Hello,

More of my philosophy about the exponential progress and about
capitalism and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am highly smart, and of course i have to talk more about why i
am optimistic about capitalism, and here is why , read the following
thoughts about the Ramez Naam’s new book so that to understand:

The Limits of the Earth, Part 1: Problems

"In my own new book, The Infinite Resource: The Power of Ideas on a
Finite Planet, I challenge this view. The problem isn’t economic growth,
per se. Nor is the problem that our natural resources are too small.
While finite, the natural resources the planet supplies are vast and far
larger than humanity needs in order to continue to thrive and grow
prosperity for centuries to come. The problem, rather, is the types of
resources we access, and the manner and efficiency with which we use them.

And the ultimate solution to those problems is innovation – innovation
in the science and technology that we use to tap into physical
resources, and innovation in the economic system that steers our
consumption.

The situation we’re in isn’t a looming wall that we’re doomed to crash
into. It’s a race – a race between depletion and pollution of natural
resources on one side, and our pace of innovation on the other."

Read more here:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/the-limits-of-the-earth-part-1-problems/

And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee
of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place
where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster
exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our
humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much
faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will
become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following
video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ

And you can read my thoughts about artificial intelligence and
productivity and about China and its artificial intelligence and
computer chips in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/UOt_4qTgN8M

And you can read my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about
Exponential Progress in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ

More of my philosophy about the american dream and more of my thoughts..

The American dream was initially conceived by Thomas Jefferson as each
citizen’s right to the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness, this american dream is not about guaranteed outcomes, of
course, but the pursuit of opportunities, so notice carefully
that i have just spoken more and more about those kind of opportunities
that we have to have and that makes the american dream, like for example
my talking in my below thoughts about Progressive Capitalism of Joseph
E. Stiglitz, since Joseph E. Stiglitz is saying in his videos below that
he has advised the democratic party about his reforms of his progressive
capitalism, so read my below thoughts carefully so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about my pedagogy and how to be efficient
at learning and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and
i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will talk about my kind of pedagogy:

So you will notice that my pedagogy is that i am learning the others
by making them understand my architectural ideas that i have invented
about different subjects or by making them understand much more clearly
architectural ideas of this or that subject, since my pedagogy says that
from understanding those architectural ideas of this or that subject ,
this easy much more the learning for you and this permits you to go
really fast in learning and this gives form to a high intelligence, this
is why i am doing it this way, so i will give you an example of it, so
look for example at the following study that says that humans
are selfish and egoistic:

Humans are naturally selfish, study finds

https://thebaynet.com/humans-are-naturally-selfish-study-finds-html/

So when you look at the above study you can quickly become pessimistic,
but here again i am giving my architectural idea that permits you to
understand that capitalism is the key that solves greatly the above
problem, and it is that capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a
reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living
standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to
the owners of capital, so then you are noticing that we have not be
pessimistic about the being competition and being egoism, since we have
to look at what is happening in a holistic manner, but of course
capitalism has to be managed by rules such as Antitrust laws, and
here is my new proverb and my thoughts about it so that you understand:

"R&D (Research and development) and innovation bring
or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so you
have to know how to manage it and how to manage the
risk brought by it, so then you have to know how to manage
efficiently by not hurting good competition"

Note that "volatility" in the the dictionary means:

"A tendency to change quickly and unpredictably"

Read more here to notice it:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/volatility

This above new proverb of mine also says that since the R&D (Research
and development) and innovation bring or introduce a kind of economic
volatility, so we have also to know how to manage it carefully and
efficiently with Antitrust laws, and here is the why of Antitrust laws:

"Antitrust laws are statutes developed by governments to protect
consumers from predatory business practices and ensure fair competition.
Antitrust laws are applied to a wide range of questionable business
activities, including market allocation, bid rigging, price fixing, and
monopolies."

This new proverb of mine is also related to the below problem that
brings nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good
competition, read about it carefully in my below writing and thoughts:

More political philosophy about what are the big economic problems of
China?..

Here is the big economic problems of China:

First economic problem is that China is addicted to debt, look at the
following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT7DTn9PKLw

Second economic problem is that China has Not enough PEOPLE for the
FUTURE, look at the following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4qFVuXEe-8

Third economic problem, is that China has the same problem of
nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition
that brings efficiency, and here it is, read it carefully:

Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more about China...

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and today
i will speak about: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN?
and more..

We have to be more smart, i think China is also reproducing the
mistakes of Japan, because Japan has protected its large industrial
conglomerates called in Japanese "Keiretsu" and Japan has
compensated there disadvantages even if they were not efficient, and
Japan didn't hesitate to give the Keiretsu all kinds of advantages and
privileges even if they were not efficient, and this was not good for
"competition" and Japan has "failed" by doing it.

Look in this video carefully to notice it:

Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? - VisualPolitik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vou96yLuWXw

I think this is the same that is happening with China, since i think
China needs an efficient mechanism that protects correct "competition"
that brings good efficiency, read the following to notice it:

Competition: Europe's awakening in the face of foreign subsidies

Our state aid rules are very strict: an EU company can only receive
grants of up to € 200,000 over three years. In China, the three 5G
operators received 19 million euros each through the megalopolis of
Shenzhen (12 million inhabitants)… According to the Wall Street Journal
(article of December 25, 2019), Huawei would have benefited from 75
billion state aid via different channels, figures denied by the company.
State capitalism of China obviously raises the question of the inequity
of world competition ...

The direction the Commission is taking through the "white paper" is not
this at all. The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by
favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position
in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this
point: “What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of
equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of
competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize
companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is
there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices. "