On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 2:46:26 PM UTC, dosai prata wrote:
> On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 2:46:59 AM UTC, decadence thlon wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 13, 2023 at 10:02:43 AM UTC, gerard jud wrote:
> > > On Friday, June 9, 2023 at 9:08:34 AM UTC, dosai prata wrote:
> > > > On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 9:33:51 AM UTC, papa dumdum wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 12:50:28 AM UTC, dosai prata wrote:
> > > > > > On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 3:25:09 AM UTC, papa dumdum wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sunday, February 26, 2023 at 9:02:21 AM UTC, dosai prata wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Sunday, February 26, 2023 at 7:16:40 AM UTC, dosai prata wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, February 15, 2023 at 3:59:04 AM UTC, frodo sam0 wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 6:07:22 AM UTC, dosai prata wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 2:07:51 PM UTC, wog wacker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:26:06 AM UTC, gera...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 4:05:15 AM UTC, frodo sam0 wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 4:15:38 AM UTC, dosai prata wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 5:04:30 AM UTC, frodo sam0 wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 3:37:16 AM UTC, gera...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:31:44 AM UTC, dosai prata wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 5:06:27 AM UTC, wog wacker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 3:56:23 AM UTC, gera...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 12:54:47 AM UTC, gerard jud wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 5:53:10 AM UTC, wog wacker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 6:34:48 AM UTC, gera...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Watch these two videos:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M195UCCCgXQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQuy9_LJsNE
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is it all about? An ethnic Indian MP of Singapore complaining about racial discrimination and prejudices faced by non-Chinese, especially Indians, in Chinese-majority Singapore.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The main grouses? Discrimination faced in employment and rental of properties.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are these fair complaints?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With regard to employment, statistics will show that Indians have the highest average of employed among the other major races. As a result, they are also the highest average income earners among the major races. This is not because they are more capable or talented. Its precisely because they have Indian like Janil Puthucheary who is using his position in government to improve the employment opportunities for his fellow Indians. This has been carried out to the extend that Indians in Singapore now expect to get whatever high-paying jobs they apply for. This is not just for local Indians. Even Indians arriving from India expect to be employed easily over non-Indians in Singapore. Otherwise, they will attribute their failures to racial discrimination and complain to the government accordingly.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When it comes to rental of premises, its not only that Chinese prefer Chinese. Indians would prefer Indians and Malays would also prefer Malays. Cultural and religious differences have to be considered. Chinese would avoid Indian tenants because they stink. This is a physical fact, not racism. Indian landlords would avoid Chinese and Malays tenant because of cultural and religious differences. Malays would avoid Chinese and Indian tenants because the latter would be non-Muslims and also pork eaters. Let’s not talk about living under the some roof. Even when they are neighbors, there are disputes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Janil Puthucheary is cherry-picking. There are areas where the non-Chinese, especially Indians, are enjoying unfair advantages and privileges which he does not mention. Take the case of changes in the ethnic proportions in the population. For decades now, the proportion of Indians in Singapore’s population is increasing at the expense of the Chinese. This is against racial equality and therefore, also unconstitutional. It is bloodless ethnic cleansing of the Chinese. As the Indian proportion in Singapore’s population increases, so too attacks of Chinese by Indians. These are borne out by videos. Indians in Singapore become more anti-Chinese as they gain more political power. The Indian MP Shanmugam, who is also the Minister of Home Affairs, is against increasing the teaching hours of Mandarin in schools. Ex-President S. R. Nathan could not tolerate Mandarin being spoken in his presence. Things are going to get worse for the Chinese as more Indians continue to pour in to Singapore as India’s population growth remains out of control.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is most unfair to the Chinese. While Chinese are increasingly becoming victims of racism, we have an Indian MP repeatedly using videos to portray Chinese as perpetrators of racism. This is working against racial harmony. Imagine if Chinese and Malays MPs would make videos to champion the causes and look after the interests of their own race. Will multi-racialism still work in Singapore?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Janil Puthucheary and others like him should be stopped before race relationships in this country are damaged beyond repair.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Indians mate and breed like pests and never know how to run their country well. Many Indians quit their shithole country and go to other better run countries to seek a living. Yet these Indians carry a superiority complex with them wherever they go. They arrive in those countries expecting to be more successful than the locals there. If they fail to get in to the professions of their choice, they believe it must be because of racism against them.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No one can put it more succinctly than this American law professor.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFP4uG7PsEM
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What she says is happening in Singapore. Under a comprehensive trade agreement, CECA, Indians sneak and snake their way into Singapore. Then they would complain about racism when they don’t get the jobs the want. Its been effective. As a result, in some workplaces, e.g. some medical schools and Changi Business Park, its almost exclusively Indians. The Indian CEO of Singapore’s largest bank, DBS, proudly stated that he opened a branch in India purely out of racial affinity. Looking at the growing Indian presence in Singapore, an international Indian author, Parag Khanna, cannot help but remarks that Singapore is turning brown. He goes on to boldly claim that the future of the world will be brown.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yet this ethnic Indian politician in Singapore, Janil Puthucheary, is blind to all these. Instead he makes videos about petty racism faced by Indians in Singapore.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The worse is yet to come. Indians will be a growing menace to Singapore. Under current geopolitics, the US has chosen India as the counterweight against a rising China. The Americans are suspicious of Chinese everywhere. In Singapore they have big investments and a naval base. To be on the safe side, they would like to see more political power for Indians in Singapore. Better still if the island nation is run by an Indian PM. Don’t be surprised that the CIA is actively recruiting Indians in Singapore to work towards this end.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is not wild imagination or speculation. The CIA is known to have attempted to recruit at least one Indian from Malaysia as its agent.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXXuqzQIW34
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Five years ago, he did some stupid videos of a similar nature. Five years later, he does it again and they are just as stupid.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Silly games with lines marked out on the floor where participants have to move a step forward or backward depending on the answers they give to his dump questions on racial issues.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Has he no better things to do as an MP? Is this the best way that he can serve his constituency? The GRC system has led in members of the racial minorities like him into the government. He should be made to run in a SMC next. Let’s see if would get re-elected if he were to espouse his race theories during his election campaign.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me put it to this Indian MP as those racial minorities often put it to Chinese in Singapore with regard to China:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > “Go back to India”
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or is he on a sacred mission to turn Singapore and the world brown?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While this Puthucheary is making videos, other Indians are using the print media to stir up Sinophobia in Singapore.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First a Pew Research Centre survey released in June 2021, which found that 64 per cent of Singaporeans had a favourable view of China, and that Singaporeans were the only ones in the world to view China more positively than the US.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then in September last year, French think-tank Irsem (Institute for Strategic Research at France's Military College) also identified Singapore - where ethnic Chinese make up about three-quarters of the citizen and resident populations - as being particularly vulnerable to Chinese influence.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some weeks back, we have this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/st-closeup-the-rise-of-pro-china-singaporeans-and-what-it-means-for-singapore
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While this is still in the online version of the Straits Times after weeks of its first appearance, now we have this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/spore-is-second-most-influenced-by-china-in-the-world-according-to-taiwan-report
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > These are not unplanned. They are in response to social media articles showing India and Indians influence on Singapore. The Indian-edited Straits Times (ST) has been scouring the world for info to serve as rebuttals.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let’s examine the latest ST article further.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > “According to the China Index launched late on Monday (April 25) by Taiwan-based research outfit Doublethink Lab.”
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It’s a new index. The org doing it is geographically Taiwan-based but staffed by American-led Westerners and their Taiwanese dogs.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > “In the areas of technology, society and academia - but less so for domestic politics - the Republic was found to be especially susceptible to the exposure, pressure and effect of Beijing's influence.”
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Politics determines the technology, society and academia of a country. If domestic politics is not influenced by China, China having influence on the other areas means nothing.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The examples used as evidences of China’s influence on SG are so petty.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > “The China Index pointed to the popularity of the WeChat messaging platform among older Chinese-speaking adults here - and TikTok for the younger demographic - as evidence of Chinese influence in the technology domain. “
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Users of WeChat and TikTok in SG are much fewer than those using Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Whatsapp, YouTube, etc..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > “the index cited the Hua Yuan and Tian Fu clan associations, which are made up of mostly new Chinese immigrants to Singapore, and whose heads have been invited as special observers at either national- or province-level political consultative conferences in China.”
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How many Singaporeans have heard of Hua Yuan and Tian Fu? This only shows that the Westerners and Taiwanese are intensively spying on Singapore.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hua Yuan and Tian Fu are nothing compared to Westerners clubs such as American Club, British Club, etc.. The heads of these clubs are also consulted by their countries politicians for info on SG’s society.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > “In academia, Singapore also placed third, with the US first and Germany second. The index noted Chinese-language teachers have been hired from China to work in schools and tuition centres, along with reports of Chinese-language curriculum material increasingly following China's standards.”
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SG’s academia is heavily influenced by the West. In fact, its whole education system is a legacy of the British, with growing influence by the Americans. Many non-Chinese foreigners are employed in the academia, holding high positions. There is no Chinese school in SG. The Chinese-language is only taught as a subject in English-medium schools. Under such environment, how much can China influence SG’s academia?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > “The China Index also cited Singapore Technologies Kinetics and its subsidiary Guizhou Jonyang Kinetics producing an all-terrain personnel carrier based on the Bronco armoured vehicle used by Singapore's army, as a proof point under the military domain. The carrier reportedly saw service in Tibet recently, in support of China's People's Liberation Army troops deployed in the Himalayas.”
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That’s a petty example. SG works closely with the West and its allies in technology. In some critical technologies, this automatically excludes China, to the detriment of Singapore. Take the case of satellites. SG’s satellites built with Western technologies cannot be launched by Chinese rockets. But launching by Indian rockets is OK.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SG provides jobs to non-Chinese foreigners which may later work against the interest of China. Many Indians from India are employed in construction work. When they return to India, they can be deployed to build military infrastructure for the Indian Army in the disputed Himalayan regions bordering China.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > “It also identified a little-known YouTuber called Noel Lee, believed to be Singaporean, who started publishing in March 2021 videos on China that include denials of human rights abuses in the Xinjiang region. Mr Lee's clips are reportedly being shared on messaging platforms such as WhatsApp.”
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is petty paranoia. Noel Lee’s Youtube videos on Xinjiang are more travelogues more political statements. There are many other videos on Xinjiang done by Westerners which vehemently debunk the human rights abuses reported in the West.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is the Straits Times only concerned about China’s influence on Chinese Singaporeans? What about India’s influence on Indian Singaporeans? Singaporeans know nothing about this through the local media.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As both India’s global power and its diaspora grows, India becomes more aggressive in exploiting Overseas Indians to serve its national interest.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Diaspora as a soft power in India’s foreign policy towards Singapore
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://brill.com/view/journals/bdia/14/2/article-p161_3.xml
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > India is witnessing a revival of Hindutva or Hindu Nationalism. This ideology is about Hindu supremacist has no respect for other religions besides Hinduism. It’s a threat to multi-racial and multi-religious Singapore. The Straits Times should make Singaporeans be more aware of this impending threat.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's another one.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/on-the-ground-negotiating-clashing-chinese-singaporean-identities-amid-chinas-growing-influence
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's because Chinese Singaporeans are siding with China in its disputes with India. And the ST has an ethnic Indian chief editor.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > India is trying hard to prove itself to be a good American dog. Indian media criticises China with pleasure.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WION - Worse Indian Online Nonsense has this report:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLKmFojInZQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WTF! When Afghanistan was under a puppet government propped up by American invaders, India invested in many projects there. Indian media was praising India for that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has been in the online version of the Straits Times (ST) for months now.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/st-closeup-the-rise-of-pro-china-singaporeans-and-what-it-means-for-singapore
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Its purpose is obvious - to raise fear among Singaporeans, especially the non-Chinese. The racial minorities will be screaming “Chinese Singaporean is being influenced by a rising China. They will turn Singapore into another China. Singapore will become Chinapore!”.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let’s ignore the intended racism and look at things rationally.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Singapore is a tiny nation. To survive, it has no choice but to depend on bigger and mightier nations. Along with the dependency will come the influence. During British colonial times and earlier part of its Independence, Singapore depended on Britain and was under British influence. After the British East of Suez withdrawal, Singapore leapfrogged the region to link up with the West, especially the US. Singapore is currently dependent on the US and as a result, is under heavy American influence. But this will not be eternal. It will change as surely as it has changed from British to American influence.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A rising China is increasing its influence on more parts of the world. Is Singapore being influenced by a rising China a problem? The achievements of China have received worldwide recognition. Increasing parts of the world are relying more on China and therefore coming under its influence . Its meritocracy at work. China has helped to connect up the world, develop it and grow its economy. China has earned the merits to influence other nations. Same reason why Singapore has been heavily influenced by the the US. This cuts across Singapore’s major races, esp. among the Chinese and the Indians. Not so much the Malays. Religion is the factor. Malays, being Muslims, don’t like the Christian West.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of raising the fear about Chinese Singaporeans coming under the influence of a rising China, the media here should prepare Singaporeans for the impending influence coming from China.. This is meritocracy. It will be good for Singapore. It should be accepted by all Singaporeans, “regardless of race, language or religion”. Those racial minorities of Singapore which refuse to accept the influence of a rising China are only being racists. They can stand aside but should not be allowed to stand in the way of Singapore’s progress to a better future.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is the English-language-based ST only raising fear about the influence of a rising China on Chinese Singaporeans? This is so racist. Why has it not raised the fear about the influence on Singaporean Indians by a rising India? What about the influence on Malay Singaporeans by a rising Indonesia/Malaysia? Shouldn’t these be of concern too?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looking into the future, Singapore should be more concerned about the influence of a rising India on the Indians in Singapore. Under current geopolitics, India has become the US’s favorite nation to counter a rising China. The two are in all sorts of alliances and dalliances. It will not be just American but Indo-American power which will influence the Asia-Pacific region. Already, this is now being referred to as Indo-Pacific. US would prefer Singapore to get closer to India, to come under India’s influence. It would like to see India’s influence on Singapore grow and glow. Needless to say, this will raise India’s influence on the Indians in Singapore. This should be more worrisome for Singapore because it will not be based on meritocracy but geopolitics.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Indians have a notorious history of being used by the Western imperialists and colonialists against their follow Asians. They were used by the Brits to invade China, from the Tibetan border to the coastal areas. They were the armed guards of venues where “Chinese and dogs are not allowed”.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One benefit which India seek to gain from the Indo-American partnership is territorial expansion to accommodate its ever increasing population. For this, South-east Asia would be its priority. This region was once under an ancient Indian Empire. Indo-China is a reminder of that. Singapore was originally Singapura, an Indian Sanskrit name.. It’s India’s ambition and influence that Singapore has to worry about. The Indian-infested and Indian-edited ST will not raise awareness, let alone concern, about this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The 4th-generation leadership of Singapore should ponder over this. Should it pursue policies to counter the influence of China and encourage that of Indo-America on Singapore?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What China’s influence on Chinese in Singapore is the ST writing about?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Singapore’s English language media certain do not reflect that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Look at CNA or Channel News Asia.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At the start of every news program, it first reports the time in New Delhi, India and then the time from, not Beijing, but Hong Kong. Why? To reduce the influence of China on Singapore? How petty!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thre are scrolling text news about the game of cricket every minute of the day. This only serves the interest of the Indians who are cricket-crazy. Games that Singapore and its ethnic Chinese have excelled internationally in such as badminton and table-tennis are much less featured.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It’s been decades since there is Japan Hour, an hour long program narrated fully in the Japs language. Then there’s that Gangnam Insider, another hour long program in Korean langauge
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Japan Hour is insensitive to the ethnic Chinese in Singapore which suffered from the atrocities of the Japs Imperial Army during World War Two.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about an Israel Hour, all narrated in Hebrew? How would our Malay-Muslims feel?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about a Pakistan Hour, all narrated in Urdu? How would the Indians feel?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Japan Hour in the 1990’s may be appropriate because of Japan’s economic might then. The world has since changed. China has risen to become the second largest economy in the world. Its economic importance to the region is increasing. It would be more appropriate for CNA to have a China Hour to narrate the progress made in China, its advances in science and technology. This will be more in keeping with the time, with the changes in the world. This should be important to all Singaporeans, “regardless of race, language or religion”.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is it not the case? It seems that CNA stands for China/Chinese Not Allowed.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/give-digital-red-packets-or-fit-for-gifting-notes-this-cny-to-avoid-harming-the-environment
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another Chinese New Year (CNY) tradition thrown out of the window. Exchange of red packets not allowed, new dollar notes not allowed. Who’s behind this? The Indians. This came about after Monetary Authority of Singapore was run by two Indians, the Head and his chosen Indian Deputy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What has MAS got to do with the environment? It should concern itself with the financial state of Singapore, especially now that inflation is roaring.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is so obviously anti-Chinese racism. The Indian festival of Deepavali had just been celebrated.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gifts with wrappings were exchanged between Indians. Christmas and New Year are round the corner. Huge amount of gifts using huge amount of wrappings of all sorts will be exchanged during the celebrations, not forgeting the trees to be chopped down for decorations. These are environmentally unfriendly on a much bigger scale and severity. Why do they not concern MAS?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Look what has been done to CNY in SG. No more public celebration of the 15th, also the last day, of the occasion. Since years ago, Singaporean Chinese have been encouraged to attire in black for CNY.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Other races in Singapore have done more harm to the environment than the Chinese. What about the Indian stink? What about the Malays washing their arses with their hands? These are more damaging to the environment, physically and socially. Is MAS going to do something about it? In fact, those non-Indians who work in MAS have noticed the Indian stink getting worse since the the Indian heads took over and recruited more of their own kind.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is an organised and orchestrated efforts by the Indian racists to destroy Chinese customs and traditions in SG. Chinese better wake up. It’s time to deal with these crooked and cunning Indians.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pawh3k6tYvg
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Indians are quitting India. Singapore is the 7th among the top 10 countries they migrate to. Singapore is the smallest in terms of land size and population among those countries. This means it has the highest number of Indian migrants per unit land area and per capita in the world. It also means that India and Indian influence on Singapore is the highest among the world. Will the Straits Times write a big article about this? Why is it only concern about China's influence on Singapore?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Look what happen after Britain is led by an Indian.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > All Confusion Institutes will be closed down.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Free-trade agreement with India which will include a people-to-people exchange clause which will allow free-flow of Indians into Britain.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This should show Singaporeans, esp. the majority Chinese, what future they will have if an Indian were to become PM of Singapore.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Already, there are warnings. A past ethnic Indian President disallowed Chinese to speak in Mandarin in his presence. A current ethnic Indian Minister objects to increasing the time for Mandarin lessons in schools.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/kl-restaurant-shut-for-14-days-after-video-of-rat-nibbling-on-fried-chicken-goes-viral
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It's an Indian restaurant. The comment of the in video the image of the food the let that out.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Translated it means:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Seen with my own eyes. Will never eat Mamak food ever again.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Mamak is Indian word for uncle.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Straits Times report did not let it out.. If its a Chinese stall, it will be a different case.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Not too long ago, there was a big negative write-up about Chinese economic rice, those that serve rice with a wide variety of meat and vegetable. It has its effect. Nowadays, you will find longer customer queue for Malay and Indian food stalls.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Chinese economic rice stalls are changing operators frequently or closing down.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/kl-restaurant-shut-for-14-days-after-video-of-rat-nibbling-on-fried-chicken-goes-viral
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It's an Indian restaurant. The comment of the in video the image of the food the let that out.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Translated it means:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Seen with my own eyes. Will never eat Mamak food ever again.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Mamak is Indian word for uncle.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Straits Times report did not let it out.. If its a Chinese stall, it will.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Not too long ago, there was a big negative write-up about Chinese economic rice, those that serve rice with a wide variety of meat and vegetable. It has its effect. Nowadays, you will find longer customer queue for Malay and Indian food stalls.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Chinese economic rice stalls are changing operators frequently or closing down.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/tan-boon-lee-dave-parkash-ex-ngee-ann-poly-lecturer-gets-jail-making-racist-remarks-against-interracial-couple-3172276
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/ex-ngee-ann-poly-lecturer-sentenced-to-5-weeks-jail-6000-fine-for-making-racist-remarks-having-obscene-films
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > As expected, because the accused is Chinese and the aggrieved is Indian, even though half only, the Chinese could not have gotten worse. Lost his job, publicly apologised to that half-Indian, now jailed and fined. All these widely publicised over a long over a long period of time. He will lose his PR status. He will be kicked back to his country of origin once he is out of jail
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > There are more injustices suffered by the Chinee guy than justice for that half-Indian.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > All these punishment for what? He was only expressing his opinion privately in a conversation with the half-Indian. He was concerned for the girl. He was showing empathy for her parents. He himself has lost a daughter to an Indian man.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Girls should beware of Indian guys for good reasons.. This is not based on prejudices. It’s internationally known facts..
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Indians have a rape culture.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CknISJRFrUY
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > They don’t only rape. They gang rape.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pKHS3k31ss
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > They even rape Covid-19 patient in hospital.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BldSTDvA3xs
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Even animals are in spared.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.google.com.sg/search?q=animals+raped+india&ei=OJKxY_WVA6zcz7sPpui5yAg&ved=0ahUKEwj1kf-qxKb8AhUs7nMBHSZ0DokQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=animals+raped+india&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQAzoECAAQQzoFCAAQkQI6DgguEIMBENQCELEDEIAEOgsILhCABBCxAxCDAToECC4QQzoHCAAQyQMQQzoKCC4QsQMQgwEQQzoKCAAQsQMQgwEQQzoFCAAQgAQ6CwguEIAEEMcBENEDOgUILhCABDoGCAAQFhAeOggIABAWEB4QCjoICAAQFhAeEA86BQgAEIYDSgQIQRgASgQIRhgAUABYoFRg0VZoBHABeAGAAe0BiAGjFpIBBjYuMTYuMZgBAKABAcABAQ&sclient=gws-wiz-serp
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Especially cows.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.google.com.sg/search?q=man+rape+cow&biw=1098&bih=545&ei=hC-xY4erPJGZseMPxcCIoA8&ved=0ahUKEwiH_dua5qX8AhWRTGwGHUUgAvQ4KBDh1QMIEA&uact=5&oq=man+rape+cow&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQAzoKCAAQRxDWBBCwA0oECEEYAEoECEYYAFCxC1jFJWDdOGgBcAB4AIABiQGIAaYIkgEDNi41mAEAoAEByAEEwAEB&sclient=gws-wiz-serp
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > They don't only do it in India but overseas too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://worldnewsdailyreport.com/man-accused-of-raping-a-cow-claims-it-is-the-reincarnation-of-his-dead-wife/
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Why are those news not reported by the Straits Times? That man was exercising his social responsibility. By punishing him, Singapore is making it easy for the Indians to prey on girls. What will follow from this case? The door is wide open for Indian guys to take advantage of Chinese girls. It’s telling the girls that if you don’t accept the wooing of an Indian, you are a racist, you can’t accept diversity and inclusiveness. He can report you to the police and it will become a widely publicised case.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Indians and Malays who committed more serious racial crimes against Chinese did not get it that bad.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > A Malay racist spat repeatedly at a Chinese lady at a bus station.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfI_l2DpGsE
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > An Indian racist who spew vulgarities at Chinese.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E3z7mPVReQ
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > India woman beat Chinese girl.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyNOq9vUbd4
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Malay man beat Chinese undergrad
> > > > > > > > > > > > Man who allegedly made racist remarks, attacked university student charged with public nuisance | The Straits Times
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Indians murdered Chinese.
> > > > > > > > > > > > In Ang Mo Kio, one old Chinese man, who was praying silently by himself, was beaten to death by an Indian. The murderer was sentenced with diminished responsibility because he was “drunk”.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > In Punggol, one Chinese jogger was stabbed to death by an Indian youth. Again, he was sentenced with diminished responsibility because he was of unsound mind. Besides the knife used as the weapon of attack, he had brought along wet tissues to wipe off the blood and fingerprint from the knife. Is that a person of unsound mind?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > What is it like to be a Chinese in Singapore? Losing their ethnic identity, their dignity and and their lives to the racial minorities
> > > > > > > > > > > https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/man-sues-woman-for-trauma-after-she-rejected-him
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > https://sg.news.yahoo.com/man-sues-woman-lawsuit-trauma-friend-zoning-him-022553707.html
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > “he demanded that she either comply with his demands in order to deepen their relationship, or suffer "irrevocable" damage to her professional and personal life.”
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2023/02/01/ceo-of-d1-racing-sues-a-woman-to-claim-s3-million-for-emotional-trauma-suffered-from-being-friend-zoned/
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This confirms what a grave danger Indian men are to Chinese women.
> > > > > > > > > > > That Polytechnic lecturer was only being truthful when he advised Indian men to stay away from Chinese girls.
> > > > > > > > > > > To be fair to him, there should be a re-trial of his case.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This latest case reveals a more disturbing phenomenon about Indian-Chinese racial relationship. In Singapore, Indians hold a racist believe that they are more superior than Chinese. One of them even claimed that one day Singapore and the whole world will turn Indian-brown. Therefore its not surprising that in Singapore Indian males have a racial superiority complex over Chinese females. When an Indian male fancies a Chinese females, the latter is expected to respond positively. In their relationship, the Chinese female is expected to comply with all the demands of the Indian male, no matter how unreasonable. Otherwise it will be hell for her, as this case shows.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This is not confined to Indian-Chinese. It happens in Malay-Chinese relationship too. Take the case of Beow Tan. When she turned down the offer by her neighboring Malay family to be married to their son, her ordeal began. She was harassed until she had to seek protection from her local MP. That made it worse She was harassed by more Malays. In the end, she ended up the loser, being labelled a racist with a mental problem because she had developed a phobia for group of Malays whenever they come near her.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Things are not right among the races in Singapore. Generally speaking, its the issue between Chinese and non-Chinese. The law seems to favor the non-Chinese in racial disputes. The judgment in this latest court case may favor the Chinese but it will be an exception.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This is going to get worse for the Chinese. Government policy that favors diversities and inclusiveness mean increasing the proportion of non-Chinese in the population thus lowering the proportion and status of the Chinese majority.
> > > > > > > > > > FORWARD SINGAPORE!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Singapore's past, present and future.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Mr. Lee Kuan Yew (LKY) led Singapore to self-rule in 1959 and then joined Malaysia in 1963. He wanted to lead Malaysia based on a concept of Malaysian Malaysia.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cBCKQOGoMg
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > He believed he could led Malaysia to achieve success for all, "regardless of race, language or religion", based on meritocracy.
> > > > > > > > > > The Malays wanted none of this. They wanted a "Malaysia that is Tanah Melayu (Land of the Malays) under Ketuanan Melayu (Malays as Lord of the Land)".
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Due to such irreconciliable differences, Singapore was forced to leave Malaysia to become an Independent Nation on 9th Aug 1965. Under such circumstances, LKY had no choice but to emphasise racial equality for his newly independent nation. Here's how he expressed it in a press conference shortly after quitting Malaysia.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Mr. Lee Kuan Yew has stood for and fought for to maintain racial harmony in Singapore all his life. - YouTube
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Singapore has come a long way since its Independence in 1965. Singaporeans who left home shortly after its Independence and return now will become aware of the two obvious changes in their homeland. Besides the economic progress is its demographics. Most obvious about the latter is its much reduced Chinese majority. In its place is the big increase in other races, especially Indians, in the population. This has led an Indian international author resident in Singapore, Parag Khanna, to express his pride and joy that Singapore is turning Indian-brown. He went on confidently to declare that in future, the whole world will turn Indian-brown.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Racial equality, race-blind Singapore, Singaporean Singapore, being racially more diverse and inclusive, etc., all have not worked.. Indian racism is on the rise along with their increasing numbers. Chinese majority rule is being challenged. In 2009, old but still with a sharp mind, LKY gave a stirring speech in Parliament to bring the Indians back to earth.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6f2Kgj1nhSQ
> > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOis6p-jAGA
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > He also expressed concern that Indians who came for economic gains now may later become citizens and agitate for political gains.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This will get worse for Singapore. Under latest geopolitics, the US has roped in India to counter the rise of China. Asia-Pacific has become Indo-Pacific. Singapore is being coerced to get aligned with the Indo-American camp. The Americans would like to see more Indian power and influence in Chinese-majority Singapore.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > What's the best way for SINGAPORE FORWARD?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Should SG remain stuck in the Days of the British Empire? One in which Singaporeans become pseudo-Westerners and speak only English?
> > > > > > > > > > Or worse, go back 700 years to the Days of the Indian Empire? One in which Singaporeans become completely Indianised and communicate only in Sanskrit?
> > > > > > > > > > Or become Indian-ruled under American auspices?
> > > > > > > > > > Should it continue with policies to bring in more races and reduce the dominance of the Chinese majority until it is nothing but only another race among all the other races?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > None of the above is the way forward for SG. Every one of them is a downward spiral towards racial conflicts, a failed state and final extinction of the Nation of Singapore.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > From Malaysia, Modern Singapore was born out of race politics. Will it die by that too?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > No, Singapore should yank itself out of the Days of the British Empire as well as those of the Indian Empire. It should not join the Indo-American strategy to thwart the rise of China. Instead Singapore should strongly preserve its substantial Chinese majority and look forward and work towards the Rise of Asia led by China.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 前进吧，新加坡！
> > > > > > > > > Forward Singapore! But To Where?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 9th Aug 1965, Singapore left the Federation of Malaysia to become an independent nation. It was a multi-racial, multi-religious nation with the races officially identified as Chinese, Malays, Indians and Others (CMIO).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For pragmatic reasons, Malay was chosen as the national language and English as the common working language while Chinese culture and language still had a palpable and respectable existence.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This was the state of affairs in Singapore until the 1980's. This was when an Indian lawyer J. B. Jeyaretnam (JBJ) entered the political stage dominated by the PAP and created a tectonic change in race politics. He became the first Opposition MP after Singapore's Independence. His aggressive and abrasive style in politics meant constant clashes with LKY and the PAP in and out of Parliament. Over time, the political feud between the two personalities took on a racial tone. Indians looked at it as Chinese vs Indians, not one Singaporean politician against another. Those Indian racists should ask themselves this: could JBJ have won an election without majority Chinese votes? The Chinese disregarded his racial origin. They looked beyond race. They only wanted to have Opposition in Parliament.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The race-conscious Indians looked at things differently. They capitalised on the issue in two different ways. On one hand, JBJ was considered a heroic Indian who could take on the Chinese. He was held up as an inspiration for Indians. On the other hand, they played up his case as a manifestation of racism Indians faced in Singapore.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Meanwhile, the fight between JBJ and LKY dragged on for years until the former was charged and jailed over the handling of his political party's finances and banned from standing for election. Indians were outraged. Indian racism was aroused.They alleged that this was racial persecutions of Indians. They questioned the dominance of the Chinese in Singapore and the government's race policies. They challenged Chinese-majority rule.. They criticised LKY and anyone and anything Chinese.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Common Indian racists rhetoric against the Chinese-majority:
> > > > > > > > > "Chinese are racists. Singapore is so Chee-na. The Chinese are so privileged. Singapore is the Third China. Singapore is Chinapore."
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The political fights attracted international attention. The Americans preached to the Singapore Govt its ideal of a melting port. This was music to Indian ears.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Indians tried to rope in the Malays, telling them this: If they come for us now and you do nothing, when they are finished with us and come for you, there will be no one left to defend you"
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In 1999, when US-led NATO bombed Serbia after accusing it of carrying out ethnic cleansing of its minorities, the Indians in Sigapore were most pleased. They claimed to have the same plight as the minorities in Serbia. They wanted Singapore to end up like Serbia.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In the same year, following the Asian Financial Crisis, there was an anti-Chinese pogrom in Indonesia. Singaporean Indians had this to say to the Singaporean Chinese:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "Honestly, you people deserve it".
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The government was placed in a defensive position. It had to counter the accusations of racism. The Govt began to make policies to placate and appease the Indians. Chinese culture and language were reduced while those of the Indians were enhanced. For one Indian trashed, the whole Indian race in Singapore has to be treated as treasure. This was when the Indians begin to show more of their racist nature. They took it that they had won the racial war. They challenged the Chinese-majority rule more boldly and made never-ending demands to advance the interests of their race.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Indians in positions of influence in the English-language media used it to the fullest as a tool to fight against the Chinese. Those English-language media under Indian editorship were used to disparage Chinese and promote Indians. Chinese successes in every field would be belittled while every Indian success would be glorified. So successful were they in doing this that an Indian editor of a newspaper proudly proclaimed that "The Pen is mightier than the Sword."
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Chinese culture and language become the targets of racists attacks. Most of all, the Indians seek to reduce the Chinese proportion and increase that of their own race in the population. They advocate for a more racially diverse and inclusive Singapore, with the benefits of they own race in mind. They want Singapore to move closer to India and bring in more Indians.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Govt not only has to appease the local Indians, it has to appease India too. It entered into many types of agreements with India, CECA being one example, which allow hordes of Indians from India and the Indian diaspora to flow into Singapore.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The new arrivals are present in Singapore in such large numbers that they don't bother to integrate with the other races. They clique among themselves, live by themselves, play by themselves, eat their own kind of food by themselves in their own way, i.e., eating curry food with their hands. They behave in public as if they are in India, get themselves drunk and exposed themselves indecently. The have no regard for local law and order. They riot in their ethnic enclave of Little India
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWNiYitEaXg
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As their numbers are swelled by new arrivals, so too the strength of their racial identity. Indians racial clashes with the Chinese majority become more frequent and intense. This only happen between individuals now but will deteriorate into group clashes in future as the number of Indians continue to swell.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > India becomes more concerned about the well-beings of ethnic Indians in Singapore. India refers to them as People of Indian Origin(PIO). Indian media are prepared to take up the cudgel on their behalf on the slightest perception of discrimination against them.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXtXJVSGfDQ
> > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_HOgvGE01I
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The PIO bond with their Mother India is renewed on a Jan day of every year. This is when India celebrates Overseas India Day and the PIO renew their pledges of loyalty and service to India.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The same cannot be said of China and the Chinese in Singapore. Even though the 21st Century has witnessed the rapid rise of China into a global superpower, it does not benefit the Chinese in Singapore much. The racial minorities have made sure of that.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > They echo the Westerners' Sinophobia. They make the same anti-Chinese racists cries as before, with the Indians being the loudest:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "Singapore only welcomes Chinese. Non-Chinese are becoming second class citizens of Singapore. Singapore is the Third China. Singapore is Chinapore."
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Another of their racist cliche is that a rising China is having a growing influence on Chinese Singaporean. They would go out to the streets to interview Chinese and highlight ony those who are proud of the achievements of China.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The truth is that a rising India is having a much bigger influence on Indian Singaporeans. One example is Parnag Khanna, an Indian international author who went hyperbole over the successes of India and Indians to the extend that he believes the future of Singapore and the whole world will be Indian-brown. Indians in the media would write in favor of India whenever there is a border dispute between China and India. Highly paid Indians employed in academic institutions would publish research articles in favor of India.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Local Indians argue hard for increasing numbers of their own race to be accepted into Singapore. After that, they fight for the welfare of their newly arrived brethen. Only the best for these people will do in terms of food, accommodation, medical care, terms of employment, work conditions, compensations for work injuries, etc.. All these while they would still cry bucketful of tears as victims of racial discriminations.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cunning Indian racism has its intended effects. It puts the Singapore government on the defensive again. While the country gets closer to India and accepts Indians coming over without limit, the government has to develop Singapore's relationship with China cautiously and discourage close kinships between the people.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > To top it all, global geopolitics are favoring the Indians. Singapore is heavily dependent on the US. The US now considers China its No. 1 and ultimate threat. It has chosen India as the biggest counterweight against China. Indians everywhere are favored over Chinese by the Americans. The Americans would prefer Indians to be in charge of Singapore, so as to better secure their investments, military base and overall alliance with Singapore. They would push for an Indian Prime Minister in Singapore. They would push Singapore closer to India and to accept more Indian immigrants.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The future doesn't look good for Singapore and its Chinese majority. There is no birth control in India and its population growth is ever increasing. By this April, India will surpass China to become the most populous nation on earth. The population growth will not stop here. It will continue to grow non-stop, with no end in sight. The number of Indians coming over to Singapore will keep increasing, again, non-stop and with no end in sight.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Singapore will turn Indian-brown as has been predicted by the Indian international author Parnag Khanna. The Singapore Story will have an Indian ending.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Are all these in the Social Compact of Singapore?
> > > > > > > > The Government should be fair to Singaporeans and Singapore when it formulates immigration policies.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1. Singapore has gone through decades of birth control. Many Singaporeans were denied the rights to reproduce and bring forth their new generations. For this reason, Singapore should only allow immigration from countries which have birth control or other means to control their population growth.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > India is a country without birth control and its population growth is out of control. Singapore should not accept Indian immigrants. There will be no limit to the numbers that can come over.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Some years back, due to a falling population, Singapore has stopped its birth control. Recently, China too has stopped its birth control. This does not mean both have abandoned population growth control perpetually. This is using birth control as a means to control population growth. In future, if the population growth becomes unacceptably high again, it will return to birth control. This is not the case in India where there has never been any birth control and as a result, the population is perpetually growing.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Indians have been arguing that more of them are let in to make up for the shrinking population. This is cunning. The shrinking population is due to falling Chinese birthrate. More Chinese, not Indians, immigrants should be accepted.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2. Diversity and inclusiveness
> > > > > > > > This is another basis those racists from the racial minorities used to argue for Singapore to accept more non-Chinese immigrants.
> > > > > > > > If Singapore were to use this as a basis to welcome immigrants, then again, India is disqualified. Immigrants are unwelcome in India, no matter the ethnicity or nationality. Why? Firstly, Indians are racist and xenophobic. Secondly, the country just cannot do it. Its own population is exploding due to its no-control population growth. How many immigrants can it accommodate?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Lastly, how many people in the world would want to migrate to India?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 3. Racial Equality
> > > > > > > > Watch the ethnic composition of CMIO in the population. Not one of them should be changed at the expense of any one of the others. Indian proportion of the population is increasing at the expense of the Chinese. This is against the principle of Racial Equality.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Singapore should not accept immigrants from India freely. The island will be flooded by Indians. This is worse than being flooded by rising sea water due to climate change
> > > > > > > Recently, an ethnic Indian politician in Singapore proposes that a foreigner must pass an English Language test before he/she can qualify for PR or citizenship.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/new-citizen-permanent-resident-singapore-application-english-test-pritam-singh-josephine-teo-3309261
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We know his motive. It's to benefits his Indian race. He knows India is an English-speaking country. His proposal will make it easier for Indians to obtain PR and citizenship in Singapore.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why is India an English-speaking country? That's because India is a shithole country which can't decide on a single national language; they have many. As a result, they have to resort to using their past colonial master's language as the common language for their country.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What about Singapore? What role should English play in Singapore? For that, we have to examine English as the language of racial politics in Malaysia and Singapore.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Under British Colonialism, large numbers of Non-Malays, especially Chinese and Indians, were brought in to Malaysia. The Malays dissented this but couldn't do much about it. As the non-Malays arrived in overwhelming numbers, the Malays remained in no doubt about who Malaya belonged to. They referred to those non-Malays newcomers as 'pendatang'', which in Malay means 'guests' or 'sojourners'.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > After Malaya became an independent nation in 1957, the non-Malay migrants obtained citizenship. As their economic and political power grew, they began to challenge all aspects of Malay Supremacy, one of which was the Malay Language. They looked down on that language. They considered their own language to be superior to the Malay Language. If their own language could not be the national language of Malaysia, they would rather it be English. Racial differences such as in language, and more, led to disputes and conflicts. They led to a bloody racial riot on 13 May 1969. The Malays emerged triumphant and Malay Supremacy was firmly established and not to be challenged. Malay became the National Language. Today, it's the language of governance, politics, law, every spheres of lives in Malaysia. For pragmatic reasons, English is retained, especially in the economic sphere.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In Singapore, the English Language experienced a different fate. After independence from Malaysia in 1963, Malay became the National Language. But that was only symbolic. English is the de facto national language as anyone living in Singapore or visiting it would know.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > After the JBJ saga, when the Indians began to challenge Chinese-majority rule, they adopted the same racist attitude towards the Chinese Language, as the non-Malays did towards the Malay Language in Malaysia. Even though English was already prevalent then, they still consider Chinese Language inferior to English Language and want the the latter to replace the former wherever possible. To them, that's one important way to reduce the Chinese-majority dominance.Their job was made easy by LKY, an English-and-England-educated Anglophile. They also found support from those whose livelihoods depend solely on the language such as those in the English Language media.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Going forward, what role should English play in the continuing nation building of Singapore? For that, one has to take into consideration the sensitivities of the Malays. Malays in Singapore, like those in Malaysia, would not accept English in anyway which can diminish their racial status. To them, it is the language of those who colonised their land and brought in the 'pendatang' to overwhelm them. To use English to integrate the races? Or use it as the language of cultures where culture activities are conducted in English? What about mosque sermons being conducted in English? These will create racial conflicts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > One attribute that all races can accept for any language is its economic values. The language should be able to create wealth, provide good jobs, being the tool for scientific and technological advances. That's how a language should be accepted for common use in multi-racial, multi-religious Singapore.This language should change with time. Today it's English. Tomorrow it may not be. As another language is seen to be upcoming with good economic values for Singapore, we should not hesitate to pick it up, even if it's the language of one of our races.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Don't listen to Singaporean-Indians on immigration rules or policies. They only have one thing in mind, i.e., to bring in more of their own kind.
> > > > > > On Feb 27 during the Committee of Supply debates, Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh said that he would advocate for an English test when assessing a person's application for citizenship or permanent residency in Singapore. He was criticised for this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It prompted CNA, Channel News Aneh, to carry out a survey. The results are now published within a long article.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/english-test-new-citizens-pr-application-survey-3368571?cid=internal_mcdrecs_03042023_mcs#mdcrecs_s
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Besides the results of the survey, there are also opinions and anecdotes from public personalities, leading to a conclusion that supports the MP. This is to make it hard for the government not to accept MP Pritam Singh’s suggestion, which is the purpose of this journalistic effort.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > One thing about survey. It can be manipulated. First, you decide the result you want and then you conduct the survey in a way which will lead to the desired result.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The article took the extra effort to show the survey results based on ethnic distribution, indicating that a large majority of Chinese agrees with Singh’s suggestion. This is not surprising because Singapore has only English education with vernacular language taught as a subject since independence. There may be other factors such as the age and geographical distribution.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Still, a survey without any background knowledge or analysis does not convey accurate decisions of those surveyed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the article, a Professor provided the critical background knowledge along with some statistics.
> > > > > > “Asst Prof Ang noted that as Singapore’s total fertility rate continues to fall, the nation has looked towards immigration to supplement the population and workforce.
> > > > > > Based on data from the Singapore Census 2020, 72.3 per cent of Singapore residents born outside Singapore are literate in English.
> > > > > > Focusing on the top three countries of origin (India, Malaysia and China), the English literacy level among those from China was the lowest at 61.8 per cent, Asst Prof Ang said.
> > > > > > “Because a large proportion (62.3 per cent) of the overall resident population is Chinese-literate, Chinese immigrants may feel little need to learn another language. But this means that members from the minority races may not be able to communicate with them,” he added."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The nation’s falling fertility makes it necessary to increase immigration. But it’s the Chinese fertility rate that is falling. We should increase the immigration of Chinese. Yet India is the top country of origin of Singapore residents born outside Singapore.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > With these as background, the question for the survey should be:
> > > > > > India is currently the top country of origin of Singapore residents born outside Singapore. English Language test for Singapore citizenship and PR would favor Indians. Is it fair to require an English Language test for new immigrants?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A false claim about the English Language:
> > > > > > “Adding that Singaporeans "do not want new citizens who don’t want to live here but only want the power of the Singapore passport for their convenience", Mr Singh asked: “Is a working proficiency in English a criteria for citizenship for better integration between new citizens and Singaporeans of all races and religions, since English is our main language of communication?”
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It’s not new citizens but the racial minorities that are concerned about the international acceptance of the Singapore Passport. Every time someone suggests promoting the use of Chinese language, the minorities would respond that that would make the Singapore Passport less welcomed around the world.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are other factors more important than the English language for social integration. For example, no matter how proficiency you are in English, if you carry a strong body odor, few would want to come near you. Those who have the stink and still mix in with a crowd would be considered to be lacking in social responsibility. Those who clean the arses with their hands would be worse. No matter how high their level of English proficiency, it will not help them in social integration.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A more assuring criterion for social integration would be having a common ethnic identity with the substantial Chinese majority.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Whether it’s to make up for the falling fertility rate or for the sake of social integration, Singapore needs more Chinese, not Indians, migrants. Using English test for Citizenship and PR applications would produce the opposite effect.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Lastly, Singapore is a multi-racial, multi-religious nation with four official languages. If language were to be used as a criterion to determine citizenship and PR, then any of the official languages will do.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > MP Pritam Singh's suggestion and Channel News Aneh report on the issue are both not worthy of further attention. The authority should ignore them.
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIztnCYPvJE
> > > > >
> > > > > Pritam Singh still insists on using English Test to determine new citizenship and PR, using the CNA survey and quoting LKY from 1986 to back it up. He went on to advocate the role of English as a common language to bind all Singaporeans together.
> > > > >
> > > > > New citizens and PRs are valued for their talents. Talents around the world don't come English-speaking-only. By restricting them to the English-proficient, Singapore would be narrowing down the sources of talents to those from English-speaking countries, the most populous of which would be India. Perhaps that's the reason for this Indian MP proposal.
> > > > >
> > > > > No matter who or what had been said or written about it, has the more common use of the English Language resulted in better social cohesion and integration among Singaporeans old and new? No. On the contrary, it has resulted in more racial disputes and fights between Indians and Chinese. All the following incidents happened after 1986.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E3z7mPVReQ
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-6slteu1ws
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyNOq9vUbd4
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAtqlAGhYYk
> > > > > Not to mention the murders of Chinese by Indians.
> > > > >
> > > > > Chinese being cursed, swore at, beaten up and murdered by Indians, all done in English. Is this what English for social integration all about?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > LKY lived long enough to realise he was wrong. He foresaw the danger of the increasing proportion of Indians in the population. He publicly expressed his fear that today they contribute to the economy, tomorrow they will demand political power. He had to remind the Indians to accept Chinese-majority rule. He brought those Indians who espoused racial equality and a Singaporeans-Singapore down to earth. These are never quoted by Indians.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6f2Kgj1nhSQ
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOis6p-jAGA
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Since the JBJ saga, Singapore's identity has become synonymous with Indians and English. Both the number of Indians and the use of English Language have increased.
> > > > >
> > > > > Like a typical Indian, Singh has been silent about the ever increasing presence of Indians in Singapore but will make a big issue out of any perceived increase of Chinese. Pritam Singh has expressed concern about rich Chinese migrating to Singapore. Not surprising. If they were Indians, they will be welcomed by all Indians. Watch how Indians will use the English Language media to play this up into a big racial issue. Those rich Chinese already in Singapore should be careful about being interviewed by the English-language press. They are there with a sinister motive - to dig out dirt to make the Chinese unwelcome and make the government looks bad.
> > > > >
> > > > > Pritam Singh is a typical Indian Singaporean. Indians, by race, are not a majority on the island nor in the region. For this reason, they reject any race-based identity locally or regionally. They look for an international or global identity. They look for global power to counter local power. They are not committed to Singapore. They want to scoot off anytime when they cannot get any benefit from Singapore. That's why they are concerned about the receptiveness of the Singapore passport around the world.That's why they are diehard advocates of the English Language.
> > > > >
> > > > > Indian like Pritam Singh is a legacy of the of the JBJ saga. Anti-Chinese racism among the Indians arose out of that. Indians espouse race theories like race-blindness, racial equality, Singaporeans-Singapore, Singapore Identity, English Language for social integration and national unity, etc.., as ruses to cover up their anti-Chinese racism. Their preference for the English-language fits into these too. All these add up to say that they don't accept a Chinese-majority Singapore and they want to make Singapore more favorable for Indians to settle and live in until it's an Indian-governed or Indian-majority Singapore.
> > > > >
> > > > > Like a typical Indian Singaporean, he speaks mouthful about a multi-racial, multi-cultural Singapore but never pays any recognition to its substantial Chinese majority.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's time to make it crystal clear to the racial minorities that Singapore is first and foremost a Chinese-majority nation. The Chinese should not have to apologise for asserting their majority rights. In other parts of the world, those rights are legislated and legalised.
> > > > >
> > > > > Look at the French in Quebec. Quebec is just a province of Canada where French form the majority of the population. The English language is creeping in at the expense of the French language. This is worsen by increasing migrations of non-French into Quebec. The French are fighting back to retain the dominance of their ethnicity, especially their language. They enact laws to achieve these.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcJu_f2uPDc
> > > > >
> > > > > Consider Israel. Like Singapore, its multi-racial and multi-religious and closely linked to the West, especially English-speaking US. English is widely used but the Jewish language of Hebrew is the National Language which is most widely used. It would be unthinkable for the Jews to forsake their racial identity and replace it with a national identity in order to to accommodate the various races and religions in Israel.
> > > > >
> > > > > Closer to home, there's Malaysia. Here's what it is like over there. Malays-majority rules with a supremacy which cannot be questioned, let alone challenged. Political power is absolutely in the hands of the Malays. The Monarchy is Malays-only. The Prime Minister must be a Malay, as an unwritten rule. The language of the Malay majority is truly the National Language, used in every sphere of life. Immigration policies favor the Malays and Muslims from all over the world. As a result, Malay-Muslims proportion in the population is on the increase while those of the non-Malays are on the decline due to outward migration.
> > > > > Despite all these, Malaysia is not accused of being a racist or xenophobic country. It's internationally accepted. It is able to attract foreign investments and talents. People from various parts of the world are attracted to there to make it their second or retirement home.
> > > > > It's working well especially for the Malays-majority. Malays' rule is not challenged by the racial minorities. There's racial peace and harmony. Zero case of Malays being beaten up by non-Malays.
> > > > > English is still widely used especially in the realm of economy. But there's no such nonsense about using it as a common language for social integration or to bind the various races together. That's reserved for the Malay Language.
> > > > > The issue of a non-Malay PM is never discussed. Instead Malaysian reporters and foreign ones based in Malaysia would write about the possibility of a non-Chinese PM of Singapore!
> > > > >
> > > > > What are the minority Indians there doing about all these? They just take it all lying down.
> > > > >
> > > > > In Singapore, the racial minorities adopt a challenging attitude towards the Chinese majority. Take for example the post of Prime Minister. Since the JBJ saga, the racial minorities, especially Indians, have been pushing for a non-Chinese PM. This issue is always posed to the potential Chinese candidate for the next PM. A wrong answer will land that Chinese in trouble. When ex-DPM Heng did not deliver a satisfactory answer, a Malay immediately made a police report against him.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why such vast difference in the relationship between the racial majority and the racial minorities in the two neighboring countries? It is simply this. In Malaysia, the Malays leave no doubt who is boss. That's been settled. In Singapore this is still in doubt and yet to be settled.
> > > > >
> > > > > Singapore started off with this wishy-washy ideal of racial equality. From the very beginning of its founding, Singapore’s leaders have to grapple with myriad of problems related to the ideals of racial equality. The problems continue to grow. To this day racial equality and harmony is still considered work-in-progress. Perhaps disaster-in-progress is more accurate since racial problems are increasing as the minority races challenge the Chinese majority for dominance and supremacy in the name of racial equality.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's about time Singapore reconsiders its model for a multi-racial, multi-religious nation. Either that or it may cease to exist some decades into the future.
> > > > Indians seeking more power in Singapore
> > > >
> > > > Ethic Indian Tharman Shanmugaratnam (Tharman for short) has decided to run for President.
> > > >
> > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjSoZk6gAA4
> > > >
> > > > Does he have the PM and the Cabinet support?
> > > >
> > > > The Presidency is to supposed to be rotated among the races. To ascertain this, a law is in place to only allow members of a specific race to contest in a specific Presidential Election.
> > > >
> > > > The last three Presidents by race were Chinese Ong Teng Cheong, Indian S.R. Nathan and Malay Halimah Yakob. Among the three, the Indian served the longest, for two terms, totaling 12 years. The next one should be from "Others". This is about racial equality and fairness.
> > > >
> > > > Why is Tharman pushing these aside? The reason he gives for his decision is ridiculous. What rubbish about the changing world. It seems he does not understand the role of the President. Its mostly ceremonial plus two other main ones – appoint Ministers and hold the second key to the nation's financial reserves.
> > > >
> > > > Wrong timing, wrong reason. Why then is he still joining the race for the next President? It's racial. To serve the interest of his race. Before this, the Indians were pushing hard for him to be the the PM. Failing this, they now want him to be President. This is manifestation of Indians lust for power in Singapore. Another Indian President, just like the previous ones, would mean more Indians coming over to Singapore. There will be another spike in Indian proportion in the population of Singapore.
> > > >
> > > > Tharman represents only Indians and Indian power in Singapore. But the authority will not dare challenge him lest it will turn into another JBJ Saga. It's left to the ordinary people.
> > > >
> > > > Non-Indians should not vote for him.
> > > https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/george-goh-run-presidential-election-candidate-harvey-norman-ossia-3555876
> > >
> > > Another candidate has entered the race. Good. It means there will be competition. It would be better if its someone from the 'O' in the CMIO racial categories.
> > >
> > > This Presidential Election is starting off badly. It is not according to the government's plan. Why would the government support another Indian for President after only a gap of 6 six years of the last Indian Presidency of 12 years? This Indian will also be running for two terms of 12 years. If he is allowed, there is no guarantee there will not be another Indian who will not vie for the Presidency after him for another 12 years. Tharman has budged in without notice. The government doesn't seem to have the strength to say "No!" to him.
> > >
> > > Immediately after Tharman announced his intention, his was praised sky high by his fellow Indians in the English Language media. No mention of his past charges under the Official Secret Acts (OSA). They were hoping it would be a no-contest election. Now that Mr. George Goh has step up to be counted, unlike Tharman, he would not be praised. Instead he would be the target of disparagement and disinformation. Indians would look deep into his 40 years of business dealings and accounts to dig out any tiny dirt they can uncover and blow it out of proportion. His announcement may be the beginning of a nightmare for him.
> > >
> > > The reason Tharman gave for running for the Presidency is questionable. In what ways is the world changing that have prompted him to run for the Presidency? How would he as the President of Singapore influence those ways?
> > >
> > > Let's see. The world is witnessing the rise of China. It's influence in the world, especially in the Asia-Pacific region, is increasing. In this regard, Chinese-majority Singapore stands out among nations in the Asia-Pacific. Indians in Singapore would not like to see this happen.
> > > India is the favorite dog that the US is using to keep watch over China in Asia. The US has justified India's presence in the Asia-Paific region by defining the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean as one ocean of Indo-Pacific. India is lapping it all up.
> > >
> > > As President, Tharman will have the power to reduce China's influence in Singapore and keep Singapore close to India and the US. India's, instead of China's, influence will grow in Singapore. All good for the Indo-American dialliance. It's not surprising if it's the Americans who have suggested that he make a run for the next President of Singapore.
> > This is racism – Indian racism. It's about Indians gaining more political power and challenging Chinese-majority rule more strongly. That's the reason why this Indian is defying protocol to run for President..
> >
> >
> > Even before he is elected, signs of Indian racism are emerging.
> >
> > Indian-infested Straits Times ran an article about Indian diaspora being more influential than the Chinese one.
> > https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/india-s-diaspora-is-bigger-and-more-influential-than-any-in-history
> > CNA – Channel News Aneh and China/Chinese Not Allowed devoted a long segment of a news with only Indian views on the India-China border dispute
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTYyRnxTZrw
> >
> > Judgement of dispute between Indian and Chinese passed – in favor of the Indian of course.
> >
> > https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/man-convicted-of-kicking-woman-and-using-racial-insults-for-not-masking-up
> >
> > There will be more to come. This Indian, if he becomes President, like the previous one, will not want Chinese to be heard spoken within his earshot. He too will block the appointment of Chinese Ministers who are deemed unfriendly towards Indians.
> >
> > He will definitely want to serve for 12 year. No one will be able to stop him. After him, another Indian from the PAP will step forward for the next Presidential term. It will be one Indian after another. Singapore's Presidency will become a permanent Indian Presidency.
> >
> > It's up to the voters now. They should realise that voting for this guy is voting for more Indian power and more Indian challenges to Chinese-majority rule in Singapore.
> >
> > The Indians will claim that their fellow President has more legitimacy, and therefore more power, than the PM because he/she is directly elected by the people.
> >
> > To stop the Presidency from becoming a target of racial politics, things should revert to the old ways. That is, the President is appointed, rotated among the four racial categories of CMIO and its role is strictly ceremonial.
> Tharman for President?
>
> His claim of rights to the Presidency?
> His ability, with international standings.
> He will represent a New Era.
> How he will serve Singapore's interest in a transitional and changing world.
>
>
> Individual ability
> What is he good at? Head of MAS and other organisations? International status, leading international organisations? That's riding on the reputation of Singapore. Nothing to do with his individual ability.
> Under his charge, the latest loss incurred by MAS is 30+ billions. His fellow Indian in the English Language dismisses this as only a sideshow! Shouldn't this disqualify him from the competition? Under his tenure, MAS was more concerned about how angpows and the printing of new dollar notes would adversely affect climate change than the financial health of Singapore.
>
>
> A New Era President?
> What New Era is he talking about? He's another English-and-England-educated Anglophile that belongs to the Days of the British Empire which is long gone. He's a relic of the past. A dinosaur.
> The rise of China has brought on the Dawn of a New Era upon the world. How many Singaporeans are aware of this? They are still living in the dark world of Western superiority because Singapore's English Language media mostly echo the negative news about China from the West. An Indian Anglophile President will continue to keep Singapore in such darkness. There will no New Era or Dawn.
> A Tharman Presidency will keep Singapore stagnant in the bygone era of British Imperialism and Colonialism. His Presidency would mean more Indians and wider use of the English Language in Singapore.
>
>
> A world in transition and change. How relevant is a Tharman Presidency in such a world?
> Until now, he hasn't been forthright with the reason he wants to be President. He's talking about a changing world and its crises. "The world is in transition", "The world is changing."
>
> The world is always in transition. It's always changing. Hasn't he heard of the wise maxim "Change is the only Constant"?
>
> Can the President of Singapore help to solve international and world crises and influence a transitional and changing world? That would involve global and international politics which is beyond the role of Singapore's President. That's for the PM. Is he going to be a President with the power of a PM? Or is he preparing himself to take over the PM's job?
>
> It's precisely because of the change in geo- and global-politics that Tharman should not be the President of Singapore.
> Here's why.
> Years ago, the US has already postulated a paradigm shift in its global strategy from Christian-Judeo vs Muslim Conflict to Big Power Conflict. Big Power Conflict in the foreseeable decades will be US vs China. This Conflict is not confined to both countries only. It includes countries with like-minded ideology of democracy and Western "universal" values. India stands out among them. India is in cahoots with the US to go against China and Chinese everywhere, doing it with increasing enthusiasm and antagonism. Due to this, the Conflict is spread further among the Indian and Chinese diaporas around the world.
>
> India has become the US favorite counterweight against China. It's at the forefront of US geopolitical strategy for Asia. It has become American's guard dog over Asia. Already, Asia-Pacific has become Indo-Pacific to both. Worse, the Indo-American Dalliance is stirring up Indian racism around the world.
>
> This has a direct bearing on multiracial Singapore with Indians among its population. Singapore, being the only Chinese-run nation in the world outside of China, is viewed with suspicion, as a possible threat, to Indo-American geopolitics in Asia-Pacific and South-east Asia. Chinese-majority Singapore has become a target of Indo-American geopolitics.
>
> One glaring example here. A US newspaper with Indian reporters casting aspersions on a local Chinese Language newspaper in Singapore.
>
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2023/singapore-china-news-influence-lianhe-zaobao/
>
>
> Its not just a Chinese Language newspaper. The whole of Singapore is now under the radar of Indo-American geopolitics. Its being watched closely. US and India would prefer that Singapore come under their influence rather than that of China. One way to achieve this would be to increase the political power of Indians in Singapore. The best would be if one of Singapore's ethnic Indians becomes its national leader. India has a further design on Singapore. It wants to turn Singapore into be another destination which it can release its exploding population to - a Singapore with increasing Indian population with increasing political power. India has not forgotten the Indian Singapura of the Kalinga and Temasek era.
>
> Therefore, under current world situation, having an Indian President in Singapore would be detrimental to the nation and its ethnic Chinese. An Indian President would scheme to place Singapore in the Indo-American camp and sacrifice Singapore to serve the interest of the Indo-American Dalliance.
>
> Tharman is working hard to camouflage the truth. He is sparing no effort to show how well he can get along with Chinese. Non-Indian voters, especially Chinese, should be aware of what an Indian President would mean for them.. Don't be misled by the attractive campaign that Tharman has mounted to promote himself for the Presidency, surrounding himself with Chinese VIPs and OP (Ordinary People) and spouting slogan about Singaporean Identity.

Respect for culture?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgqAT1N0cM

This guy doesn't know what he is talking about.
Before a culture can be respected, it has to be respectable.
Having stinking body odor is not a respectable culture. Neither is cleaning your arse with your hand.

He himself needs to learn some basic about respecting cultures. Language is the soul of a culture. Before you grace a cultural ceremony of an ethnic group as a VIP, make sure you can speak the language of that culture. Otherwise you are disgracing yourself.

Deeper understanding of culture?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dJJWG-eAEg

How?
Get close to a group of stinking Indians and draw in a deep breathe?
Clean your arse with your hand like the Malays but dig deeper into your arsehole?

The proper way to a deeper understanding of a culture is to learn the language of the culture first. Language is the way to the soul of a culture. If you can only speak English, you can only understand English-language based culture. And that would be only superficially if you are not a native English speaker.

Forget about deeper understanding of a culture. Get the basic right first.
It's about time Singapore stop using English in the cultural activities of all ethnic groups. Not only does this show no respect for the culture, it is contaminating the culture.

Respect For All?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GI-v0fQiUe8

You have shown no respect for the other races. It's not the turn for an Indian to be President again. You have cut queue. You have upset protocol. Quit the race now to show your respect for all the races.