Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Prosperity makes friends, adversity tries them. -- Publilius Syrus


interests / rec.games.backgammon / A boring position

SubjectAuthor
* A boring positionpeps...@gmail.com
`* Re: A boring positionTimothy Chow
 `- Re: A boring positionpeps...@gmail.com

1
A boring position

<6fea2356-e2bf-4474-939d-a0022507eee3n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=9338&group=rec.games.backgammon#9338

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a54:0:b0:6b5:ccf3:a0ad with SMTP id 81-20020a370a54000000b006b5ccf3a0admr5590734qkk.612.1659178505019;
Sat, 30 Jul 2022 03:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:239c:b0:10b:8a3c:f9e7 with SMTP id
e28-20020a056870239c00b0010b8a3cf9e7mr3408431oap.161.1659178504668; Sat, 30
Jul 2022 03:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 03:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=217.155.59.144; posting-account=X1j9wgoAAADLt4UnZrIneT3jwl9HvLMd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.155.59.144
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6fea2356-e2bf-4474-939d-a0022507eee3n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: A boring position
From: pepste...@gmail.com (peps...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 10:55:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2801
 by: peps...@gmail.com - Sat, 30 Jul 2022 10:55 UTC

Well, I found it interesting, or I wouldn't have posted it.
But I'm sure many people would find it boring, too.
Here (rather shamefully), I miscounted the pips and doubled.
I wouldn't have doubled if I had counted correctly.

What interests me is that, although XG is very close to a beaver,
the double isn't so terrible (by my standards). Just a 0.03 loss.

In cube action problems, the beaver question tends to be
given short shrift. If we don't consider beavers, then the
action is too obviously ND/T to be worth posing as a problem.

Paul

XGID=-BBBBBBA----a-----Bdbcbab-:0:0:1:00:14:27:X:Daniel O:eXtremeGammon
3:0:10

Score is X:14 O:27. Unlimited Game, Jacoby Beaver
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X | | O O O O O O |
| X | | O O O O O |
| | | O O |
| | | O |
| | | |
| |BAR| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | X X X X X X |
| O X | | X X X X X X |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 85 O: 69 X-O: 14-27
Cube: 1
X on roll, cube action

Analyzed in XG Roller+
Player Winning Chances: 60.12% (G:1.45% B:0.02%)
Opponent Winning Chances: 39.88% (G:0.26% B:0.01%)

Cubeless Equities: No Double=+0.214, Double=+0.404

Cubeful Equities:
No double: +0.051
Double/Take: +0.021 (-0.030)
Double/Pass: +1.000 (+0.949)

Best Cube action: No double / Take
Percentage of wrong pass needed to make the double decision right: 2.9%

eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10

Re: A boring position

<tc39ue$3rum7$2@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=9340&group=rec.games.backgammon#9340

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tchow12...@yahoo.com (Timothy Chow)
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Subject: Re: A boring position
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 08:58:52 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <tc39ue$3rum7$2@dont-email.me>
References: <6fea2356-e2bf-4474-939d-a0022507eee3n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 12:58:54 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8c948c87617de0b1c6f6821a9b21036f";
logging-data="4061895"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18lRk4MYY3o7sNrd0M/NRu3lh9NEf7ClZQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wlz1J5A5t+44j0odTirYRPjY/Ik=
In-Reply-To: <6fea2356-e2bf-4474-939d-a0022507eee3n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Timothy Chow - Sat, 30 Jul 2022 12:58 UTC

On 7/30/2022 6:55 AM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
> In cube action problems, the beaver question tends to be
> given short shrift.

There's a good reason for this. In practice, decisions to
beaver involve a heavy dose of non-mathematical considerations.

---
Tim Chow

Re: A boring position

<86b8f426-5fbe-43ce-af16-10bf6712983fn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=9344&group=rec.games.backgammon#9344

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4310:b0:6ac:f9df:178d with SMTP id u16-20020a05620a431000b006acf9df178dmr6939263qko.773.1659201720425;
Sat, 30 Jul 2022 10:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1591:b0:33a:6ec9:bd02 with SMTP id
t17-20020a056808159100b0033a6ec9bd02mr4262845oiw.270.1659201720160; Sat, 30
Jul 2022 10:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 10:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <tc39ue$3rum7$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=217.155.59.144; posting-account=X1j9wgoAAADLt4UnZrIneT3jwl9HvLMd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.155.59.144
References: <6fea2356-e2bf-4474-939d-a0022507eee3n@googlegroups.com> <tc39ue$3rum7$2@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <86b8f426-5fbe-43ce-af16-10bf6712983fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: A boring position
From: pepste...@gmail.com (peps...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 17:22:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1827
 by: peps...@gmail.com - Sat, 30 Jul 2022 17:21 UTC

On Saturday, July 30, 2022 at 1:58:56 PM UTC+1, Tim Chow wrote:
> On 7/30/2022 6:55 AM, peps...@gmail.com wrote:
> > In cube action problems, the beaver question tends to be
> > given short shrift.
> There's a good reason for this. In practice, decisions to
> beaver involve a heavy dose of non-mathematical considerations.
>
> ---
> Tim Chow

Yes.
Let's ignore Kauder paradoxes and let's assume equal strength play.
A player might reason that their equity is improved by beavering.
However, the other player has reasoned that their equity is improved by doubling.
So we need a meta-judgment about whether the opponent is more likely to be correct
than we are.

Paul

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor