"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:o8lvjgp47bpo6d5g5brr3d99skv59nkcu7@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 14:31:07 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:p4nshg5o68mt96ui2ig1o1i93sihatg7js@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 14:21:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:jj11ggh0h092v3roi0a9pe8kttc4ainkvv@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 14:15:11 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message
>>>>>>news:ak80fglqqri2c08evr5hjcd2cbnjd9hola@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:41:50 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>message
>>>>>>>>news:9jl8eg5cckn6i0l19nb7c1ug6p6a3mhkvr@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 17:26:07 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>>message
>>>>>>>>>>news:n44sdgple9fpicacpm7f2871iam5ddfvif@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:52:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>>>>message
>>>>>>>>>>>>news:i49fcghjpsqmspi0kk7nt5qjbt9qhqutts@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Back in the day, fast food restaurants didn't necessarily
>>>>>>>>>>>>> offer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> laundry list of items they do now. That's why people are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bugging
>>>>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>>> over a recently released photo of a McDonald's menu snapped in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1973,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as ABC 10 News reports. Patrons who are used to choosing from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 145 menu items (via Marketplace) were shocked by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> slimmed-down
>>>>>>>>>>>>> offerings - at least in quantity, if not in nutritional
>>>>>>>>>>>>> value -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shown
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the photo. Let's take a look at the retro menu, shall we?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mashed.com/img/gallery/people-cant-believe-this-70s-mcdonalds-menu/just-the-basics-1623264345.webp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As explained by Insider, the original McDonald's restaurants,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> first of which opened in 1955, had bare-bones menus, featuring
>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hamburgers, cheeseburgers, fries, sodas, and milkshakes. Over
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> years, franchises have added a steady stream of then-new,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> now-beloved
>>>>>>>>>>>>> items: the Filet-O-Fish in 1965, the Big Mac in 1968, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chicken
>>>>>>>>>>>>> McNuggets in 1983. Today, most McDonald's locations boast more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 130 menu items, providing something for everyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for us, we'd be happy with a cheeseburger, fries, and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> chocolate
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shake. Take us back to 1973?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read More:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mashed.com/433078/people-cant-believe-this-70s-mcdonalds-menu/?utm_campaign=clip
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Wouldn't bother me one bit, but there are some modern item's I
>>>>>>>>>>>>woul
>>>>>>>>>>>>dmiss
>>>>>>>>>>>>like the Mcflurry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh and BTW shame on you klous for posting in webp format.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> WebP is an image format employing both lossy and lossless
>>>>>>>>>>> compression,
>>>>>>>>>>> and supports animation and alpha transparency. Developed by
>>>>>>>>>>> Google,
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> is designed to create files that are smaller for the same
>>>>>>>>>>> quality,
>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>> of higher quality for the same size, than JPEG, PNG, and GIF
>>>>>>>>>>> image
>>>>>>>>>>> formats. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebP
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is obvious now that you are foolishly and ignorantly blaming
>>>>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> posting a link to this picture
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mashed.com/img/gallery/people-cant-believe-this-70s-mcdonalds-menu/just-the-basics-1623264345.webp
>>>>>>>>>>> as you think I own mashed.com and have control over the format
>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>> use to post graphics.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh really klous? Well if you didn't post it, then just whose
>>>>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>>>>>there who posted that message?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The POINT is, you should have posted a link to a more universally
>>>>>>>>>>accepted
>>>>>>>>>>format. This is Usenet. You will be forgiven this time, but next
>>>>>>>>>>time,
>>>>>>>>>>WATCH IT.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The point is, you ignorant pup, that the webp format is as
>>>>>>>>> acceptable
>>>>>>>>> as jpg or png, and you *will* accept it, and there is nothing you
>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>> do about it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Fine. I refuse to argue this point with you, so I'm giving in.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TRANSLATION: Jenny just realized that webp is a web standard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No, I never said anything that could be translated like that. What I
>>>>>>said
>>>>>>was, it wasn't worth taking the time to argue this fact with an idiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Of COURSE it is, which is why I'm discussing it with a.f.f-f's
>>>>> resident idiot.
>>>>
>>>>Listen Klous, I don't need any lesson's from YOU.
>>>
>>> Of course you do, Jenny. You're woefully ignorant in any subject we've
>>> ever discussed.
>>>
>>>> I obviously was the one
>>>>more smart about Webp,
>>>
>>> Obviously, you had no idea what it was, because you cried like a
>>> school girl when I used a link with it.
>>>
>>> "Oh and BTW shame on you klous for posting in webp format." you
>>> whined.
>>>
>>>>First of all becouse I KNEW IT EXISTED BEFORE YOU DID
>>>>and already new it's many disadvantage's.
>>>
>>> You knew nothing about it then, and you know what I taught you now.
>>
>>
>>Lies, obvious lie's. If I knew nothing about it, then how would I know
>>how
>>traoublesome it was, and make a decision to ban it?
>
> You wouldn't, because (a) it's not troublesome

THEY (not it) are EXTREMELY troublesome, and

>(b) you didn't ban it.

Yes I did. And the people responded to my ban, nobody has been posting
webp link's for quite some time now. PROVING that people respect me as
leader of this newsgroup.