"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:i5pjjghgulerk6j6tukhsh9s4um46s6vth@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 00:03:47 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:tdb2hglsa000927mts5ou0gklfrqemei76@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 8 Aug 2021 20:49:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Why on EARTH would they add alcohol AFTER, Jenny?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>SO IT DOESN'T BOIL OFF OBVIOUSLY.
>>>
>>> That makes ZERO sense. Try again.
>>>
>>> WHY would they add alcohol after, Jenny?
>>
>>
>>Becouse it's a BOURBON BURGER, klous. My personal opinion is that they
>>DON'T add the bourbon After cooking it, my expert advice is they only cook
>>the souce hot enough so that it doesn't boil off.
>>Irregarldess teh process, the FACT remains, and is confirmed on wendy's
>>website, that the ALCOHOL REMAIN'S.
>
> No, they do not confirm it on the web site.

YES, THEY DID. It said QOUTE, REAL BOURBON.

Then for emphasis, it says on the webstire, READ THAT PART AGAIN.

https://order.wendys.com/product/31298/bourbon-bacon-cheeseburger

There is no such thing as Alcohol-free bourbon, Klous.

On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 18:34:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:i5pjjghgulerk6j6tukhsh9s4um46s6vth@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 00:03:47 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:tdb2hglsa000927mts5ou0gklfrqemei76@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 8 Aug 2021 20:49:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Why on EARTH would they add alcohol AFTER, Jenny?
>>>>>
>>>>>SO IT DOESN'T BOIL OFF OBVIOUSLY.
>>>>
>>>> That makes ZERO sense. Try again.
>>>>
>>>> WHY would they add alcohol after, Jenny?
>>>
>>>
>>>Becouse it's a BOURBON BURGER, klous. My personal opinion is that they
>>>DON'T add the bourbon After cooking it, my expert advice is they only cook
>>>the souce hot enough so that it doesn't boil off.
>>>Irregarldess teh process, the FACT remains, and is confirmed on wendy's
>>>website, that the ALCOHOL REMAIN'S.
>>
>> No, they do not confirm it on the web site.
>
>YES, THEY DID. It said QOUTE, REAL BOURBON.
>

Where?

>Then for emphasis, it says on the webstire, READ THAT PART AGAIN.
>
>https://order.wendys.com/product/31298/bourbon-bacon-cheeseburger
>
>There is no such thing as Alcohol-free bourbon, Klous.

As you KNOW, but can't be honest and admit, the alcohol is burned
off during cooking.

--
When the world ends, there'll be no more air.
That's why it's important to pollute the air now. Before it's too
late. :)

On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 18:34:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:i5pjjghgulerk6j6tukhsh9s4um46s6vth@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 00:03:47 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:tdb2hglsa000927mts5ou0gklfrqemei76@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 8 Aug 2021 20:49:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Why on EARTH would they add alcohol AFTER, Jenny?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>SO IT DOESN'T BOIL OFF OBVIOUSLY.
>>>>
>>>> That makes ZERO sense. Try again.
>>>>
>>>> WHY would they add alcohol after, Jenny?
>>>
>>>
>>>Becouse it's a BOURBON BURGER, klous. My personal opinion is that they
>>>DON'T add the bourbon After cooking it, my expert advice is they only cook
>>>the souce hot enough so that it doesn't boil off.
>>>Irregarldess teh process, the FACT remains, and is confirmed on wendy's
>>>website, that the ALCOHOL REMAIN'S.
>>
>> No, they do not confirm it on the web site.
>
>YES, THEY DID. It said QOUTE, REAL BOURBON.

No, they did NOT confirm it had alcohol on the web site.

>There is no such thing as Alcohol-free bourbon, Klous.

There is when you cook it off, you numbskull.

On Mon, 04 Oct 2021 03:53:34 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

>>>>Becouse it's a BOURBON BURGER, klous. My personal opinion is that they
>>>>DON'T add the bourbon After cooking it, my expert advice is they only cook
>>>>the souce hot enough so that it doesn't boil off.
>>>>Irregarldess teh process, the FACT remains, and is confirmed on wendy's
>>>>website, that the ALCOHOL REMAIN'S.
>>>
>>> No, they do not confirm it on the web site.
>>
>>YES, THEY DID. It said QOUTE, REAL BOURBON.
>
>No, they did NOT confirm it had alcohol on the web site.
>
>>There is no such thing as Alcohol-free bourbon, Klous.
>
>There is when you cook it off, you numbskull.

This has been explained to Jenny a few times. There is no way he
doesn't know this.

--
I suffer from chronic apathy.
I was going to go see a doctor about it, but I didn't really care.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:s7nllglqrrab0199e7rqgjsrsvcbmjcl1a@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 18:34:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:i5pjjghgulerk6j6tukhsh9s4um46s6vth@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 00:03:47 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:tdb2hglsa000927mts5ou0gklfrqemei76@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sun, 8 Aug 2021 20:49:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why on EARTH would they add alcohol AFTER, Jenny?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>SO IT DOESN'T BOIL OFF OBVIOUSLY.
>>>>>
>>>>> That makes ZERO sense. Try again.
>>>>>
>>>>> WHY would they add alcohol after, Jenny?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Becouse it's a BOURBON BURGER, klous. My personal opinion is that they
>>>>DON'T add the bourbon After cooking it, my expert advice is they only
>>>>cook
>>>>the souce hot enough so that it doesn't boil off.
>>>>Irregarldess teh process, the FACT remains, and is confirmed on wendy's
>>>>website, that the ALCOHOL REMAIN'S.
>>>
>>> No, they do not confirm it on the web site.
>>
>>YES, THEY DID. It said QOUTE, REAL BOURBON.
>
> No, they did NOT confirm it had alcohol on the web site.

BOURBON HAS ALCOHOL YOU FUCKTARD.

>>There is no such thing as Alcohol-free bourbon, Klous.
>
> There is when you cook it off, you numbskull.

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE, NO PROOF WHATSOEVER THAT THE ALCOHOL IS "COOKED OFF."

But please, bo right ahead and try to post some "fact's" that the alcohol is
cooked off.

On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:47:13 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

[...]

>>>>>Becouse it's a BOURBON BURGER, klous. My personal opinion is that they
>>>>>DON'T add the bourbon After cooking it, my expert advice is they only
>>>>>cook the souce hot enough so that it doesn't boil off.
>>>>>Irregarldess teh process, the FACT remains, and is confirmed on wendy's
>>>>>website, that the ALCOHOL REMAIN'S.
>>>>
>>>> No, they do not confirm it on the web site.
>>>
>>>YES, THEY DID. It said QOUTE, REAL BOURBON.
>>
>> No, they did NOT confirm it had alcohol on the web site.
>
>BOURBON HAS ALCOHOL YOU FUCKTARD.
>

But, as has been PROVED, the alcohol is gone before the burger
reaches the consumer.

>>>There is no such thing as Alcohol-free bourbon, Klous.
>>
>> There is when you cook it off, you numbskull.
>
>THERE IS NO EVIDENCE, NO PROOF WHATSOEVER THAT THE ALCOHOL IS "COOKED OFF."
>

The lack of a liquor license is ABSOLUTE PROOF!

>But please, bo right ahead and try to post some "fact's" that the alcohol is
>cooked off.

It's already been proved, gasbag.

--
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons...
for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:47:13 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:s7nllglqrrab0199e7rqgjsrsvcbmjcl1a@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 18:34:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:i5pjjghgulerk6j6tukhsh9s4um46s6vth@4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 00:03:47 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message
>>>>>news:tdb2hglsa000927mts5ou0gklfrqemei76@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Sun, 8 Aug 2021 20:49:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why on EARTH would they add alcohol AFTER, Jenny?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>SO IT DOESN'T BOIL OFF OBVIOUSLY.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That makes ZERO sense. Try again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WHY would they add alcohol after, Jenny?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Becouse it's a BOURBON BURGER, klous. My personal opinion is that they
>>>>>DON'T add the bourbon After cooking it, my expert advice is they only
>>>>>cook
>>>>>the souce hot enough so that it doesn't boil off.
>>>>>Irregarldess teh process, the FACT remains, and is confirmed on wendy's
>>>>>website, that the ALCOHOL REMAIN'S.
>>>>
>>>> No, they do not confirm it on the web site.
>>>
>>>YES, THEY DID. It said QOUTE, REAL BOURBON.
>>
>> No, they did NOT confirm it had alcohol on the web site.
>
>BOURBON HAS ALCOHOL YOU FUCKTARD.

Try to calm yourself, Jenny.

I know it might be embarrassing for you to be constantly proven wrong,
and you hide behind your wall of lies as a salve for those wounds.

You know that Wendy's did NOT confirm -- anywhere on their web site--
that alcohol remains in their bourbon sauce after it has been cooked.

If it was true, you would have provided a link.

You did not provide a link.

This is because you're a liar.

You know you're a liar. I know you're a liar. You know that I know,
and I know that you know I know.

Everyone knows.

You're a liar, Jenny.

But your being exposed as a liar is NO REASON FOR SHOUTED PROFANITY.

Thank you.

>"Are you really so weak in your position that you have to resort to child-ish name-calling"
- Jerry Sauk

>Everybody, stop lying about yourselves, about me or anything. And let's
>stop accusing other people about lying. It's getting out of hand. If we
>all agree to stop it, then it won't be a problem at all, and we can avoid
>accusing each other of it also.
>
>So Starting NOW: No lying please!
-Jerry Sauk, 12/9/2007

On Mon, 08 Nov 2021 01:34:47 -0800, KWills <A@B.C> wrote:

>On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:47:13 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>>>>Becouse it's a BOURBON BURGER, klous. My personal opinion is that they
>>>>>>DON'T add the bourbon After cooking it, my expert advice is they only
>>>>>>cook the souce hot enough so that it doesn't boil off.
>>>>>>Irregarldess teh process, the FACT remains, and is confirmed on wendy's
>>>>>>website, that the ALCOHOL REMAIN'S.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, they do not confirm it on the web site.
>>>>
>>>>YES, THEY DID. It said QOUTE, REAL BOURBON.
>>>
>>> No, they did NOT confirm it had alcohol on the web site.
>>
>>BOURBON HAS ALCOHOL YOU FUCKTARD.
>>
>
> But, as has been PROVED, the alcohol is gone before the burger
>reaches the consumer.

Note how he "forgot" to provide any link proving Wendy's "confirmed"
his lie on their web site.

LOL

On Mon, 08 Nov 2021 04:23:09 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Nov 2021 01:34:47 -0800, KWills <A@B.C> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:47:13 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>>>>>Becouse it's a BOURBON BURGER, klous. My personal opinion is that they
>>>>>>>DON'T add the bourbon After cooking it, my expert advice is they only
>>>>>>>cook the souce hot enough so that it doesn't boil off.
>>>>>>>Irregarldess teh process, the FACT remains, and is confirmed on wendy's
>>>>>>>website, that the ALCOHOL REMAIN'S.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, they do not confirm it on the web site.
>>>>>
>>>>>YES, THEY DID. It said QOUTE, REAL BOURBON.
>>>>
>>>> No, they did NOT confirm it had alcohol on the web site.
>>>
>>>BOURBON HAS ALCOHOL YOU FUCKTARD.
>>
>> But, as has been PROVED, the alcohol is gone before the burger
>>reaches the consumer.
>
>Note how he "forgot" to provide any link proving Wendy's "confirmed"
>his lie on their web site.
>
>LOL

Gasbag can't very well link to something that exists solely
within the confines of his pathological lying.

--
"Hail imp," shouted Vlad, the Imp Hailer.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:q55iogdu4fdkta4k4o8rdvhcbgd9bai62t@4ax.com...
> I know it might be embarrassing for you to be constantly proven wrong,
> and you hide behind your wall of lies as a salve for those wounds.
>
> You know that Wendy's did NOT confirm -- anywhere on their web site--
> that alcohol remains in their bourbon sauce after it has been cooked.

IT DOESN'T SAY IT'S "BURNED OFF " EITHER.

> If it was true, you would have provided a link.
>
> You did not provide a link.
>
> This is because you're a liar.

Klous, YOU need to A>) provide a link that it's burned off.

becouse the FACT of the matter, is, that the website states CLEARLY that the
bourbon used is REAL BOURBON.

So now the burdon of proof falls on YOU to prove that there is no alcohol in
the "real" bourbon.

And so far you have provided NO SUCH LINK.

On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:39:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Klous, YOU need to A>) provide a link that it's burned off.

====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========

[ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
[ ] You are lying, as usual
[ ] Typical racist Jenny response
[ X ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
[ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
[ ] Yes, it *is* private property
[ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
[ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
[ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet

======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========

On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:39:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:q55iogdu4fdkta4k4o8rdvhcbgd9bai62t@4ax.com...
>> I know it might be embarrassing for you to be constantly proven wrong,
>> and you hide behind your wall of lies as a salve for those wounds.
>>
>> You know that Wendy's did NOT confirm -- anywhere on their web site--
>> that alcohol remains in their bourbon sauce after it has been cooked.
>
> IT DOESN'T SAY IT'S "BURNED OFF " EITHER.
>
>

Because they presume readers will have passed fifth grade
science.

>> If it was true, you would have provided a link.
>>
>> You did not provide a link.
>>
>> This is because you're a liar.
>
>
>Klous, YOU need to A>) provide a link that it's burned off.
>

You would know this if you had passed fifth grade science.

>becouse the FACT of the matter, is, that the website states CLEARLY that the
>bourbon used is REAL BOURBON.

This isn't in dispute.
That you're reduced to defending a claim never presented only
serves to further PROVE you know your lie has been exposed.

>
>So now the burdon of proof falls on YOU to prove that there is no alcohol in
>the "real" bourbon.

Why? You alone make the claim there is no alcohol in real
bourbon.

>
>And so far you have provided NO SUCH LINK.
>

Why would anyone link to anything for YOUR lie?

[Cue crickets]

--
Aspire to inspire before you expire.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:i9kfqgpgmhn1fuplpgdiub74f4mp0tvaik@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:39:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Klous, YOU need to A>) provide a link that it's burned off.
>
> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>
> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
> [ ] You are lying, as usual
> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
> [ X ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet

====== BEGIN STANDARD KLOUS RESPONSE =========

[ ] The public enteres teh Property.
[ ] You are lying, as usual
[ ] Have you 9 y/o nieghbor show you how to do that.
[ ] Just upgrade your damn computer.
[ ] That wasn't a lie, you just don't understand
[ ] Yes, it *is* public property
[ ] That discussion has already been closed.
[ ] What are you blathering on about now.
[ ] My name is Jerry, not Jenny
[ X ] Stop avoiding teh issue and answer the question.
[ ] STFU and give other people a chance to talk.

======= END STANDARD KLOUS RESPONSE ==========

On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 02:24:38 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:i9kfqgpgmhn1fuplpgdiub74f4mp0tvaik@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:39:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Klous, YOU need to A>) provide a link that it's burned off.
>>
>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>
>> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
>> [ ] You are lying, as usual
>> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
>> [ X ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
>> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
>> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
>> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
>> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
>> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>
>====== BEGIN STANDARD KLOUS RESPONSE =========
>
>[ ] The public enteres teh Property.
>[ ] You are lying, as usual
>[ ] Have you 9 y/o nieghbor show you how to do that.
>[ ] Just upgrade your damn computer.
>[ ] That wasn't a lie, you just don't understand
>[ ] Yes, it *is* public property
>[ ] That discussion has already been closed.
>[ ] What are you blathering on about now.
>[ ] My name is Jerry, not Jenny
>[ X ] Stop avoiding teh issue and answer the question.
>[ ] STFU and give other people a chance to talk.
>
>======= END STANDARD KLOUS RESPONSE ==========
>

He already answered. I have as well.

--
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.

On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 02:24:38 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:i9kfqgpgmhn1fuplpgdiub74f4mp0tvaik@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:39:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Klous, YOU need to A>) provide a link that it's burned off.
>>
>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>
>> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
>> [ ] You are lying, as usual
>> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
>> [ X ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
>> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
>> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
>> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
>> [ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
>> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>
>====== BEGIN STANDARD KLOUS RESPONSE =========
>
>[ ] The public enteres teh Property.
>[ ] You are lying, as usual
>[ ] Have you 9 y/o nieghbor show you how to do that.
>[ ] Just upgrade your damn computer.
>[ ] That wasn't a lie, you just don't understand
>[ ] Yes, it *is* public property
>[ ] That discussion has already been closed.
>[ ] What are you blathering on about now.
>[ ] My name is Jerry, not Jenny
>[ X ] Stop avoiding teh issue and answer the question.
>[ ] STFU and give other people a chance to talk.
>
>======= END STANDARD KLOUS RESPONSE ==========
>

====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========

[ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
[ ] You are lying, as usual
[ ] Typical racist Jenny response
[ x ] This has already been explained to you
[ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
[ ] Yes, it *is* private property
[ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
[ X ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
[ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet

======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ev7u2hp4f97f882io6agtg29m17o7ht94b@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 22:27:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:88qa0hlsu2qt7p06pmslbpt5lu38t2jhgt@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:14:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I still waiting for you to post some sort of PROOF that the alcohol is
>>>>burned off.
>>>
>>> Actually, no, you're not.
>>>
>>> You've seen the proof, you've ignored it, and you're just making a
>>> pest of yourself.
>>
>>I have posted MULTPLE refute's
>
> No. You are lying. Yo have posted no factual refutations. Only your
> opinion, which is worthless.
>
>>To refresh your memory, these possible argument's are,
>
> Interested in facts, not possibilities.

Stop trying to evade the issue, and post REFUTE'S to my many possible
argument's

IOW, PROVE that the alcohol isn't added after the souce is cooled.

PROVE that the souce is heated to a temp that burns off alcohol.

and also my many other argument's.

<crickets>

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:42:58 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ev7u2hp4f97f882io6agtg29m17o7ht94b@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 22:27:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:88qa0hlsu2qt7p06pmslbpt5lu38t2jhgt@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:14:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I still waiting for you to post some sort of PROOF that the alcohol is
>>>>>burned off.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, no, you're not.
>>>>
>>>> You've seen the proof, you've ignored it, and you're just making a
>>>> pest of yourself.
>>>
>>>I have posted MULTPLE refute's
>>
>> No. You are lying. Yo have posted no factual refutations. Only your
>> opinion, which is worthless.
>>
>>>To refresh your memory, these possible argument's are,
>>
>> Interested in facts, not possibilities.
>
> Stop trying to evade the issue, and post REFUTE'S to my many possible
>argument's

====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========

[ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
[ ] You are lying, as usual
[ ] Typical racist Jenny response
[ x ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
[ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
[ ] Yes, it *is* private property
[ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
[ x ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
[ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet

======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5n116hh9ecc3250f363n4nvcub1589ubrg@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:42:58 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:ev7u2hp4f97f882io6agtg29m17o7ht94b@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 22:27:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:88qa0hlsu2qt7p06pmslbpt5lu38t2jhgt@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:14:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I still waiting for you to post some sort of PROOF that the alcohol is
>>>>>>burned off.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, no, you're not.
>>>>>
>>>>> You've seen the proof, you've ignored it, and you're just making a
>>>>> pest of yourself.
>>>>
>>>>I have posted MULTPLE refute's
>>>
>>> No. You are lying. Yo have posted no factual refutations. Only your
>>> opinion, which is worthless.
>>>
>>>>To refresh your memory, these possible argument's are,
>>>
>>> Interested in facts, not possibilities.
>>
>> Stop trying to evade the issue, and post REFUTE'S to my many possible
>>argument's
>
> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>
> [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
> [ ] You are lying, as usual
> [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
> [ x ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
> [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
> [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
> [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
> [ x ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
> [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>
> ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========

Ahh, the good ol' trusty snip 'n' screach. Well I don't have time to go
back and look up what you snipped. If you want to consider this a victory
on your part, go right head.

In article <uv-dnUehqJSSah7_nZ2dnUU7-SNQAAAA@supernews.com>,
jerrysauk@hotmail.com says...
>
> "KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:5n116hh9ecc3250f363n4nvcub1589ubrg@4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:42:58 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> > <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>message
> >>news:ev7u2hp4f97f882io6agtg29m17o7ht94b@4ax.com...
> >>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 22:27:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> >>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>>>message
> >>>>news:88qa0hlsu2qt7p06pmslbpt5lu38t2jhgt@4ax.com...
> >>>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:14:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> >>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>I still waiting for you to post some sort of PROOF that the alcohol is
> >>>>>>burned off.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Actually, no, you're not.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You've seen the proof, you've ignored it, and you're just making a
> >>>>> pest of yourself.
> >>>>
> >>>>I have posted MULTPLE refute's
> >>>
> >>> No. You are lying. Yo have posted no factual refutations. Only your
> >>> opinion, which is worthless.
> >>>
> >>>>To refresh your memory, these possible argument's are,
> >>>
> >>> Interested in facts, not possibilities.
> >>
> >> Stop trying to evade the issue, and post REFUTE'S to my many possible
> >>argument's
> >
> > ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
> >
> > [ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
> > [ ] You are lying, as usual
> > [ ] Typical racist Jenny response
> > [ x ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
> > [ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
> > [ ] Yes, it *is* private property
> > [ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
> > [ x ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
> > [ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
> >
> > ======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
>
>
> Ahh, the good ol' trusty snip 'n' screach. Well I don't have time to go
> back and look up what you snipped. If you want to consider this a victory
> on your part, go right head.

Everyone has victory over you.

--

Robert M. Wolfe
5907 Stanton Ave
Pittsburgh, PA 15206
(412) 404-8757

Mobile number
(412) 853-6395

Landline number
(330) 996-7497

Email addresses
rob.wolfe@pacbell.net
royalitytosha@yahoo.com
rob1214@hotmail.com
r.olfe@yahoo.com

This is where I work.
Tel: 412-648-9440
Fax: 412-648-1891

Administrative Offices
University of Pittsburgh
Center for Human Genetics
and Integrative Biology
570B Scaife Hall
Pittsburgh, PA 15261

On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>If you want to consider this a victory
>on your part, go right head.

Of course I will.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>If you want to consider this a victory
>>on your part, go right head.
>
> Of course I will.

Then why snip out the argument?

Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
[Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
"Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
when he wrote the following:
>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>If you want to consider this a victory
>>>on your part, go right head.
>>
>> Of course I will.
>
> Then why snip out the argument?
>

You have no argument to snip.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
> when he wrote the following:
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>If you want to consider this a victory
>>>>on your part, go right head.
>>>
>>> Of course I will.
>>
>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>
>
> You have no argument to snip.

Then why snip it?

On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>> when he wrote the following:
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory
>>>>>on your part, go right head.
>>>>
>>>> Of course I will.
>>>
>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>
>>
>> You have no argument to snip.
>
>Then why snip it?
>

Why snip what?

If you have an argument, post it.

Your blathering and repeating your lies over and over again is not an
"argument," Jenny

It's just nonsensical chattering, like a monkey. Usenet etiquette
dictates that I cut it so other readers don't have to wade through
your lying monkey prattle.

Oh, and by the way. You're up to 100 documented lies. Congratulations.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/

I'm sure we'll see 1,000 before you know it.
------------------------------------------

When will Jenny confess that he lied when he made this claim?

:JENNY_LIE: Many week's [sic] ago, he [Kwills] personally
:JENNY_LIE:emailed me after I refused his re-admission,
:JENNY_LIE:and he admitted he was in teh [sic] wrong and
:JENNY_LIE:that he is just a troll. He also suggested
:JENNY_LIE:I killfile [sic] Klous [sic] as well, which prove's
:JENNY_LIE: [sic] how much respect for the killfiling [sic] program.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory
>>>>>>on your part, go right head.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>
>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>
>>>
>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>
>>Then why snip it?
>>
>
> Why snip what?
>
> If you have an argument, post it.

I DID post it. You SNIPPED it. as Usual when yu face a argument you can't
respond to.