2e96627d-1b4c-456f-9013-824b5396eac2n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6172&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#6172

  copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:554d:0:b0:3b0:4ae1:f0d0 with SMTP id o13-20020ac8554d000000b003b04ae1f0d0mr60323qtr.214.1673388786963;
Tue, 10 Jan 2023 14:13:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:67d7:0:b0:662:2458:3ef7 with SMTP id
c23-20020a9d67d7000000b0066224583ef7mr4285145otn.150.1673388786699; Tue, 10
Jan 2023 14:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 14:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=178.239.254.0; posting-account=X8jQvQoAAAC_NC08dLOkUOO64GE2HSQn
NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.239.254.0
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2e96627d-1b4c-456f-9013-824b5396eac2n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]
From: rock.vac...@gmail.com (Wibs)
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:13:06 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: Wibs - Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:13 UTC

With the recent Netflix and the book, 'Spare' concerning Prince Harry, it raised a question of Constitutional Law in my mind.

Currently, Charles III is king, and Prince William is his heir, then Prince William's son, Prince George is next in line.

However, if Prince William died for any reason (God forbid), would Prince George then take his place as heir, or would Prince Harry take that place, as the eldest (surviving) son of the monarch?

Wibs

Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]

<f47ca078-0b33-40d2-8320-da8159189a99n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6173&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#6173

  copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:890:b0:6fe:ab3e:3d09 with SMTP id b16-20020a05620a089000b006feab3e3d09mr2268537qka.111.1673389487092;
Tue, 10 Jan 2023 14:24:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:ed46:b0:150:9183:2869 with SMTP id
ex6-20020a056870ed4600b0015091832869mr2409879oab.164.1673389486822; Tue, 10
Jan 2023 14:24:46 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 14:24:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2e96627d-1b4c-456f-9013-824b5396eac2n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=129.252.86.129; posting-account=3HoCXgoAAABz6-UpwKiosjBmkEzofcr6
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.252.86.129
References: <2e96627d-1b4c-456f-9013-824b5396eac2n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f47ca078-0b33-40d2-8320-da8159189a99n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]
From: ravinmav...@yahoo.com (Johnny Brananas)
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:24:47 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1835
 by: Johnny Brananas - Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:24 UTC

On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 5:13:07 PM UTC-5, Wibs wrote:
> With the recent Netflix and the book, 'Spare' concerning Prince Harry, it raised a question of Constitutional Law in my mind.
>
> Currently, Charles III is king, and Prince William is his heir, then Prince William's son, Prince George is next in line.
>
> However, if Prince William died for any reason (God forbid), would Prince George then take his place as heir, or would Prince Harry take that place, as the eldest (surviving) son of the monarch?
>
> Wibs

George
Charlotte
Louis
Henry/ Harry
Archibald
Lillibet
Andrew
Beatrice
Eugenie
Edward
James
Louise
Anne
Peter
Zarra

Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]

<fa368a4c-93b5-48de-8140-3b6ab81c707en@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6175&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#6175

  copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:166a:b0:702:1a38:e42d with SMTP id d10-20020a05620a166a00b007021a38e42dmr4234114qko.306.1673457574280;
Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:19:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:c99b:b0:150:97a0:1ca6 with SMTP id
hi27-20020a056870c99b00b0015097a01ca6mr2349170oab.132.1673457574016; Wed, 11
Jan 2023 09:19:34 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:19:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <f47ca078-0b33-40d2-8320-da8159189a99n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=108.25.113.148; posting-account=uWo17QkAAACwr2CGJoo7J6SP8d-kkpFl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.25.113.148
References: <2e96627d-1b4c-456f-9013-824b5396eac2n@googlegroups.com> <f47ca078-0b33-40d2-8320-da8159189a99n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fa368a4c-93b5-48de-8140-3b6ab81c707en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]
From: charlesw...@gmail.com (charles...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:19:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2331
 by: charles...@gmail.com - Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:19 UTC

On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 5:24:48 PM UTC-5, Johnny Brananas wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 5:13:07 PM UTC-5, Wibs wrote:
> > With the recent Netflix and the book, 'Spare' concerning Prince Harry, it raised a question of Constitutional Law in my mind.
> >
> > Currently, Charles III is king, and Prince William is his heir, then Prince William's son, Prince George is next in line.
> >
> > However, if Prince William died for any reason (God forbid), would Prince George then take his place as heir, or would Prince Harry take that place, as the eldest (surviving) son of the monarch?
> >
> > Wibs
> George
> Charlotte
> Louis
> Henry/ Harry
> Archibald
> Lillibet
> Andrew
> Beatrice
> Eugenie
> Edward
> James
> Louise
> Anne
> Peter
> Zarra

Close, but not correct. Following Beatrice is Sienna Elizabeth, and following Eugenie is August. Following Peter is Savannah, and then Isla Elizabeth.
Following Zara is Mia, then Lena and then Lucas. And finally we pass from Her late Majesty's descendants to David Earl of Snowden

Chuck

Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]

<6401fafc-a28d-4929-8797-88624a172de1n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6176&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#6176

  copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:47d0:0:b0:3a7:2963:f4e2 with SMTP id d16-20020ac847d0000000b003a72963f4e2mr3121916qtr.375.1673459871488;
Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:57:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:b41d:b0:13d:2093:7c89 with SMTP id
x29-20020a056870b41d00b0013d20937c89mr4724211oap.295.1673459871257; Wed, 11
Jan 2023 09:57:51 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:57:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <fa368a4c-93b5-48de-8140-3b6ab81c707en@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=129.252.86.129; posting-account=3HoCXgoAAABz6-UpwKiosjBmkEzofcr6
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.252.86.129
References: <2e96627d-1b4c-456f-9013-824b5396eac2n@googlegroups.com>
<f47ca078-0b33-40d2-8320-da8159189a99n@googlegroups.com> <fa368a4c-93b5-48de-8140-3b6ab81c707en@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6401fafc-a28d-4929-8797-88624a172de1n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]
From: ravinmav...@yahoo.com (Johnny Brananas)
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:57:51 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2863
 by: Johnny Brananas - Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:57 UTC

On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 12:19:35 PM UTC-5, charles...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 5:24:48 PM UTC-5, Johnny Brananas wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 5:13:07 PM UTC-5, Wibs wrote:
> > > With the recent Netflix and the book, 'Spare' concerning Prince Harry, it raised a question of Constitutional Law in my mind.
> > >
> > > Currently, Charles III is king, and Prince William is his heir, then Prince William's son, Prince George is next in line.
> > >
> > > However, if Prince William died for any reason (God forbid), would Prince George then take his place as heir, or would Prince Harry take that place, as the eldest (surviving) son of the monarch?
> > >
> > > Wibs
> > George
> > Charlotte
> > Louis
> > Henry/ Harry
> > Archibald
> > Lillibet
> > Andrew
> > Beatrice
> > Eugenie
> > Edward
> > James
> > Louise
> > Anne
> > Peter
> > Zarra
> Close, but not correct. Following Beatrice is Sienna Elizabeth, and following Eugenie is August. Following Peter is Savannah, and then Isla Elizabeth.
> Following Zara is Mia, then Lena and then Lucas. And finally we pass from Her late Majesty's descendants to David Earl of Snowden
>
> Chuck

Totally correct as far as those who have _any_ chance of ascending the throne, but you're right, I did forget some of the infant twerps spawned by the first set of twerps.

I'm not predicting that the actual future monarchs will ever be other than the descendants of Willy (... unless his entire family is in a helicopter crash or similar).

Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]

<e13a0fd4-9759-4f93-8ff9-ca9e87506d95n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6177&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#6177

  copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:4ace:b0:3ad:3d6e:937 with SMTP id fx14-20020a05622a4ace00b003ad3d6e0937mr371340qtb.459.1673460163976;
Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:02:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6957:0:b0:677:7b36:6168 with SMTP id
p23-20020a9d6957000000b006777b366168mr4705946oto.222.1673460163333; Wed, 11
Jan 2023 10:02:43 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:02:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <fa368a4c-93b5-48de-8140-3b6ab81c707en@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=50.37.97.14; posting-account=ysT2WAoAAAD3tS1it3CP1N_fzqondDgH
NNTP-Posting-Host: 50.37.97.14
References: <2e96627d-1b4c-456f-9013-824b5396eac2n@googlegroups.com>
<f47ca078-0b33-40d2-8320-da8159189a99n@googlegroups.com> <fa368a4c-93b5-48de-8140-3b6ab81c707en@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e13a0fd4-9759-4f93-8ff9-ca9e87506d95n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]
From: taf.medi...@gmail.com (taf)
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:02:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2643
 by: taf - Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:02 UTC

On a slightly more relevant note, since we are talking inheritance law, is there a technical term for the manner of general inheritance practiced in medieval England?

English inheritance can be confusing because it operated differently on different levels. For the monarchy, it operated differently at different times, eventually settling on male-preference primogeniture (except when it wasn't), until a few years ago when it changed to strict primogeniture. For most of the highest titles, it was male-exclusive primogeniture. For most of the lesser titles of nobility, a modified male-preference primogeniture applied, in which cognatic inheritance required a unique female inheritor/cognatic line, else abeyance among the multiple daughters/lines resulted, and for landholdings and other such possessions and rights, it was a similarly modified male-preference primogeniture, but with equal partition among the cognates. So the question I have is, what is the technical term for this system of 'modified male-preference primogeniture with cognatic partition' inheritance? (I am sure there must be one, and likely more than one, since categorizing and naming is a tried and true way for social scientists to maintain their publication records without doing any actual research.)

taf

Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]

<tpn6ao$10qta$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6178&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#6178

  copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pss...@optusnet.com.au (Peter Stewart)
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Subject: Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 07:31:22 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <tpn6ao$10qta$1@dont-email.me>
References: <2e96627d-1b4c-456f-9013-824b5396eac2n@googlegroups.com>
<f47ca078-0b33-40d2-8320-da8159189a99n@googlegroups.com>
<fa368a4c-93b5-48de-8140-3b6ab81c707en@googlegroups.com>
<e13a0fd4-9759-4f93-8ff9-ca9e87506d95n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 20:31:20 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="55593577d6c94479ced3eacdf7eac81c";
logging-data="1076138"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/znEfod5wpY1KipqDlGRs+"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.6.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gfl3bpMimQ3UI32YM3ou+YaRaHE=
In-Reply-To: <e13a0fd4-9759-4f93-8ff9-ca9e87506d95n@googlegroups.com>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 230111-0, 11/1/2023), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Peter Stewart - Wed, 11 Jan 2023 20:31 UTC

On 12-Jan-23 5:02 AM, taf wrote:
> On a slightly more relevant note, since we are talking inheritance law, is there a technical term for the manner of general inheritance practiced in medieval England?
>
> English inheritance can be confusing because it operated differently on different levels. For the monarchy, it operated differently at different times, eventually settling on male-preference primogeniture (except when it wasn't), until a few years ago when it changed to strict primogeniture. For most of the highest titles, it was male-exclusive primogeniture. For most of the lesser titles of nobility, a modified male-preference primogeniture applied, in which cognatic inheritance required a unique female inheritor/cognatic line, else abeyance among the multiple daughters/lines resulted, and for landholdings and other such possessions and rights, it was a similarly modified male-preference primogeniture, but with equal partition among the cognates. So the question I have is, what is the technical term for this system of 'modified male-preference primogeniture with cognatic partition' inheritance? (I am sure there must be one, and likely more than one, since categorizing and naming is a tried and true way for social scientists to maintain their publication records without doing any actual research.)
The preferred terms often use Salic inheritance as the reference, adding
prefixes for variants - semi-Salic, quasi-Salic. The technical term you
are looking for may be mad-hatter-Salic.
Peter Stewart

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]

<08e1dd2d-37b8-446d-be6d-782386126542n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6213&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#6213

  copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:d802:0:b0:6ff:1118:341f with SMTP id u2-20020ae9d802000000b006ff1118341fmr3433816qkf.351.1673860089939;
Mon, 16 Jan 2023 01:08:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:6d0d:b0:157:8df:1cbf with SMTP id
mw13-20020a0568706d0d00b0015708df1cbfmr2753177oab.150.1673860089647; Mon, 16
Jan 2023 01:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 01:08:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <tpn6ao$10qta$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:c7e:3916:ca00:54b8:34ac:721c:8dea;
posting-account=aK9mgAoAAABUjoqhY-fmYs9TDWzGz1tV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7e:3916:ca00:54b8:34ac:721c:8dea
References: <2e96627d-1b4c-456f-9013-824b5396eac2n@googlegroups.com>
<f47ca078-0b33-40d2-8320-da8159189a99n@googlegroups.com> <fa368a4c-93b5-48de-8140-3b6ab81c707en@googlegroups.com>
<e13a0fd4-9759-4f93-8ff9-ca9e87506d95n@googlegroups.com> <tpn6ao$10qta$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <08e1dd2d-37b8-446d-be6d-782386126542n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Prince Harry and Constitutional Law [Off topic]
From: peterdel...@gmail.com (Peter de Loriol Chandieu)
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:08:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 3390
 by: Peter de Loriol Chan - Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:08 UTC

On Wednesday, 11 January 2023 at 20:33:50 UTC, pss...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
> On 12-Jan-23 5:02 AM, taf wrote:
> > On a slightly more relevant note, since we are talking inheritance law, is there a technical term for the manner of general inheritance practiced in medieval England?
> >
> > English inheritance can be confusing because it operated differently on different levels. For the monarchy, it operated differently at different times, eventually settling on male-preference primogeniture (except when it wasn't), until a few years ago when it changed to strict primogeniture. For most of the highest titles, it was male-exclusive primogeniture. For most of the lesser titles of nobility, a modified male-preference primogeniture applied, in which cognatic inheritance required a unique female inheritor/cognatic line, else abeyance among the multiple daughters/lines resulted, and for landholdings and other such possessions and rights, it was a similarly modified male-preference primogeniture, but with equal partition among the cognates. So the question I have is, what is the technical term for this system of 'modified male-preference primogeniture with cognatic partition' inheritance? (I am sure there must be one, and likely more than one, since categorizing and naming is a tried and true way for social scientists to maintain their publication records without doing any actual research.)
> The preferred terms often use Salic inheritance as the reference, adding
> prefixes for variants - semi-Salic, quasi-Salic. The technical term you
> are looking for may be mad-hatter-Salic.
>
> Peter Stewart
>
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
> www.avg.com
It is wonderful to see some names I recognise on this list! I left shortly after Leo van de Pas left this earth.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor