On Sun, 05 Dec 2021 07:54:21 -0800, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:

>On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 00:43:45 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:eufiogt6ckt6ok2hljhsqpu8jchvrvh0ri@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:38:14 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jenny's ridiculous hardware requirement fantasy here:
>>> Message-ID: <39qdnQc8zpUyAxX8nZ2dnUU7-VXNnZ2d@supernews.com>
>>>
>>>>People who do not meet these MINUMUM system requirement's, are not allowed
>>>>to post to alt.fast-food. People found in violation of this policy, will
>>>>be subject to the normal progressive waning policy's already in effect
>>>
>>> Oh no! They'll get WARNED?!?!?!?? LOL
>>
>>YES, you will get warned. Of serious Consequence's.
>
> BWahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
> What delusional consequences do you propose? Will you LIE about
>kill filing them, as you've consistently PROVED you did with me?

Maybe he's going to make a "List" and put people on it. Then they will
be on Jenny's "List."

Surely, no good can come from that.

LOL

On Sun, 05 Dec 2021 08:04:16 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 05 Dec 2021 07:54:21 -0800, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 00:43:45 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:eufiogt6ckt6ok2hljhsqpu8jchvrvh0ri@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:38:14 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Jenny's ridiculous hardware requirement fantasy here:
>>>> Message-ID: <39qdnQc8zpUyAxX8nZ2dnUU7-VXNnZ2d@supernews.com>
>>>>
>>>>>People who do not meet these MINUMUM system requirement's, are not allowed
>>>>>to post to alt.fast-food. People found in violation of this policy, will
>>>>>be subject to the normal progressive waning policy's already in effect
>>>>
>>>> Oh no! They'll get WARNED?!?!?!?? LOL
>>>
>>>YES, you will get warned. Of serious Consequence's.
>>
>> BWahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
>> What delusional consequences do you propose? Will you LIE about
>>kill filing them, as you've consistently PROVED you did with me?
>
>Maybe he's going to make a "List" and put people on it. Then they will
>be on Jenny's "List."
>
>Surely, no good can come from that.
>
>LOL

Since the Gasbag has PROVED he never kill filed me, I hope he
will answer. Of course, when/if he does, he will LIE. He's too scared
of honesty to answer in any other way.

--
Even a broken clock can be right twice a day.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:arqoog93rr4jk7fmiiels71g5352lcvqr5@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:10:30 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote in message
>>news:sme0pc$c5p$3@dont-email.me...
>>
>>
>>> His "MININIMUM requires" ignores other OS families besides Winderz.
>>
>>
>>No it doesn't. There are a lot of better os's then windows 95
>>
>
> Then why didn't you mention them?

Becouse system requiment's DON'T mention every PC configuation that the
system is compatable with, they just say Windows 95 OR BETTER is required.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:llqoogli2b0g022tt0p6c3nmdanpevhteu@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:07:45 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>3.) Window's 95 or better is REQUIRED.
>>
>>
>>> Obviously Jenny has never heard of Mac or Linux operating systems. Yet
>>> another reason he's unqualified to make any such "requirements."
>>
>>What makes you think I never heard of them?
>
> Your past displays of ignorance.

Well if my allgeded "ignorance" proves that I didn't know about Mac and
Linux, then YOUR ignorance, which is much greater, prove's you never heard
of COMPUTERS.

> More people use Linux and it's derivatives than any other operating
> system on the planet.

But on COMPUTERS, which teh majority of devices that use Usenet on, are
MICROSOFT systems.

> There is no way to ban them.

Sure there is. I would simply issue a proclomation.

> You are-- as I just proved-- woefully ignorant about computers and
> operating systems.

You proved no such thing about my knowledge of computers.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5sqoogd6ghdl6radr7gl11q1fgvmsg6g0q@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:03:29 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:9u4iog5m9mgpbvk2dcghiv0cvbnk235ln3@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:38:14 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Taking decisive leadership action, I have decided to require a minumum
>>>>system requirement's for all people posting to this newsgroup.
>>>
>>> There are no system requirements to participate in this newsgroup.
>>
>>Yes there are. I simply defined them more exactly.
>
> No. There are not.
>
>>If there are no system requirement's for posting, then explain to me how a
>>computer without Internet Access, a processor, a operating system etc.
>>can
>>post.
>
> They can mail their posts to me and I will post it for them.

<Yawn> then go right ahead klous, post your personal address here right now
so that peopl ecan post to usenet without a computer.

<crickets>

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:57:43 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:llqoogli2b0g022tt0p6c3nmdanpevhteu@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:07:45 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>3.) Window's 95 or better is REQUIRED.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Obviously Jenny has never heard of Mac or Linux operating systems. Yet
>>>> another reason he's unqualified to make any such "requirements."
>>>
>>>What makes you think I never heard of them?
>>
>> Your past displays of ignorance.
>
>Well if my allgeded "ignorance" proves that I didn't know about Mac and
>Linux, then YOUR ignorance, which is much greater, prove's you never heard
>of COMPUTERS.
>

That makes no sense. But your pathological lying never does.
Explain how Klaus was able to bring up alternate OSes if, as you
are COMPELLED to LIE about, he never heard of computers?
Serious, you should speak with a mental health care professional
as quickly as you can.

>
>> More people use Linux and it's derivatives than any other operating
>> system on the planet.
>
> But on COMPUTERS, which teh majority of devices that use Usenet on, are
>MICROSOFT systems.
>

Liar!
Linux is used far more than any other. But you will present the
VALID, CREDIBLE, VERIFIABLE evidence for your claim. Unless you're
lying, of course.

[Cue crickets]

>> There is no way to ban them.
>
> Sure there is. I would simply issue a proclomation.
>

You have NO authority to issue anything.
If someone with WIN3.1 should be able to access and wish to post,
s/he may do so. There is literally nothing you can do to stop them.

>> You are-- as I just proved-- woefully ignorant about computers and
>> operating systems.
>
>You proved no such thing about my knowledge of computers.

Your exposing your very real NEED to lie, as you have done, does
not change the TRUTH that was posted.

--
Even a broken clock can be right twice a day.

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:58:57 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:arqoog93rr4jk7fmiiels71g5352lcvqr5@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:10:30 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote in message news:sme0pc$c5p$3@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>>
>>>> His "MININIMUM requires" ignores other OS families besides Winderz.
>>>
>>>
>>>No it doesn't. There are a lot of better os's then windows 95
>>
>> Then why didn't you mention them?
>
>Becouse system requiment's DON'T mention every PC configuation that the
>system is compatable with, they just say Windows 95 OR BETTER is required.

But there are NO system requirements for this, or any other,
group. That you NEED to lie, and do so in this subject, does not
change this TRUTH.

--
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons...
for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 18:00:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:5sqoogd6ghdl6radr7gl11q1fgvmsg6g0q@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:03:29 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message news:9u4iog5m9mgpbvk2dcghiv0cvbnk235ln3@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:38:14 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Taking decisive leadership action, I have decided to require a minumum
>>>>>system requirement's for all people posting to this newsgroup.
>>>>
>>>> There are no system requirements to participate in this newsgroup.
>>>
>>>Yes there are. I simply defined them more exactly.
>>
>> No. There are not.
>>
>>>If there are no system requirement's for posting, then explain to me how a
>>>computer without Internet Access, a processor, a operating system etc.
>>>can post.
>>
>> They can mail their posts to me and I will post it for them.
>
><Yawn> then go right ahead klous, post your personal address here right now
>so that peopl ecan post to usenet without a computer.
>
><crickets>

How does someone as stump STUPID as you consistently PROVE
yourself to be survive in the world? I really do want to know.

--
There's no place like 127.0.0.1

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:57:43 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Well if my allgeded "ignorance" proves that I didn't know about Mac and
>Linux, then YOUR ignorance, which is much greater, prove's you never heard
>of COMPUTERS.

So I TOLD you about Mac and Linux, and you're claiming that means I
don't know about computers.

Laugh laugh laugh laugh

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:58:57 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:arqoog93rr4jk7fmiiels71g5352lcvqr5@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:10:30 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote in message
>>>news:sme0pc$c5p$3@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>>
>>>> His "MININIMUM requires" ignores other OS families besides Winderz.
>>>
>>>
>>>No it doesn't. There are a lot of better os's then windows 95
>>>
>>
>> Then why didn't you mention them?
>
>Becouse system requiment's DON'T mention every PC configuation that the
>system is compatable with, they just say Windows 95 OR BETTER is required.
>

But it's NOT required.

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 18:00:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:5sqoogd6ghdl6radr7gl11q1fgvmsg6g0q@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:03:29 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:9u4iog5m9mgpbvk2dcghiv0cvbnk235ln3@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:38:14 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Taking decisive leadership action, I have decided to require a minumum
>>>>>system requirement's for all people posting to this newsgroup.
>>>>
>>>> There are no system requirements to participate in this newsgroup.
>>>
>>>Yes there are. I simply defined them more exactly.
>>
>> No. There are not.
>>
>>>If there are no system requirement's for posting, then explain to me how a
>>>computer without Internet Access, a processor, a operating system etc.
>>>can
>>>post.
>>
>> They can mail their posts to me and I will post it for them.
>
><Yawn> then go right ahead klous, post your personal address here right now
>so that peopl ecan post to usenet without a computer.
>
><crickets>
>

Klaus Schadenfreude
101 S Military Ave
#107
Green Bay, WI 54303

On 2021-12-06, Jerry Sauk <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

> they just say Windows 95 OR BETTER is required.

who ever "they" is is wrong.

--
fos@sdf.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - https://sdf.org

On 2021-12-08, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:57:43 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:llqoogli2b0g022tt0p6c3nmdanpevhteu@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:07:45 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>3.) Window's 95 or better is REQUIRED.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Obviously Jenny has never heard of Mac or Linux operating systems. Yet
>>>>> another reason he's unqualified to make any such "requirements."
>>>>
>>>>What makes you think I never heard of them?
>>>
>>> Your past displays of ignorance.
>>
>>Well if my allgeded "ignorance" proves that I didn't know about Mac and
>>Linux, then YOUR ignorance, which is much greater, prove's you never heard
>>of COMPUTERS.
>>
>
> That makes no sense. But your pathological lying never does.
> Explain how Klaus was able to bring up alternate OSes if, as you
> are COMPELLED to LIE about, he never heard of computers?
> Serious, you should speak with a mental health care professional
> as quickly as you can.
>
>>
>>> More people use Linux and it's derivatives than any other operating
>>> system on the planet.
>>
>> But on COMPUTERS, which teh majority of devices that use Usenet on, are
>>MICROSOFT systems.
>>
>
> Liar!
> Linux is used far more than any other. But you will present the
> VALID, CREDIBLE, VERIFIABLE evidence for your claim. Unless you're
> lying, of course.
>
> [Cue crickets]
>
>>> There is no way to ban them.
>>
>> Sure there is. I would simply issue a proclomation.
>>
>
> You have NO authority to issue anything.
> If someone with WIN3.1 should be able to access and wish to post,
> s/he may do so. There is literally nothing you can do to stop them.
>
>>> You are-- as I just proved-- woefully ignorant about computers and
>>> operating systems.
>>
>>You proved no such thing about my knowledge of computers.
>
> Your exposing your very real NEED to lie, as you have done, does
> not change the TRUTH that was posted.

you two imbeciles need to get a room and consumate your relationship.

this thread is one of the dumbest things i've seen on usenet, ever.

--
fos@sdf.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - https://sdf.org

On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 01:27:31 -0800, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:

>On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:58:57 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:arqoog93rr4jk7fmiiels71g5352lcvqr5@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:10:30 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote in message news:sme0pc$c5p$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> His "MININIMUM requires" ignores other OS families besides Winderz.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>No it doesn't. There are a lot of better os's then windows 95
>>>
>>> Then why didn't you mention them?
>>
>>Becouse system requiment's DON'T mention every PC configuation that the
>>system is compatable with, they just say Windows 95 OR BETTER is required.
>
> But there are NO system requirements for this, or any other,
>group. That you NEED to lie, and do so in this subject, does not
>change this TRUTH.

If he knew anything about computers, he'd know people were accessing
Usenet way before Windows 95 existed. It was released in 1995, and
people have been accessing Usenet since at least 1983.

On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 01:27:56 -0800, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:

>On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 18:00:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:5sqoogd6ghdl6radr7gl11q1fgvmsg6g0q@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:03:29 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message news:9u4iog5m9mgpbvk2dcghiv0cvbnk235ln3@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:38:14 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Taking decisive leadership action, I have decided to require a minumum
>>>>>>system requirement's for all people posting to this newsgroup.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are no system requirements to participate in this newsgroup.
>>>>
>>>>Yes there are. I simply defined them more exactly.
>>>
>>> No. There are not.
>>>
>>>>If there are no system requirement's for posting, then explain to me how a
>>>>computer without Internet Access, a processor, a operating system etc.
>>>>can post.
>>>
>>> They can mail their posts to me and I will post it for them.
>>
>><Yawn> then go right ahead klous, post your personal address here right now
>>so that peopl ecan post to usenet without a computer.
>>
>><crickets>
>
> How does someone as stump STUPID as you consistently PROVE
>yourself to be survive in the world? I really do want to know.

It's like he WANTS people to know how stupid he is.

On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 14:14:45 -0000 (UTC), fos <fos@sdf.org> wrote:

>On 2021-12-08, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:57:43 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:llqoogli2b0g022tt0p6c3nmdanpevhteu@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:07:45 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>3.) Window's 95 or better is REQUIRED.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Obviously Jenny has never heard of Mac or Linux operating systems. Yet
>>>>>> another reason he's unqualified to make any such "requirements."
>>>>>
>>>>>What makes you think I never heard of them?
>>>>
>>>> Your past displays of ignorance.
>>>
>>>Well if my allgeded "ignorance" proves that I didn't know about Mac and
>>>Linux, then YOUR ignorance, which is much greater, prove's you never heard
>>>of COMPUTERS.
>>>
>>
>> That makes no sense. But your pathological lying never does.
>> Explain how Klaus was able to bring up alternate OSes if, as you
>> are COMPELLED to LIE about, he never heard of computers?
>> Serious, you should speak with a mental health care professional
>> as quickly as you can.
>>
>>>
>>>> More people use Linux and it's derivatives than any other operating
>>>> system on the planet.
>>>
>>> But on COMPUTERS, which teh majority of devices that use Usenet on, are
>>>MICROSOFT systems.
>>>
>>
>> Liar!
>> Linux is used far more than any other. But you will present the
>> VALID, CREDIBLE, VERIFIABLE evidence for your claim. Unless you're
>> lying, of course.
>>
>> [Cue crickets]
>>
>>>> There is no way to ban them.
>>>
>>> Sure there is. I would simply issue a proclomation.
>>>
>>
>> You have NO authority to issue anything.
>> If someone with WIN3.1 should be able to access and wish to post,
>> s/he may do so. There is literally nothing you can do to stop them.
>>
>>>> You are-- as I just proved-- woefully ignorant about computers and
>>>> operating systems.
>>>
>>>You proved no such thing about my knowledge of computers.
>>
>> Your exposing your very real NEED to lie, as you have done, does
>> not change the TRUTH that was posted.
>
>you two imbeciles need to get a room and consumate your relationship.
>
>this thread is one of the dumbest things i've seen on usenet, ever.

You impotent response here is right up there.

On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 14:11:52 -0000 (UTC), fos <fos@sdf.org> wrote:

>On 2021-12-06, Jerry Sauk <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> they just say Windows 95 OR BETTER is required.
>
>who ever "they" is is wrong.

The Gasbag knows this. He is UNABLE to be honest unless he makes
a mistake.

--
Be really good to your family and friends. You never know
when you are going to need them to empty your bedpan.

On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 14:14:45 -0000 (UTC), fos <fos@sdf.org> wrote:

[...]

>>>You proved no such thing about my knowledge of computers.
>>
>> Your exposing your very real NEED to lie, as you have done, does
>> not change the TRUTH that was posted.
>
>you two imbeciles need to get a room and consumate your relationship.
>
>this thread is one of the dumbest things i've seen on usenet, ever.

Think about men getting a room a lot, do you?
So long as you realize your fantasy will never become reality, it
does no harm. But expressing your deep desire that the Gasbag and I
"get a room," publicly, isn't the best thing to do.
But, at least, we now KNOW why you keep coming back.

--
Aspire to inspire before you expire.

On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 06:15:43 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 01:27:31 -0800, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:58:57 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:arqoog93rr4jk7fmiiels71g5352lcvqr5@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:10:30 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote in message news:sme0pc$c5p$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> His "MININIMUM requires" ignores other OS families besides Winderz.
>>>>>
>>>>>No it doesn't. There are a lot of better os's then windows 95
>>>>
>>>> Then why didn't you mention them?
>>>
>>>Becouse system requiment's DON'T mention every PC configuation that the
>>>system is compatable with, they just say Windows 95 OR BETTER is required.
>>
>> But there are NO system requirements for this, or any other,
>>group. That you NEED to lie, and do so in this subject, does not
>>change this TRUTH.
>
>If he knew anything about computers, he'd know people were accessing
>Usenet way before Windows 95 existed. It was released in 1995, and
>people have been accessing Usenet since at least 1983.

When I first joined Usenet, I used Windows 3.1. I don't know if
Windows 3.1 is actually available, but I would really like to get it
just to log on and post with it.

--
Bless me, Father, for I have committed an original sin.
I poked a badger with a spoon.

On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 06:15:43 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude wrote:

> On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 01:27:31 -0800, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:58:57 -0600, "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message news:arqoog93rr4jk7fmiiels71g5352lcvqr5@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:10:30 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote in message
>>>>>news:sme0pc$c5p$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> His "MININIMUM requires" ignores other OS families besides Winderz.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>No it doesn't. There are a lot of better os's then windows 95
>>>>
>>>> Then why didn't you mention them?
>>>
>>>Becouse system requiment's DON'T mention every PC configuation that the
>>>system is compatable with, they just say Windows 95 OR BETTER is
>>>required.
>>
>> But there are NO system requirements for this, or any other,
>>group. That you NEED to lie, and do so in this subject, does not change
>>this TRUTH.
>
> If he knew anything about computers, he'd know people were accessing
> Usenet way before Windows 95 existed. It was released in 1995, and
> people have been accessing Usenet since at least 1983.

My first experience with the USENET was in '91 on an HP/UX 8 system that
ran rn. (HP9000/835 iirc).

Then we got the original Trumpet installed on our DOS PC's.

(This was doing computing services work at the local 2-year college. Our group
networked the campus during the early and mid 90's.)

So Sauk is wrong. Of course.

--
-v

On 2021-12-09, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 14:14:45 -0000 (UTC), fos <fos@sdf.org> wrote:

> [...]

>>>>You proved no such thing about my knowledge of computers.

>>> Your exposing your very real NEED to lie, as you have done, does
>>> not change the TRUTH that was posted.

>>you two imbeciles need to get a room and consummate your relationship.

> Think about men getting a room a lot, do you?
> So long as you realize your fantasy will never become reality, it
> does no harm. But expressing your deep desire that the Gasbag and I
> "get a room," publicly, isn't the best thing to do.

you'll never know if you don't like it until you try it. if you don't
try it, you will spend the rest of your life wondering if it would have
been something beautiful.

> But, at least, we now KNOW why you keep coming back.

you seem to have me confused with someone else.

--
fos@sdf.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - https://sdf.org

On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:51:07 -0000 (UTC), fos <fos@sdf.org> wrote:

>On 2021-12-09, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 14:14:45 -0000 (UTC), fos <fos@sdf.org> wrote:
>
>> [...]
>
>>>>>You proved no such thing about my knowledge of computers.
>
>>>> Your exposing your very real NEED to lie, as you have done, does
>>>> not change the TRUTH that was posted.
>
>>>you two imbeciles need to get a room and consummate your relationship.
>
>> Think about men getting a room a lot, do you?
>> So long as you realize your fantasy will never become reality, it
>> does no harm. But expressing your deep desire that the Gasbag and I
>> "get a room," publicly, isn't the best thing to do.
>
>you'll never know if you don't like it until you try it. if you don't
>try it, you will spend the rest of your life wondering if it would have
>been something beautiful.
>

I've not shot myself in the foot. And I don't have to in order to
know I wouldn't enjoy it.

>> But, at least, we now KNOW why you keep coming back.
>
>you seem to have me confused with someone else.

No, I do not.

--
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3bkfqg1fukq8juer5vqkejalbkku17vteh@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:34:09 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:9u4iog5m9mgpbvk2dcghiv0cvbnk235ln3@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:38:14 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Taking decisive leadership action, I have decided to require a minumum
>>>>system requirement's for all people posting to this newsgroup.
>>>
>>> There are no system requirements to participate in this newsgroup.
>>
>>oh, is that so? So people don't even required to have a COMPUTER to post
>>here?
>
> No, they are not.
>
>>Explain to me how that works, klous.
>
> They can post from their local library.

WHICH WOULD STILL REQUIRE A ******COMPUTER******* AT THE LIBRBABY, WHICH
CONFORMS TO THE MINUMUN SYSTEM LAYOUT i ALREADY PRESCRIBED.

On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 02:26:03 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3bkfqg1fukq8juer5vqkejalbkku17vteh@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:34:09 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:9u4iog5m9mgpbvk2dcghiv0cvbnk235ln3@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:38:14 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Taking decisive leadership action, I have decided to require a minumum
>>>>>system requirement's for all people posting to this newsgroup.
>>>>
>>>> There are no system requirements to participate in this newsgroup.
>>>
>>>oh, is that so? So people don't even required to have a COMPUTER to post
>>>here?
>>
>> No, they are not.
>>
>>>Explain to me how that works, klous.
>>
>> They can post from their local library.
>
>WHICH WOULD STILL REQUIRE A ******COMPUTER******* AT THE LIBRBABY,

But it's not the poster's machine, stupid.

>WHICH
>CONFORMS TO THE MINUMUN SYSTEM LAYOUT i ALREADY PRESCRIBED.

But someone with a machine running Windows 3.1 could post,
thereby proving your minimum requirements to be laughable at best. And
that's before we get into the reality that you lack any authority to
prescribe anything here. Or anywhere else.

--
Bless me, Father, for I have committed an original sin.
I poked a badger with a spoon.

On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 02:26:03 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3bkfqg1fukq8juer5vqkejalbkku17vteh@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:34:09 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:9u4iog5m9mgpbvk2dcghiv0cvbnk235ln3@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:38:14 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Taking decisive leadership action, I have decided to require a minumum
>>>>>system requirement's for all people posting to this newsgroup.
>>>>
>>>> There are no system requirements to participate in this newsgroup.
>>>
>>>oh, is that so? So people don't even required to have a COMPUTER to post
>>>here?
>>
>> No, they are not.
>>
>>>Explain to me how that works, klous.
>>
>> They can post from their local library.
>
>WHICH WOULD STILL REQUIRE A ******COMPUTER******* AT THE LIBRBABY, WHICH
>CONFORMS TO THE MINUMUN SYSTEM LAYOUT i ALREADY PRESCRIBED.

Nope