dolf wrote:
> 19 APRIL 2023
>
> MATTERS RELEVANT TO IBAC CASE-2022XXXX AS COMPLAINT LODGED 17 JULY 2002
> BEING ITEM: 27. IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR
> PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT?
>
> 1)    It ought then to be substantive cause to bring CRIMINAL CHARGES
> against legal counsel PETER RIDDELL for PERJURY and perverting the
> COURSE OF JUSTICE by a deliberate misrepresentation of two telephone
> calls made to them in a matter of self representation before a BLIND
> judicatory. That my conduct in matters of this complaint was mindful
> that PRESERVATION of any probity related to such action against the
> INSURER was a primary concern.
>
> YOUTUBE: "MUSE - RESISTANCE"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPE9uSFFxrI>
>
> I HAVE NOT LABOURED FOR 25 YEARS JUST SO SOMEONE CAN STEAL MY LIFE
> OPPORTUNITY which is enumerated within our 17 APRIL 2023 submission to
> IBAC in conveying the use of MATRIX PROTOTYPES #SIX (#123 / #369) as
> TWEEDLEDUM[B] and #ONE (#99 / #297) TWEEDLEDEE[D] as an established fact
> in then providing an "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" against an INSURER's
> IMPROPRIETY by deploying a term dichotomy such as “TOTAL AND PERMANENT
> DISABILITY” as involving destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
> overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>
>
> 2)    The concept of a #232 - HIJACKING SCHEMA perpetuated as a
> "gennaion pseudos" (ie. honourable or noble lie) against the SOVEREIGN /
> AUTONOMY dynamic were considerations also raised (ie. the IDENTICAL
> MATRICES were provided) within our submissions of 17 TO 20 JULY 2018 as
> made to the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION:
>
> "In practical functional terms of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ie.
> PROTOTYPE #NINE WITHIN BOTH 9x9 MATRICES) applicable to the INSURANCE /
> FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY that if the perennial [philosophical] use of
> the binomial THEORY OF NUMBER METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2
> + #3 + #4 = #10}  has an inherent deficiency TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND
> TWEEDLEDEE[D] and an introduction of a further dichotomy such as “TOTAL
> AND PERMANENT DISABILITY” as a disparity between SALARY CONTINUANCE
> INSURANCE POLICY and that of SUPERANNUATION portfolios it is as #1 + #2
> + #3 + #4 = #10 capable of destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
> overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle.
>
> Furthermore in relation to a disproportionate or non existent insurance
> benefit being applied to the chronic psychiatric condition known as PTSD
> - POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER in the circumstance where effective
> GOVERNANCE is a product of SAPIENT reality and our proposition to extend
> definition of a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF
> HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS
> THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY.
>
> That the Insurance Industry’s failure to appropriately manage and in
> circumstance of a lack of provision as appropriate medical intervention
> to the precursor medical condition: “HYPER-AROUSAL OF THE CENTRAL
> NERVOUS SYSTEM AND STRESS OF THE STARTLE REFLEX” is then (ie. I can
> articulate time after all and I have an experience of a bomb blast on 27
> March 1986) causal for the exasperation of the medical condition in[to]
> a chronic state."
>
> 3)    To that end, we have provided a psychiatrist who specialises in
> METAPHOR THERAPY and a cognitive scientist (Monash University) our
> informal research case study on the use of a four line lyric as then a
> NEURAL LINGUISTIC SPACIAL OVERLAY and META DESCRIPTORS (#317, #205,
> #144, #383) for an event intervention against MURDOCH press over US
> PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN'S IRELAND visit to thwart seditious contemporaneous
> local actions by IRISH REPUBLICANISM
>
> 4)    From correspondence with FRANCESCO DE FERRARI the AMP CHIEF
> EXECUTIVE OFFICER dated 29 JUNE 2020 (who as an ITALIAN took no action
> because of an intention to sell those products and services), it was
> stated that my last conversation with a "DESIGNATED LEGAL PRACTICE"
> failed on the basis that such "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" (as we then termed it
> to be) being entirely defined by the ROYAL COMMISSION as obtained from
> MEDIA REPORTS OF 27 APRIL 2018 conveying ROWENA ORR AS QUEEN'S COUNSEL
> ASSISTING THE ROYAL COMMISSION INTO FINANCIAL SERVICES ADVISING CRIMINAL
> PROSECUTION OUGHT TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST AMP FOLLOWING EVIDENCE OF
> 'UNCONSCIONABLE' MISCONDUCT WHICH WAS DESCRIBED AS 'UNLAWFUL AND
> ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG'.
>
> WE USED THIS EXACTING EXAMPLE IN OUR SUBMISSION TO THE FINANCIAL
> SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION: By suggesting the imperative of #432 -
> DISHEARTENING was an impost purposed {TORAH #FIVE: #114 / #342; #SIX:
> #123 / #369 v’s HETEROS #SIX: #114 / #342 by #FIVE: #111 / #333; #ONE:
> #99 / #297 impetus} upon the Dutch troops and the United Nations
> authority itself does not in any manner diminish the suffering of the
> people but diminishes the culpability of the Dutch entirely since they
> themselves were the targets and the #419 - SLAUGHTER the means.
>
> Being habitual and recalcitrant misconduct of the insurer which now
> grants me an opportunity to seek a redress for alleged perjury by LEGAL
> COUNSEL MR. PETER RIDDELL which was undertaken on behalf of AXA GLOBAL
> (AUSTRALIA) GROUP INSURANCE arising from his 4 December 2001 mischievous
> letter made to the VICTORIAN CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (VCAT) as
> the knowingly false misrepresentation of 2 telephone calls made by me on
> 30 November, 2001 in being a courtesy to that LEGAL COUNSEL for the
> INSURER.
>
> ----------
>
> TO: AMP CLAIMS ASSESSORS
>
> FURTHER TO CORRESPONDENCE SENT @ 1438 HOURS ON 15 AUGUST 2017 / 1334
> HOURS ON 16 AUGUST 2017 / 0911 HOURS ON 22 AUGUST / MULTIPLE OF 31
> AUGUST 2017 ARE THESE ADDITIONAL DIARY NOTES WITH RESPECTS TO MY CLAIM
> NO: M1001872 FOR PLAN NO: 00004,283:
>
> Given this clear evidence to the contrary of Mr Peter Riddell’s
> submission made to the VCAT Extra-ordinary hearing of 7 December, 2001
> in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone
> calls as the basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence.
> The following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and
> conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 February 2004
> obtained from tapes provided by the Victoria Civil & Administrative
> Tribunal (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 7
> December 2001 before Deputy President Ms. Cate McKenzie presiding over
> A500 of 2000 in matter of Australian Casualty & Life (AXA Global Group
> Insurance) and Mark Capecchi. The proceedings were conducted by
> telephone hook-up.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?
>
> Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by
>
> MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
> Shannon Lindner with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
> on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the
> Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
> raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
> understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
> why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
> there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
> bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
> necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
> determine how best to deal with it.
>
> In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
> if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
> Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
> what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
> what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of
> course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has
> finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.
>
> MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 November in the morning I received a
> telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that
> he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages
> on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those
> messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my
> family. I, that morning, contacted the Victoria Police and reported the
> matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I
> not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am
> presenting myself by way of telephone today.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?
>
> MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
> of those
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?
>
> MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
> to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
> matter it ought to be on evidence.
>
> MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape
>
> MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
> volume.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.
>
> TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm
> just wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my
> previous submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their
> transcendent logic built on time]. They are religious model that
> co-ordinates or synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this
> year. That means [when this year expires,] my court case will be a
> matter of an accusation of fascism against yourself at the company from
> which I will not cease until I have your #419 - SOUL.
>
> You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have
> until the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand
> against the action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude
> when one of us going to the #390 - GRAVE."
>
> TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "Mr Riddell, Dolf Boek. You do realise that if
> you are not prepared to come clean with your justifications of your past
> treatment of me that as of the new year we will not be having another
> contract because I will not be co-operating with you further and we will
> are more likely to go to court at some stage. At some stage you are
> going to have to recognise the fact that you are a blasphemer. Your
> religious context has no continuing validity and since I am able to
> rationally prove that with a mathematical model..... you are going to
> understand how forceful and hard metaphysics is."
>
> MR RIDDELL: That concludes the two voice mail messages.
>
> ...
>
> MR RIDDELL: - - - submission that Mr Boek has conducted himself in such
> a way that he shows he has no intention of according to the rules of the
> court. He has indicated quite clearly that his court case will now be a
> matter of fascism against myself and AXA and in those circumstances a
> false claim is frivolous and vexatious and should be struck out forthwith.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Boek. Mr Boek? Very well, all right. Now, I will hear
> from Mr
>
> MR BOEK: Yes, ma'am, I have - you would have noticed that there were no
> actual words of threat. They were words that were based on fact in that
> particular phone call. Here I have a particular mathematical model which
> is mentioned in that particular phone call. It is based upon a work by
> Johann Kepler, a German astronomer born in 1571 to 1630. He came up with
> three rules of which I have come up with a fourth [associated to the
> ephemeral and mundane as a transcendent fecundite connection to the
> Vernal and the Autumn Equinox in the 6th year of the 22nd Course of
> Gamul: 7 x 24 x 13 x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2423 x 293 years -
> Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21 March].
>
> His three rules in terms of astronomical cycles were: (1) that the
> planet... And then I will get to my bit of relevance to the 6000 years.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, yes, yes.
>
> MR BOEK: (1) That the planets move in elliptical orbits around the sun
> which is situated at one of the focus of the ellipses; (2) that the
> radius vectors joining each planet to the sun describes equal areas in
> equal times; (3) that the ratio of the square of the planet's year to
> the cube of the planet's mean distance from the sun is the same for each
> planet.
>
> Now, what I am suggesting is that the 6000 year cycle fits a
> mathematical model on logic and reason called Telos equals Arch plus
> C-squared:
>
> Telos [122J3W1D] = Arch [3W1D] + c² [9(9²+1)/2]
>
> That has been my particular field of study as my retirement activity. A
> religious pursuit which is, how can I say, an area of contemplative
> life. The best model that can currently be exhibited with regards to
> this particular thesis is nothing more than Harry Potter and the
> Philosopher Stone. I raise that as a particular point because the poetry
> that is used in...
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/EarthSeasons.png>
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/fascist.gif>
>
> There are several legal issues involved with respects to [the] Saint
> Andrews Cause Célèbre participated in by the representatives of the
> Returned Service League as Public Authority and the nature of its
> association to a FOREIGN POWER as a group named KNIGHTS TEMPLARS
> INTERNATIONAL which formed within 2015 and comprises various: RELIGIONS
> / STATES / MILITARY / ORGANISATIONS / INSTITUTIONS as unconscionable
> attempts made by them to impose a substituted ethic @5 against the
> INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL
> upon our War Dead and to usurp @1 the Sovereignty embodied within the
> Governor General as ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE.
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Templar%20Saint%20Andrews.JPG>
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Knights%20Mantra.jpg>
>
> [IMAGES: THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL AS SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE
> CÉLÈBRE HAS A SUBSTITUTED ETHOS AS MANTRA: "FOR THOSE BRAVE WHO GAVE
> THEIR LIVES SO WE COULD LIVE OURS"]
>
> MR RIDDELL: Madam, could I object?
>
> ...
>
> MR RIDDELL: I am not sure that the intention is entirely relevant. It is
> the manner in which I reasonably interpreted those phone messages. There
> is a transcript before the court. I was threatened. Mr Boek, by his
> conduct today and in the past, on any objective view appears to be
> unstable. I think it is inappropriate that this matter be continued.
>
> Peter Riddell on January 2013 published this perspective:
>
> TITLE: "The Illegality Defence: Has your insured been misbehaving?"
>
> Insurers and superannuation fund trustees assessing life and disability
> claims may have cause to consider an insured's unlawful conduct and
> whether grounds arise to decline a claim on the basis of the illegality
> defence. There are a number of aspects to the illegality defence. This
> paper reviews the impact of public policy on claims for indemnity
> arising out of unlawful conduct on the part of insureds.
>
> WHO DOES THIS IMPACT?
> Insurers and superannuation fund trustees assessing disability insurance
> claims.
>
> WHAT ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN?
> Unlawful conduct by an insured may allow an insurer to deny liability
> for an insurance claim on the grounds that it would be against public
> policy to allow an insured to receive a benefit under the policy.
>
> As the application of public policy often involves making difficult
> value judgments, each case will depend upon its own particular
> circumstances. As such, you may first wish to seek advice as to what
> action to take having regard to the facts of your particular claim.
>
> ILLEGALITY AND PUBLIC POLICY
> It is well established that a claim that arises out of a loss caused
> directly in the commission of a felony or similarly serious criminal
> offence by an insured can be denied on the ground that to pay the claim
> would be contrary to public policy.  This is based on the principle that
> no person should benefit from their crime or wrongdoing ("the public
> policy principle").
>
> ------------
>
> 17 APRIL 2023
>
> COUNCIL NOTE: I would suggest that the only means remaining for
> WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL to mitigate vicarious liability associated to
> any intended LEGAL ACTION is to remove the CHERISHED / BLESSED MOTHER
> WITH NAKED CHILD STATUE before KING CHARLES III coronation on 6 MAY 2023.
>
> 1)    The accompanying document deals with the issue on an #373 common
> element between a DEATH THREAT [#205, #237 - USE OF FORCE, #315, #321
> #333, #342, #373 ***] OF BUTCHERED #419 - SLAUGHTERED MEAT PLACED WITHIN
> MY MAILBOX ON 15 NOVEMBER 2017 as being evidence of an unaccountable and
> obmutescence as #373 - HATRED perpetuated by localised and
> unconstitutional IRISH REPUBLICANISM / RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (RSL)
> protagonists of seditious action pursuant to 26 MARCH 2017 attendance at
> MICHAEL JOHN GILMARTIN'S STAR HOTEL for a fillet minion lunch
> accompanying a moderate (ie. TOSS A BUMPER OR TWO DOWN OUR THROAT)
> consumption of alcohol, in making a reasonable objection to a ruckus
> disruption of a requested quiet amenity, then resulting within an
> unlawful year long liquor ban upon the entirely fabricated and
> uncorroborated pretext that I threatened to kill a patron as a person
> then entirely unknown to either the hotel or myself:
>
> - NOVICHOK poisoning event [#291 / #342 / #373 *LUOSHU*] on 4 MARCH 2018
> - GOOD FRIDAY AGREEMENT [#298 / #373 ***] on 10 APRIL 1998
> - REICH CONCORDAT [#291 / #373 ***] on 20 JULY 1933
>
> 2)    An identified catalyst for action is related to the term GALLIPOLI
> which is the Italian form of the Greek name Καλλίπολις (Kallipolis),
> meaning 'beautiful city' and thusly has an unavoidable correspondence to
> FASCISM and ROME's FOUNDATION STONES @1 - #99 / #297, @5 - #111 / #333.
>
> This philosophical term Kallipolis actually applies to the utopian
> ATLANTIS as city-state ruled by philosopher-kings as theorised by Plato
> in the Republic where the ideal city (kallipolis) had a charter myth,
> the MYTH OF THE METALS, a gennaion pseudos (Rep. III.414b) which is not
> best rendered as 'Noble Lie' but as the metaphorical or mythical
> statement of a truth which the general populace can understand and be
> persuaded to accept only in some such form.
>
> 3)    TIM ROWE (MASTER OF CEREMONIES AT SAINT PATRICK'S DAY CHERISHED /
> BLESSED MOTHER WITH NAKED CHILD STATUE UNVEILING) ON 22 MAY 2018:
> "RESPONSE - BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION AS PERSECUTION (paraphrased):
>
> #232 - *FOREVER* *YOUNG* *WAR* *GRAVES* #298 - *ENCLOSURE* *POEM*
> #232 - UNLAWFUL WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD BAN EVENT OF 26 MARCH 2017
> #232 - PLAQUE PLACEMENT ON 8 JUNE 2017
>
> AS THE PROBABLE WORLD WAR ONE 2018 CENTENNIAL HIJACK SCHEMA as [#6, #2,
> #8, #6, #200, #10] / [#2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #6] = bâchûwr (H970):
> {UMBRA: #216 % #41 = #11} 1) youth, *YOUNG* *MAN*;
>
> Council acknowledges receipt [ECM 2332240 / Our reference TR:SM] of the
> letter and advise that no further action will be taken at this point in
> time."
>
> 4)    The diary note for the STAR HOTEL event dated 26 MARCH 2017
> appears to conform with a dialectic obtained from a MATRIX PROTOTYPE
> #SIX (ie. having a #123 = #17, #41, #65 correspondence to the DOMINION
> matrix which is associated with the LUOSHU square as then its reference
> object with an implicit #38 logical fallacy) element #232 - UNLAWFUL
> LIQUOR BAN EVENT 26 MARCH 2017 (gâzar (H1504): *TO* *DECREE*,
> *EXCLUDED*, *CUT* *OFF* / rîyb (H7379): *DISPUTE*, *CONTROVERSY*, *CASE*
> *AT* *LAW*) = [#66, #42, #18, #65, #41]
>
> 
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%201.png>
>
>
> A further patterning attribute was associated to 30 MAY 2017 (#308):
> DATE OF UNLAWFUL LIQUOR BAN NOTICE AS MISREPRESENTATION OF AN INCIDENTAL
> STAR HOTEL EVENT [#358 / #291] OF 26 MARCH 2017 AND THAT WAS RECEIVED
> UPON 5 JUNE 2017 IN TRANSITING DURING PENTECOST SUNDAY.
>
> 5)    Whereas the stone pedestal with a FOREVER YOUNG POEM situated
> adjacent to a LONE PINE tree associated with GALLIPOLI on the external
> boundary to the SALE WAR GRAVES cemetery appears to deploy a dialectic
> obtained from a MATRIX PROTOTYPE #ONE (ie. having a structural
> correspondence to GERMAN fascism and immaterially to the VATICAN CITY
> STATE) element #232 - FOREVER YOUNG (bâchûwr (H970): *YOUTH*, *YOUNG*
> *MAN* / zâkar (H2142): *RECALL*, *REMEMBER*) POEM (SACRED GROVE EXTERNAL
> TO SALE WAR CEMETERY #298 - ENCLOSURE) [#1, #9, #17, #25, #33, #41, #49,
> #57]
>
> 
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%202.png>
>
>
> 6)    This common and besieging element #38 / #232 - 8 JUNE 2017 as
> CARDINAL GEORGE PELL's birthday is similarly occurs on the occasion of a
> #449 - METAL PLAQUE INSTALLATION at the #449 - CHERISHED / BLESSED
> MOTHER WITH NAKED CHILD STATUE (ie. unveiled on #449 - SAINT PATRICK'S
> DAY 17 MARCH 2017) which appears to be a transit event (BOER WAR
> MEMORIAL --> ECCLESIASTICAL CALENDAR CONFORMITY) related an improper
> POPPY wreath observed at the BOER WAR MEMORIAL on 10 JUNE 2017.
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/OATH%2020170608%201510%20-%202.jpg>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOER%2020170610%201154%20-%205.jpg>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOER%2020170610%201153%20-%204.jpg>
>
> 7)    The earlier event date of 10 JUNE 2015 as #38 - FULLNESS (SHENG)
> corresponds to RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN's second meeting with
> POPE FRANCIS AT THE VATICAN as STATE VISIT concerns on whether there
> were DISCLOSURES MADE TO PUTIN ABOUT SUCH FAITHFUL SOLDIERS OF THE
> CATHOLIC CHURCH AS ECCLESIASTICAL ACTION on 11 APRIL 2015 (#308) as
> DECLARATION OF PAPAL BULL MISERICORDIAE VULTUS (ANNOUNCED: #449 / #503 -
> 13 MARCH 2015.
>
> 8)    Thus our document has some considerations on concerns by the
> RUSSIANs (REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM IDEA @328) HAVING A VALID CONCERN (ie.
> the #33 - PHONEMES induces a pathological characteristic within the
> TABLE TALK which includes JEWS, CHRISTIANS and COMMUNISTS in the same
> class as exclusion group) ABOUT NAZI IDENTITY (ie. "rewrite history and
> glorify fascists" [Wikileaks document ID: 08MOSCOW2656_a, dated 1
> FEBRUARY 2008]) which is BELLIGERENTLY an unresolved question of 90
> years duration and could subject NATO to reparations within the
> UKRAINIAN proxy war.
>
> FOR SCENARIO EXPANSION SEE: "MANAGING MAGGOTY FLY STRIKE WITH STRATEGIC
> CHEMICAL APPLICATION "
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Maggoty%20Fly%20Strike.pdf>
>
and then

In article <w96dnZ9Cx6Xez935nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
>
> dolf wrote:
> > 19 APRIL 2023
> >
> > MATTERS RELEVANT TO IBAC CASE-2022XXXX AS COMPLAINT LODGED 17 JULY 2002
> > BEING ITEM: 27. IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR
> > PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT?
> >
> > 1)    It ought then to be substantive cause to bring CRIMINAL CHARGES
> > against legal counsel PETER RIDDELL for PERJURY and perverting the
> > COURSE OF JUSTICE by a deliberate misrepresentation of two telephone
> > calls made to them in a matter of self representation before a BLIND
> > judicatory. That my conduct in matters of this complaint was mindful
> > that PRESERVATION of any probity related to such action against the
> > INSURER was a primary concern.
> >
> > YOUTUBE: "MUSE - RESISTANCE"
> >
> > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPE9uSFFxrI>
> >
> > I HAVE NOT LABOURED FOR 25 YEARS JUST SO SOMEONE CAN STEAL MY LIFE
> > OPPORTUNITY which is enumerated within our 17 APRIL 2023 submission to
> > IBAC in conveying the use of MATRIX PROTOTYPES #SIX (#123 / #369) as
> > TWEEDLEDUM[B] and #ONE (#99 / #297) TWEEDLEDEE[D] as an established fact
> > in then providing an "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" against an INSURER's
> > IMPROPRIETY by deploying a term dichotomy such as ?TOTAL AND PERMANENT
> > DISABILITY? as involving destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
> > overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle
> >
> > <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>
> >
> > 2)    The concept of a #232 - HIJACKING SCHEMA perpetuated as a
> > "gennaion pseudos" (ie. honourable or noble lie) against the SOVEREIGN /
> > AUTONOMY dynamic were considerations also raised (ie. the IDENTICAL
> > MATRICES were provided) within our submissions of 17 TO 20 JULY 2018 as
> > made to the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION:
> >
> > "In practical functional terms of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ie.
> > PROTOTYPE #NINE WITHIN BOTH 9x9 MATRICES) applicable to the INSURANCE /
> > FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY that if the perennial [philosophical] use of
> > the binomial THEORY OF NUMBER METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2
> > + #3 + #4 = #10}  has an inherent deficiency TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND
> > TWEEDLEDEE[D] and an introduction of a further dichotomy such as ?TOTAL
> > AND PERMANENT DISABILITY? as a disparity between SALARY CONTINUANCE
> > INSURANCE POLICY and that of SUPERANNUATION portfolios it is as #1 + #2
> > + #3 + #4 = #10 capable of destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
> > overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle.
> >
> > Furthermore in relation to a disproportionate or non existent insurance
> > benefit being applied to the chronic psychiatric condition known as PTSD
> > - POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER in the circumstance where effective
> > GOVERNANCE is a product of SAPIENT reality and our proposition to extend
> > definition of a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF
> > HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS
> > THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY.
> >
> > That the Insurance Industry?s failure to appropriately manage and in
> > circumstance of a lack of provision as appropriate medical intervention
> > to the precursor medical condition: ?HYPER-AROUSAL OF THE CENTRAL
> > NERVOUS SYSTEM AND STRESS OF THE STARTLE REFLEX? is then (ie. I can
> > articulate time after all and I have an experience of a bomb blast on 27
> > March 1986) causal for the exasperation of the medical condition in[to]
> > a chronic state."
> >
> > 3)    To that end, we have provided a psychiatrist who specialises in
> > METAPHOR THERAPY and a cognitive scientist (Monash University) our
> > informal research case study on the use of a four line lyric as then a
> > NEURAL LINGUISTIC SPACIAL OVERLAY and META DESCRIPTORS (#317, #205,
> > #144, #383) for an event intervention against MURDOCH press over US
> > PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN'S IRELAND visit to thwart seditious contemporaneous
> > local actions by IRISH REPUBLICANISM
> >
> > 4)    From correspondence with FRANCESCO DE FERRARI the AMP CHIEF
> > EXECUTIVE OFFICER dated 29 JUNE 2020 (who as an ITALIAN took no action
> > because of an intention to sell those products and services), it was
> > stated that my last conversation with a "DESIGNATED LEGAL PRACTICE"
> > failed on the basis that such "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" (as we then termed it
> > to be) being entirely defined by the ROYAL COMMISSION as obtained from
> > MEDIA REPORTS OF 27 APRIL 2018 conveying ROWENA ORR AS QUEEN'S COUNSEL
> > ASSISTING THE ROYAL COMMISSION INTO FINANCIAL SERVICES ADVISING CRIMINAL
> > PROSECUTION OUGHT TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST AMP FOLLOWING EVIDENCE OF
> > 'UNCONSCIONABLE' MISCONDUCT WHICH WAS DESCRIBED AS 'UNLAWFUL AND
> > ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG'.
> >
> > WE USED THIS EXACTING EXAMPLE IN OUR SUBMISSION TO THE FINANCIAL
> > SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION: By suggesting the imperative of #432 -
> > DISHEARTENING was an impost purposed {TORAH #FIVE: #114 / #342; #SIX:
> > #123 / #369 v?s HETEROS #SIX: #114 / #342 by #FIVE: #111 / #333; #ONE:
> > #99 / #297 impetus} upon the Dutch troops and the United Nations
> > authority itself does not in any manner diminish the suffering of the
> > people but diminishes the culpability of the Dutch entirely since they
> > themselves were the targets and the #419 - SLAUGHTER the means.
> >
> > Being habitual and recalcitrant misconduct of the insurer which now
> > grants me an opportunity to seek a redress for alleged perjury by LEGAL
> > COUNSEL MR. PETER RIDDELL which was undertaken on behalf of AXA GLOBAL
> > (AUSTRALIA) GROUP INSURANCE arising from his 4 December 2001 mischievous
> > letter made to the VICTORIAN CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (VCAT) as
> > the knowingly false misrepresentation of 2 telephone calls made by me on
> > 30 November, 2001 in being a courtesy to that LEGAL COUNSEL for the
> > INSURER.
> >
> > ----------
> >
> > TO: AMP CLAIMS ASSESSORS
> >
> > FURTHER TO CORRESPONDENCE SENT @ 1438 HOURS ON 15 AUGUST 2017 / 1334
> > HOURS ON 16 AUGUST 2017 / 0911 HOURS ON 22 AUGUST / MULTIPLE OF 31
> > AUGUST 2017 ARE THESE ADDITIONAL DIARY NOTES WITH RESPECTS TO MY CLAIM
> > NO: M1001872 FOR PLAN NO: 00004,283:
> >
> > Given this clear evidence to the contrary of Mr Peter Riddell?s
> > submission made to the VCAT Extra-ordinary hearing of 7 December, 2001
> > in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone
> > calls as the basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence.
> > The following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and
> > conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 February 2004
> > obtained from tapes provided by the Victoria Civil & Administrative
> > Tribunal (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 7
> > December 2001 before Deputy President Ms. Cate McKenzie presiding over
> > A500 of 2000 in matter of Australian Casualty & Life (AXA Global Group
> > Insurance) and Mark Capecchi. The proceedings were conducted by
> > telephone hook-up.
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?
> >
> > Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by
> >
> > MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
> > Shannon Lindner with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
> > on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the
> > Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
> > raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
> > understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
> > why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
> > there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
> > bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
> > necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
> > determine how best to deal with it.
> >
> > In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
> > if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
> > Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
> > what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
> > what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of
> > course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has
> > finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.
> >
> > MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 November in the morning I received a
> > telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that
> > he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages
> > on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those
> > messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my
> > family. I, that morning, contacted the Victoria Police and reported the
> > matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I
> > not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am
> > presenting myself by way of telephone today.
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?
> >
> > MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
> > of those
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?
> >
> > MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
> > to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
> > matter it ought to be on evidence.
> >
> > MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape
> >
> > MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
> > volume.
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.
> >
> > TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm
> > just wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my
> > previous submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their
> > transcendent logic built on time]. They are religious model that
> > co-ordinates or synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this
> > year. That means [when this year expires,] my court case will be a
> > matter of an accusation of fascism against yourself at the company from
> > which I will not cease until I have your #419 - SOUL.
> >
> > You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have
> > until the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand
> > against the action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude
> > when one of us going to the #390 - GRAVE."

Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> In article <w96dnZ9Cx6Xez935nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100
> @gmail.com says...
>>
>> dolf wrote:
>>> 19 APRIL 2023
>>>
>>> MATTERS RELEVANT TO IBAC CASE-2022XXXX AS COMPLAINT LODGED 17 JULY 2002
>>> BEING ITEM: 27. IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR
>>> PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT?
>>>
>>> 1)    It ought then to be substantive cause to bring CRIMINAL CHARGES
>>> against legal counsel PETER RIDDELL for PERJURY and perverting the
>>> COURSE OF JUSTICE by a deliberate misrepresentation of two telephone
>>> calls made to them in a matter of self representation before a BLIND
>>> judicatory. That my conduct in matters of this complaint was mindful
>>> that PRESERVATION of any probity related to such action against the
>>> INSURER was a primary concern.
>>>
>>> YOUTUBE: "MUSE - RESISTANCE"
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPE9uSFFxrI>
>>>
>>> I HAVE NOT LABOURED FOR 25 YEARS JUST SO SOMEONE CAN STEAL MY LIFE
>>> OPPORTUNITY which is enumerated within our 17 APRIL 2023 submission to
>>> IBAC in conveying the use of MATRIX PROTOTYPES #SIX (#123 / #369) as
>>> TWEEDLEDUM[B] and #ONE (#99 / #297) TWEEDLEDEE[D] as an established fact
>>> in then providing an "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" against an INSURER's
>>> IMPROPRIETY by deploying a term dichotomy such as ?TOTAL AND PERMANENT
>>> DISABILITY? as involving destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
>>> overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>
>>>
>>> 2)    The concept of a #232 - HIJACKING SCHEMA perpetuated as a
>>> "gennaion pseudos" (ie. honourable or noble lie) against the SOVEREIGN /
>>> AUTONOMY dynamic were considerations also raised (ie. the IDENTICAL
>>> MATRICES were provided) within our submissions of 17 TO 20 JULY 2018 as
>>> made to the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION:
>>>
>>> "In practical functional terms of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ie.
>>> PROTOTYPE #NINE WITHIN BOTH 9x9 MATRICES) applicable to the INSURANCE /
>>> FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY that if the perennial [philosophical] use of
>>> the binomial THEORY OF NUMBER METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2
>>> + #3 + #4 = #10}  has an inherent deficiency TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND
>>> TWEEDLEDEE[D] and an introduction of a further dichotomy such as ?TOTAL
>>> AND PERMANENT DISABILITY? as a disparity between SALARY CONTINUANCE
>>> INSURANCE POLICY and that of SUPERANNUATION portfolios it is as #1 + #2
>>> + #3 + #4 = #10 capable of destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
>>> overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle.
>>>
>>> Furthermore in relation to a disproportionate or non existent insurance
>>> benefit being applied to the chronic psychiatric condition known as PTSD
>>> - POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER in the circumstance where effective
>>> GOVERNANCE is a product of SAPIENT reality and our proposition to extend
>>> definition of a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF
>>> HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS
>>> THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY.
>>>
>>> That the Insurance Industry?s failure to appropriately manage and in
>>> circumstance of a lack of provision as appropriate medical intervention
>>> to the precursor medical condition: ?HYPER-AROUSAL OF THE CENTRAL
>>> NERVOUS SYSTEM AND STRESS OF THE STARTLE REFLEX? is then (ie. I can
>>> articulate time after all and I have an experience of a bomb blast on 27
>>> March 1986) causal for the exasperation of the medical condition in[to]
>>> a chronic state."
>>>
>>> 3)    To that end, we have provided a psychiatrist who specialises in
>>> METAPHOR THERAPY and a cognitive scientist (Monash University) our
>>> informal research case study on the use of a four line lyric as then a
>>> NEURAL LINGUISTIC SPACIAL OVERLAY and META DESCRIPTORS (#317, #205,
>>> #144, #383) for an event intervention against MURDOCH press over US
>>> PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN'S IRELAND visit to thwart seditious contemporaneous
>>> local actions by IRISH REPUBLICANISM
>>>
>>> 4)    From correspondence with FRANCESCO DE FERRARI the AMP CHIEF
>>> EXECUTIVE OFFICER dated 29 JUNE 2020 (who as an ITALIAN took no action
>>> because of an intention to sell those products and services), it was
>>> stated that my last conversation with a "DESIGNATED LEGAL PRACTICE"
>>> failed on the basis that such "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" (as we then termed it
>>> to be) being entirely defined by the ROYAL COMMISSION as obtained from
>>> MEDIA REPORTS OF 27 APRIL 2018 conveying ROWENA ORR AS QUEEN'S COUNSEL
>>> ASSISTING THE ROYAL COMMISSION INTO FINANCIAL SERVICES ADVISING CRIMINAL
>>> PROSECUTION OUGHT TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST AMP FOLLOWING EVIDENCE OF
>>> 'UNCONSCIONABLE' MISCONDUCT WHICH WAS DESCRIBED AS 'UNLAWFUL AND
>>> ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG'.
>>>
>>> WE USED THIS EXACTING EXAMPLE IN OUR SUBMISSION TO THE FINANCIAL
>>> SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION: By suggesting the imperative of #432 -
>>> DISHEARTENING was an impost purposed {TORAH #FIVE: #114 / #342; #SIX:
>>> #123 / #369 v?s HETEROS #SIX: #114 / #342 by #FIVE: #111 / #333; #ONE:
>>> #99 / #297 impetus} upon the Dutch troops and the United Nations
>>> authority itself does not in any manner diminish the suffering of the
>>> people but diminishes the culpability of the Dutch entirely since they
>>> themselves were the targets and the #419 - SLAUGHTER the means.
>>>
>>> Being habitual and recalcitrant misconduct of the insurer which now
>>> grants me an opportunity to seek a redress for alleged perjury by LEGAL
>>> COUNSEL MR. PETER RIDDELL which was undertaken on behalf of AXA GLOBAL
>>> (AUSTRALIA) GROUP INSURANCE arising from his 4 December 2001 mischievous
>>> letter made to the VICTORIAN CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (VCAT) as
>>> the knowingly false misrepresentation of 2 telephone calls made by me on
>>> 30 November, 2001 in being a courtesy to that LEGAL COUNSEL for the
>>> INSURER.
>>>
>>> ----------
>>>
>>> TO: AMP CLAIMS ASSESSORS
>>>
>>> FURTHER TO CORRESPONDENCE SENT @ 1438 HOURS ON 15 AUGUST 2017 / 1334
>>> HOURS ON 16 AUGUST 2017 / 0911 HOURS ON 22 AUGUST / MULTIPLE OF 31
>>> AUGUST 2017 ARE THESE ADDITIONAL DIARY NOTES WITH RESPECTS TO MY CLAIM
>>> NO: M1001872 FOR PLAN NO: 00004,283:
>>>
>>> Given this clear evidence to the contrary of Mr Peter Riddell?s
>>> submission made to the VCAT Extra-ordinary hearing of 7 December, 2001
>>> in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone
>>> calls as the basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence.
>>> The following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and
>>> conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 February 2004
>>> obtained from tapes provided by the Victoria Civil & Administrative
>>> Tribunal (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 7
>>> December 2001 before Deputy President Ms. Cate McKenzie presiding over
>>> A500 of 2000 in matter of Australian Casualty & Life (AXA Global Group
>>> Insurance) and Mark Capecchi. The proceedings were conducted by
>>> telephone hook-up.
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?
>>>
>>> Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by
>>>
>>> MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
>>> Shannon Lindner with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
>>> on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the
>>> Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
>>> raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
>>> understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
>>> why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
>>> there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
>>> bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
>>> necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
>>> determine how best to deal with it.
>>>
>>> In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
>>> if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
>>> Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
>>> what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
>>> what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of
>>> course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has
>>> finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.
>>>
>>> MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 November in the morning I received a
>>> telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that
>>> he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages
>>> on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those
>>> messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my
>>> family. I, that morning, contacted the Victoria Police and reported the
>>> matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I
>>> not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am
>>> presenting myself by way of telephone today.
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?
>>>
>>> MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
>>> of those
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?
>>>
>>> MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
>>> to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
>>> matter it ought to be on evidence.
>>>
>>> MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape
>>>
>>> MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
>>> volume.
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.
>>>
>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm
>>> just wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my
>>> previous submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their
>>> transcendent logic built on time]. They are religious model that
>>> co-ordinates or synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this
>>> year. That means [when this year expires,] my court case will be a
>>> matter of an accusation of fascism against yourself at the company from
>>> which I will not cease until I have your #419 - SOUL.
>>>
>>> You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have
>>> until the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand
>>> against the action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude
>>> when one of us going to the #390 - GRAVE."
>
> is this anything
>