Hello,

Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about self-interest
and competition and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am highly smart, so look carefully at the following saying of
Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism:

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

I think i am highly smart, and i think what he means is that it is from
individual human egoism or self-interest that comes solidarity and
cooperation and collaboration, as i am explaining in my thoughts below,
and it can become an egoism as a group of solidarity or/and cooperation
or/and collaboration against the other group, but it can also become a
universal solidarity and/or cooperation and/or collaboration, so then
this egoism as an individual or as a group creates competition, and
competition does regulate economic activity, so then i say that it is
the model of Adam Smith, and as you notice that in the model of Adam
Smith, egoism is the engine and the cause of properity and happiness of
nations, but i think that the model of Adam Smith is not correct, since
what i have just said that competition is not sufficient, since we have
to have a good "diversification" of the economy that makes the economy
"resilient".

Read my previous thoughts:

More precision of my philosophy about the Adam Smith idea about
competition is the regulator of economic activity and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i am quickly understanding Adam Smith
architectural idea of: competition regulates the economic activity,
since i think that his model speaks about competition in a global world,
so he is like proving in a general way, but the world is not organized
in such a way, since the world is organized in zones like European union
or like countries, so when Adam Smith says that competition is the
regulator of economic activity , he also means that competition has to
exist as a first condition, so if competition exists , he then says
that competition can be the regulator of economic activity, but i think
that it is not true, since there is still a missing part, since what i
have just said that competition is not sufficient, since we have
to have a good "diversification" of the economy that makes the economy
"resilient".

More of my philosophy about the holistic view of competition and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and so that to understand my thoughts below
about competition in capitalism and economic Liberalism, look carefully
of how i am explaining below the how competition fights efficiently
corruption, so it is thus like inherent to my explanation that
competition creates cooperation or collaboration inside the group that
compete against another group, so it is not just black or white, since
as you notice that the model becomes much more clear, and that the point
of view of of Adam Smith, the father of economic Liberalism, is also
true, since i think that, in his views, competition indirectly creates
cooperation and collaboration, and we can logically infer that the view
of Adam Smith about egoism is also true, since this competition that
creates selfishness and egoism , and i think that we can also say that
competition starts from selfishness and egoism, is also the cause of
cooperation and collaboration, and it is from where comes also the
following saying of Adam Smith:

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations",

And we can also explain this saying above of Adam Smith by using another
level of abstraction, and it is the following:

In economic Liberalism of Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time
regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud,
price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the
engine of the properity and happiness of nations, and Adam Smith
described the opposing, but complementary forces of self-interest and
competition as the invisible hand, it means that while producers and
consumers are not acting with the intent of serving the needs of others
or society, they do, since when you work, your goal is to earn money,
but in the process you provide a valuable good or service that benefits
others and society, so it is the basis of the following saying of Adam
Smith: "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of
nations"

More of my philosophy about the America’s national anthem and more of my
thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i have just looked at the following
America’s national anthem here:

https://blogs.transparent.com/english/americas-national-anthem/

And i think i am understanding it by looking at the architectural ideas
of this America’s national anthem, so i think i am highly smart and
i am seeing in it a pattern with my fluid intelligence and i think
that it is the the main architectural idea of America’s national anthem,
and it is the following:

"O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave!"

But philosophically, in this America’s national anthem, the land of USA
that is the land of the free, is the land of liberty, and the land of
liberty is the land of liberty of today and of the tomorrow or the
future, so since we have to be the land of the free of the today and of
the tomorrow or of the future, so the land of the free, in this
America’s national anthem, means that we have to be "responsability" so
that to be free today and tomorrow and in the future, and it also means
that USA is land that is always in construction by the process of
competition etc. as i am explaining below, so that to be free:

And of course the America’s national anthem says the following:

"And this be our motto: “In God is our trust.”"

More of my philosophy about competition in capitalism or economic
Liberalism and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and
i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will ask a philosophical question of:

Wich precedes as a cause to the other, competition or profit ?

So i think that it is central to capitalism and to economic Liberalism,
since you can naively say that we are competing since
we have to survive, but i think that it is too much simplistic to think
so, since i think that without the profit that attracts , competition
will be too idiotic, since i can also logically infer that the big
profit makes the competition smart since it favors growth, and it favors
a good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation, but we can
notice that competition has the tendency to make you selfish and
egoistic, but here again i say that you have to look at it in an
holistic manner and say that it is also balanced or solved much more
efficiently by the fact that capitalism is not a zero sum game, since
with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising
living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of
return to the owners of capital, so i think that we have not to be
pessimistic.

More of my philosophy about the ideas of Adam Smith the father of
economic Liberalism and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i say that Adam Smith the father of
economic Liberalism argued that profits flowed from capital investments,
and that capital gets directed to where the most profit can be made, and
i think that as competition , this idea is central to capitalism, since
i think that it also favors a good allocation of resources and,
ultimately, innovation, and it looks like the why we have to be
financial capitalism too, since i say about it the following:

The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people,
in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to
start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In
a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually
start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved
the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you
create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take
advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a
good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation.

More of my philosophy about quality and quantity and cost and more of of
my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have just talked yesterday about how
competition fights efficiently corruption, but there is another
philosophical question, since in economic Liberalism of Adam Smith,
competition is central and really important, but i think that there is
still an important thing in the model of Adam Smith that is missing,
since i think that "competition" is not sufficient in the model of Adam
Smith, since for example in economic Liberalism we
compete on the quality and/or quantity and/or cost, but, and by logical
analogy, so that to not get stuck in a local minimum and avoids
premature convergence as in optimization problems, i think that a good
diversification of economy is also central, so i think that competition
without a good diversification of economy is not a good thing, since i
say that a good diversification of economy makes the economy "resilient"
even if we compete on quality and/or quantity and/or cost, and of course
read my below thoughts about corruption: